Template for the Operational Programme under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Morten Greve Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy 01.03.20131.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management
1 Categorisation of EU interventions Cohesion policy
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
Performance Framework
Expert group meeting on models, draft templates and guidance for the Partnership Agreement and operational/cooperation programmes under cohesion policy.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
ESIF Business Process and Simplification Nic Suggit Department of Communities and Local Government 24 April 2014.
Regional Policy Draft Implementing Act Consistent approach to determine the milestones and targets in the performance framework and to assess the attainment.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Ad hoc expert group meeting on draft templates and guidance for the Partnership Agreement and operational programmes under cohesion policy
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Opportunities for interregional cooperation in Regional Operational Programmes: Article 96.3.d) of the Common Provisions Regulation INTERACT Future Pilot.
Reporting on financial instruments to the Commission under the Annual and Final implementation reports Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
SFC THE NEW FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
26 June 2008 DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting Ex-post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes co-financed by the European Fund for Regional.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Template and guidance for the content of the Partnership Agreement 24 May
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
YEI in the PA and OP ESF TWG 4 March 2014, Brussels EMPL E1.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Budapest, June 2014 Hermina Golob Head od Development Policies Division SLOVENIA Partnership agreement and Operational programme
1 Cohesion Policy Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 21 September 2009 Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Delegated act on irrecoverable amounts (IRR) (Fiche 34, version 2, 25 November 2014) DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Monitoring of financial instruments and provision of monitoring information to the Commission under the Annual and Final implementation reports António.
SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 structured approach DG Agriculture and Rural Development G.2 - Unit "Financial coordination of Rural development"
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) operational programme
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal 12 th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated.
Indicators – intervention logic, differences ( vs programming period, ESF vs. ERDF) Piotr Wolski Marshall’s Office Zachodniopomorskie.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Regional Policy Requirements and application of ARTICLE 55 Lisbon, 19 April 2013 Michaela Brizova DG REGIO.F1: Operational Efficiency.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Leader as a part of the new CAP
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Performance Framework
NPA eMS application – Project Information
data to be recorded and stored in computerised form (DA)
Performance framework review and reserve
Models for the operational programme and the cooperation programme
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Amending the Performance Framework
Purpose of the presentation
New controls introduced in SFC
Draft model for the progress report Expert group on 24 October 2013 First discussion Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Financial Engineering Modification of the Council Regulation
Draft Delegated Act Financial corrections linked to the performance framework (Art. 20 of CPR) As amended after expert meeting on October 24, 2013 Veronica.
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
From SFC2007 to SFC2014 Luis Velasco, Eric Kilian
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Implementing act on the model for the annual and final implementation report under the European Territorial Cooperation goal 12th Meeting of the Expert.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

Template for the Operational Programme under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Morten Greve Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy

Shortcomings of period Double encoding Information provided in both tables and documents Information already provided is not used automatically Unclear or insufficient reporting requirements Templates lacking in details and clarity Cumbersome modification and decision processes Lack of programme and data structure led to inefficient assessments and analysis Minor modification require assessment and full decision

A long term investment Providing everything in a structured way through pre-defined templates and forms Fast programme modification process Clear reporting Enhanced data quality Detailed specifications More work now but more clarity in the future Harmonisation Long term efficiency gains

More structure (templates and SFC2014) Everything is structured and organised Data fields and tables Selection Lists (Drop down menus) Check boxes + yes/no Text fields Text box title Provide a description of no more than x characters of the following items: … Text box title Provide a description of no more than x characters of the following items: … Common Indicators Additional waste recycling capacity - tons Estimated reduction in leakage - m 3 Total length of new railway line – km Estimated decrease of GHG in CO 2 equivalent - tons ❑ ❑ ✓

More structure (templates and SFC2014) Documents are optional and for information Except where specifically required by regulation En-ante evaluation etc. In case of inconsistency between documents and data the structured data in the forms prevails Links and references cannot be used Complete reference documents are produced by the system based on the information A complete PDF version of the programme with a single click Will not include information supplied through documents Changes compared to previous versions are identified automatically Correct treatment ensured automatically Amendments with or without a Commission decision Text changes are highlighted

Technical details of the template Purpose of the template To identify all elements of a programme To provide definitions for all elements To define the relationship between elements To remove any ambiguity The template will not Define the graphical layout of the SFC2014 input screens

Technical details of the template Each field has an identifier Description IDUnique identifier of the element typeN=Number, D=Date, S=String, C=Checkbox, P=Percentage, B=Boolean maxlengthMaximum number of characters including spaces in a text field inputM=Manuel, S=Selection, G=Generated by the system decisionN=Not part of the Decision - article 87(10) PAY=Element can be covered solely by the Partnership Agreement – article 87(8)

Defining the priorities

Defining the priorities

Defining the priorities Simple case: As a general rule a priority should be mono-fund, cover only one thematic objective and a single category of region Priority axisThematic objective Category of regionInvestment priorities Specific objectives corresponding to the investment priorities Fund (specify the Fund: ERDF, Cohesion Fund, ESF) Union support - EUR Co-financing rate 11Less developed 1.1Obj. 1 ERDF€ % 1.3Obj More developed3.2Obj. 3ERDF€ %

Defining the priorities Complex case: Can cover more than one fund, more than one thematic objective and more than one category of region Priority axisThematic objective Category of regionInvestment priorities Specific objectives corresponding to the investment priorities Fund (specify the Fund: ERDF, Cohesion Fund, ESF) Union support - EUR Co-financing rate 1 1Less developed 1.1Obj. 1 ERDF€ % 1.3Obj. 2 2Less developed2.2Obj. 3ERDF € More developed3.2Obj. 4ERDF€ % 10Less developed10.1Obj. 5ESF€ % 1N.A.1.2Obj. 6CF€ % 2…………………

Indicators and other elements Priority axis and indicators All information in particular output and result indicates will follow the structure of the priority axis Simple priorities will have a simple indicator table Complex priorities will have complex indicator tables broken down in accordance with the intervention logic. All tables will be created and wherever possible pre-filled on the basis of the intervention logic

Pre-filled tables

Automatically generated tables

Elements not subject to a Commission decision

Elements that can be provided solely in the Partnership Agreement