HBr, E(0), KERs and relative intensities revisited: https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/Crete/PPT-141107.pptx Content:pages: KER spectra and „channel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HBr, E(1), one-color, VMI KER spectra VMI, E(1) vs J´(=J´´)………………………………………2 Branching ratios……………………………………………………………..3-4 Prediction calculations……………………………………………………5.
Advertisements

Fig. 4-1, p Fig. 4-2, p. 109 Fig. 4-3, p. 110.
HCl,  =0, H 3 7Cl and H35Cl analysis. agust,www,.....Sept10/PPT aak.ppt agust,heima,...Sept10/XLS ak.xls agust,heima,...Sept10/Look for J ak.pxp.
Slide 1Fig. 2.1a, p.25. Slide 2Fig. 2.1b, p.25 Slide 3Table 2.1, p.25.
HCl, dep. Calc. E0,V10,V11
Comparison of E(1), V(m+8), H(0) and V(m+7) VMI data: 1 color exp: KER spectra, 1color exp.……………………..…………..2-5 Beta2 vs J´,1 color exp.…………………………………….6-10.
Slide 1Fig. 22.1, p.669. Slide 2Fig. 22.3, p.670.
Slide 1Fig. 18.1, p.545. Slide 2Fig. 18.1e, p.545.
Slide 1Fig. 17.1, p.513. Slide 2Table 17.1, p.514.
Slide 1Fig. 11.1, p.337. Slide 2Fig. 11.2, p.338.
Slide 1Fig. 19.1, p Slide 2Fig. 19.2, p. 583.
Slide 1Fig. 21.1, p.641. Slide 2Fig. 21.2, p.642.
Slide 1Fig. 10.1, p.293. Slide 2Fig. 10.1a, p.293.
Slide 1Fig. 5.1, p.113. Slide 2Fig. 5.1a, p.113 Slide 3Fig. 5.1b, p.113.
P.464. Table 13-1, p.465 Fig. 13-1, p.466 Fig. 13-2, p.467.
Fig. 11-1, p p. 360 Fig. 11-2, p. 361 Fig. 11-3, p. 361.
CH2Br2: 1) Absorption 2) REMPI scans: overview (slides 12-15) 3) C+ REMPI vs absorption spectrum agust,www,....ch2br2/PPT ak.ppt agust,heima,...CH2Br2/PXP ak.pxp.
Table 6-1, p Fig. 6-1, p. 162 p. 163 Fig. 6-2, p. 164.
1) HBr 1D (2+n)REMPI spectra simulations 2) Energy level shifts and intensity ratios for the F(v´=1) state agust,www,....Jan11/PPT ak.ppt agust,heima,....Jan11/XLS ak.xls.
cm CH 3 Br 10k 40k 70k CH 3 Br* C*( 1 D 2 )+H 2 +HBr C**( 1 D 2 )+H 2 +HBr J’’ k 150k C + +H 2 +HBr+e.
HBr, F 1  2, v´=1
HCl & HBr, E(v´=0,1) vs. V agust,www,....June11/PPT ak.ppt agust,www,....HBr/June11/Energy difference and intensity ratio for HBr and HCl jl.xls.
HBr V.v´=m+8 Agust,heima,....HBr/Jan11/19930_ pxp Agust,www,....hbr/Jan11/PPT ak.ppt Agust,heima,...HBr/Jan11/XLS ak.xls.
CH3Br, HBr detection agust, www,...Sept09/PPT ak.ppt.
HBr agust,www,.....Jan11/PPT ak.ppt agust,heima,...Jan11/PXP ak.pxp agust,heima,...Jan11/HBr18820_ pxp.
1 CH3Br, C, C* and C** dissociation formation channels vs C+ spectra Explanation for enhanced C+ Rydberg state spectra in the cm-1.
HBr agust,www,....June11/PPT ak.ppt agust, heima,...June11/XLS ak.xls agust, heima,....June11/PXP ak.pxp 1) HBr absorption vs excitations.
Figure 1.1 The observer in the truck sees the ball move in a vertical path when thrown upward. (b) The Earth observer views the path of the ball as a parabola.
HBr, (updated ; slide 12) V(m+i) /HBr+(v+) spectra analysis
HCl, negative ion detections 1hv ion-pair spectra (slides 3-4) Loock´s prediction about H+ + Cl- formation channels(slides 5-6) Energetics vs Dye for V(v´= )
HI Relevant to the HI- Perturb.II paper:pages: H(2) ion intensities (system (b))………………………2-9
Plan for HBr VMI experiments in FORTH, autumn 2014 & progress -one and two-color experiments States to study……………………………………………….2-3 Rotational lines……………………………………………….4-5.
HI H(1) vs V(m+6) & O(0) vs. V(m+7):
HCl, E(v´=2) agust,www,…..hcl/June11/PPT ak.ppt agust,heima,…HCl/June11/HCl E2 spectra jl.pxp agust,heima,…HCl/June11/HCl E2 spectra jlaka.pxp.
HBr, Potential curve diagram for HBr and HBr + (See next slides):
SCH-X; X =F, Cl,Br,I Summary: K(eq->ax) (vs T) ax) >(vs T)  G # (eq->#) references.
HBr; Updated: Imaging experiments in Crete Labtop..C:……/Crete/HBr/PPT aka.pptx &
HBr, V(m+8), one-color, VMI One-color: KER spectra VMI, V(m+8) vs J´(=J´´)…………………………………2 Branching ratios……………………………………………………………..3-4 Angular distributions………………………………………………………5-7.
HBr Energetics agust,www,....hbr/PPT ak.ppt agust, heima,...HBr/XLS ak.xls.
HBr, V(m+4) (and E(0)) (Updated ; slide: 24-6) 1)KER spectra vs J´ (slides 2-3) 2)I(H + + Br(1/2))/I(H + + Br(3/2)) vs. J´(slide 4) 3)Comparison.
Fig. 6-CO, p p. 185a p. 185b p. 185c p. 185d.
CH3Br, one-color exp.: CHn+, iBr+ and CiBr+ ions vs CH3Br(Ry) states: Content: pages:
CH3Br, one-color exp.: CHn+, iBr+ and CiBr+ ions vs CH3Br(Ry) states: Content: pages:
CH3I VMI-REMPI data and analysis:
continued on next slide
HBr, Angular distributions for V(m+i), i = 4-10; J´
continued on next slide
מיומנויות תקשורת בין אישית סוגי שיחות שונים בין שנים, בבית הספר.
H(0), one-color, VMI and slicing images
HBr, 3S-, J´= 8 & V(m+9) Updated:
Изразеното в настоящата презентация мнение обвързва единствено автора и не представлява официално становище на Комисията за финансов надзор Данил Джоргов.
2 color VMI exp. CH3(X;v1v2v3v4) detection; hi
VMI-fitting results for V(m+i), i=4-10
6pp 3S- vs l / J´ Updated: One color, H+ detection: pages
HBr Mass resolved REMPI and Imaging REMPI.
NB: Presentation time is 12 minutes + Question and Answer
Logic Gates Revision Package.
CH3I summary This file includes some ideas about dissociation of
What Causes The Tides To Occur?
ADDITIVE VS. MULTIPLICATIVE RELATIONSHIPS
HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions.
CH3I VMI-REMPI data and analysis:
Fig. 6-CO, p. 211.
CH3Br Negative particle detections; Electrons /PES:
07CO, p. 190.
HBr The cm-1 system (slides 2-16)
KER predictions for Br+ images
CF3Br agust,www,....cf3br/PPT ak.ppt agust,heima,....Sept10/XLS ak.xls
Line Graphs.
Presentation transcript:

HBr, E(0), KERs and relative intensities revisited: Content:pages: KER spectra and „channel integrations“……………….2-3 Intensity ratios (Table)………………………………………....4 Intensity ratios (graphs)……………………………………….5-7 Updated:

E 1  + (v´= 0) H* + Br*(1/2) H* + Br(3/2) HBr + *(1/2,v + ) HBr + (3/2,v + ) J´= H + kinetic energy release / eV Lay:0, Gr:1 dat files: X1_3_NewCenter/X1_3sp X1/x1sp (old)

; Lay:0, Gr:1 KER/eV Integrations: H* + Br*(1/2) H* + Br(3/2) I(total, 0,02 – 2.27 eV): I(HBr + *(1/2,v + ) HBr + (3/2,v + )) ( eV): J´=

J´:I(H*+Br*)/I(H*+Br)I(HBr + /HBr + *)/I(H*+Br) 90, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ; sheet: “Int.ratios”

Lay:2, Gr:2 J´ I(Br*)/I(Br)

Lay:1, Gr:5 J´ I(HBr+)/I(Br)

To be compared with Fig. 5 in manuscript:

NB the integrations in slides3 were performed for Intensity vs. KER/eV instead of for Intensity vs. Pixel number as pointed out by Petros in an („ Re: HBr VMI paper -I“) I will now perform an integration as „Intensity vs. Pixel numbers“

pix ; Lay:3, Gr:0 J´= H* + Br*(1/2) H* + Br(3/2) I(HBr + *(1/2,v + ) HBr + (3/2,v + )) ( pix range):

Lay:4, Gr:9 J´ I(Br*)/I(Br)

I(HBr+)/I(Br) J´ Lay:5, Gr:10

Lay:6, Gr:9 I(HBr+)/I(Br) J´ I(Br*)/I(Br)