8-12-2015AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Astrometry in AW Overview of Astrometric processing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mutidimensional Data Analysis Growth of big databases requires important data processing.  Need for having methods allowing to extract this information.
Advertisements

Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado ASEN 5070 OD Accuracy Assessment OD Overlap Example Effects of eliminating parameters.
Some problems... Lens distortion  Uncalibrated structure and motion recovery assumes pinhole cameras  Real cameras have real lenses  How can we.
Pushing Astrometry to the Limit Richard Berry. Barnard’s Star Location: Ophiuchus Location: Ophiuchus Coordinates: 17 h 57 m º41’36”(J2000) Coordinates:
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Megacam Imaging of the Extended Groth Strip M. Ashby, B. McLeod, J.-S. Huang, P. Barmby, G. Fazio, C. Papovich, S. Willner.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
MMT Megacam Brian McLeod Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
MSU CSE 240 Fall 2003 Stockman CV: 3D to 2D mathematics Perspective transformation; camera calibration; stereo computation; and more.
Pan-STARRS Seminar: IPPEugene Magnier Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline Astrometry and Photometry IFA Pan-STARRS Seminar 735 October 14, 2004.
Institute for Astronomy Comet DataBase Project Contact: Jacqueline Keane Instructions for Observing Log Sheet Conversion Authors:
Face Recognition Using Neural Networks Presented By: Hadis Mohseni Leila Taghavi Atefeh Mirsafian.
Processing of exoplanet full field images Farid Karioty CoRoT Week 12/06/2005.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
E. BertinAstro-WISE workshop 11/ TERAPIX: SCAMP E.Bertin (IAP & Obs. de Paris/LERMA)
Cavalier Fabien on behalf LAL group Orsay GWDAW 10 December, 14 th 2005 Reconstruction of Source Location using the Virgo-LIGO network Presentation of.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
Epipolar geometry The fundamental matrix and the tensor
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
Course 12 Calibration. 1.Introduction In theoretic discussions, we have assumed: Camera is located at the origin of coordinate system of scene.
Photometry and Astrometry of SIM Planetquest Globular Cluster Targets T. M. Girard (Yale), A. Sarajedini (U. Florida), B. Chaboyer (Dartmouth) Table 1.
The Chinese SONG proposal: scientific concerns Jianning Fu (Beijing Normal University) and Chinese SONG team Beijing ─ March 29, 2010 The third workshop.
1 DES Photometric Calibration Strategy Douglas L. Tucker (FNAL) Filter and Calibrations Strategy Workshop 4 April 2008.
Principal Component Analysis Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University.
+ AstroDrizzle Products for HST & JWST 2014 STScI Calibration Workshop Jennifer Mack, STScI.
Seminars on formation and evolution of the Galaxy Feb 12, 2002 The construction of the GSC2.2 Catalog Mario G. Lattanzi Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
4-PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION OF DIGITIZED ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES Yavor Chapanov 1 1 – National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
1 Groningen, November 2003 ASTROWISE OAC TEAM The ASTRO-WISE project: status at OAC The OAC AW team: J.M. Alcalà, F. Getman, A. Grado, M. Pavlov,
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
The Global Pool The Global Pool AstroWise Workshop AstroWise Workshop list of active and potential calibrators.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 The SPIRE Destriper Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE ICC 1.
April 2001 OPTICON workshop in Nice 1 The PSF homogenization problem in large imaging surveys Emmanuel BERTIN (TERAPIX)
POSSII IMAGES ASTROMÉTRIC REDUCTION Reduction methods and their influence on Theta and Rho measures Ignacio Novalbos O.A.N.L. Barcelona.
MGL/OATo 7th GSC2 Meeting, Barolo (I), 22 Oct 2001 The GSC2.2 Catalog: Global Properties Mario G. Lattanzi Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino.
Difference Image Analysis at OAC Groningen, 1st Dec 2004 AW-OAC team.
Physics 114: Lecture 13 Error Analysis, Part III Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
The OmegaCAM photometric systems. OmegaCAM calibration plan (1) Basic OmegaCAM terminology : ● Key bands vs User bands ● Key band -> User band transformation.
MSW - July The Establishment of Astrometric Calibration Regions And the determination of positions for objects much fainter than existing reference.
Calibration for WFPC2 Vera Platais Astrometric X g =a 1 +a 2 X+a 3 Y+a 4 X 2 +a 5 XY+a 6 Y 2 +a 7 X 3 +a 8 X 2 Y+a 9 XY 2 +a 10 Y 3 Y g =b 1 +b 2 X+b.
26th October 2005 HST Calibration Workshop 1 The New GSC-II and it’s Use for HST Brian McLean Archive Sciences Branch.
Improved ACS Geometrical Distortion Correction Richard Hook TIPS Meeting, STScI, 18th December 2003.
Astrometry with Schmidt Plates Difficulty in attaining highly accurate positions -Bending of plates as they are placed in plate holder -Characteristics.
GSPC -II Program GOAL: extend GSPC-I photometry to B = V ˜ 20 add R band to calibrate red second-epoch surveys HOW: take B,V,R CCD exposures centered at.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
WFC3 SMOV UVIS and IR Geometric Distortion Calibration and Multidrizzle Vera Kozhurina-Platais and WFC3 team.
Date of download: 7/11/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Relationship among the intrinsic parameters and the rotation angle; *, the results.
Relative Astrometry AstroWISE workshop, Leiden
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy
A Difference Imaging Tool
Employment of AGIS for Nano-Jasmine
Paper – Stephen Se, David Lowe, Jim Little
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
Globular Cluster Astrometry
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Functions and their Graphs
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Observational Astronomy Astrometry
Warmup NO CALCULATORS Convert into radians or degrees.
Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs
Finite Element Surface-Based Stereo 3D Reconstruction
UCAC U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog T.J. Rafferty
Echidna: current status and expected performance
Presentation transcript:

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Astrometry in AW Overview of Astrometric processing

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Astrometry in AW Contents Ingest –Diagnostics Single frame astrometry –Diagnostics, Quality Control Global astrometry –Diagnostics, Quality Control Super global astrometry –Potential

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single Global Ingest Astrometry in AW RawScienceFrameBiasFrame FringeFrame MasterFlatFrame IlluminationCorrection HotPixelMap ColdPixelMap GainLinearity PhotometricParameters ReducedScienceFrame CoaddedRegriddedFrame SatelliteMapCosmicMap RegriddedFrame SaturatedPixelMap WeightFrame AstrometricParameters

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Ingest Astrometry Why –Pointing problems –Large pointing offsets –Often small offsets –Unpredictable 0.5 – 1 image size Principally no limit

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Ingest Astrometry What –WFI data How –Frame based x-y grid Map all CCD x-y positions on one x-y grid A-priori knowledge of CCD chips on frame No rotation < few degrees Good knowledge of pixel scale (few percent) –opipe.astro.instrument.HeaderTranslatorWFI # Astrometric properties of the instrument. # CRPIX values for the chips in [CRPIX1, CRPIX2] format crpix_map = {'ccd50' : [ 4061., -223.], 'ccd51' : [ 1918., -222.], 'ccd52' : [ -226., -223.], 'ccd53' : [-2366., -222.], 'ccd54' : [-2364., 3904.], 'ccd55' : [ -215., 3899.], 'ccd56' : [ 1919., 3901.], 'ccd57' : [ 4061., 3898.]}

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Ingest Astrometry –Large offset determination (dx, dy) domain with large errorbars ~100 pixels –Application of offset –Refinement using triangulation method Offset Rotation Scale

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Ingest Astrometry Where –Example -> dbview -> index of tables ->AstrometricCorrection -> select all

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Ingest Astrometry –CD matrix CD1_1 = xx CD1_2 = xy CD2_1 = yx CD2_2 = yy –Update Astrom object –Product RawScienceFrame

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Standard pipeline reduction –Reduction per CCD –Overscan/Flat/Bias –Astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Pipeline processing single CCD’s –Input RawScienceFrame –Preastrom Pointing offset correction per CCD Small rotation/scaling correction Allow tight association extracted/reference objects –Astrom Single CCD astrometric solution

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Preastrom –Pointing offset correction –Small rotation/scaling correction –Allow tight association extracted/reference objects Astrom –PDEG=3 –opipe.astro.external.LDAC –opipe.astro.main.Astrom conf = LDAC.astromconf.get_kw_dict() conf[‘PDEG'] = 3 LDAC.astrom(incats, outcats, 'dither.pairs', 'dither.residuals', **conf) ASTROM_KWLIST = [('VERBOSE', 'DEBUG'), ('NITER', 5), ('XMIN', 0.0), ('XMAX', ), ('YMIN', 0.0), ('YMAX', ), ('PDEG', 2), ('FDEG', [1, 0, 0]), ('XPIXSIZE', ), ('YPIXSIZE', ), ('# DEFAULT USED: RA', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: DEC', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: ERR', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: XPOS', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: YPOS', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: FIELD', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CAMERA', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: ERRPOS', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: XM2', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: YM2', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CORR', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CRVAL1', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CRVAL2', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CRPIX1', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CRPIX2', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CDELT1', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: CDELT2', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: XWID', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: YWID', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: EPOCH', None), ('# DEFAULT USED: DATA_TYPE', None)]

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Diagnostisc –Log Throught the iteration sequence the Rms and max values should decrease to smaller values to end up Rms< 2.5 and max< If these values are not reached, definitely something is wrong. 17:26:19 - LDAC: End of equation solution s iteration 0 17:26:19 - LDAC: Rms and max ref stars residuals for camera 0: and :26:19 - LDAC: End of equation solution s iteration 1 17:26:19 - LDAC: Rms and max ref stars residuals for camera 0: and :26:19 - LDAC: End of equation construction s iteration 2 17:26:19 - LDAC: Rms and max ref stars residuals for camera 0: and :26:19 - LDAC: End of equation construction s iteration 3 17:26:19 - LDAC: Rms and max ref stars residuals for camera 0: and :26:19 - LDAC: End of equation construction s iteration 4 17:26:19 - LDAC: Rms and max ref stars residuals for camera 0: and

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Diagnostisc –Log First column contains X related solution, second column Y related solution. So here the WCS is a rotated one Third column gives solution errors X = * x * y * x^ e-05 * x*y * y^2 and Y = * x * y * x^ * x*y * y^2 17:26:19 - LDAC: Distortion coefficients for camera 0 17:26:19 - LDAC: (arcseconds) (radians) 17:26:19 - LDAC: / e /- 8.82e-07 X*1*Cheb0(F) 17:26:19 - LDAC: /- 4.24e e-07 +/- 2.16e-07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) 17:26:19 - LDAC: /- 6.17e e e-06 +/- 3.14e-07 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) 17:26:19 - LDAC: e /- 2.84e e e-06 +/- 1.44e-07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) 17:26:19 - LDAC: /- 1.56e e e-06 +/- 7.92e-08 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F)

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Diagnostisc –Correlation matrix The number of reference stars large for a good solution. 6 Free parameters, -> 12 pairs for statistical accuracy. In general < 50 is not so good. The correlation matrix highest values on diagonal and all 0 on the other positions. X related and Y related parameters are correlated, but there should not be any cross dependencies between X and Y. Matrix is ordered: (X, Y, X**2, X*Y, Y**2). Offset with the columns direction X related solutions and rows direction Y related solutions. 17:26:19 - LDAC: Number of reference stars: :26:19 - LDAC: Number of overlap stars: 0 17:26:19 - LDAC: Min and Max of covariance matrix: 17:26:19 - LDAC: (radians)**2 (")**2 17:26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC: :26:19 - LDAC:

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Diagnostics –Residuals catalog Original astrom call Extract to ascii catalog: The ascii catalog contains the residuals in Ra,Dec, the Ra and Dec of the extracted object and the X,Y coordinates of the reference and extracted objects (Note only true in case of pipeline astrom, not so for Global Astrom) astrom -i tmp cat1 -o tmp cat7 -p tmp cat6 -c astrom.conf -r ldac.ast.cat.residuals ldactoasc -i ldac.ast.cat.residuals -t RESIDUALS -k DRa DDec Ra Dec Xpos1 Ypos1 Xpos2 Ypos2 > res.asc

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Diagnostics -Plots

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Quality Control –Positional accuracy Reference catalog (USNO) –0.3 arcsec on large scales –0.15 arcsec on small scales (relative) Extracted object Reference stars –RMS extracted objects 0.1 arcsec at 5 σ –RMS residuals at 5 σ < 0.5 arcsec –Max residuals < 1.5 arcsec –Solution accuracy Errors on astrometric parameters All stderr from solution Number of reference stars MEAN_DRA MEAN_DDEC SIG_DRA SIG_DDEC NREF x_err y_err xx_err xy_err yy_err field_err

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Single frame astrometry Product – RegriddedFrame AstrometricParameters –Full astrometric solution

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry What –Set of overlapping pointings -d : date (in yyyy-mm-dd format) -c : chip name -f : filter name -i : instrument name -o : object name (full name or regular expression) -g : AssociationListName –Equal camera/CCD’s –Irrelavant: filters, number of pointings GAstrom –GAstrometric Set of sourcelists lists One associate list

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Input –ReducedScienceFrame Product –RegriddedFrame Astrometric Parameters –Full astrometric solution

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global scaling parameter 4200 Distortion coefficients for camera 0 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 7.55e e-05 +/- 7.69e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 6.65e e /- 6.77e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.16e e e-06 +/- 1.18e+08 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) /- 9.65e e e-06 +/- 9.83e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.05e e e-06 +/- 1.07e+08 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 1 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 4.85e e e-05 +/- 4.94e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) e e-05 +/- 4.18e e e-07 +/- 4.26e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) e-05 +/- 2.36e e-07 +/- 2.4e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 5.88e e /- 5.98e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.62e e e-06 +/- 1.65e+07 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) /- 2.7e e e-06 +/- 2.75e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) e-05 +/- 9.44e e e-07 +/- 9.61e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 2 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 4.8e e e-05 +/- 4.89e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) e e-05 +/- 4.16e e e-07 +/- 4.24e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) e-05 +/- 3.28e e-07 +/- 3.34e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 6e e /- 6.11e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 2.87e e e-05 +/- 2.92e+07 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) /- 3.86e e e-05 +/- 3.93e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 9.86e e e-06 +/- 1e+08 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 3 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 5.72e e e-06 +/- 5.82e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) 1.491e e-06 +/- 4.97e e e-07 +/- 5.06e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) /- 9.5e e-05 +/- 9.67e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 6.27e e /- 6.38e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.65e e e-06 +/- 1.68e+08 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) /- 1.02e e e-05 +/- 1.04e+08 X*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 9.05e e e-06 +/- 9.21e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 4 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 5.33e e-05 +/- 5.42e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) 7.777e e-05 +/- 4.76e e e-07 +/- 4.85e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) e-05 +/- 9.14e e-07 +/- 9.3e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 5.03e e /- 5.12e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.64e e e-06 +/- 1.67e+08 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) /- 8.58e e e-06 +/- 8.74e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 7.05e e e-06 +/- 7.18e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 5 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 5.48e e e-05 +/- 5.58e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) e e-05 +/- 4.81e e e-07 +/- 4.9e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) /- 3.73e e-06 +/- 3.79e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) /- 4.98e e /- 5.07e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 3.15e e e-06 +/- 3.2e+07 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) 5.123e e-06 +/- 3.46e e e-08 +/- 3.52e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) 1.248e e-06 +/- 6.84e e e-08 +/- 6.97e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 6 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 5.5e e e-05 +/- 5.6e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) e e-05 +/- 4.8e e e-07 +/- 4.88e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) e-05 +/- 2.51e e-07 +/- 2.55e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) e /- 5.19e e /- 5.28e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) e-05 +/- 1.63e e e-07 +/- 1.66e+07 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) e-05 +/- 2.21e e e-07 +/- 2.25e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) -8.57e /- 7.21e e e-06 +/- 7.34e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) Distortion coefficients for camera 7 (arcseconds) (radians) /- 5.31e e e-05 +/- 5.41e+07 1*1*Cheb0(F) e e-05 +/- 4.61e e e-07 +/- 4.69e+07 1*1*Cheb1(F) /- 7.57e e-05 +/- 7.7e+07 X*1*Cheb0(F) 2.115e /- 5.49e e /- 5.59e+07 1*Y*Cheb0(F) /- 1.15e e e-06 +/- 1.17e+08 X**2*1*Cheb0(F) e-06 +/- 7.81e e e-08 +/- 7.95e+07 X*Y*Cheb0(F) 6.572e /- 7.85e e e-06 +/- 8e+07 1*Y**2*Cheb0(F) !Corrections to plate center coordinates (arcseconds) (radians) and plate center coordinates (radians) e e-05 6e e e e-05 6e e e e-05 6e e e e-05 6e e e e-05 6e e-07 Number of reference stars: 3597 Number of overlap stars: 7935

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Product – RegriddedFrame AstrometricParameters

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Final product –CoaddRegiddedFrame Selection list for Coadd must/may be equal to GAstrom

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Quality Control –Positional accuracy Reference catalog (USNO) –0.3 arcsec on large scales –0.15 arcsec on small scales (relative) Extracted object Reference stars –RMS extracted objects 0.1 arcsec at 5 σ –RMS residuals < 0.5 arcsec –Max residuals < 1.5 arcsec Extracted object Extracted objects –RMS extracted objects 0.1 arcsec at 5 σ –RMS residuals < 0.2 arcsec –Max residuals < 0.6 arcsec MEAN_DRA MEAN_DDEC SIG_DRA SIG_DDEC

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Quality Control –Solution accuracy Reference objects –Errors on astrometric parameters –All stderr from solution –Number of reference stars < 0.3 arcsec /sqrt(N ref /P DEG ) Overlap pairs –Errors on astrometric parameters –All stderr from solution –Number of pairs –Offset among dither pointings < 0.1 arcsec /sqrt(N over /P DEG ) NREF x_err y_err xx_err xy_err yy_err (xxx_err xxy_err xyy_err yyy_err) field_err

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Global astrometry Quality Control –Pre- and Post coadd PSF Dithering cases sub-sampling -> sharper images PSF regridded > PSF coadded No anisotropy

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Super global astrometry Potential solution sky-wise –Database stores Sourcelists Relations, creation history –Separate into distinct, independent effects Instrument –Chips on baseplate –Litho masks Camera –Mounting, filters, ADC Telescope –Pointing, remount/resurface, reconstruct

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Super global astrometry Potential solution sky-wise –Variability of effects Constant elements –Chips mounted on base Time evolution Discontinuities –(un)mounting parts of instrument/camera/telescope Relations with ambient –Temperature –Humidity

AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Super global astrometry Potential solution sky-wise –Error budget RMS position extracted sources 0.1 * pixelsize= 0.02 arcsec Overlap statistics: # sources x # overlaps Fixed frame (whole sky) of overlapped pointings Connect to astrometric reference catalog –Characteristics Large scale and small scale high precision Use more precise less dense astrometric catalogs: Hipparcos <0.001 arcs, Tycho <0.03 arcsec