Mathematics/Science Partnerships and Troops-to-Teachers By Sander Langebeeke And Kentavius Means.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2003 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
Expanding the Pool of Qualified Teachers for Ohio Schools: A Program for Transitioning Military Personnel into the Teaching Profession.
October 5, 2010 Title III Services to Private Schools.
Oklahoma’s Math and Science Partnership (Title 2 Part B) Gloria Bayouth Executive Director, Office of Federal Programs Jennifer Lamb Director of Elementary.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
The Need for Certified Teachers in New York State The New York State Education Department Office of Higher Education May
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Who Will Teach? Experience Matters Between 2004 and 2008, 300,000 veteran teachers left the workforce for retirement. See the Shifts in the Age of the.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
The Educator Preparation Reform Act S Sponsored by Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) H.R Sponsored by Representative Mike Honda (D-CA) 1.
Transition to Teaching Recruiting, Preparing, and Retaining Science Teachers through TTT Beatriz Ceja, Gillian Cohen-Boyer and Thelma Leenhouts U.S. Department.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Teacher Education Accountability: Impact on States and Teacher Preparation Programs Sophia McArdle, Ph.D. Office of Postsecondary Education.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
HEAD OF THE CLASS A Quality Teacher in Every Pennsylvania Classroom.
Progress Report: Highly Qualified Teachers in School Year New York State Education Department April 2008 See for.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Profile of Virginia’s Instructional School Personnel Presented to the Special Education Advisory Committee on September 29, 2011 Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant.
Teacher Quality Program (TQP) Mathematics and Science Partnership Meeting Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Presented by Patricia Barrett & Salimah Shabazz 1.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
What Washington Teachers Think About “Race to the Top” Issues Highlights From a Statewide Survey December 2009.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Progress Report: Teacher Supply and Demand in School Year New York State Education Department May 2008 Full report at
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Community and Technical Colleges The Hub of Modern Workforce Systems Hans Meeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Vocational and Adult Education United.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
World Bank (Department of Education) Teacher Policies: Supply, Training, Professional Development, Incentives Juan Manuel Moreno The World Bank Regional.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Parent and Family Engagement Input Meeting
Overview for Alternate Assessment
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
What Parents Need to Know
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Creekside School Title I School-wide Program Title One Annual Meeting
What Parents Need to Know
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

Mathematics/Science Partnerships and Troops-to-Teachers By Sander Langebeeke And Kentavius Means

Mathematics and Science Partnerships

How It Works The Mathematics and Science Partnerships program is a grant program to help improve the learning of students by enhancing training for Math and science teachers and recruiting teachers who are highly qualified. Districts are given the funds to educate their teachers and to recruit highly qualified teachers.

Key Requirements The Department of Education receives $100 million dollars each year and spreads it around the country to schools who are part of the partnership. Schools need these requirements if they want money from the Department of Education: – Institute reforms that are aligned with academic standards in mathematics and science. – Engage in activities that are based on scientific research. – Carry out reforms and create an accountability plan. – Continue reforms after federal funding has ended.

Quality is measures by the progress the grantee makes over the year. The Mathematics and Science Partnerships are based on quality work based on Scientific Research. Partnerships are authorized to carry out activities that are based on scientifically based research and must conduct a comprehensive assessment of their teacher quality and professional development needs before receiving grant funds. Quality

Troops-to-Teachers

How It Works The Troops-to-Teachers program encourages former military personnel to become classroom teachers. The purpose of this program is to help relieve teacher shortages, especially in high-need areas such as math, science and special education; provide positive role models for public school students; and assist former military personnel in making the transition to teaching as a second career. To date, more than 4,300 teachers have been hired through the program, in every state and in more than 2,000 school districts.

Key Requirements The program is funded through the U.S. Department of Education, which then transfers the funds to the Department of Defense DANTES office. Troops-to-Teachers itself does not provide participants with preservice training to become certified teachers; rather, the program provides guidance on how to obtain certification. Participants receive a stipend of up to $5,000 to pay for certification costs or a bonus of $10,000 if they teach full-time in a high-need school as an elementary, secondary, vocational or technical teacher for at least three years.

Quality According to a Troops-to-Teachers survey conducted in 1998, the program has successfully recruited significant numbers of men and minorities to teaching. 90 percent of Troops-to-Teachers participants are male and 29 percent are minorities, compared to 26 percent and 13 percent, respectively, on a national level. Troops-to-Teachers participants are also more likely than teachers on a national level to teach in shortage subject areas, such as mathematics, science and special education, and to teach or be willing to teach in inner cities and rural areas. The quality of the program will be measured by its progress in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel. This progress was reported to Congress on March 31, 2006.