Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
3nd KEK-CEA Workshop on Superconducting magnets and cryogenics for accelerator frontier - 24/03/2009 Ceramic insulation for Nb3Sn accelerator magnets F.Rondeaux.
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Long Racetrack (LR) strategy – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP DOE review - FNAL, June 12-14, 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: LR R&D goals & plans Long Racetrack.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/11/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
The construction of the model of the curved fast ramped superconducting dipole for FAIR SIS300 synchrotron P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova The construction.
SMC Plans for new SMCs for Fresca2 program J.C. Perez EUCARD-WP7-HFM Short Model Coil review 12 December 2011.
Towards Nb 3 Sn accelerator magnets, challenges & solutions, history & forecast Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
Eucard-WP7-HFM 9 th Collaboration Meeting at Warsaw University of Technology Status on SMC & RMC Models J.C Perez on behalf of SMC collaboration team.
October/7/2011 J.C. Perez TE-MSC-MDT EuCARD WP7-HFM Collaboration Meeting (Geneva) SMC E U CARD WP7 HFM S TATUS UPDATE MEETING O CTOBER 2011 J.C. Perez.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
G.A.Kirby 4th Nov.08 High Field Magnet Fresca 2 Introduction Existing strand designs, PIT and OST’s RRP are being used in the conceptual designs for two.
R. Bonomi R. Kleindienst J. Munilla Lopez M. Chaibi E. Rogez CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 CASE STUDY 1: Group 1C Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study introduction Paolo Ferracin CERN, Geneva Claire Antoine
LARP Magnets FNAL contribution to LARP (LHC Accelerator Research Program) FNAL core-program support to LARP DOE Annual Program Review - May 16-18, 2006.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
Superconducting Magnet Development for Ex-Situ NMR FY04 Plan G. Sabbi, 3/31/03.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
S. Caspi, LBNL TQS – Progress and plans Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration meeting FNAL April
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
QXF magnet integration Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
Ex-Situ NMR LDRD Progress report 1/27/03 1/27/03 1.Review of problem, status/plans - GianLuca 2.Magnetic and mechanical design- Paolo 3.Magnet configuration/fabrication.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Nb3Sn wiggler development
TQS Overview and recent progress
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
High Field Hybrid Design
J.C. Perez on behalf of SMC collaboration team J.C. Perez
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
To be presented at Nb3Al R&D Review,
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FRESCA2 - Coils 1+2 scenario
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Contents Introduction Description of the prototype –Conductor and cable –Superconducting coil –Coil pack –Mechanical structure Magnetic design –Analytical analysis –Coil configuration Lorentz forces Mechanical design –Stress analysis Work plan update Conclusions

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Introduction Proof of principle of an ex-situ NMR superconducting magnet –Volume (sweet spot) with high and homogeneous field in a “free region” LDRD proposal prototype design –Three horizontal coils (NbTi) –Field of ~ 2000 Gauss –Sweet spot: 3 mm volume at 15 mm –Homogeneity of 10 -3

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Prototype: conductor and cable Strands –  0.7 mm –Nb 3 Sn filaments in a copper matrix Cable –20 strands –8 mm wide and 1.3 mm thick –0.1 mm insulation (fiberglass)

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Prototype: superconducting coil Coil design: subscale magnet program Cable is wound around an iron island Two layers, 20 turns each Coil main dimensions –300 mm X 110 mm X 15 mm Coil confinement: horse shoe Heat treatment, epoxy impregnation

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Prototype: coil pack Four coils: –SC-11 and SC-12 (under fabrication) –SC-01 and SC-02 (SM baseline) Sweet spot sideConnection side

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Prototype: mechanical structure Steel pads Iron yoke Aluminum shell Diameter: 620 mm Thickness: 110 mm Assembly: –Key and bladder ( new LBNL technology ) Cool-down to 4.3 K

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Magnetic design: analytical analysis Analytical study –Line currents –Accelerator magnet formalism: - I x y + I d t –Field expressed in a series of harmonics: B 1 : dipole; B 3 : sextupole; B 5 : decapole Goal: maximize the B 1 and minimize the higher order harmonics

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Magnetic design: coil configuration Optimization with blocks of conductors instead of line currents Once fixed the position (and the number) of the blocks, two possible coil configurations: x y d t Vertical configuration Horizontal configuration

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Magnetic design: prototype coils The vertical configuration was chosen –Less efficient but more degrees of freedom –More suitable for field quality optimization Main features –4 subscale magnet coils –Current: 11 kA –Field in the sweet spot: 2600 Gauss –Distance of sweet spot from the structure: 45 mm –Homogeneity: limited by the choice of the subscale magnet coils (~10 -2 in 3 mm volume)

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Lorentz forces Horizontal Lorentz forces –tend to separate the coils –F X1 = 600 kN –F X2 = 664 kN Vertical Lorentz forces –No vertical support (sweet spot region) –Magnetic design must limit outward forces –In the prototype negligible outward forces Pre-stress –To limit the conductor movement (quench) the coils are pre-compressed by the mechanical structure

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Mechanical design: stress analysis The pre-compression is provided by –Bladders and keys: 40 % –Different thermal contraction between aluminum shell and iron yoke: 60 % Final stress in the shell: 200 MPa The stress in the shell transferred (via yoke and pad) to the coils No vertical support Full access to the sweet spot

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Work plan update Design: –Basic magnetic/mechanical analysis completed –Design studies of optimized magnets will continue through September Drawings: –ProE model and drawings are being completed Parts: –Support structure parts available by end of April Fabrication: –New coils already wound; heat treatment and impregnation completed by mid April –Assembly completed by end of May Test: –June-July time frame Analysis: –August-September (abstract will be submitted for MT18)

Superconducting Magnet Group 03/31/2003 Paolo Ferracin Conclusions The prototype demonstrates the main design features of the ex-situ magnet: –Mechanical structure with full access to saddle point –Field in the sweet spot –Distance of the sweet spot –Coil configuration –Fabrication and assembly techniques Next steps –Field homogeneity –First ex-situ NMR experiment