S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY B ALTIMORE, MD P ENN S TATE A RCHITECTURAL E NGINEERING S ENIOR C APSTONE P ROJECT N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION A DVISOR : D R. J OHN M ESSNER [Image Courtesy of

I NTRODUCTION N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD A NALYSIS 1 │ S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE Courtesy of P ROJECT O VERVIEW A NALYSIS 2 │ M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Courtesy of Google Maps Courtesy of A NALYSIS 3 │ F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN A NALYSIS 4 │ A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM Courtesy of Courtesy of

P ROJECT O VERVIEW N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD B UILDING N AME C OPPIN S TATE S CIENCE A ND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER L OCATION B ALTIMORE, M ARYLAND B UILDING O CCUPANT C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY O CCUPANCY T YPE B USINESS (B) S IZE 135,000 GSF N UMBER OF S TORIES A BOVE G RADE 4 P LUS P ENTHOUSE B UILDING T IMELINE O CTOBER 2012 – O CTOBER 2014 O VERALL P ROJECT C OST $76.2M P ROJECT D ELIVERY M ETHOD CM AT R ISK C ONTRACT T YPE GMP [Image courtesy of Google Maps ] O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Site Layout

P ROJECT O VERVIEW N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O WNER │ U NIVERSITY OF M ARYLAND C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGER │ B ARTON M ALOW C OMPANY A RCHITECT │ C ANNON D ESIGN M ECHANICAL & E LECTRICAL E NGINEER │ C ANNON D ESIGN C IVIL E NGINEERS │ S ITE R ESOURCES, I NC. S TRUCTURAL E NGINEER │ C OLUMBIA E NGINEERING, I NC. │ G EOTECHNICAL E NGINEER │ T.L.B. A SSOCIATES, I NC. │ P LUMBING / F IRE P ROTECTION │ WFT E NGINEERING, I NC. O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3

P ROJECT O VERVIEW N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD Rendering at SW Corner [Image courtesy of Building Systems Structural System Exterior Façade System Mechanical System Cast-in-Place Concrete – Floors 1 to 4 Structural Steel - Penthouse Brick Veneer Terracotta Wall Tiles Curtain Wall Metal Panels 6 Air Handling Units - VAV System 3 Boilers (Expansion for 7) – Partially Serves Perimeter Heating System O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3

O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD Problem Background Five different cladding assemblies with multiple materials increase installation time Potential Solutions 1.Replace terracotta wall tiles on east elevation with current brick veneer 2.Implement Lean Management Principles (SIPS & Last Planner System) [Drawing A0418] 0 3 Area of Terracotta Tiles Wall Assemblies at East Elevation

A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD Schedule EvaluationOriginal Schedule East Elevation – Perimeter Studs & Sheathing 40 days East Elevation – Exterior Brick Veneer 38 days ItemQuantityUnitTotal Incl. O&P Extended Total Incl. O&P Baseline Cost Terracotta Wall Tile S.F. $ $ 113,290 Brick Veneer7567.8S.F. $ $ 200,849 Variance(add) $ 87,559 Cost Evaluation 20 days 12 days O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3

A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION SIPS Example [Image courtesy of LPS Example [Image courtesy of Short Interval Production Schedule (SIPS) Utilized with repeatable construction activities Activities blocked as single unit on matrix Lean Principles: Flow & Value Last Planner System (LPS) Trade commitments for scheduled durations Lean Principles: Pull, Flow & Value 0 3

A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION Results Exterior Cladding Assembly Replacement Additional $87,559 to budget Reduced schedule by 8 days Constructability of east façade would be simplified and schedule reduced, however it is a cost prohibitive option. Lean Management Principles Reduce accident frequency by up to 66% Potential for major schedule acceleration and cost savings Instituting lean building practices will improve communication and provide more effective scheduling methods. 0 3

A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION Problem Background Stick-built curtain wall system leads to longer on-site installation and increased labor costs Potential Solutions Implement a unitized curtain wall panel system that can be delivered on a just-in-time basis 0 3 Building Section Isometric at Northwest Tower Location of Major Curtain Wall Area

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Panel Anchor Detail [Images courtesy of www. wausauwindow.com] Anchor Isometric Detail Plan of Connection Detail Curtain Wall Panel Manufacturer: Wausau Window and Wall Systems Utilizes interlocking frame design to accommodate seismic, live and thermal building movements (3/4” vertical movement) Offered in 4 sided structural glazed panels per specifications Unique ‘jack-bolt” anchoring option for fast installation Case Study: Metro Park 6 Building – Alexandria, VA - Installed 52 panel sections in 6.5 hours (7.5 min/panel)

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Schedule Evaluation *Northwest Tower based upon 52 panels/day *Remaining building area based upon 26 panels/day Northwest Tower – panels/day = 6 days Balance of Panels – panels/day = 19 days Trimout/Caulk Panels – panels/day = 27 days Total = 52 days 80 days 52 days Original Duration – Stick-Built Projected Duration – Unitized Savings: 28 days Cost Evaluation *Using 1 erection crew and 1 staging crew for unitized panels ItemQuantityUnit Total Incl. O&P Extended Total Incl. O&P Stick Built System34,675SF$ $ 6,241, Subtotal$ 6,241, Unitized System34,675SF$ $ 5,305, Staging Crew for Panels 34,675SF$ 9.35$ 324, Subtotal$ 5,629, Total Savings$612,014

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Lean Principles Unitized curtain wall panels implements a pull production strategy Delivery sequence implements a just-in- time planning approach [Womack, James, and Daniel Jones. Lean Thinking.2003] Planning Process Map Installation Sequence

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.L EAN P RINCIPLES IV.R ESULTS V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Results Unitized Curtain Wall Panel System Savings of $612,014 to budget Accelerated schedule by 28 days Implementation of pull production just-in-time delivery to cut storage fees on-site and eliminate material handling times The constructability of the curtain wall system will be effectively increased through a unitized panel system. Time and costs will be saved due to decreased handling time and proper delivery sequences. 0 3

A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Problem Background Finned tube radiators for perimeter heating leads to extended and cost prohibitive installation methods. Potential Solutions Replace finned tube radiator units with linear diffusers at ceiling to provide same temperature air at perimeter as room air. Rittling Finned Tube Radiator [ Nailor Linear Diffuser

A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Mechanical Breadth Finned tube radiator load in BTU/HR was converted to equivalent load in CFM Each equivalent CFM load was assigned to specific AHU based on location in building New linear diffuser duct run was sized appropriately for calculated CFM load Key assumption: Current duct sizes would not change due to the design alternative to add linear diffusers Goal: To determine the load savings on boiler and the additional load on air handling units

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN Schedule Evaluation Cost Evaluation Item Daily Output Duration Per Crew Crew No. Total Duration (w/ Crews) Finned Tube Radiator System Pipe Insulation Insulation Waste (5%) Fittings (add 15%) /4" Copper Pipe7634 1" Copper Pipe /4" Copper Pipe " Copper Pipe /2" Copper Pipe Hydronic Pump, 3HP50.41 FTR Units Total Duration for Finned Tube Radiator System 89 Linear Diffuser System Aluminum Ductwork Linear Diffusers Total Duration for Linear Diffuser System27 ItemQuantityUnitTotal Incl. O&P Extended Total Incl. O&P Pipe Insulation4536S.F. $ $ 2, Fittings (add 15%)680L.F. $ $ 18, /4" Copper Pipe2584L.F. $ $ 41, " Copper Pipe1313L.F. $ $ 26, /4" Copper Pipe551L.F. $ $ 14, " Copper Pipe36L.F. $ $ 1, /2" Copper Pipe55L.F. $ $ 3, Insulation Waste (5%)227L.F. $ $ 2, Hydronic Pump2Ea. $ 4, $ 8, FTR Units1550L.F. $ $ 122, Total $ 241, ItemQuantityUnitTotal Incl. O&P Extended Total Incl. O&P Aluminum Ductwork6046Lb. $ $ 90, Linear Diffusers155Ea. $ $ 20, Total $ 110, Finned Tube Radiator System Linear Diffuser System 62 days $132,000

N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN Item Finned Tube Radiator Linear DiffuserDifference Cost ($)$ 241,974.18$ 110, ~ $ 132,000 Schedule (Days) Results Linear Diffuser System Alternative Savings of $132,000 to budget Accelerated schedule by 62 days Labor-intensive connections eliminated Mechanical Breadth Outcome Savings of 358,000 BTU/HR on boiler Increase of 8162 CFM, 2426 CFM & 5977 CFM on AHU 1, 2 & 3, respectively The constructability of the alternative perimeter heating system will eliminate the labor-intensive brazing connections and costly copper hydronic piping. The linear diffusers are much more time effective and save on material cost. Summary

A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Spread Footing Locations Problem Background Potential schedule acceleration areas by analyzing an alternative foundation system in lieu of the current rammed aggregate piers Potential Solutions Replace rammed aggregate pier system with a driven steel H-pile system to reduce schedule duration and cost [Image courtesy of Driven Steel H-Pile Illustration [LRFD Bridge Design Specs and Federal Highway Admin]

A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Schedule Evaluation Cost Evaluation ItemQuantityUnit Daily Output (V.L.F) Total Duration (days) Driven Steel H-Piles HP12x V.L.F HP12x 84513V.L.F Mob./Demob.5184V.L.F Total6 Geopier System ( Based upon Bid Package #1)10 Variance (Savings)(4) ItemQuantityUnit Total Incl. O&P Extended Total Incl. O&P Driven Steel H-Piles HP12x V.L.F.$ 41.58$ 86, HP12x 84513V.L.F.$ 54.31$ 27, Mob./Demob.5184V.L.F. $ 1.98 $ 10, Total$ 124, Geopier System ( Based upon Bid Package #1)$ 150, Variance (Savings) $ (25,429.83) Design Capacities

A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM I.B ACKGROUND & S OLUTIONS II.S CHEDULE /C OST E VALUATION III.R ESULTS VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 Results Driven Steel H-Pile Alternative Savings of $25,000 to budget Accelerated schedule by 4 days Quality Assurance improved The alternative driven pile system resulted in a lower cost due to the shallow depth of piles. The quality control issues are minimized due to the controllable characteristics of a steel member. Goal Achieved

C ONCLUSION N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION 0 3 A NALYSIS 1 │ S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE Courtesy of A NALYSIS 2 │ M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL Courtesy of A NALYSIS 3 │ F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN A NALYSIS 4 │ A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM Courtesy of Replacing exterior cladding to brick veneer is cost prohibitive Last Planner System improves effective communication and can reduce accident frequency by 66% Unitized panels saves $612,014 Accelerates schedule by 28 days Constructability of curtain wall greatly improves with pull production Linear diffuser alternative saves $132,000 Accelerates schedule by 62 days Eliminates on-site labor-intensive brazing connections and costly copper pipe Driven steel H-piles alternative saves $25,000 Accelerates schedule by 4 days Quality Assurance improved Final Summary Overall savings of 94 days in the schedule and a total of $769,000

A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS N ICHOLAS Z ITTERBART │ C ONSTRUCTION O PTION S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY C ENTER C OPPIN S TATE U NIVERSITY │ B ALTIMORE, MD O UTLINE I.I NTRODUCTION II.P ROJECT O VERVIEW III.A NALYSIS 1: S CHEDULE R ESEQUENCE IV.A NALYSIS 2: M ODULARIZATION OF C URTAIN W ALL V.A NALYSIS 3: F INNED T UBE R ADIATOR D ESIGN VI.A NALYSIS 4: A LTERNATIVE F OUNDATION S YSTEM VII.C ONCLUSION Academic Acknowledgements Dr. John Messner – CM Faculty Advisor Dr. Robert Leicht Prof. Kevin Parfitt Prof. Robert Holland Penn State AE Faculty Industry Acknowledgements Barton Malow Company Cannon Design The University of Maryland Coppin State University Thank You! Special Thanks The Barton Malow STC Project Team My Family and Friends

A PPENDIX A – A NALYSIS 1

A PPENDIX B – A NALYSIS 2

A PPENDIX C – A NALYSIS 3

A PPENDIX D – A NALYSIS 4

Footing Location (Column Lines) Footing Type (Per S100) Footing Size (Per S100) Pile Type Qty. of Pile (27’ length) 4A-EEF2B6'-0" x 6'-0" x 1'-10"HP12x A-EEF2A6'-0" x 6'-0" x 1'-2"HP12x D-FF, 2D-DD.9, 2C-FF, 2C-DD.9 F11A4'-0" x 4'-0" x 1'-0" HP12x (4 ea.) 2A-DD.9F11A4'-0" x 4'-0" x 1'-0" HP12x 531 2B-DD.2F1A5'-0" x 5'-0" x 1'-0" HP12x 531 4A-DDF9A (Part 1)15'-0" x 16'-0" x 3'-0" HP12x A-DDF9A (Part 2)30'-0" x 4'-0" x 3'-0" HP12x 535 4A-DDF9A (Part 3)32'-0" x 9'-0" x 3'-0" HP12x BF5B9'-0" x 9'-0" x 2'-8" HP12x A.1F3B7'-0" x 7'-0" x 2'-4" HP12x B to AF10A42'-0" x 17'-0" x 4'-0" HP12x BF8A14'-0" x 14'-0" x 3'-0" HP12x A.1F7A11'-0" x 11'-0" x 2'-4" HP12x A.1F5A9'-0" x 9'-0" x 1'-10" HP12x BF7A11'-0" x 11'-0" x 2'-4" HP12x 536 Totals HP12x 5377 HP12x 8419 A PPENDIX D – A NALYSIS 4