Harbors Module NH3: Formulation – Measures, Strategies and Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRADABLE PERMITS IN WATERWAY TRANSPORT JIM FAWCETT ECONOMIST GALVESTON DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Multipurpose Projects Module M2: Cost Allocation BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Plan Formulation: General
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
Introduction to TIDE Transferability Methodology TIDE Workshop: Transferring walking innovation in the European context Walk21, Munich, 11 th September.
MIS 2000 Class 20 System Development Process Updated 2014.
A Report to Congress Addressing “the Critical Need for Additional Port and Inland Waterway Modernization to Accommodate Post- Panamax Vessels”
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Manual Environmental Protection Department H. M. Wong 18 June 2005.
Flood Avoidance and Mitigation
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
Problem and Situation Analysis Public Sector Improvement Facility Project Resources.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
1 WIN-WIN MANAGEMENT: USING A TASK BASED SYSTEM TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY Berkshire Advisors, Inc.
Value Engineering. Definition Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design.
This material was produced under grant number SH SH-1 from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. It does not.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Heading TfL Sustainability Approach and Resource management Helen Woolston, TfL Sustainability Coordinator BASE London June 2013.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Charleston District Charleston Harbor Post 45 Deepening Feasibility Study Barbara Melvin Senior Vice President.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
BUILDING STRONG SM Plan Formulation: General Module G-1: What is plan formulation?
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
CSCP, UNEP, WBCSD, WI, InWEnt, UEAP ME Life Cycle Management Navigator: 12_PR_LCC 1 The Life Cycle Management Navigator Life Cycle Costing Training Session.
Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
Dredging Engineering: Building & Maintaining Underwater Highways
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER1: Authorities and Policies.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
M4 - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Multi-Purpose Projects Module M4: Telling the Plan Formulation Story.
BUILDING STRONG SM Partnering and Coordination to Accomplish the Navigation Mission.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Cost Sharing Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Recreational Impacts of Coastal Restoration Projects CNREP Presentation Joseph Berlin May 28, 2010.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Module 2011 Planning Associates Class Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE Mission Overview.
Roseau River Flood Damage Reduction Project Roseau, Minnesota.
CHEVRON PIPE LINE COMPANY Risk Based Prioritization Process.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Propeller Club for Port of New Orleans 24 September 2015.
Mitigation and Impact management
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
Plan Formulation: General Module G-3: How to identify measures and build them into plans.
1 Formulate Alternatives Planning Step 5. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning Steps Social Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
Ecology and environment, inc. ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment Georganna B. Collins, International.
Stakeholder consultations
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
Continuing Authorities Program
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL PREVIEW
Exercise Module 3b Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
Strategies Achieving our Goals
Mitigation.
PIANC, Chair of WFD Navigation Task Group
So what is Water Resources Engineering?
Brian McVey Environmental Engineering Manager HII-Ingalls Shipbuilding
Presentation transcript:

Harbors Module NH3: Formulation – Measures, Strategies and Plans

NH3 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives The student will be able to:  Identify management measures  Develop plan formulation strategies for navigation projects  Use strategies to formulate alternative plans  Explain the basic economic evaluation of navigation plans

NH3 - 3 BU ILDING STRONG SM Deep-Draft Navigation Formulation  Meets objectives  Accommodate larger ships  Reduce traffic delays  Increase safety  Recognizes constraints  Resources – endangered species  Institutional – disposal  Financial – sponsor’s resources  Develops  Management measures  Plan formulation strategies  Plans

NH3 - 4 BU ILDING STRONG SM Approach to Formulation  Interview experienced and/or technical experts  Consult documents of similar studies  Group exercises – brainstorming

NH3 - 5 BU ILDING STRONG SM Identifying Management Measures  Structural measures  Nonstructural measures Exercise: Let’s Brainstorm a list

NH3 - 6 BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures  Channel deepening and widening  Anchorages  Breakwaters  Berthing areas  Mooring areas  Disposal areas  Methods e.g phased construction

NH3 - 7 BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Breakwater, confined disposal site)

NH3 - 8 BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Detached straight breakwater)

NH3 - 9 BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Small boat harbor associated with deep draft)

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Harbor deepening)

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Dredging & Beach Nourishment)

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Structural Measures (Jetty Construction)

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Nonstructural Measures  Operational practices  Traffic Controls  Changes in operating procedures (tides, lightering,etc)  Modification of local service facilities  Storage  Berthing  Structural measures by non-Federal interests are often referred to as nonstructural measures.

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Develop Plan Formulation Strategies Strategies would reflect the desires of the non- Federal sponsor and other stakeholders  Avoid high cost relocations  Avoid significant environmental resources  Serve different terminals/ports  Evaluate the impacts of adding channel reaches  Addressing different combinations of the planning objectives  Remember disposal options and beneficial uses  Make sure that all stakeholders are involved in the development of formulation strategies

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Formulate Alternatives  Combining measures – examples  Channel deepening with anchorages  Channel deepening with phased widening  Traffic management with anchorages  Channel deepening with beneficial uses of dredged material  Synergies – look for opportunities to serve other needs

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Evaluation of Alternatives  Verify technical/engineering feasibility  Evaluate environmental impacts  Perform economic analysis of costs and benefits  Account for uncertainty through sensitivity analysis

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM NED Costs  Construction costs  General Navigation Facilities  Project features – breakwaters, jetties, etc.  Dredging and disposal  Real estate  Mitigation  Local Service Facilities  Operation and maintenance costs  Interest during construction  Associated costs

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Associated Costs – What Are They and Who Pays  Frequently overlooked because  Often not paid by non-Federal partner  Incurred by project users  Associated with the general navigation feature to achieve the estimated benefits  Represent costs not otherwise accounted for  Variable costs of doing business  May not be self-liquidating  Related to project throughput

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM NED Benefits – Basically Savings in Transportation Unit Costs  Cost Reduction Benefit (same origin-destination and same mode).  Reductions in costs incurred from trip delays  Increased loads in existing ships  Reduction in costs because larger or longer tows  Reduction in costs because of using larger ships  Change in mode benefits  Shift of origin-destination benefits  Induced movement benefit (if you build it, will they come?)  Reduction in vessel damages

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Take Away Points  Plan formulation is the art of creating plans to address the objectives and constraints related to navigation problems and opportunities  Don’t reinvent the wheel. Use previous studies, conduct interviews and brainstorm.  In developing plan formulation strategies, you need to understand the basic policies affecting plans for navigation improvements. Be sure to consider timing as well as the measures themselves.  Breakpoints in costs are especially important to formulation and associated costs need to be included in the analysis

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM Where We are Going  Next, we’ll cover reformulation to optimize the alternative plans.  We’ll cover incremental analysis and learn to identify the NED plan.  We’ll also learn how to deal with locally preferred plans

NH BU ILDING STRONG SM What issues would arise in having formulation accomplished as an in-kind service? Challenge Question: