PERCH Air Quality Study – PAQS Special thanks to Carl Mohrherr Alan Knowes Staff of OJSES FL-DOH FL-DEP SEARCH Partnership for Environmental Research and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Advertisements

Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Developing Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Code for the MCM David Johnson (Mike Jenkin and Steve Utembe) Department of Environmental Science and Technology,
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
METO 621 Lesson 24. The Troposphere In the Stratosphere we had high energy photons so that oxygen atoms and ozone dominated the chemistry. In the troposphere.
Scientific Issues: Organic Aerosols
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
Air Chemistry GISAT 112. Scientific and Technical Concepts Phases of airborne matter- gases, particles Inorganic and organic chemicals Balancing chemical.
QUESTIONS 1.If CO emission to the atmosphere were to double, would you expect CO concentrations to (a) double, (b) less than double, (c) more than double?
Pacific 2001 – Synthesis of Findings and Policy Implications Roxanne Vingarzan Pacific and Yukon Region.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Lindsey Kuettner and Dr. Patricia Cleary  Department of Chemistry  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Back Trajectory Analysis and Measurement of Ozone.
PERCH Air Quality Study An Assessment of Particulate Matter, Ozone, and Air Toxics in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties.
SEASONAL VARIABILITY OF ORGANIC MASS CONTRIBUTION TO PM2.5 WITHIN METRO ATLANTA AND FURTHER DOWNWIND K. Baumann 1, M.E. Chang 1, A.G. Russell 2, E.S. Edgerton.
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, Venus Dookwah, Sangil Lee, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell Funded in part by DoD/EPA/State.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Urban vs. Rural Atlanta An assessment of : 1)PM2.5 composition and trends 2)The Atlanta Urban Heat Island Effect.
Characterization of Organic Aerosol Formation and Processing in California from Airborne Measurements R. Bahreini, A.M. Middlebrook, C. Warneke, J. de.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
X. Zhang, J. Liu, E. T. Parker and R. J. Weber
CRAZ Ozone Analysis Xin Qiu, Ph.D., ACM, EP May 3 rd, 2011.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Charmex workshop Trieste 1/Total Working sesssion « chemical processes » overview Relevant questions : -VOC reactivity, oxidized.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Concentration Estimation Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Lee CEE 6319:
1.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Secondary Organic Aerosols
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
CE (%) Conclusions and Outlook  Most monitoring sites in GA exceed the annual NAAQS for PM 2.5, coastal sites benefit from land-sea breeze circulation.
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
Measurements of Trace Gases and PM 2.5 Mass and Composition near the Ground and at 254 m agl During TexAQS 2000 and Comparison with Other Regions K. Baumann,
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
METO 621 CHEM Lesson 4. Total Ozone Field March 11, 1990 Nimbus 7 TOMS (Hudson et al., 2003)
Lecture-3. Primary air pollutants - Materials that when released pose health risks in their unmodified forms or those emitted directly from identifiable.
Direct (Primary) and Indirect (Secondary) Emissions from Biomass and Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Evaluation of Emission Inventory.
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Properties of Particulate Matter
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Environmental Science 5e
Chapter 24 Air Pollution. Stationary and Mobile Sources of Air Pollution Two Sources of Air Pollution 1. Stationary Sources: have a relatively fixed location.
Air Pollution.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
PERCH Air Quality Study – PAQS
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
K. Baumann, M.E. Chang, V. Dookwah, S. Lee, A.G. Russell
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Presentation transcript:

PERCH Air Quality Study – PAQS Special thanks to Carl Mohrherr Alan Knowes Staff of OJSES FL-DOH FL-DEP SEARCH Partnership for Environmental Research and Community Health

PERCH Air Quality Study – Phase II Scope: air toxics, ozone, and particulate matter. Identify, compile, and assess existing emissions and ambient air data from US EPA, FL DEP, and private (e.g. SEARCH). Review existing studies (particularly National Air Toxics Assessment and Gulf Coast Ozone Study). Any gaps? Complete a health impacts literature search. Screen for potential health risks due to realized and potential ambient exposures. Design and conduct field pilot study. Phase II Findings Reported at Meetings on 11/3/03 and 12/8/03, and in Quarterly Reports Nov’03 and Feb’04.

Pollutants at OJS and in the Region

Diurnal Characteristics: Averages, Std.Dev. OLF UWF ELY OJS PNS NAS NVR Convective winds Sporadic SO 2 events Bimodal CO and NOy Similar daytime O 3 maxima at all sites Less nighttime O 3 titration at NAS shoreline Trend to higher PM 2.5 mass in southern part

Air Toxics from VOC can samples Halogenated HCs F-114 F-11 F-113 CCl 4 Aromatics Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m-xylene p-xylene o-xylene 1,3-butadiene 4-ethyltolene 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene AVG STD AVG STD

VOC Source Apportionment via CMB8

Gasoline related sources were dominant contributors (combined ~ 65 %), followed by primers and enamel, refinery fugitives, biogenics, and diesel exhaust. Trend to higher biogenic contributions during daytime. Trend to higher gasoline contributions during nighttime and early morning. Similarities to air toxics (aromatics). VOC Source Apportionment via CMB8

Transport from Local and Distant Sources Ozone (O 3 ) OJS WAR NAS NVR OLF ELY PNS

Transport from Local and Distant Sources Carbon Monoxide (CO) ELY WAR UWF OJS PNS NAS NVR OLF

Transport from Local and Distant Sources Fine PM Mass (PM 2.5 ) NAS NVR OJS PNS OLFELY

Fine Particle Composition Monitor “PCM” Reactive Gases and PM 2.5 Species Channel 1: NH 3 Na +, K +, NH 4 +, Ca +2 Channel 2: HF, HCl, HONO, HNO 3, SO 2, HCOOH, CH 3 COOH, (COOH) 2 F -, Cl -, NO 3 -, SO 4 =, HCOO -, CH 3 COO -, C 2 O 4 = Channel 3: EC, OC, “SVOC”

PCM Data Quality: Reactive Gases Reactive Gases

PCM Results: Reactive Gases NH 3 systematically lower at daytime ( ppbv) than nighttime ( ppbv). Formic and Acetic track closely, higher during day than night, indicating microbial soil (T) and photochemical atmospheric sources (esp. dry period at end). HNO 3 tracks with O 3, maximum at day, and towards high O 3 (and PM 2.5 ) period at end, pointing to photochemical source.

PCM Results: PM 2.5 Acidity Charge balance shows high acidity towards dry period at end of campaign.

PCM Results: PM 2.5 Mass and Composition Sulfate fraction highest towards end. Uncertainty in Un-ID caused by uncertain EC and OC!

PCM Data Quality: PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Mass and Water-soluble Ions

PCM Data Quality: EC/OC PM 2.5 Elemental and Organic Carbon Also, same punch analyses (precision): % uncertainty (usually <10%)!!

Phase II Findings Period 7/15-8/14 characterized by frequent precipitation. Period has been unseasonably wet for SE-US. Leading to low [O 3 ] and [PM 2.5 ] region-wide. Land-sea breeze circulation most prominent at shore sites. Sea breeze (southerly flow) converging with westerlies on middays. Highest [O 3 ] associated with southerly component flow at all sites. Highest [PM 2.5 ] with continental air mass during dry period at end. OJS predominantly influenced by mobile sources (CO, NOy). Sporadic SO 2 events during morning BL evolution. Gasoline related sources largest contributor to total measured VOC, highest at night and early morning. Biogenic VOC contribute most (8 +-4 %) during daytime. High O 3 and PM 2.5 event associated with highest HNO 3 and LOA. Formic and Acetic track closely, higher during day, indicating microbial soil (T) and photochemical atmospheric sources. NH 3 systematically higher at night, early a.m.  mobile sources? Highest SO 4 = mass fraction and acidity during high PM period. Large (>40%) but uncertain organics fraction, plus highly uncertain EC, due to hidden instabilities in TOT laser intensity and T controls.

Improve EC and OC data quality by reanalysis. Integrate and comprehensively evaluate regional PM 2.5 mass and composition data (incl. FLDEP, ADEM, GAEPD, SEARCH). Characterize air mass history from regionally elevated PM episode i.t.o. transport (back-trajectories) and chemical transformation; apply Lagrange box model, emissions, and STN observations. Identify origin and primary sources (distant but large wild fires?) for regional pollution. Estimate P(O 3 )/OPE and evaluate in conjunction with OM/OC estimates and relative OC fractions evolving at different T, to constrain OC oxidation state. Assess fraction of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) from EC tracer method (OC/EC ratio). Develop selection criteria for primary EC/OC considering measured photochemical products (O 3, HNO 3, NOz/NOy) and primary source indicators (CO, SO 2, NOy and ratios) Phase III Outlook

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA): Organic compounds, some highly oxygenated, residing in the aerosol phase as a function of atmospheric reactions that occur in either gas or particle phases. SOA formation mainly depends on: Emissions & forming potential of precursors aromatics (BTX, aldehydes, carbonyls) terpenes (mono-, sesqui-) other biogenics (aldehydes, alcohols) Presence of other initiating reactants O 3, OH, NO 3, sunlight, acid catalysts Mechanisms (with half hr to few hr yields): Gas-to-particle conversion/partitioning e.g. terpene oxidation Heterogeneous reactions aldehydes via hydration and polymerization, forming hemiacetal/acetal in presence of alcohols Particle-phase reactions acetal formation catalytically accelerated by particle sulfuric acid (Jang and Kamens, ES&T, 2001)

Photochemical Processes Leading to O 3 and PM SOA NOz An Assessment of Tropospheric Ozone Pollution, A North American Perspective, NARSTO, National Acad. Press, 2000.

Atlanta JST Griffin downwind Elevated regional O 3 background reflected in regression’s intercept: higher in Aug 99! At JST higher intercept and slope during Aug ’99 (OPE= 4 vs 3): more efficient P(O 3 ). OPE in air mass arriving at Griffin is likely larger given by upper and lower limits. Lower limit assumes 1 st order loss of HNO 3 due to surface deposition at k ≈ 0.22 h -1. Air mass transitions from VOC-limited to NOx-limited regime due to Biogenic HC. High photochemical activity P(O 3 ) allows for high P(SOA): rural/urban gradient. Photochemical Activity Source – Receptor Considerations: O 3 /NOz as “OPE”

OPE Considerations for Pensacola 2003 Crude midday OPE is very similar for both sites, indicating moderate OPE. Intercept indicating relatively low background O 3 level. A much more refined analysis is required for true OPE. High PM 2.5 /O 3 case study: Compare on temporal and spatial basis.