National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability NCCCSIA Webinar #2 Conducting the Error Rate Review Process using the Revised Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Verification of Eligibility for School Meals.
Advertisements

Receive a Process Application Task. Navigate to the Document Search page to View the Application.
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Michael Seereiter Director of Planning, NYS Office of Mental Health and EO #38 Implementation Lead 1.
1 Frank J. Murphy Assistant Chief Financial Officer for Financial Management June 15, 2009 HUD’s Results on Eliminating Improper Payments.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Introduction to Apportionment and the Exhibit C Prepared and presented by California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Ed Monroe, CPA, Specialist.
G Personal Finance G  Almost 31% of an individual’s paycheck is deducted  Taxes are the largest expense most individuals will have 
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
PreviousNext FirstLast 1 of 7 The Project Budget is a tool used by Alcoa Foundation to assess: a)the % of the requesting organization’s total annual.
The Municipality of Chatham-Kent.  The 2014 Provincial Budget included an investment of $269 million over three years to support a wage enhancement for.
Joyce Soroka Supervisor of Field Services. P.L , Section 126 Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of.
Eileen Hileman Administrative Assistant for School Nutrition Programs MS, RD.... Pam Heimbach.
Verification SY Objectives Identify the steps required for Verification. Calculate an accurate sample size and verify the correct number of applications.
Bill Finerfrock Executive Director
Food Stamp Program Quality Control Northern Counties Corrective Action Conference September 2007.
Sampling and Fieldwork Preparation Plans using the Renewal Data Collection Instructions.
1 Wisconsin Shares Child Care Subsidy Program Legislative Audit Bureau August 2009.
Calculating Resident Rent
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Ticket to Work: All EN Payments Call Part III Tuesday, August 27, 2013.
Ticket to Work: All EN Payments Call Part II April 29, 2014.
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
Understanding Your Paycheck and Tax Forms
First 5 LA Invoicing & Budget Modification Workshop OHCD Contractors FY
Improper Authorizations for Payment October 21, 2008.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Reimbursements, Reporting & Budget Modifications
Winter Conference National Association of State Veterans Home February 26 - March 4, 2010 Washington, DC Theresa Hayes State Home Per Diem Program.
FIRST 5 LA Baby-Friendly Hospital Project New Contractor Orientation September 20, 2011.
Western Region CSREES Administrative Officer’s Meeting Monterey, California October 4 – 6, 2005 Janet Downey, Staff Accountant OEP, POFMB, Oversight Section.
Division Of State Funding Charter Schools For School Year Nora T. Rainey, Program Specialist Phone Number (512) Fax Number (512)
CCO Quality Pool Methodology February 7, 2014 Lori Coyner, Accountability and Quality Director 1.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
State Webinar #2: Customizing the Record Review Worksheet.
Attendance Directors Meeting April 18, 2012 Home School and Homebound.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
CCAP Case Reviews MFWCAA Conference September 30, 2009.
Georgia Medicaid DSH Audit Training October 29 th, 2009 Jim Erickson, Member Myers and Stauffer LC.
Assessment Program Announcements 2009 University Certification and Program Officials Conference December 2, 2009.
Tom Torlakson State Superintendent of Public Instruction Family Fees For Part Day California State Preschool (CSPP) California Department of Education.
KCMP SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS Winter Reporting Period.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
BUDGET FORMAT EXPLANATION Presented by Devon Nish Utah Department of Human Services Bureau of Contract Management.
Verification SY Objectives Identify the steps required for Verification. Calculate an accurate sample size and verify the correct number of applications.
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Administrative Review Requirements.
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Community Eligibility Provision Frequently Asked Questions and Answers State Roundtable 2014 Wednesday July 16th SNA Annual National Conference.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Part 265: Data Collection and Reporting.
Estimates Training Financial Analysis & Accountability Branch May 2012.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
 Inform students of the most recent changes to educational benefits  Inform students of new procedures concerning Shelton State Community College  Inform.
Office of Multifamily Housing Programs General RHIIP Presentation June 14, 2004.
JFMIP Management Conference Washington, DC | May 9, 2015.
INTERREG III B CADSES Neighbourhood Programme Administrative and Financial Aspects of Hydrocare Project Dr. Janka Strakova Project contact.
Chapter 2-Part A. Filing Requirements, Estimated Tax Statute of Limitations Penalties Edited September 7, 2016 Howard Godfrey, Ph.D., CPA Professor of.
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Protecting the Integrity of Federal Payments
School Business Division NC Department of Public Instruction
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Office of Federal Financial Management Office of Management and Budget
Value-Based Payments.
Value-Based Payments.
Presentation transcript:

National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability NCCCSIA Webinar #2 Conducting the Error Rate Review Process using the Revised Data Collection Instructions (DCI)

Improper Payment focus Calculating an improper payment error State Improper Payments Report (ACF-404) Corrective Action Plan (ACF-405) National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability AGENDA

REASON FOR CHANGE TO PAYMENTS Authorizations not accurate proxy for payments Authorizations 20 percent higher than actual payments Changes allow States to assess amount of eligibility error based on the actual payments National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

IMPROPER AUTHORIZATION ERROR 410 AUTHORIZATION / COMPUTATIONSEligibility worker’s sample month Authorization amount $225 Reviewer’s Sample Month Authorization amount $225 There are no errors in this case. 410 RESULTS Compute the difference between the amount authorized to be paid in a sample review month and the amount that should have been authorized. This difference is the error amount. Indicate if the error amount is an Overauthorization or Underauthorization. 1 No Error / Error 2 Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3 Overauthorization Underauthorization 4 Total Amount of Improper Authorization for Payment ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT AUTHORIZATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) SECTION IV. INCOME AND AUTHORIZATION National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

IMPROPER PAYMENT ERROR ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS 410 RESULTS 1. No Error Error Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

HOW TO CALCULATE AN IP ERROR – Overpayments (DCI p. 22) – Underpayments (DCI p. 23) – Case Errors with no Improper Payment (DCI p. 24) – Underpayment errors that are partial month payment amounts (DCI pp. 33 and 47) National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

KEY DEFINITIONS Subsidy Amount— The monthly amount the State will pay for the child’s subsidy and is frequently referred to as the certificate or voucher amount. Sample Month Payment Amount—The amount paid for services received in the sample month. The Sample Month Payment Amount may be equal to the Subsidy Amount (a full payment) or may be less (a partial payment) due to such things as attendance, center closures, school schedules, etc. Glossary Pg. 33, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

EXAMPLE 1: NO PAYMENT ERROR ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2)FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s Subsidy Amount: $225 Reviewer’s Subsidy Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month O NA $0 $225 There is no difference in the subsidy amounts The worker ‘s subsidy amount was correct. There is no improper payment error in this case.

ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s Subsidy Amount: $250 Reviewer’s Subsidy Amount: $200 Sample Month Payment Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month The reviewer’s subsidy amount is $200 while the sample month payment amount was $250. The result is a $50 overpayment. 1 N O $50 $250 Section VII, Pg. 22, Data Collection Instructions EXAMPLE 2: OVERPAYMENT ERROR

EXAMPLE 3: OVERPAYMENT ERROR ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s subsidy amount: $400 Reviewer’s subsidy amount: $200 Sample Month Payment Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month 1 N O $75 $275 The reviewer’s subsidy amount is $200 while the sample month payment amount was $275. The result is a $75 overpayment.

EXAMPLE 4: CASE ERROR - NO IMPROPER PAYMENT ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s Subsidy Amount: $275 Reviewer’s subsidy amount: $250 Sample Month Payment Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month The reviewer’s subsidy amount is $250 while the sample month payment amount was $200. There is no improper payment as the sample month payment was less than the reviewer’s amount. 1 N NA $0 $200 Section VII, Pg. 24, Data Collection Instructions

EXAMPLE 5: UNDERPAYMENT ERROR ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2) FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s Subsidy Amount: $150 Reviewer’s subsidy amount : $175 Sample Month Payment Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month The reviewer’s subsidy amount is $175 while the sample month payment amount was $150. The result is a $25 underpayment. 1 N U $25 $150 Section VII, Pg. 23, Data Collection Instructions

EXAMPLE 6: PARTIAL MONTH PAYMENT UNDERPAYMENTS ELEMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY & PAYMENT DETERMINATION (1) ANALYSIS OF CASE RECORD (2)FINDINGS (3)RESULTS (4) 410 PAYMENTS/ COMPUTATIONS Worker’s Subsidy Amount: $300 Reviewer’s Subsidy Amount: $400 Sample Month Payment Amount: $ RESULTS Compare the eligibility worker's subsidy amount with the reviewer's subsidy amount. If there is a difference, compare the reviewer’s subsidy amount to the sample month payment amount. o If the sample month payment amount is greater, the difference is an overpayment. o If the sample month payment amount is less, the difference is an underpayment. 1. No Error Error 2. Insufficient/ Missing Documentation 3. Underpayment Overpayment 4. Total Amount of Improper Payment 5. Total Payment Amount for Sample Month The reviewer’s subsidy amount was $400 while the sample month payment amount was $150. As sample month payment was a partial month payment contact the RO to receive approval of a prorated amount 1 N U $150

ACF–404 PART II - ERROR MEASURES REPORTING Number of cases sampled Total number of cases with an error Percentage of cases with an error Total number of cases with an improper payment Percentage of cases with an improper payment Total number of cases with an improper payment due to missing or insufficient documentation Percentage of cases with an improper payment due to missing or insufficient documentation Total amount of payments for the sampled cases Total amount of improper payments for review period (gross amount of underpayments and overpayments) Total amount of underpayments for review period Total amount of overpayments for review period Percentage of the total amount of payments for the sampled cases that are improper payments Average amount of improper payments Estimated annual amount of improper payments Section VIII, Pg. 28, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

ACF–404 PART III QUESTION 18B What is the amount of improper payments the State recovered as a result of the previous review? Section VIII, Pg. 30, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability

A Lead Agency with an error rate that exceeds 10 percent must submit: o A corrective action plan within 60 days of the June 30 submission of the State Improper Payments Report (ACF-404) o Subsequent reports describing progress in implementing the plan Section II, Pg. 3, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ACF-405)

Section II, Pg. 3, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ACF-405) The corrective action plan must include: o Current error rate (Percentage of IP) o Identification of a senior accountable official o Actions and milestones to be undertaken to reduce improper payments with names of those responsible o Timeline for completion of each action o Timeline for reducing the error rate below 10 percent o Targets for future improper payments

Section II, Pg. 3, Data Collection Instructions National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ACF-405) Progress reports must be submitted as requested by the Assistant Secretary Failure to carry out actions described in the approved corrective action plan will be grounds for a penalty or sanction under § 98.92

CONTACT National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability – – x273 To view the archived recording of this presentation, visit: The recording will be available until May 12, National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability