Hybrid Indirect Transmissions (HIT) for Data Gathering in Wireless Micro Sensor Networks with Biomedical Applications Jack Culpepper(NASA), Lan Dung, Melody.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
Advertisements

Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu April 26, 2015.
ENERGY-EFFICIENT COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS MICROSENSOR NETWORKS W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, Published in 2000.
LEACH Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy Deparment of Computer Science Institute of System Architecture, Chair for Computer Network Dresden, 23 January.
Presented by Rick Skowyra
Routing Protocols for Sensor Networks Presented by Siva Desaraju Computer Science WMU An Application Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor.
Presentation: Energy Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan.
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Mikhail Nesterenko Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari.
Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
Kyung Tae Kim, Hee Yong Youn (Sungkyunkwan University)
An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan (MIT)
1 Message Oriented Middleware and Hierarchical Routing Protocols Smita Singhaniya Sowmya Marianallur Dhanasekaran Madan Puthige.
Sensor network Routing protocol A study on LEACH protocol and how to improve it.
An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks Using Ant Colony Optimization Ali-Asghar Salehpour, Babak Mirmobin, Ali.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Tufts Wireless Laboratory Tufts University School Of Engineering Energy-Efficient Structuralized Clustering for Sensor-based Cyber Physical Systems Jierui.
Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network
AES based secure LEACH for WSN’s. Obstacles of WSN Security Limited resources-Limited memory, code space and energy. Unreliable Communication-Densely.
Aeon LEACH An Efficient LEACH protocol in Heterogeneous and Homogenous Wireless Sensor Networks Under Guidance Of: Dr. Mohammad Mozumdar Presented By :
Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy An Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Micro-sensor Networks M. Aslam hayat.
Presented By- Sayandeep Mitra TH SEMESTER Sensor Networks(CS 704D) Assignment.
A novel Energy-Efficient and Distance- based Clustering approach for Wireless Sensor Networks M. Mehdi Afsar, Mohammad-H. Tayarani-N.
LEACH Week 11 Lecture 2 5/7/2015LEACHFolie 1 von XYZ.
A Novel Cluster-based Routing Protocol with Extending Lifetime for Wireless Sensor Networks Slides by Alex Papadimitriou.
Globecom 2004 Energy-Efficient Self-Organization for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Fully Distributed approach Liang Zhao, Xiang Hong, Qilian Liang Department.
A Hierarchical Energy-Efficient Framework for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 55, NO. 3, MAY.
APTEEN: A Hybrid Protocol for Efficient Routing and Comprehensive Information Retrieval in Wireless Sensor Networks Arati Manjeshwar, Dharma P. Agrawaly.
On the Energy Efficient Design of Wireless Sensor Networks Tariq M. Jadoon, PhD Department of Computer Science Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Talha Naeem Qureshi Joint work with Tauseef Shah and Nadeem Javaid
Fault Tolerant and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Network Name : Tahani Abid Aladwani ID :
CuMPE : CLUSTER-MANAGEMENT AND POWER EFFICIENT PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS ITRE’05 Information Technology: Research and Education Shen Ben Ho.
M-GEAR: Gateway-Based Energy-Aware Multi-Hop Routing Protocol
A Framework for Energy- Saving Data Gathering Using Two-Phase Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Wook Chio, Prateek Shah, and Sajal K. Das Center for.
Multimedia & Networking Lab
A novel gossip-based sensing coverage algorithm for dense wireless sensor networks Vinh Tran-Quang a, Takumi Miyoshi a,b a Graduate School of Engineering,
Stochastic sleep scheduling (SSS) for large scale wireless sensor networks Yaxiong Zhao Jie Wu Computer and Information Sciences Temple University.
Minimal Hop Count Path Routing Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks Jae-Young Choi, Jun-Hui Lee, and Yeong-Jee Chung Dept. of Computer Engineering, College.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Network Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi Raghavendra.
MAC Protocols In Sensor Networks.  MAC allows multiple users to share a common channel.  Conflict-free protocols ensure successful transmission. Channel.
Lan F.Akyildiz,Weilian Su, Erdal Cayirci,and Yogesh sankarasubramaniam IEEE Communications Magazine 2002 Speaker:earl A Survey on Sensor Networks.
A Low-Latency and Energy-Efficient Algorithm for Convergecast in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors Sarma Upadhyayula, Valliappan Annamalai, Sandeep Gupta.
An Energy-Aware Periodical Data Gathering Protocol Using Deterministic Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) Mohammad Rajiullah & Shigeru Shimamoto.
Efficient Energy Management Protocol for Target Tracking Sensor Networks X. Du, F. Lin Department of Computer Science North Dakota State University Fargo,
A SURVEY OF MAC PROTOCOLS FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
ELECTIONEL ECTI ON ELECTION: Energy-efficient and Low- latEncy sCheduling Technique for wIreless sensOr Networks Shamim Begum, Shao-Cheng Wang, Bhaskar.
LEACH Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy Deparment of Computer Science Institute of System Architecture, Chair for Computer Network Dresden, 23 January.
MMAC: A Mobility- Adaptive, Collision-Free MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Muneeb Ali, Tashfeen Suleman, and Zartash Afzal Uzmi IEEE Performance,
Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks Ajay Mahimkar The University of Texas at Austin March 24, 2004.
Variable Bandwidth Allocation Scheme for Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Network SeongHwan Cho, Kee-Eung Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
A Multi-Channel Cooperative MIMO MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks(MCCMIMO) MASS 2010.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Energy-Efficient Wake-Up Scheduling for Data Collection and Aggregation Yanwei Wu, Member, IEEE, Xiang-Yang Li, Senior Member, IEEE, YunHao Liu, Senior.
Group Members Usman Nazir FA08-BET-179 M.Usman Saeed FA08-BET-173
Routing and Clustering Xing Zheng 01/24/05. References Routing A. Woo, T. Tong, D. Culler, "Taming the Underlying Challenges of Reliable Multihop Routing.
A Bit-Map-Assisted Energy- Efficient MAC Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Jing Li and Georgios Y. Lazarou Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
ROUTING TECHNIQUES IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: A SURVEY.
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
AN EFFICIENT TDMA SCHEME WITH DYNAMIC SLOT ASSIGNMENT IN CLUSTERED WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Shafiq U. Hashmi, Jahangir H. Sarker, Hussein T. Mouftah and.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
1 Power-efficient Clustering Routing Protocol Based on Applications in Wireless Sensor Network Authors: Tao Liu and Feng Li Form:International Conferecnce.
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks 5. Routing
SENSYS Presented by Cheolki Lee
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Presentation transcript:

Hybrid Indirect Transmissions (HIT) for Data Gathering in Wireless Micro Sensor Networks with Biomedical Applications Jack Culpepper(NASA), Lan Dung, Melody Moh CCW 2003, IEEE Speaker : Chi-Chih Wu

Outline INTRODUCTION BASIC MODELS PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION Micro sensors The consumers of power Data processing Communications Major consumer of power Communications Most energy expensive applications Remote sensing

H BS INTRODUCTION Current remote sensing routing protocols increase efficiency data fusion power management systems clustering chaining z y xB BS

INTRODUCTION W. Heinzelman et al, “ Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks ” (LEACH) Each node has a probability p of becoming a cluster-head the protocol guarantees that every node will be cluster-head only once in 1/p rounds HH BS

INTRODUCTION Stephanie Lindsey and Cauligi S. Raghavendra, “ PEGASIS:Power Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems ” Chains of nodes are computed using a greedy algorithm Chain leaders are elected to fuse data and transmit the result to BS

INTRODUCTION Features of HIT Utilizing one or more clusters to reduce the number of transmissions to the remote base station Parallel, multi-hop indirect transmissions even in the presence of multiple, adjacent clusters Goals Minimize energy consumption Minimize network delay

BASIC MODELS Data Delivery Model Radio Model Analysis of Direct versus Indirect Transmissions Parallel Transmissions Analysis of TDMA versus CSMA

Data Delivery Model Sensor networks can be classified in terms of the data delivery required Continuous (HIT based) Event-driven Observer-initiated Hybrid

Radio Model A radio transceiver dissipates E elec = 50 nJ/bit

Analysis of Direct versus Indirect Transmissions A B C A B C Energy Saving

Parallel Transmissions Parallel indirect transmissions Use intelligent scheduling algorithm (TDMA) Achieves lower delay than LEACH H H

Analysis of TDMA versus CSMA CSMA wastes energe versus TDMA Collisions Overhearing Control packet overhead Idle listening Advantages of TDMA No collisions Little overhead High energy efficient Disadvantages of TDMA Time synchronization It is difficult to change the TDMA schedule

PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION HIT is consisting of two periods Cluster setup Long steady state

PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION HIT makes the following assumptions Nodes are distributed randomly Nodes are able to communicate by CSMA the result of n fusions will be independent of n, and be no more than a constant multiple of s Nodes are able to estimate distances Each sensor node has a unique node ID

PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION HIT protocol consists of the following phases Cluster-Head Election Cluster-Head Advertisement Cluster Setup Route Setup Blocking Set Computation MAC Schedule Creation Data Transmission

Cluster-Head Election Election Scheme I(a) single cluster nodes take as cluster-head turn in order of node ID Election Scheme I(b) single cluster nodes take turn as cluster-head, some nodes may not ever be cluster-head (lower levels of connectivity or energy)

Cluster-Head Election Election Scheme II(a) multiple clusters nodes are elected randomly (LEACH) Election Scheme II(b): multiple clusters nodes are elected randomly, some nodes may not ever be cluster-head (lower levels of connectivity or energy)

Cluster-Head Advertisement(CSMA/CD) Cluster-heads broadcast their status at the fixed power with the message Non-cluster-heads then compute the distance to the clusterhead and save the value as D(H, j) H e f g h b D(H,j) H-id

Cluster Setup one or more clusters will be formed, and the upstream and downstream relationship will be created. each node has only one upstream neighbor d(u, H) < d(i, H), d(i, u) < d(i, H)

H e f g h b i j d k c H e f g h b i j d k c Cluster Setup D(H,j) id D(j,u j ) d(u, H) < d(i, H), d(i, u) < d(i, H)

Route Setup all nodes broadcast its upstream neighbor ’ s information it adds i to its list of downstream neighbors for j, DOWN(j) Source-id Upstream-id D(j,u j )

Blocking Set Computation each node computes the blocking set for its downstream neighbors we say node i blocks node j if and only if d(i, ui) > d(i, uj) i blocks j does not necessarily imply that j blocks I each downstream neighbor of j blocks all other downstream neighbors of j 10 8

MAC Schedule Setup

Data Transmission This phase does not require the use of a CDMA code

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION All nodes were bestowed with 20 J of initial energy, round was fixed at 10,000. The data rate of the wireless net-work is 1 Mbit/s, the coordinates for the base station are (l/2,-200), The average size of a sensor data item, a 50-bit packet For LEACH and HITm, we specified that 1% of the nodes would be elected cluster- heads

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

CONCLUSION We introduce a hybrid clustering and indirect transmission scheme for micro sensor networks The novel feature of parallel indirect transmissions and the complete protocol including phases of clustering, routing, and scheduling Performance evaluations showed that HIT provides energy savings over LEACH, PEGASIS, and Direct HIT also greatly reduces the delay

THANK YOU