Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
UNCLASSIFIED Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Stephen Malys NGA Senior.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Coordinate Systems, Datums and Map Projections
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Datum Transformation and Coordinate Conversion. Cartesian Coordinate System Y Z X Ellipsoid sized a & f WGS -84 is Earth Centered Earth Fixed; Origin.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch
Geographic Information Systems in Water Science Unit 4: Module 1, Lecture 2 – Coordinate Systems and Common GIS data formats.
Datums and Coordinates How the Evolution of GPS is Transforming Survey and Mapping GITA/ACSM April 25, 2010 Pam Fromhertz Colorado State Geodetic Advisor,
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
Coordinate Systems in Geodesy By K.V.Ramana Murty, O. S.
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Geodesy and Map Projections Geodesy - the shape of the earth and definition of earth datums Map Projection - the transformation of a curved earth to a.
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Giovanni Sella CORS Program Manager NOAA-National Geodetic Survey CORS Program Updates FY Especially New Revised Coordinates CGSIC - Portland,
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Introduction to Geodesy and Geomatics Position, Positioning Modes, and the.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS FOR GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
Feedback on the New Datums Reference Frames 2015 Geospatial Summit April 14, 2015 Amar Nayegandhi Dewberry Consultants LLC.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
Geodesy and Datums Ellipsoid and Geoid Geographic Coordinate system.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
Representing the Earth
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
OUTLINE:  definition and history  three major models  how are reference shapes used  geodetic systems G EODESY.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…
Positioning America for the future A New Geometric Datum for the U.S.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Coordinate Systems 1 Coordinate Systems Purpose:
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
BLM Issues Michael D. Londe, Ph.D. Geodesist, DOI - BLM.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems Geodesy - the shape of the earth and definition of earth datums Map Projection - the transformation of.
Height and Transformations
Presentation transcript:

Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference October 6th, 2015 Arlington, VA

Are You Confused? WeToo

The American Reference Systems North American Datum of 1927 – ugly and Obsolete – Do not bother with it!! North American Datum of 1983 – Newer more accurate ….. But Which NAD83? NAD83 (86) NAD83 (HARN) NAD83 (CORS93) NAD83 (CORS96) NAD83 (CORS94) NAD83 (NSRS2007) NAD83 (NSRS2011)

The Story of NAD83 There have been seven realizations (versions) of NAD 83 in the United States. These changes have come as a result of maturing GPS and other geodetic technologies that have allowed for more precise measurements of the earth’s center of mass, and other elements that define a reference system The original NAD 83 (referred to as NAD 83 (1986) by the National Geodetic Survey) was developed using the best technology available at the time. However, the geocentric, Cartesian axes, and scale were all somewhat imprecise. ( using non-GPS) Starting in 1989, each state - in conjunction with NGS and various other state institutions used GPS to establish regional reference frames that were to be consistent with NAD83. These networks of GPS control points were originally called High Precision Geodetic Networks (HPGN), and currently are referred to as High Accuracy Reference Networks (HARN).

The Story of NAD83 This collection of regional realizations referred to as NAD 83 (HPGN) or NAD 83 (HARN) is the second realization of NAD 83. (GPS only controls) Beginning in late 1994, NGS introduced further realizations of NAD 83 when the agency organized a network of Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS). These realizations are the result of transforming then-current ITRFxx positional coordinates of a subset of CORS stations in the United States, and in its last realization, in the US and Canada, to NAD 83. These realizations are referred to as: – NAD 83 (CORS93) – NAD 83 (CORS94) – NAD 83 (CORS96) In 2007, NGS re-computed NAD83 (CORS96) at epoch 2002 and introduced new realization of NAD83 called NAD83 (NSRS2007) In 2011, NGS re-computed NAD83 (CORS96) at epoch 2010 and introduced new (latest) realization of NAD83 called NAD83 (NSRS2011)

Courtesy NGS

Orthometric Height (H) The distance along the plumb line from the geoid up to the point of interest H Earth’s Surface The Geoid NAVD 88 reference level H (NAVD 88) Errors in NAVD 88 : ~50 cm bias, ~ 100 cm CONUS tilt, 1-2 meters ave in Alaska NO tracking

World Tectonic Plates (15 plates) Pacific, African, Amur, Antarctica, Arabia, Australia, Caribbean, Eurasia, India, North America, Nazca, Okhotsk, South America, Somalia, Yangtze Non-Geocentric Datum: Why Should We Be Concerned? - The earth's surface is not fixed and rigid like an egg shell. - Earth consists of many sections, or plates, which move slowly over time in various directions and rates in a process called crustal motion.

Plate Angular Velocities Estimation Scientists have been studying this movement to know where land masses are with respect to one another and where they will be in the future. Why Should We Be Concerned?

Accurately Measured Geoid Heights From Goco Satellite Gravity Modeling

The birth of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and ITRF Scientific community rigorously establishes International Standard for Terrestrial Reference System The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS)** maintains the standard The Standard shaped the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) which is realized (defined) through the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) through periodical computations of the positions and velocities of over 550 sites around the world for a given date. ** The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), formerly the International Earth Rotation Service, is the body responsible for maintaining global time and reference frametimereference frame standards, notably through its Earth Orientation Parameter (EOP) and International CelestialInternational Celestial Reference System Reference System (ICRS) groups.

WHAT IS ITRF Anyway? It is co-ordinates in an International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) which are computed at different epochs and the solutions are called International Terrestrial Reference Frame ( ITRF). It is also: An internationally accepted standard; The most accurate geocentric reference system currently available. Reliable – maintained by internationally well known scientific organizations; Internally consistent over time; Unambiguously specified datum definition (origin, scale, orientation and their respective time evolution) The longer the sites operate, the better the positions and velocities can be determined and the more accurate the ITRF will be. It is continuously evolving with our maturing understanding of Geodesy, gravity, and other advances in technologies and physical sciences

Identifying ITRF ITRF defined (realized) to be – Earth-Based System: Geocentric coordinate system based on GRS1980 ellipsoid – Constructed from a set of reference points on topographic surface of the Earth – Accurate: Based on multiple data sources: Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) GPS DORIS ( Doppler satellite tracking system developed for precise orbit determination and precise ground location) – Continuously Evolving: Reference station coordinate solutions and velocities define frame at specific time – ISO compliant : Solutions based on consistent set of conventions, constants and models

Benefits of an ITRF based geocentric datum A single standard for collecting, storing and using geographic or survey related data and maps; Provide direct compatibility with GNSS measurements and mapping or geographic information system (GIS) which are also normally based on an ITRF based geodetic datum; Minimize the need for casual users to understand datum transformations; Allow more efficient use of an organizations’ spatial data resources by reducing need for duplication and unnecessary translations; Help promote wider use of spatial data through one user friendly data environment; Reduce the risk of confusion as GNSS, GIS and navigation systems become more widely used and integrated into business and recreational activities.

The Story of WGS84 In the early 1980s the need for a new world geodetic system was generally recognized by the geodetic community and the Department of Defense (DoD) as the then-current WGS 72 system is no longer serves the needs; The DoD intended for WGS84 to be used as “the single standard of reference within the Department of Defense.” The WGS 84 originally used the GRS 80 reference ellipsoid (refined later) and was designed to be close or equal to NAD83/86reference ellipsoid The latest major revision of WGS 84 included an Earth Gravitational Model first published in 1996, called EGM96, with revisions as recent as EGM96 EGM96 model has the same reference ellipsoid as WGS 84, but has a higher-fidelity geoid (roughly 100 km resolution versus 200 km for the original WGS 84). The latest Earth Gravitational Model EGM2008 has been publicly released by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) uses a 5 x 5-Minute Geoid undulation Grid (about 9 km grid). Accuracy world wide 3-5 cm / km (for baseline length of <30 km) Adopted from NGA presentation to the International Committee on GNSS - Working Group D Saint Petersburg, Russia 16 September 2009

The Story of WGS84 In the early 1980s the need for a new world geodetic system was generally recognized by the geodetic community and the Department of Defense (DoD) as the then-current WGS 72 system is no longer serves the needs; The DoD intended for WGS84 to be used as “the single standard of reference within the Department of Defense.” The WGS 84 originally used the GRS 80 reference ellipsoid (refined later) and was designed to be close or equal to NAD83/86reference ellipsoid The latest major revision of WGS 84 included an Earth Gravitational Model first published in 1996, called EGM96, with revisions as recent as 2004.EGM96 EGM96 model has the same reference ellipsoid as WGS 84, but has a higher-fidelity geoid (roughly 100 km resolution versus 200 km for the original WGS 84). The latest Earth Gravitational Model EGM2008 has been publicly released by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) uses a 5 x 5-Minute Geoid undulation Grid (about 9 km grid). Accuracy world wide 3-5 cm / km (for baseline length of <30 km) Adopted from NGA presentation to the International Committee on GNSS - Working Group D Saint Petersburg, Russia 16 September 2009

Adopted from NGA presentation to the International Committee on GNSS - Working Group D Saint Petersburg, Russia 16 September 2009

What Happened to WGS84? Since the DoD decided to align WGS84 with ITRF in 1994, for all practical purposes, an ITRF based geodetic datum, and WGS84 are the same. The difference is of the order of centimeters. The WGS 84 (G1150) is equivalent to ITRF2000 The latest adjustment is referenced as WGS 84 (G1674) is equivalent to ITRF2008 (agrees to the centimeter level) The origin of the WGS84 framework is also the earth’s center of mass..

Adopted from NGA presentation to the International Committee on GNSS - Working Group D Saint Petersburg, Russia 16 September 2009

What all his means to my work and how? Answer: A lot!! How? –G–GCP coordinates in NAD83(86) ≈ WGS84(original) = WGS84(transit) differs from WGS84 (1150) coordinates by about 1.6 m (1+ m in horizontal and 1+ m vertical); –G–GCP coordinates in WGS84(original) differs from WGS84 (1150) by m (1+ m in horizontal and 1+ m vertical); –N–NAD83(NSRS2007) = ≈ NAD83(HARN)) differs from WGS84 (G1150) by m –N–NAVD88 has a bias of 50 cm, therefore, it is not true orthometric height. This means transforming NAVD88 to ellipsoidal height based on GPS is wrong by a bias of 50 cm!! Best strategy is to use EGM08 for orthometric heights conversion for new projects when possible (unless client wants NAVD88) –U–Use ITRF in production if you are using GPS-based controls and ABGPS to the end when possible and then export your data in the client specified datum!!

Courtesy NGS

NGS Plans on Replacing NAD83 New Geometric Datum by 2022

Courtesy NGS

PID AI0952 Anchorage, AK ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters PID DF9223 Los Angeles, CA ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters PID DF9219 Denver, CO ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters PID DF5765 Chicago, IL ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters PID DF4064 New York, NY ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters PID DF9225 Miami, FL ITRF00/WGS84(G1150) N W NAD N W Difference meters

Courtesy NGS

What Should I Use Now? Best Conversion Tools HTDP for NAD83(NSRS2007) to different WGS84 and ITRF Blue Marble (with HTDP insert) for almost all conversions ESRI ArcGIS for limited conversions CORPSCON for limited conversions If non of those does what you want, please call Blue Marble!

Thank You!