Purpose and Goals of the NCSX Conference Call on Modular Coil Analyses February 25, 2004 ??

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Properties of the NCSX Modular Coil Conductor 14 January 2004 Leonard Myatt Myatt Consulting, Inc.
Advertisements

Weld Geometry A-B Flange:A Possible Alternate to the Extended Shim/ Double Fillet Weld For welds with overlaps – consider the above to make TIG welding.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Studying Thermal Creep on a Sample using ANSYS Dara Navaei, Siegfried Malang, Xueren Wang ARIES Project Meeting Jan. 26 th,2011 UCSD.
The Effect of Spraying on Thermal Fatigue Cracking David Schwam, X.J. Zhu and J.F. Wallace Case Western Reserve University NADCA DMC February 20, 2007.
Summary of Twisted Racetrack / Clamp Analysis K. D. Freudenberg.
Thermal Analysis of a 1 Hour Fire Resistive Joint Design for Architectural Expansion Joints Preliminary Final Report Jason Shaw.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
Training Manual Aug Probabilistic Design: Bringing FEA closer to REALITY! 2.5 Probabilistic Design Exploring randomness and scatter.
Page 1 of 14 External Transition Joints for Tungsten Divertors D. Navaei, X. R. Wang, M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power.
Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type fusion reactors Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for.
Stellarator magnets L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting March 8-9, 2004.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Environmental Simulation of Circuit Board Epoxy Group Members Greg Kurtz Brad Walsh Brad Grimmel Jeff Baudek.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
September 30, 2003 NCSX Modular Coil Winding Form Prototype FDR1 NCSX Prototype Modular Coil Winding form FDR Phil Heitzenroeder PPPL September 30, 2003.
Application of ESPI in investigating the static deformation of a lead-free joint D. Karalekas 1, J.Cugnoni 2, J. Botsis 2 1 Lab. Adv. Manufact. and Testing,
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
LASER and TIG welding ANSYS FE model for thermal and mechanical simulation (A. Capriccioli)
November 9, 2005 Thomas Hill, NSNFP DOE SNF Canister Planned Activities.
1 WBS 1 Design Analysis Status NCSX Analysis Meeting Dec 3, 2003.
1. Introduction to Design 2. Materials and Processes 3. Load Determination 4. Stress, Strain, and Deflection 5. Static Failure Theories 6.
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
June 12, 2003FDR Race Track Test Coil1 Final Design Review Racetrack Test Coil James H. Chrzanowski (PPPL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory June 12, 2003.
J.H. ChrzanowskiMod Coil R&D Update1 Modular Coil R&D Update April 9, 2003 James H. Chrzanowski.
A Review of NCSX Conventional Coil Insulation Stresses Presented by Leonard Myatt.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures Introduction. Steel as a Building Material Advantages High strength / weight ratio Properties are homogeneous and predictable.
NCSX NCSX PF Coil PDR 12/14/07 1 Len Myatt NCSX PF Coil PDR Joseph Rushinski Michael Kalish Fred Dahlgren.
In-Vessel Coil System Conceptual Design Review – September, Vertical Stability Coil Structural Analyses P. Titus, July
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
NCSX Modular Coil Joint Load/Stress Calculation By Leonard Myatt Myatt Consulting, Inc.
May 19-20, 2004NCSX FDRLeonard Myatt 1 Linear Structural Analysis of the NCSX Modular Coil & Shell Leonard Myatt NCSX Final Design Review May 19-20, 2004.
The Deformation Effects of Aluminide Over the Pack Coatings Diffusion Cycles on an Inconel 600 Coating Boat Lid (Rectangular Plate) by Sergio L. Moren.
Summary of Winding Pack Thermal Results K. Freudenberg
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
Probabilistic Design Systems (PDS) Chapter Seven.
NCSX B. Nelson for the NCSX Engineering Team NCSX modular coil cooling workshop June 10-11, 2004 PPPL NCSX Modular Coil Cooling Requirements and Initial.
NCSX NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review 11/6/07 1 Tom Brown Art Brooks Raki Ramakrishnan Mike Kalish NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review.
J.H. ChrzanowskiMod Coil R&D Update1 Modular Coil R&D Update April 2, 2003 James H. Chrzanowski.
NCSX P. Fogarty, K. Freudenberg, T. Hargrove, G. Lovett, B. Nelson, P. Goranson, D. Williamson October 15, 2004 Twisted Racetrack Coil Final Design Review.
Euratom TORE SUPRA  CEA comments on documents provided by the Project Leader Introduction I Performance issues II Operation Issues III. Manufacturing.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
NCSX R&D Activity Update Jim Chrzanowski June 11, 2003.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
Twisted Racetrack Revisited Model Changes: Side A has 10 turns Clamps have been modified to as built geometry. Property Changes (linear results.
NCSX 1 CTD Test Results Kalish 11/30/04. NCSX 2 The Issue The Winding Pack (WP) insulation (pre- impregnated S-2 glass with co-wound polyimide film) has.
NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL.
Wayne, The upper and lower guides are now small enough in mass so they can be made directly from the CAD models by stereolithography, and at a reasonable.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy SNS mercury target fatigue life prediction with Fe-Safe/Verity High Power Targetry Workshop.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
NCSX Modular Coil Joint Load/Stress Calculation By Leonard Myatt Myatt Consulting, Inc.
IDENTIFICATION OF FATIGUE FRACTURE PLANE POSITIONS WITH THE EXPECTED PRINCIPAL STRESS DIRECTION Aleksander KAROLCZUK Ewald MACHA Technical University of.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.
Jonathan Donkers1, Lin Zhang1+
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
EuCARD2 WP 10.2 HTS Conductor
The Effect of Spraying on Thermal Fatigue Cracking
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
ANSYS FE model for thermal and mechanical simulation
API 17 TR8 HPHT Design Guideline Methodology
Presentation transcript:

Purpose and Goals of the NCSX Conference Call on Modular Coil Analyses February 25, 2004 ??

Agenda Phil Heitzenroeder – Introduction  Background  Purpose of the Conference Call  Goals David Williamson - Discussion of Analyses  From the Preliminary and Baseline Design Reviews  Required for the Final Design Review  Discussion of Material Properties Used and Required Jim Chrzanowski – Cable Properties Testing  discussion of the test specimens and testing methodology planned on the “final” coil cable. Open Discussions  Comments on the Analyses  Comments on the proposed Cable Testing / Properties Determination Develop a Plan of Action

The PBR Design and Analysis Presentation concluded: “ Analysis shows design to be adequate for reference operating scenarios  Coil cools from 40-deg temperature rise after pulse in 15-min with no ratcheting  Deflection of coil structure due to EM loads is <0.04-in, stress minimal (FS=2)  Winding stress depends on properties, initial strain due to cure and thermal shrinkage  Initial analysis shows stress up to 16-ksi, FS=1.3  Further non-linear analysis is planned during final design ” But… Calculations were based on estimated or preliminary properties for the materials. Fatigue calculations were not performed. For the FDR, in the analysis area we need to demonstrate that the static, fatigue, and thermal analyses results meet NCSX’s design criteria; This requires defendable materials properties!  E for the impregnated cable. This is the most important parameter, and the one for which we still have many questions. An ANSYS cable model would predict an E in the range of 4 x higher.   for the stainless steel casting and cable. Not a problem; just need more data.  Shrinkage coefficient for the epoxy/glass.  Tests indicates 1.48%, but expected “gaps” opening between test windings and the coil forms are not observed!  This is important because it makes a big difference in how the winding is initially supported by the winding form.  K for the impregnated cable. We’re probably OK with available data on Cu and epoxy. Background

Purpose of this Call To discuss the understanding the analysis history and future plans. To discuss the materials properties used to date, data concerns, and plans for additional materials test. Most importantly, to get your suggestions concerning the analysis, materials data, and testing.

Meeting Goal To develop plans for: Independent checking of thermal, static and fatigue analyses (parallel calculations?). Possible joint analyses activities (model development?) Materials testing consultation, possible assistance in actual test performance, and consultation on the data analysis