Peggy McDonald, Executive Director, NJ Office of Special Education Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

Informational Parent Meeting Cedar Hill School October 22, 2013.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Bringing it all together!
October 16, 2012 Yargo Elementary School.  Mrs. Diane Bresson ◦ Principal  Mrs. Tonia.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Supporting Students with Disabilities in the Classroom Standards Based IEPs LASPDG Presented by Kathy Kilgore January 22, 2015.
Understanding the IEP Lori Freeman, Director of Special Education PreK-12 Maria Albano, Coordinator of Special Education, Hommocks Middle School Alexis.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
ELA STRANDS.
DPI UPDATE: SPECIAL EDUCATION ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT-DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 1.
200.6(a)(1) Specially Designed Instruction 200.6(a)(1) Students with disabilities shall be provided special education in the least restrictive environment,
Study of the Standards using Common Core English Language Arts.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Overview of the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment System
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education,
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
Effective Pedagogical Practices for Fragile Learners California Educational Research Association December 2011 Alicia Henderson, Ph.D. Franklin-McKinley.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities Understanding Language Language, Literacy, and Learning.
A transitional approach. REPORT CARDS PHONE CALLS TO PARENTS S PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES STUDENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES EVALUATED STUDENT WORK STANDARDIZED.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Common Core State Standards Learning for the Future.
Setting High Academic Expectations that Ensure Academic Achievement TEAM PLANNING STANDARDS & OBJECTIVES TEACHER CONTENT KNOWLEDGE.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
DECEMBER 2013 Dynamic Learning Maps: Claims and Conceptual Areas and Common Core Essential Elements Update The present publication was developed under.
Common Core Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Carry across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
History Race to the Top Common Core Standards adopted Analysis of Common Core Standards Revisions.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
 Remember: › Standards are………… › Standards are not………… › Use Assessment to drive Instruction.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
ACCOMMODATIONS Using Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment in the classroom.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
Summer Institutes 2013 Changing Teacher Practice Changing Student Outcomes.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Serving Students with Disabilities in Indiana
Common Core Literacy Standards Overview February 4, 2012 Ebony E. Bullock, Buffalo Schools Ndekezi Ndeze, Buffalo Schools.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
INCLUSIVE PRACTICES Co-Teaching Models
New State Standards: School Year
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium
New State Standards: School Year
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Peggy McDonald, Executive Director, NJ Office of Special Education Programs

 Review strategies and supports to align instruction for students with IEPs with grade- level academic standards  Learn about NJ district approaches to the alignment process

 (1) Special education means specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability… 34 CFR Sec (a)(1)

 Specially designed instruction means adapting, as appropriate to the needs of an eligible child under this part, the content, methodology, or delivery of instruction  (i)To address the unique needs of the child that result from the child’s disability; and  (ii) To ensure access of the child to the general curriculum, so that the child can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children.

 Content  Adjust text complexity range (lexiles)  Add foundational skills (phonemic awareness/phonics)  Functional Skills (ADL, Mobility)

 All children with disabilities are included in all general State and districtwide assessment programs, including assessments described under …the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, with appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments where necessary and as indicated in their respective IEPs.”  20 USCS Sec. 1412(a)(16)

 The State must—  (a) Have in effect established goals for the performance of children with disabilities in the State that—  … (2) Are the same as the State's objectives for progress by children in its definition of adequate yearly progress, including the State's objectives for progress by children with disabilities, under section 1111(b)(2)(C) of the ESEA, 20 U.S.C. 6311;

 (4) Are consistent, to the extent appropriate, with any other goals and academic standards for children established by the State;

 (b) Support and facilitation. State rules, regulations, and policies under Part B of the Act must support and facilitate LEA and school-level system improvement designed to enable children with disabilities to meet the challenging State student academic achievement standards. 34 CFR Sec (3)

 A child with a disability is not removed from education in age- appropriate regular classrooms solely because of needed modifications in the general education curriculum. 34 CFR Sec (e)

 A statement of the child's present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, including-- (i) How the child's disability affects the child's involvement and progress in the general education curriculum (i.e., the same curriculum as for nondisabled children); 34 CFR Sec (a)(1)(i)

 (2)(i) A statement of measurable annual goals, including academic and functional goals designed to-- (A) Meet the child's needs that result from the child's disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum;  34 CFR Sec (a)(2)

 Running Parallel…

 Alignment with the state’s academic content standards means that the State has defined clearly the connection between the instructional content appropriate for non- disabled students and the related knowledge and skills that may serve as the basis for a definition of proficiency.

Standards Curriculum Instructional Units Learning Objectives IEP Goals and Objectives

Standards Curriculum Learning Objectives Materials Methods Assessments

 Learning Objectives  Study skills, executive functioning  Differentiated Teaching Strategies  UDL Principles  Flexible Grouping  Supplemental Instruction – Reteach/Enrich  Accessible Instructional Materials  Leveled texts, software, supplementary programs  Manipulatives  Assessment  Alternate Assessments  Accommodations and Modifications

 Methods  Scheduling  Pacing

Standards Grade Level Content Organized into Units of Study

Standards Curriculum Grade 2 English Language Arts Instructional Unit 1 Unit 2Unit 3Unit 4Unit 5 The curriculum for a specific grade and subject can be broken down into several instructional units.

Standards Organized into Instructional Units from Curriculum Organized by Chronological Grade Level

Standards Curriculum:Grade 2 English Language Arts

Standards Curriculum Instructional Units Learning Objectives IEP Goals and Objectives Embedded Skills Foundational Skills Other Needs: Social Skills Organizational Skills Motor Skills

Standards Curriculum: Grade 2 English LA Instructional Unit 1 Learning Objective: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. IEP Goal : The student will answer “who”, “what” and “where” questions based on a text at the independent reading level. Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. IEP Goal: The student will answer “where”, “when”, “why” and “how” questions based on a familiar text. IEP Goal: The student will be able to create “WH” questions based on key details in an informational text. Learning Objective

Standards Curriculum: Grade 5 Math Instructional Unit 3 Learning Objective: Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions.. IEP Goal: The student will identify parts vs. wholes Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. IEP Goal: The student will separate whole objects and groups into parts Learning Objectives: Add and subtract fractions (including mixed numbers) with unlike denominators. Learning Objective

Standards Curriculum: Grade 5 Math Instructional Unit 3 Learning Objective: Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions.. IEP Goal: Student will increase appropriate social responses to peers by responding to greetings in four out of five opportunities Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. Learning Objective: RL.2.1: Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text. IEP Goal: The student will add and subtract fractions with like denominators Learning Objectives: Add and subtract fractions (including mixed numbers) with unlike denominators. Learning Objective

 ‘Unpacking’ the Standards  Universal Design For Learning  Scaffolds  Accommodations/Adaptations  Foundational/Embedded/Essential Skills  Essential Elements

StandardStandard Unpacked 1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. 1.Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view. a. Introduce a topic or text clearly, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure in which ideas are logically grouped to support the writer’s purpose. b. Provide logically ordered reasons that are supported by facts and details. c. Link opinion and reasons using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., consequently, specifically). d. Provide a concluding statement or section related to the opinion (North Carolina Department of Education)

 set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learncurriculum  provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone--not a single, one- size-fits-all solution  flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs cast.org

 Instructional scaffolding  Adding supports for students in order to enhance learning and aid in the mastery of tasks  systematically building on students’ experiences and knowledge as they are learning new skills  temporary and adjustable  As students master the assigned tasks, the supports are gradually removed ▪

 W 3.1Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons.  Express a point of view about text  Support a point of view about text – find the evidence  Write opinion supporting a point of view with evidence  Varied text complexity

 Read aloud  Extended Time  Calculator  Graphic Organizers  Audio Texts  Consistency between instruction and assessment 

 Concepts of Print  Phonological Awareness  Phonics and Word Recognition  Fluency

 Specific statements of knowledge and skills linked to grade-level expectations indentified in college and career readiness standards  Aligned with Common Core State Standards

Initial Precursor: Typically reflect foundational nodes in the learning map Distal Precursor: Nodes on map between target and foundational Proximal Precursor: Nodes on map between target and foundationalTarget – Closest to the knowledge and skills reflected in the Essential Element Successor – Designed to give students the opportunity to stretch toward content in the general education grade level standard

Claim 1- Number Sense: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of numbers MC 1.1 Understand number structures (counting, place value, fraction) MC 1.2 Compare, compose, and decompose numbers and sets MC 1.3 Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic operations. Claim 1 – Number Sense: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of numbers EE.3.NBT.2. Demonstrate understanding of place value to tens. Target Node – Explain place values for ones and tens Proximal – recognize multiple tens and something; compose numbers based on ten Distal – Recognize a unit; explain ten as a composition of ten ones Initial – Recognize separateness; recognize set An example – Math Claims Conceptual Areas Essential Elements Nodes & Connections K. CC.1,4,5 1.NBT.1a-b 2.NBT.2a-b,3 3.NBT.1,2,3 3.NF NF.1-2,3 5.NF.1,2 6.RP.1 7.RP NS.2.c-d 8.NS.2.a

  Model curriculum (under revision)  ELL scaffolds  Instructional Supports  Njcore.org  Special education resources  Learning Resource Centers  Positive Behavioral Supports in Schools