BigCal Calibration E04-108&04-019 Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China January 2008 Hall C Users Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.

Advertisements

Introduction This project used cosmic rays to test a prototype Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator (MBTS) that will be used in the ATLAS experiment at CERN.

Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.

Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?

Calculating and Interpreting the Correlation Coefficient ~adapted from walch education.

Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.

Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.

Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April

Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.

Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.

Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)

Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.

14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework M.Bogolyubsky, Y.Kharlov B.Polichtchouk, S.Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino ALICE off-line week 3 October 2005.

Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.

SLAC, HiRes T-461: “FLASH” part 1 Justin Findlay.

Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.

Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.

BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.

Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.

A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.

First Look at FLASH Thick Target Test Beam (Jan 2004) Results The Alumina Underground Jan. 13, 2004.

Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.

Kelli Hardy Compton Study from Experimental Data.

GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.

SANE Asymmetries Hovhannes Baghdasaryan. Measurement We are measuring Assumption is that background asymmetry is small Then Measured asymmetry is the.

Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.

Electron Calibration and Performance ( ) N. Benekos (MPI), R. Nikolaidou (Saclay), S. Paganis (Sheffield) Contributions from: A. Farbin (CERN) +

 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.

JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.

Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.

TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )

JLab PAC33, January 16, 2008 Polarization transfer in WACS 1  p   p Polarization transfer in Wide-Angle Compton Scattering Proposal D. Hamilton,

1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.

Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.

BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.

1 Outline First look at the 2007 data with the offline reconstruction (~1000evts) : –Clusters. –Reconstructed Space points. FastOffline plots: –2 differents.

Compton Data Analysis Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.

1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.

Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.

Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda （ Univ. of Tsukuba)

Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.

Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration

The High Dynamics Readout of PMT for BGO Calorimeter

Ioannis Manthos Laboratory of Nuclear & Particle Physics

CLAS12 software workshop

Quartz Detectors for the SuperHMS Spectrometer A

CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results

M. Jones B. Wojtsekhowski

THE NEW FOCAL PLANE POLARIMETER

Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017

2.6 Draw Scatter Plots and Best-Fitting Lines

Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan

Status report Minjung Kim

HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs

GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction

Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011

Testbeam analysis on module #1

Energy Calibration with Compton Data

Vibrational state distributions of (1) scattered unoriented NO(v = 3) (green bars), (2) NO(v = 3) with an incidence orientation of O atoms pointing toward.

Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration

GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE

COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION

Presentation transcript:

BigCal Calibration E04-108& Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China January 2008 Hall C Users Meeting

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Calibration method 3. Calibration 4. Radiation damage 5. Energy resolution 6. Summary

1. Introduction TF1-0 type lead glass, 12-stage Russian FEU-84 PMT, coupled by 1cm soft optical ‘cookie’. Protovino part: 1024 bars of 3.8x3.8x45cm 3 lead glass RCS part: 720 bars of 4.0x4.0x40cm 3 lead glass BigCal goal: identify elastic event, reduce high background rate

Kinematics table KinE beam (Gev)E e (Gev)Distance(cm)Angle(°)Absorber(cm)

2. Calibration Method where k=1,1744 Solve 1744 linear equations (3) for calibration coefficients C j, Use C j to calculate new High Voltage. 1ADC channel=1Mev E—electron energy (e_hms) A—ADC value C—calibration coefficient i—event number j—block number (1) (2) (3) (4)

3. Calibration Use HMS information to select elastic electrons: HMS predicted energy; HMS predicted & BigCal Position correlation; Max energy cluster.

Position Correlation HMS predicted position BigCal cluster position VS. HMS predicted position Assuming elastic scattering, use HMS track to calculate elastic electron hit position. Reconstructed cluster

Example Kinematics 6, electron energy:1.507Gev, BigCal theta: 44.9 o, 10cm Al absorber Cluster ADCADC/E_hmsADC/E_hms/gain ADC mean=1459 Gain=ADC/E_hms=0.957 Energy resolution=12%

Calculated Calibration coefficient HV calculation After solving formula (3) we can get calibration coefficient shown below. The mean calibration coefficient greater than 1, demands increase HV of BigCal. With formula (4), we can calculate new HV based the current HV. (note: negative HV) HV difference Amplitude HV ratio

After loading new HV The gain of ADC shifted to1 after loading new HV The energy resolution improved by 0.5% Cluster ADCADC/E_hms

4. Radiation damage The radiation damage of lead glass makes the energy resolution increased. The gain of cluster ADC keep decreasing as beam on.

Gain VS. Time

Gain VS. Beam Charge 1’’ Al

5. Energy resolution The relation of energy resolution and electron energy is defined as: Where σ is the energy resolution, E is electron energy, The first term includes all systematic block-to-block differences and calibration errors; the the second term contains the effect of photoelectron statistics; the third term represent the fluctuation in pedestal due to electronics noise. The effect of 10cm Al absorber on energy resolution is significant. (5)

Energy resolution VS. Beam Charge

Energy resolution VS. Time

KinE e (Gev)Distance(cm)Angle(°)Absorber(cm)Energy resolution

Energy resolution*E 1/2 VS. Elastic electron energy Red points -10 cm absorber Blue points -2.5 cm absorber

kine 5 energy resolution Nov Jan

6. Summary The BigCal calibration has been done at start of each kinematics (except 7). Al absorber has strong effect on the energy resolution of BigCal. The HV of BigCal increase approximately 86V comparing to the beginning of experiment. The lead glass blocks cured itself partially when the beam is off for a long time.

Thank you!