1 Initial Report of Facility Study To the Board of Education June 12, 2007 Dave Bloom, John Frieden, Nancy Galbraith Mark Hepner, Tori Lindeman, Mike Oberhaus,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathway to Excellence & Equity September 25, 2007.
Advertisements

Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Rezoning Study -Community Forum- Thompson Middle School February 15, :30 – 7:30pm.
Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Special Project Team Secondary Enrollment and Facilities Study Group Community Meeting – December 3, 2013 Dalton Public Schools.
Center City Connector Transit Study Open House #2 June 6, 2013.
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax Connector Riders Advisory Committee (RAC) Board Transportation Committee March 17, 2015.
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Orientation to the Physical Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Elk Island Public Schools
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
One Voice Conference: Gender Attitudes Towards School Board Governance: Professional Leadership and Policy Orientation Patricia Neville, Michael Rubino,
Our recommendations were informed by an initial screen of all schools, community feedback and impact analyses, building walkthroughs, program assessments.
Fulton Charter System Overview. Fall 2010 Winter Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring – Summer 2012 Conversion to Fulton Charter System 2 Board voted to.
1 Office of Portfolio Management CEC 31 Meeting – July 8, 2013 For discussion purposes.
Using the Foundation Phase Child Development Assessment Profile Training for Assessment.
Objectives and Timelines Mark P. Mondanaro SCHOOL CLOSING AND CONSOLIDATION FEASIBILITY.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
NAEP 2014 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Tips on Board Relations Dr. Susan Lockwood, Retired Superintendent and Executive Director.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
Questions Do we need further consultation on our capital plan for the peninsula? What should the scope of the consultation be? Are we limiting the consultation.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HARFORD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REDISTRICTING INITIATIVE FOCUS GROUP PRESENTATION PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE.
Getting the Most Value for Your Assessment Dollar: Cost Analysis for the New Kentucky Assessment System John F. Olson Assessment Solutions Group CCSSO.
1 Strategic Master Plan 2015 Annebelle Nery, PhD Executive Dean of Institutional Effectiveness, Educational Services & Planning Daniel Martinez, PhD Director,
Educational Achievement Project Kickoff. Goals Develop an initial technical specification for the exchange of educational achievement data across medical.
District Strategic Technology Committee. Purposes Submit technology bridge plan to MDE by June 30 (original) Evaluate current resources of the district,
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
HAMILTON WEST ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAMILTON WEST ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE PUBLIC MEETING #4 Cathedral High School Monday, June 23, 2008.
AEBG Webinar September 25, Agenda for Today MOE & Consortia allocations update Governance Questions Adult Education Block Grant Reporting Toolkit.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
DRAFT Grady Cluster Capacity Community Conversation September 24, 2015.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Illinois State Board of Education Public Forum for Educational Environment Pikeland CUSD 10 January 25, 2011.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
HAMILTON WEST ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE HAMILTON WEST ACCOMMODATION REVIEW COMMITTEE PUBLIC MEETING #3 Cathedral High School Monday, May 5,
2014 Citizens’ Bond Advisory Committee Board Presentation June 17, 2014.
Redesigning Liver Distribution David Mulligan, MD, Chair Liver & Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee November 12-13, 2014.
Lee Elementary Community Forum Friday, October 23, 2015.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Joint Working on Waste and Street Cleansing.
Lamar CISD Secondary Zoning July 27, 2009.
Valparaiso Community Schools Strategic Planning Process July 20, 2010.
Littleton Public Schools Trends and Implications Littleton Community Retreat April 18, 2008.
ESSENTIAL SKILLS ACHIEVEMENT STANDARD ON SMARTER BALANCED Cristen McLean Policy Analyst Derek Brown Director of Assessment.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force Review, Update and Recommendation Subgroup 5/14/2015.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force Recommendation Criteria 3/12/2015.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Scott Raines, Director of School Planning and Construction “Investing in West Virginia’s Future”
STR Your Oak Park School District’s Administration Building E N H A N C I N G N O W E N V I S I O N I N G F U T U R E S.
Bedford Borough Electoral review briefing 21 July 2009.
Dawn Hendricks, Ph.D. Early Childhood Special Education Coordinator
Board Standards and School Board Self-Assessment
Dalton Public Schools Special Project Team
Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Parent/Community Meeting March 13, 2018 Presented by:
September 2011 Public Open Houses
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
HFFA Membership Study Results Wave 2
Demographic Redistricting Study
Presentation transcript:

1 Initial Report of Facility Study To the Board of Education June 12, 2007 Dave Bloom, John Frieden, Nancy Galbraith Mark Hepner, Tori Lindeman, Mike Oberhaus, Mike Russell, Ruth Ann Tobey- Brown, Pat Upchurch and Dennis Weiss

2 PURPOSE OF STUDY Utilize facilities to house students to maximize their potential achievement while operating in an efficient manner.

3 Conclusions 1. Each variable was scored individually for each housing option.The scores for a single variable across the housing options did have significant variance (from 1-4).However, the interaction between variables,sometimes in an inverse relationship, narrowed the range of the total scores for the housing options.

4 Conclusions 2. There was not much differentiation between scores in the base scoring model and the Board-Administration Perception Model.This would indicate that the weighting of the Board and Administrators did not have much impact on the results.

5 Conclusions 3. Four of the housing options,a,b,m and n did not score in the top six in any of the models.Three of the housing options,f,I and j scored in the top six scores in only one model.If the decisions were to be based solely on the models in this study, these housing options should not be considered any further.

6 Conclusions Based on model scores, recommend that these not be considered further

7 Conclusions 4. Four of the housing options,g1,c,d, and l are in the top six scoring options in at least three of the models included in this study.These housing options should be considered for further study.

8 Conclusions Based on model scores, further consideration should be given to these options

9 Conclusions 5. Seven additional housing options,e,g,h,k,o,p and q were in the top six scores in two of the models included in this study and may be considered for further study.

10 Conclusions Based on model scoring, these options may be given further consideration

11 Conclusions 6. Only two of the 18 housing options considered choice schools.To determine the demographics for housing options with choice schools required an extrapolation of the current data of where students reside that attend the choice school.This extrapolation was time consuming and may not reasonably predict the students that would actually attend the choice schools.

12 Conclusion 6 (continued) This diminished the reliability of the scoring of those options.Although the models did not indicate choice being a top scoring option, the prior success and continual waiting list for enrollment would indicate that further consideration should be given to this option.

13 Summary Beginning of process. Will have changes prior to decision Community input is vital prior to decision

14 Summary Beginning of process This study was intended to provide a view of of potential housing options for District 41. It is not exhaustive and many other housing options may be considered. The results should help to frame future discussion and may require analysis of housing options not included in this study.

15 Timeline

16 Timeline June 19 th, discussion of report To determine if additional housing options should be considered To determine if the 18 housing options presented may be reduced to a smaller number July 1 st begin community forums on study Gather input/feedback

17 Timeline During July and August solicit community input Report feedback received and changes to study to the Board of Education Superintendent recommendation in September Board of Education act on recommendation in October

18 Communication This presentation and a copy of the study will be posted on the District website by end of the week and available at the Public Library Will begin collecting input and feedback Cards for community to ask questions are available tonight Will answer the questions and create a frequently asked questions page on the District website Solicit questions on website or in writing Maintain FAQ segment on website

19 Communication Will answer the questions and create a frequently asked questions page on the District website Solicit questions on website or in writing Maintain FAQ segment on website

20 Community Forums Host community forums Review study Answer questions Take suggestions/recommendations Would like to have one-two Board Members attend each forum Contact Kim Colson to schedule

21 Thank You!