Acknowledgements Comparative analysis of novel proteins from the CATH family of zinc peptidases Debanu Das 1,2, Abhinav Kumar 1,2, Lukasz Jaroszewski 1,3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protein Structure Database Introduction Database of Comparative Protein Structure Models ModBase 生資所 g 詹濠先.
Advertisements

Pfam(Protein families )
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Alex Mitchell InterPro team Using InterPro for functional analysis.
Shotgun crystallization of the Thermotoga maritima proteome Protein properties and crystallization conditions that correlate with crystallization success.
A Novel Multigene Family May Encode Odorant Receptors: A Molecular Basis for Odor Recognition Linda Buck and Richard Axel Published in Cell, Volume 65,
From crystals to pdb: building a high throughput crystallography pipeline for structural genomics Chiu HJ 1, Wolf G 1, West W 2, van den Bedem H 1, Miller.
Strict Regularities in Structure-Sequence Relationship
Protein structure (Part 2 of 2).
Computational Molecular Biology (Spring’03) Chitta Baral Professor of Computer Science & Engg.
MCSG Site Visit, Argonne, January 30, 2003 Genome Analysis to Select Targets which Probe Fold and Function Space  How many protein superfamilies and families.
Summary Protein design seeks to find amino acid sequences which stably fold into specific 3-D structures. Modeling the inherent flexibility of the protein.
The Protein Data Bank (PDB)
Protein Modules An Introduction to Bioinformatics.
The Crystallographic Refinement of TM1389- A methyl-transferase from Thermotoga maritima Rosanne Joseph SLAC Summer Intern Joint Center for Structural.
Topic 2 Adam Godzik. JCSG approach: no model archives, building models “on the fly”
Detecting the Domain Structure of Proteins from Sequence Information Niranjan Nagarajan and Golan Yona Department of Computer Science Cornell University.
Subsystem Approach to Genome Annotation National Microbial Pathogen Data Resource Claudia Reich NCSA, University of Illinois, Urbana.
Current Status of Homology Modeling Using MCSG Structures 319 MCSG structures in PDB have over 400,000 sequence homologues. These structures represent.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction
Genome-scale Metabolic Reconstruction and Modeling of Microbial Life Aaron Best, Biology Matthew DeJongh, Computer Science Nathan Tintle, Mathematics Hope.
SALVAGE METHODS APPLIED TO FAILED PFAM FAMILIES Anna Grzechnik 1, Dennis Carlton 1, Heath Klock 2 Mark W. Knuth 2 and Scott A. Lesley 1,2* 1 The Joint.
Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions  Predicting domain structure families and their domain contexts  Exploring.
The Pfam and MEROPS databases EMBO course 2004 Robert Finn
A community-driven annotation platform for structural genomics Workshop on the Biological Annotation of Novel Proteins, March 7-8, 2008 Biomedical theme:
Multiple Alignment and Phylogenetic Trees Csc 487/687 Computing for Bioinformatics.
Helen M. Berman, Rutgers University EMBO Practical Course Section: Searching Structure Databases September 26, 2008 PSI Structural Genomics Knowledgebase.
TSRI Administrative Core Ian Wilson Peter Kuhn Marc Elsliger Frank von Delft Tina Montgomery Gye Won Han Rong Chen Angela Walker UCSD Bioinformatics Core.
Ligand search and data mining of Structural Genomics structures Abhinav Kumar, Herbert Axelrod, Ashley Deacon Structure Determination Core, Joint Center.
Function first: a powerful approach to post-genomic drug discovery Stephen F. Betz, Susan M. Baxter and Jacquelyn S. Fetrow GeneFormatics Presented by.
Proteomics The science of proteomics Applications of proteomics Proteomic methods a. protein purification b. protein sequencing c. mass spectrometry.
NIGMS Protein Structure Initiative: Target Selection Workshop ADDA and remote homologue detection Liisa Holm Institute of Biotechnology University of Helsinki.
Protein Structure & Modeling Biology 224 Instructor: Tom Peavy Nov 18 & 23, 2009
Structural Genomics Consortium releases 1,000th protein structure The Structural Genomics Consortium (SGC), an international public-private partnership.
PIRSF Classification System PIRSF: Evolutionary relationships of proteins from super- to sub-families Homeomorphic Family: Homologous proteins sharing.
Protein Sequence Analysis - Overview - NIH Proteomics Workshop 2007 Raja Mazumder Scientific Coordinator, PIR Research Assistant Professor, Department.
Bioinformatics MEDC601 Lecture by Brad Windle Ph# Office: Massey Cancer Center, Goodwin Labs Room 319 Web site for lecture:
Ligand search and data mining of Structural Genomics structures Abhinav Kumar, Herbert Axelrod, Ashley Deacon Structure Determination Core, Joint Center.
Using structure in protein function annotation: predicting protein interactions Donald Petrey, Cliff Qiangfeng Zhang, Raquel Norel, Barry Honig Howard.
Acknowledgements Experiences with automated screening at the JCSG C.B.Trame 1,2, H-J.Chiu 1,2, S.Oommachen 1,2, M.Miller 1,2, A.Cohen 2, I.I.Mathews 2,
TOPSAN – A community-driven resource for enhanced impact of structural genomics data. Protein Structure Initiative "Bottlenecks" Workshop, NIH Campus,
Acknowledgements Comparative Analysis of Novel Proteins from the CATH Family of Zinc Peptidases Debanu Das 1,2, Abhinav Kumar 1,2, Lukasz Jaroszewski 1,3.
March 28, 2002 NIH Proteomics Workshop Bethesda, MD Lai-Su Yeh, Ph.D. Protein Scientist, National Biomedical Research Foundation Demo: Protein Information.
Guidelines for sequence reports. Outline Summary Results & Discussion –Sequence identification –Function assignment –Fold assignment –Identification of.
Joint Center for Molecular Modeling Addressing Protein Crystallization Bottlenecks by Screening Multiple Homologs Lukasz Jaroszewski, Lukasz Slabinski,
PROTEIN STRUCTURE (Donaldson, March 10,2003) What are we trying to learn about genes and their proteins: Predict function for unknown protein by comparison.
V diagonal lines give equivalent residues ILS TRIVHVNSILPSTN V I L S T R I V I L P E F S T Sequence A Sequence B Dot Plots, Path Matrices, Score Matrices.
V diagonal lines give equivalent residues ILS TRIVHVNSILPSTN V I L S T R I V I L P E F S T Sequence A Sequence B Dot Plots, Path Matrices, Score Matrices.
InterPro Sandra Orchard.
Modelling proteomes Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Marc Robinson-Rechavi Département d'Ecologie et d'Evolution Université de Lausanne Genomique structurale comparative et evolution des proteines What is.
Acknowledgements Comparative Analysis of Novel Proteins from the CATH Family of Zinc Peptidases Debanu Das 1,2, Abhinav Kumar 1,2, Lukasz Jaroszewski 1,3.
The Biologist’s Wishlist A complete and accurate set of all genes and their genomic positions A set of all the transcripts produced by each gene The location.
Sequence: PFAM Used example: Database of protein domain families. It is based on manually curated alignments.
Experiences with automated crystal screening at the JCSG
Crystal Screening and Data Collection Activities at SDC
Ligand Search and Data Mining of Structural Genomics Structures
Crystal Screening and Data Collection Activities at SDC
JCSG Bioinformatics core overview: 2006
Genome Annotation Continued
Predicting Active Site Residue Annotations in the Pfam Database
Target selection strategies for the mouse genome
Prediction of Protein Structure and Function on a Proteomic Scale
Genomes and Their Evolution
SDC pipeline crystals screened
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Sequence Based Analysis Tutorial
Crystallomics Core Overview
Mining PSI Structures: JCSG Ligand Server
Genome Pool Strategy for Structural Coverage of Protein Families
Presentation transcript:

Acknowledgements Comparative analysis of novel proteins from the CATH family of zinc peptidases Debanu Das 1,2, Abhinav Kumar 1,2, Lukasz Jaroszewski 1,3 and Ashley Deacon 1,2 1 Joint Center for Structural Genomics, 2 Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, 3 Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA, The JCSG is funded by the Protein Structure Initiative of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences. SSRL operations is funded by DOE BES, and the SSRL Structural Molecular Biology program by DOE BER, NIH NCRR BTP and NIH NIGMS. UCSD Bioinformatics Core John Wooley Adam Godzik Slawomir Grzechnik Lukasz Jaroszewski Sri Krishna Subramanian Andrew Morse Tamara Astakhova Lian Duan Piotr Kozbial Dana Weekes Natasha Sefcovic Prasad Burra Josie Alaoen Cindy Cook Stanford /SSRL Structure Determination Core Keith Hodgson Ashley Deacon Mitchell Miller Herbert Axelrod Hsiu-Ju (Jessica) Chiu Kevin Jin Christopher Rife Qingping Xu Silvya Oommachen Henry van den Bedem Scott Talafuse Ronald Reyes Abhinav Kumar Christine Trame Debanu Das GNF & TSRI Crystallomics Core Scott Lesley Mark Knuth Dennis Carlton Thomas Clayton Kevin D. Murphy Christina Trout Marc Deller Daniel McMullan Heath Klock Polat Abdubek Claire Acosta Linda M. Columbus Julie Feuerhelm Joanna C. Hale Thamara Janaratne Hope Johnson Edward Nigoghossian Linda Okach Sebastian Sudek Aprilfawn White Ylva Elias Glen Spraggon Bernhard Geierstanger Sanjay Agarwalla Charlene Cho Bi-Ying Yeh Anna Grzechnik Jessica Canseco Mimmi Brown Scientific Advisory Board Sir Tom Blundell Univ. Cambridge Homme Hellinga Duke University Medical Center James Naismith The Scottish Structural Proteomics facility Univ. St. Andrews James Paulson Consortium for Functional Glycomics, The Scripps Research Institute Robert Stroud Center for Structure of Membrane Proteins, Membrane Protein Expression Center UC San Francisco Soichi Wakatsuki Photon Factory, KEK, Japan James Wells UC San Francisco Todd Yeates UCLA-DOE, Inst. for Genomics and Proteomics Exploratory Projects Kurt Wüthrich Reto Horst Maggie Johnson Amaranth Chatterjee Michael Geralt Wojtek Augustyniak Pedro Serrano Bill Pedrini William Placzek NIH Protein Structure Initiative Grant U54 GM The Joint Center for Structural Genomics Mission: To establish a robust and scalable protein structure determination pipeline that will form the foundation for a large-scale cost effective production center for Each project moves through target selection through publication along the Target Pipeline. The Role of the Structure Determination Core in the JCSG AutoindexIntegrate SolveTrace Scale 1. Screen Crystals and Collect Data Use Stanford AutoMounter to rapidly screen crystals without human intervention Control data collection using Blu-Ice software interface 2. Automatically Process Data (Xsolve, by G. Wolf) Use common crystallographic programs running in parallel to accelerate structure determination 3. Refine and Evaluate Structures Automate protein model completion (Xpleo, by van den Bedem) Develop automated quality control procedure 4. Publish Structures Partially automated structure note generation I. Introduction III. General structure and biochemistry These metallopeptidases show a high degree of structural conservation in the CATH domain which has a α/β/α sandwich architecture. The active site usually comprises of histidines and carboxylates interacting with two zinc ions. Despite the variety of molecular functions and substrate specificities of these proteins, the catalysis most likely involves a hydroxyl ion ligand involved in a nucleophilic attack. The full proteins often oligomerize and display some differences in their oligomerization state, however, the exact role of the oligomer in the molecular function is still unclear. In some cases, dimer formation results in assembly of a productive catalytic site. Figure of the representative CATH structure from VII. Comparison of two proteins with >30% sequence identity within the same Pfam PF01546: 1CG2, 2RB7 1CG2:C-terminal glutamate moiety from folic acid and its analogues, such as methotrexate 2RB7: Unknown function, JCSG Common core ~290 aa, RMSD ~3.0 Å II. Background and Significance CATH proteins belong to PFAM clan CL0035 (Peptidase MH/MC/MF), and MEROPS peptidase (also termed proteases/proteinases/proteolytic enzymes) database clan MH/MC/MF of metallopeptidases. CL0035 has 7591 proteins in 8 Pfams: These proteins are involved in a variety of proteolytic activities, have a range of substrate specificities and are present in numerous microbial organisms, many of which are important human pathogens like S. aureus, S. typhimurium, T. vaginalis, M. tuberculosis, N. gonorrhea, N. meningitidis, C. trachomatis, G. intestinalis, and E. coli. Several of these proteins have been investigated for their therapeutic potential and diseases roles (Canavan’s disease, cancer therapy and prohormone/propeptide processing). As part of its mission to increase structural coverage of protein families, JCSG is targeting proteins from the large CATH homologous superfamily of zinc peptidases, which belong to the phosphorylase/hydrolase-like fold in SCOP and are comprised of proteins from several Pfam families (the peptidase_MH clan). Hidden Markov Models from the CATH database were used to identify sequences in the JCSG genome pool. PSI-Blast seeded with sequences of these CATH family members were used to find additional proteins. These two sets contained 226 unique targets. After removing targets with more than 30% sequence identity to any PDB structure or to any crystallized target from a structural genomics center, 161 targets remained. Further clustering at 90% (in order to avoid nearly identical sequences), yielded a set of 137 targets. To date we have solved 7 structures from this CATH family and 7 other targets have been crystallized. In addition, 16 structures have been solved by other worldwide structural genomics centers. We present our progress towards complete structural coverage of this family, highlighting common and variant structural features that support different molecular and cellular roles, focusing on active site residues, ligand binding, protein size and oligomerization state. This analysis may provide insights into structural themes that dictate protein function and also allows modeling of protein structures related by sequence. Our structures serve as a nucleation point for the design of further structure-based experiments to probe the biochemical and biomedical roles of these proteins. V. Structures solved by JCSG VI. Phylogenetic tree and structure tree IV. Progress of structure determination X. Active site comparisons VIII. Proteins with <30% sequence id. within the same Pfam PF01546: 2RB7, 2QYV (green) Common core ~250 aa, RMSD ~3.0 Å XII. Inferences and further work: In the quest for increasing structural coverage across protein families, it is expected that proteins similar in sequence within a protein family will be similar in structure. Increasing structural coverage provides better templates for modeling other proteins. The comparative structural analysis presented here provides experimental verification of the validity of this approach. The 7 structures presented here provide a basis for enhancing the modeling of 2177 out of 7591 proteins (~29%) belonging to this Pfam clan. Furthermore, 3 of these JCSG structures provide the first examples of structures for proteins within a particular sequence cluster (2QYV, 2QJ8 and 3B2Y) and thus provide the basis for modeling 384 unique proteins (10 from organisms listed as top human pathogens) belonging to these 3 clusters from 2 different Pfams (PF01546 and PF04952). 2QYV/HP9625C represents the first crystal structure of a dipeptidase PepD showing a dimer Further analysis will be performed to try to understand evolutionary relationships between these proteins based on sequence-based phylogenetic trees and structure-based trees. Attempts will be made to investigate use of these structures and their comparative analyses in understanding structural basis for enzyme function and substrate specificities by analysis of active site amino acids, and to attempt to exploit information for therapeutic purposes. IX. Comparison between different Pfams 2RB7, 1XJO (brick), 2QJ8 (gold) 2RB7.pdb (HP1666A), 1.6Å, R/Rfr=15.4/18.0% Unknown function, PF close homologs from important human pathogens Potential in cancer therapy 2QYV.pdb (HP9625C), 2.11Å, R/Rf= 22.0, 24.4% Putative Xaa-His dipeptidase, PF01546, Zn+2 bound 7 close homologs from important human pathogens 2FVG.pdb (TM1049), 2.01Å, R/Rf= 20.3/24.4% Endoglucanase, PF close homologs from important human pathogens HP10625B, 2.3Å, work in progress PF close homologs from important human pathogens Potential in cancer therapy PF04952Succinylglutamate desuccinylase / Aspartoacylase family (AstE-AspA ) 458 proteins2 JCSG structures, 5 all other SG PF02127Aminopeptidase I Zinc metalloprotease M all other SG PF01546Peptidase family M20/M25/M JCSG structures, 7 all other SG6 non-SG PF00246Zinc carboxypeptidase M non-SG PF04389Peptidase family M non-SG PF00883Cytosol aminopeptidase family, catalytic domain827 1 all other SG1 non-SG PF05343M42 Glutamyl aminopeptidase4271 JCSG structures, 1 all other SG1 non-SG PF05450Nicastrin48None Biomedical theme: Central Machinery of Life - proteins conserved in all kingdoms of life Biological theme: Complete coverage of Thermotoga maritima 2RB7 (cyan) and 1CG2, PF Functions of proteins with solved structures and >30% seq id include diaminopimelate biosythesis (component of cell wall and lysine biosynthesis) dapE gene: succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase activity; Carboxypeptidase G2: cleaves C-terminal glutamate moiety from folic acid and its analogues, such as methotrexate; N-acetyl-L-citrulline deacetylase; Peptidase T: tripeptidase, hydrolyzes tripeptides at their N-termini Active site is 1CG2 is H112, D141, E200, E176, H385 Based on this, puutative active site in 2RB7 is H72, D99, D100, E138, E139, D162 Active site in 2RB7 Hydrolysis of methotrexate by 1CG2, implications in cancer and gene therapy Based on this information, it would now be possible to perform targeted experiments to determine substrate for the function of 2RB7, perform structure-based site-directed mutagenesis experiments and to also explore possiblity of exploiting therapeutic potential Common core ~100 aa, RMSD 3.69 Å Least amount of common conserved core when structures in different Pfams in the same Pfam clan and CATH family are compared For structures that cluster together at 30% level, structural conservation in the common core is the highest, Generally only slight rearrangement of secondary structural elements is observed (within the domain). fatcat.burnham.org/POSA Sequence with >30% identity within a particular Pfam also cluster together in structure space PF PF PF PF PF ** PF PF PF ** XI. First structure of a dipeptidase in clan MH, 2QYV/HP9625C reveals a dimer The 2QYV (PepD, MEROPS M20.007, clan MH, subfamily C) monomer is very similar in structure to the 1LFW monomer (PepV, MEROPS M20.004, subfamily A). Both are dipeptidases belonging to PF However, 1LFW is known to function as a monomer in which the molecular structure mimics that of a dimer seen in most other proteins in this Pfam. PepD in E. coli and Prevotella albensis is seen to function as a dimer. 2QYV represents the first crystal structure of a PepD, revealing it to be dimeric in the crystal structure as well as by size exclusion chromatography. This novel structure serves as a starting point for further experiments to probe the effect of dimer formation on protein function. 2QVP.pdb (HP10645A), 2.0Å, R/Rf= 16.1/21.3% Unknown function, PF04952 Structure suggests target may be closer in homology To PF00246 proteins Common core ~190 aa, RMSD ~3.0 Å PF04952: 2QJ8, 3B2Y (cyan) Larger rearrangements and extensions of secondary structural elements. Inserts and novel features more common. * PFAM assigned based on sequence homology detected with FFAS There are 3 targets not assigned by PfamA or FFAS. ** 7 targets indicated show significant FFAS match to both PF04389 and PF05450, possibly distant bacterial homologs to the eukaryotic nicastrin family. Distribution of selected targets across Pfam families Targets assigned in PfamA Targets unassigned in PfamA * Current status of 137 targets All targets selected in March B2Y.pdb (HP10645E), 1.74Å, R/Rfr=17.45/21.51% Unknown function, PF04952, Ni+2 bound Structure suggests target may be closer in homology To PF00246 proteins 2QJ8.pdb (HP10622H), 2.0Å, R/Rf= 20.7/25.4%, Unknown function, PF04952 Homolog involved in Canavan’s disease