1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Terzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE - LNF, Andrea Dainese 1 Preparation for ITS alignment A. Dainese (INFN – LNL) for the ITS alignment group.
IV Convegno Nazionale Fisica ALICE, Palau, Andrea Dainese 1 Cosmics in ITS: tracking & alignment A.Dainese (INFN Legnaro) ITS alignment group:
11th April 2008TOF DA & ppChiara Zampolli. DAQ-DA Three DAQ-DAs implemented, deployed, validated, and tested: TOFda TOFnoiseda TOFpulserda DCS-DA One.
CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.
SSD offline status Offline week CERN, 7 July 2008 Enrico Fragiacomo on behalf of ALICE SSD.
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
Online Monitoring and Analysis for Muon Tomography Readout System M. Phipps, M. Staib, C. Zelenka, M. Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology Department.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
Ajit and Dario ALICE offline week 10th June Dario Favretto Ajit Kumar Mohanty ALICE Raw Data Production.
Offline Wek, CERN, April 2008 Andrea Dainese 1 Status of ITS tracking A. Dainese (INFN Legnaro)
V4-20-Release P. Hristov 08/08/ Changes: v4-20-Rev-38 #85151 Memory leak in T0 DQM agent. From rev #85276 AliGRPPreprocessor.cxx: Port to.
Offline report – 7TeV data taking period (Mar.30 – Apr.6) ALICE SRC April 6, 2010.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Cosmic Ray Run III Cosmic Ray AliEn Catalogue LHC08b 1.
1 N. BrunerUniv. of New Mexico MuTr Software  Online  Calibration  Offline.
HMPID offline status report D. Di Bari, L. Molnar, G. Volpe ALICE Offline Week, CERN, 22 June 2009.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
Tracker Visualization Tool: integration in ORCA Maria S. Mennea, Giuseppe Zito University & INFN Bari, Italy Tracker b-tau Cosmic Challenge preparation.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
February 07, 2002 Online Monitoring Meeting Detector Examines Should aid in: 1.Diagnosing problems early and getting it fixed 2.Making decisions on the.
SSD status report Marek Chojnacki, Panos Christakoglou, Enrico Fragiacomo, Marco Van Leeuwen, Massimo Venaruzzo
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
TPC QA + experience with the AMORE framework Marian Ivanov, Peter Christiansen + GSI group.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
ITS Calibration Database Requirements Updated By Bjørn S. Nilsen On behalf of the ALICE ITS Sub-detector Group.
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
1 The status of the SDD detector - OFFLINE - Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE CLUB – October 14th 2008.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – October 20th 2008.
SSD STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo – INFN Trieste. Outlook  MC-data comparison  Cluster finder  dE/dx  Material budget in geometry ITS alignment&offline.
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Report from TRD on Raw Data Christoph Blume ALICE Offline Week, October, 2006.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.
1 Outline First look at the 2007 data with the offline reconstruction (~1000evts) : –Clusters. –Reconstructed Space points. FastOffline plots: –2 differents.
The ALICE data quality monitoring Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
TOTEM Collaboration Meeting 13/12/06 Fabrizio Ferro-INFN-Ge 1 T1 SW status.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
V4-19-Release P. Hristov 11/10/ Not ready (27/09/10) #73618 Problems in the minimum bias PbPb MC production at 2.76 TeV #72642 EMCAL: Modifications.
DAQ thoughts about upgrade 11/07/2012
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
V4-18-Release P. Hristov 21/06/2010.
F. Bellini for the DQM core DQM meeting, 04th October 2012
Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Calibrating ALICE.
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
Experience between AMORE/Offline and sub-systems
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008

2 Summary ITS Offline QA  Approach  Status  Plans ITS QA code for the Online DQM  Status What’s Next…

3 Offline QA Approach  Minimize code duplication (SDD & SSD) Code for QA & DQM in AliRoot amoreAgent to drive the DQM, which calls AliRoot DQM GUI in Amore  Online Monitoring Used during the last cosmic run  Build QA distributions on real Data

4 SPD QA Implementation status Offline - ESD Offline - Digits Offline - RecPoints Offline - RAW Online - RAW Comparison with ref. data WarningsCode in SVN Code implementation Definition of monitored objects SOURCE Online - RecP READY IN PROGRESS NOT STARTED

5 SPD QA Implementation status

6 SSD QA Implementation status Offline - ESD Offline - Digits Offline - RecPoints Offline - RAW Online - RAW Comparison with ref. data WarningsCode in SVN Code implementation Definition of monitored objects SOURCE Online - RecP READY IN PROGRESS NOT STARTED

7 SSD QA - RAWS Event typeSSD data sizeSSD data size/ DAQ data size LDC map SSD data size per DDL DDL map Data size distribution for each DDL Data size distribution for each LDC Occupancy as a function of the pair (N ladder,N module )

8 SSD QA - CLUSTERS Module ID map:  Modules that have a cluster Distribution of local x and z coordinates Distribution of the global x, y, z coordinates Distribution of the θ, φ, r coordinates Cluster type distributions Charge ratio = (qp - qn)/(qp + qn) Charge [KeV] Charge map [KeV] = f(N module,N ladder )

9 SDD QA Implementation status Offline - ESD Offline - Digits Offline - RecPoints Offline - RAW Online - RAW Comparison with ref. data WarningsCode in SVN Code implementation Definition of monitored objects SOURCE Online - RecP READY IN PROGRESS NOT STARTED

10 SDD QA/DQM SDD Control List  Digit (module, anode, time, charge) Level - Detector Performance –Baselines ( -> dead channels) –Noise –Injectors –Layer 1/Layer 2 entries Layer Level –N_entries vs Ladder Number Ladder Level –N_entries vs Detector Number Detector Level Patterns (N_entries vs. Anode, Time Bin) Q_Average vs Anode Q_Average vs Time …

11 SDD QA/DQM SDD Control List  RecPoint/Cluster (module, X, Y) Level - Reconstruction Validation (…not for ONLINE…) –Layer 1/Layer 2 entries Layer Level –N_entries vs Ladder Number Ladder Level –N_entries vs Detector Number Detector Level Patterns (N_entries vs. X, Y) Q_Average vs X Q_Average vs Y …

12 SDD QA/DQM Module map for injector run

13 SDD QA/DQM Cluster charge

14 SDD QA/DQM Cluster Global coordinates Layer 4 Layer 3

15 SDD DQM SDD Amore/DQM GUI

16 What’s Next? ONLINE DQM/QA  SPD Until now, stay with MOOD  SDD/SSD AMORE + AliRoot Improve the GUI Optimize the updating frequency (-> speed) Add long-term detector controls (SDDs) –Drift speed vs time –Baseline vs time –… Minimize the number of histograms … Exploit the improvements in the new AMORE version –Custom time interval for update –New Subscribe procedure  AMORE improvements wishlist Update histograms dynamically ONLY when they are requested from a GUI agent (minimize task load … )

17 What’s Next? OFFLINE QA  SPD/SDD/SSD Improve the DataMaker implementation QA Checker implementation –Define the reference distributions This is the difficult part The detector behaviour is not understood (yet) It can be implemented on simulated data, but it is meaningless (you get what you put … ) Reference distributions should be blessed by the hardware people –Implement the QA set of checks and provide the QA result Who does the SPD/SDD/SSD merging?