Overview of New Practices & Policy Skewed Bridges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of New Practices & Policy Deck Issues. Topics Stakeholder Responsibilities Stakeholder Responsibilities Deflection Control Measures Deflection.
Advertisements

Understanding Skewed Bridge Behavior
Potential Solutions Goals for Design – What are we concerned about? –Primary Goal: Get the deck on successfully Stability during deck pour Stability during.
Bridge Design Manual Whats New?. Waters of the United States Placement of fill material below Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) requires 401/404 permit.
Analysis Methods for Skewed Structures
ODOT Structure Project Manager Seminar Concrete Decks
Structural Steel Construction
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge.
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Ying Tung, PhD Candidate
Parts of typical slab formwork
Elastic Stresses in Unshored Composite Section
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
By : Prof.Dr.\Nabil Mahmoud
2013 C&MS Section 500- Structures Changes from 2010 to 2013 Construction and Materials Specifications in Structures Items.
Finding Errors in Structural Designs How is it Typically Done? James Hanson, Ph.D., P.E. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Voted #1 Eight Consecutive.
Deck Issues: Design Perspective.
Wrap Up What you should walk away with today Understanding of how skewed structures behave Understanding of how skewed structures behave When you should.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Design of Tension Members
Office of Highway Safety Girder Failure Dan Walsh.
Connections and Bracing Configurations
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Design of Tension Members
Chapter 5 Fatigue.
 Project Delivery  Design Considerations  Lessons Learned.
Chapter -9 WEB STIFFENERS.
Pipe Supports and Restraints
Bridge Design Project Using SolidWorks and SolidWorks Simulation to design, test and build structures.
Competency: Draw wall sections and details. Objective: Apply concepts of wood sill and floor construction.
Damage Illustrations. Potential Bridge Damage Bridge Component / DamagePossible Cause Approach Slab or Pavement  Raised, lowered, cracked, or buckled.
I-5, Skagit River Bridge Collapse First Annual Missouri Bridge Conference April 9, 2015 Columbia, MO Jugesh Kapur, PE, SE.
ODOT Policy for Deck/Slab Closure Pours Sean Meddles, P.E. Assistant Administrator ODOT Office of Structural Engineering.
Bridge Structure Types and Components. BRIDGE STRUCTURE TYPES AND COMPONENTS TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2.
EXAMPLE 9.2– Part VI PCI Bridge Design Manual
APPENDIX A (RFI) FOR THE FABRICATION OF MULTIPLE STEEL REACTION STRUCTURES FOR NASA-MSFC STRUCTURAL TESTING Mike Roberts 12/2/09.
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part VII PCI Bridge Design Manual
By PARIKH KALPESH. Overview Introduction Structural evaluation of the bridge deck, girders, abutment, and piers Recommended non destructive tests Short.
Appendices Subpart R Steel Erection
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
STRUT & TIE MODELS (S-T-M)
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Wisconsin Department of Transportation City of Milwaukee, WI December 13, 2001 City of Milwaukee,
Moment Connection Requires Bolts Outside the Flanges
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part V PCI Bridge Design Manual BULB “T” (BT-72) THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK LRFD SPECIFICATIONS Materials copyrighted by Precast/Prestressed.
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
MAST STORAGE RACK Philip Crist Max Carpenter Sean Ellis Gershom Obeng.
Shear Stresses in Concrete Beams
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras1 IS 800:2007 Section 8 Design of members subjected to bending.
Typical Bridge Components
IS 800:2007 Section 8 Design of members subjected to bending
Design of Gantry Girders
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge. contents Bearings Horizontal and transversal wind bracing Classification of bridges.
Investigation of the Effects of End Region Deterioration in Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Royce Floyd, Cameron Murray, Darion Mayhorn DONALD.
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Oregon DOT Integral Abutment Design Criteria
Structural Considerations for Bridges
Seismic Design Impact to
Design of Gantry Girders
By : Prof.Dr.\Nabil Mahmoud
General - Stiffener/web connection
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
Competency: Draw wall sections and details.
Chapter 3 BENDING MEMBERS.
Design of Beams - Limit States
BFC Structural Steel and Timber Design
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Post Seismic Bridge Inspection
Presentation transcript:

Overview of New Practices & Policy Skewed Bridges

What does all this mean?

Preliminary Design Considerations What potential skewed solutions should be considered? What about non- skewed solutions?

Potential Skewed Solutions 1.Erect Girders Plumb 2.Erect Girders Out-of-Plumb 3.Stiffen Superstructure 4.“Lean-on” Bracing

Potential Solutions – Solution 1 Erect Girders Plumb Erect girders plumb → Girders rotate out of plumb during deck placement (girders will be permanently twisted)

How much twist is too much ? ODOT Limit:  ≤ 0.6° Or 1/8” per ft.  x 1

For Line Girder Analysis: For Line Girder Analysis: If δ ≤ S/100 then  ≤ 0.6° S δ  

Potential Solutions – Solution 2 Erect Girders out of Plumb Erect girders out of plumb (twisted) → Girders rotate to plumb during deck placement

Potential Solutions – Solution 3 Stiffen Superstructure Add steel Add steel –Bigger flanges –Deeper webs –Add girder line(s) Use shored construction Use shored construction Use only upon approval from OSE

Potential Solutions – Solution 4 Lean-on Bracing Internal Lean on Bracing (Solution “4I”) Internal Lean on Bracing (Solution “4I”) External Lean on Bracing (Solution “4E”) External Lean on Bracing (Solution “4E”)

Skewed Bridge Design Process (Steel Beams/Girders) Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Implement External Lean-on Bracing* Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 No Design Using Line Girder Analysis Yes Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis*

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Perform Line Girder Analysis for “Optimized” Design. Remember: Main girder elements act independently and effect of crossframes are ignored. Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1) S δ  

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Complete Design Using Line Girder Analysis for “Optimized” Design Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1) Potential Skew Solution 1: Erect Girders Plumb

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Check Design Rating Using PC- BARS Rating for New bridges must equal or exceed HS-25 Rating assumes no future wearing surface Should be considered during preliminary element sizing Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1) Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) Stiffen design: Increase “Optimized” steel design 0% to ±25% (By Weight) Increase depth Increase flange sizes Add girder(s) Potential Skew Solution 3: Stiffen Superstructure

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) S δ  

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) Complete Design Using Line Girder Analysis for Stiffened Design Potential Skew Solution 1: Erect Girders Plumb

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3)

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3) Perform Refined Analysis* to account for crossframe-girder interaction. No * Begin Refined Analysis by sizing primary members using member sizes from “Optimized” Line Girder Analysis.

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3) No 1/8” 1’  Perform Refined Analysis*

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3) No Complete Design Using Refined Analysis Potential Skew Solution 1: Erect Girders Plumb Perform Refined Analysis*

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3) No Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #4) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Yes Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis*

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #4) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Yes Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Potential Skew Solution 3: Stiffen Super. Increase “Optimized” steel design 0% to ± 25% (by weight) then recheck twist. Perform Refined Analysis*

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #4) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Yes Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #5) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Yes Perform Refined Analysis*

Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #5) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Yes No Potential Skew Solution 4: Implement Internal Lean- on Bracing using Refined Analysis * Perform Refined Analysis* * Begin Refined Analysis for Lean-on bracing by sizing primary members using member sizes from “Optimized” Line Girder Analysis.

Check Girder Twist Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #5) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Yes No Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No Potential Skew Solution 3: If “No” increase “Optimized” steel design 0 to ±25% (by weight) and recheck twist.

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Differential Deflections < S/100 No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #5) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Yes No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Differential Deflections < S/100 No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #6) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Implement External Lean-on Bracing* No Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No

Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Differential Deflections < S/100 No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #6) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Implement External Lean-on Bracing* No * Size primary members using “Optimized” steel design from Line Girder analysis. Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No Potential Skew Solution 4: Implement External Lean- on Bracing with Refined Analysis*

Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #6) Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Differential Deflections < S/100 No Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Implement External Lean-on Bracing* No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel No Required for Preliminary Design

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #7) Perform Refined Analysis*

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #7) Skew > 45° Perform Refined Analysis*

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #7) * Begin Refined Analysis by sizing primary members using member sizes from “Optimized” Line Girder Analysis. Perform Refined Analysis*

Skew > 45° Perform Refined Analysis* Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #7) Required for Preliminary Design

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #8) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis*

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #8) No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Perform Refined Analysis* Required for Preliminary Design

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #9) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Perform Refined Analysis* Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel

Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate No Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #9) Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Perform Refined Analysis* Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Required for Preliminary Design

Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #10) No Implement External Lean-on Bracing* Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Perform Refined Analysis* Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel

Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #10) Implement External Lean-on Bracing* Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Perform Refined Analysis* Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Required for Preliminary Design

Skewed Bridge Design Process (Steel Beams/Girders) Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skew > 45° Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? No Implement External Lean-on Bracing* Implement Internal Lean-on Bracing with Refined Analysis* No Finish Design Using Refined Analysis: Erect Girders Vertical And Allow To Rotate Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Differential Deflections < S/100 30° < Skew ≤ 45° Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel Differential Deflections < S/100 No Design Using Line Girder Analysis Yes Girder Twist < 1/8”/ft? Perform Refined Analysis* Stiffen Design: 0% to ± 25% Additional Steel

What about skewed Prestressed I-Beams Superstructures?

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Alternate Superstructure Type Skewed Bridge Design Process Prestressed Beams/Girders: Skew > 30°

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Perform Line Girder Analysis for “Optimized” Design. Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes S δ   Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Complete Design Using Line Girder Analysis for “Optimized” Design Potential Skew Solution 1: Erect Girders Plumb Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Yes Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #1) Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Stiffen Design: Add beam line Increase beam size Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) S δ  

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Design Using Line Girder Analysis Check That Design Rates Using PC-BARS Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 Yes No Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #2) Required for Preliminary Design

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 No Alternate Superstructure Type Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3)

Differential Deflections < S/100 Perform Line Girder Analysis Stiffen Design Differential Deflections < S/100 No Alternate Superstructure Type Design Alternate Structure Type Skewed Bridge Design Process (Branch #3)

Non-skewed Alternatives Designers should consider: Longer spans that eliminate or reduce skew Longer spans that eliminate or reduce skew Straddle Bents that span the under-bridge feature Straddle Bents that span the under-bridge feature For alternatives with similar costs: ODOT will prefer reduced skews over “Lean on” construction.

Detail Design Considerations Stakeholder Responsibilities Intermediate Crossframes End Crossframes End Diaphragms Bearings

Stakeholder Responsibilities Designer Responsibilities: Structural design during deck placement & final condition Structural stability during deck placement

Stakeholder Responsibilities Contractor Responsibilities: Detailing bracing members to fit under steel dead load with girders plumb at erection Structural stability during erection Structural stability during deck placement (if different than plan)

Intermediate Crossframes 2004 ODOT BDM Design Requirements “On skewed structures, in order to accommodate differential dead load deflections of adjacent stringers that exceed ½ inch at any intermediate crossframe location, the erection bolt holes in the crossframe members should be detailed as slotted holes. Hole dimensions shall be 1/16” wider than the nominal bolt diameter and ¾” longer than the nominal bolt diameter. Holes in the stiffeners shall be 3/16” larger than the diameter of the erection bolts. Final bolting and welding shall not be completed until after the deck concrete has been placed.“

Intermediate Crossframes No Slots in Crossframe members: Slots cause: Insufficient bracing Exaggerated deflections/rotations

Intermediate Crossframes Bracing members should be fully tightened and welded during deck placement Bracing members should be fully tightened and welded during deck placement Fully Tighten Bolts Field weld Type 3Type 4

Intermediate Crossframes Design bracing members for Refined Analysis Loads Start with GSD-1-96 Add beef where necessary

End Crossframes: Skews End Crossframes: Skews > 30° DO NOT INSTALL END CROSSFRAME DIAGONALS UNTIL DECK PLACEMENT IN ADJACENT SPAN IS COMPLETE. End Armor Bottom Chord Diagonals

Eliminates girder end rotation caused by decambering Simplifies refined analysis model Reduces locked-in stresses Temporary bracing should be investigated Bottom Chord End Armor End Crossframes: Skews End Crossframes: Skews > 30° DO NOT INSTALL END CROSSFRAME DIAGONALS UNTIL DECK PLACEMENT IN ADJACENT SPAN IS COMPLETE.

End Diaphragms Steel Superstructures (Skew > 30°) OR Concrete Superstructures (Skew > 10°) Place diaphragms after deck placement in adjacent span is complete. Stage 1 Stage 2

End Diaphragms Steel Superstructures (Skew > 30°) OR Concrete Superstructures (Skew > 10°) Stage 1 Stage 2 Eliminates girder end rotation caused by decambering Simplifies refined analysis model Reduces locked-in stresses in end diaphragm & main members and reduces potential for cracking Temporary end bracing should be considered

Bearings Rotations Design Bearings for the out- of-plane rotations. Use results from refined analysis - OR - 1/8” per ft. (max.)

Bearings Load Plates Do not bevel load plate in transverse direction. Forces girder web out-of- plane during erection Complicates bearing fabrication

Bearings Size Bearings for Refined Analysis Reactions Fixed Bearings Expansion Bearings

Policy Changes Bridge Design Manual (BDM) New Appendix Section: ODOT Guide for the Design of Skewed Superstructures

Summary An itemized summary is provided at the back of the seminar handout and is available for download at our website:

Questions ?? Questions to: