CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Andrew Burrill R&D ERL SRF Electron Gun Andrew Burrill February 17-18, 2010 SRF Electron Gun.
Advertisements

Normal-Conducting Photoinjector for High Power CW FEL Sergey Kurennoy, LANL, Los Alamos, NM, USA An RF photoinjector capable of producing high continuous.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC  and 0 Mode Interaction in RF Gun John Schmerge, SLAC November.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
DUAL FEED RF GUN DESIGN FOR LCLS Liling XIAO, Zenghai LI Advanced Computations Department Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Nov , SLAC-LCLS Injector.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
A Polarized Electron PWT Photoinjector David Yu DULY Research Inc. California, USA SPIN2004, Trieste, Italy 10/14/04.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Ultra high brightness photoinjector for EBTF/CLARA facility at Daresbury B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC photoinjector development team Accelerator.
Steve LidiaICFA Workshop, Chia LagunaJuly, 2002 Flat Beam Photoinjectors for Ultrafast Synchrotron Radiation Sources Steve Lidia Lawrence Berkeley National.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
Advanced Energy Systems Inc. P.O. Box 7455, Princeton, NJ Phone:(609) Fax:(609) Jangho.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Velocity bunching from S-band photoinjectors Julian McKenzie 1 st July 2011 Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Multipacting Simulation for the PITZ RF Photo Gun Igor Isaev Unwanted Beam Workshop 2012 Humboldt-University Berlin, The PITZ RF Photo Gun.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
THE ANDRZEJ SOŁTAN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES INSTYTUT PROBLEMÓW JADROWYCH im. Andrzeja Sołtana
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
Beam plan at STF phase1 12/6/2005 TTC-WG3 H. Hayano STF phase1 1st step : DC-gun + photo-cathode (2006) quick beam source( DC gun exist), no pre-acceleration,
X-band Based FEL proposal
Photocathode based Electron Sources for Particle Accelerators – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow B.L. Militsyn STFC ASTeC, UK European Workshop on Photocathodes.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Development of High Brightness Electron Photoinjectors at ASTeC B.L. Militsyn Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science & Technology Facility Council,
Free Electron Laser Studies
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Linac beam dynamics Linac dynamics : C. Bruni, S. Chancé, L. Garolfi,
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
by P. Musumeci and F.Tazzioli
NC Accelerator Structures
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
SPARC RF gun status by P. Musumeci Review committee
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Beyond the RF photogun Jom Luiten Seth Brussaard
MIT Compact X-ray Source
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Electron Source Configuration
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Electron sources for FCC-ee
Physics Design on Injector I
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Injector for the Electron Cooler
Presentation transcript:

CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn

CLARA Compact Linear Advanced Research Accelerator Beam Energy ~250MeV SASE Saturation length <15m Seed with Ti:Sa 800nm, lase up to 8 th harmonic Seeding with HHG at 100nm also possible Single spike SASE, electron bunch length ~50fs FWHM and charge <20pC Seeding, peak current ~400A, flat top ~300fs and charge <200pC

Photocathode Guns Allows the production of extremely short bunches dependent on laser pulse length. High RF gradients and solenoidal fields allow for emittance preservation. Removable photocathode inserts allow for higher quantum efficiency through the use of metal photocathode surfaces. Laser Pulse Electron Bunch Photocathode Solenoid Bucking coil RF TM010  -mode

Basic parameters UnitsOperating mode Repetition Rate100 Hz400 Hz FrequencyGHz RF peak power maxMW<10 RF average power max (estimate) kW10 Gun gradientMV/m120100/80 Bunch chargepC Operating modePulsed/Train pulsedPulsed RF feedbackRequired

Choice of number of cells Cavity design 100 Hz400 Hz 100 MV/m120 MV/m100 MV/m120 MV/m Pulsed power, MW Average power, kW Pulsed power, MW Average power, kW Pulsed power, MW Average power, kW Pulsed power, MW Average power, kW 1.5 cell cell In order to remain below the 10 kW average power limit, and the 10 MW peak power limit set by the klystron, the only option that allows peak fields of 120 MV/m to be reached is a 1.5 cell gun. Target power 7MW peak due to losses in transmission system.

a b r blend a = minor radius b = major radius r = iris radius blend = blending radius C1 length = length of 1 st cell including iris C1 length

Changing ellipticity (MHz ) Ellipticity Mode separation is ~22 MHz

Mode separation Mode separation is the only thing that gets worse at lower iris radius Choose a lowest acceptable mode separation and go with that iris radius No lower than 20 MHz Iris radius = 13.4 mm 15 MHz/m was required at LCLS to reduce beating between modes

Stored Energy6.23 J Maximum Surface H A/m Ratio of cathode E field to maximum surface E field1.06 E field flatness Operating Mode Frequency MHz Zero Mode Frequency MHz Q0Q Coupling (k)6.86E-3 Mode Separation20.08 MHz Integrated Axis field6.69 MV R/Q (no Transit Time factor) R (no Transit Time factor)3.06E+06 Superfish optimisation: final results

EHEH

Probe aperture optimisation In order to minimise the peak H-field, a large probe aperture was chosen This has the effect of changing the cell frequency, necessitating a retune of that cell The peak magnetic field in the cell is now 2.54x10 5 A/m. – The calculated temperature increase for that location is 25K The baseline H-field in that location is 1.94x10 5 A/m. – The calculated temperature increase for that location is 14K

Cathode plug: 10 mm diameter Cathode plug (10 mm diameter) 3 rd generation plug

Cathode plug optimisation Additional optimisation was performed on the cathode plug profile. An elliptical profile was adopted to maximise the (E field at centre)/(max E field on cathode) ratio. 0.6 ratio chosen

Field flatness with cathode and probe coupler.

Peak field distribution - Electric

Peak field distribution - Magnetic

coupZ0 = distance between C2 iris and coupler tip External Q CST gives the Q 0 as being The target Q e should be CoupZ0 = 11.5 mm Some adjustability should built- in in order to allow for adjusting the Q e to the effectively measured Q 0.

Minimising coupler parasitic mode transmission

Tuneable alternative: H feed Short RF in Shorts are now used which can be adjusted and used for pumping. Tee sections provide a reflective element to provide matching.

Mechanical Design Up to 10kW average RF power will need to be handled. Thermal simulations have been extensively performed on all gun components in order to ensure power handling capability. Solutions to integrate the gun with the solenoids, photocathode transfer system and other components are mostly complete.

Conclusion The RF design is approaching its final phase and mechanical design is already under way. Planned manufacture later this year. Planned installation from early 2015.