Connecticut Education Network “Forum” June 14, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Advertisements

Chapter 3: Planning a Network Upgrade
What is BTOP? And the future of the CEN Network..
CTS IT Security Enhancement Projects December 10, 2014.
Connecticut Education Network February 4, 2004 Statenets CEN Project Update Robert P. Vietzke, Network Architect & Program Director.
Enterprise Architecture The Arkansas Approach. Key Areas What is enterprise architecture? Why is it important? How you can participate Current status.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Services in a Converged WAN Accessing the WAN – Chapter 1.
1 IS112 – Chapter 1 Notes Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer Fall 2005.
Connecticut Education Network. Project History Higher Education Initiative Lt. Governor’s Proposal & Legislation Commission organization & tasks State.
1 NJEDge.net Portal Proof Of Concept (POC) Update Joe Walter Enterprise Solutions Center (ESC) Verizon ESG June 11, 2003.
IT Broadband Connectivity Infrastructure Projects Projects Status.
Selecting a WAN Technology Lecture 4: WAN Devices &Technology.
SCINET The South Carolina Information Network A Gathering of State Networks St. Louis, Missouri April 17, 2000 Tom Fletcher Deputy Director Office of Information.
OARnet Update Linda Roos Gathering of State Networks February 4, 2004.
Palm Coast’s Municipal Fiber-Optic Network: Project Update
Tennessee Network Update >> Gathering of State Networks February 9, 2005.
Don McDaniel, DIS Network Services Division Administrator Next Generation State Network.
Rhode Island Network for Educational Technology, Inc Update Sharon Hussey Executive Director Copyright Sharon L. Hussey, This work is the intellectual.
TECHNOLOGY AND THE BOND PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY PLAN
OSC (Ohio Supercomputer Center) 1224 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH (614) www.osc.edu THIRD FRONTIER OVERVIEW OPLIN MEETING April.
Multi-Use Network Update Presented to: Colorado Higher Education Computing Organization CHECO Spring Conference 2001.
Embracing Technology Making IP Telephony Work Romolo Pallini GIPS, Director Networks, Internet Technologies & Telecom Getronics.
Connecticut Education Network Robert P. Vietzke CEN Network Architect, Dept. of Information Technology
2 Systems Architecture, Fifth Edition Chapter Goals Describe the activities of information systems professionals Describe the technical knowledge of computer.
Policy Committee Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 Budget Considerations: Dark Fiber November 13, 2002.
SCSC 311 Information Systems: hardware and software.
Technology Planning. Primary Elements Stakeholders Leadership team Needs assessment Technology components Work plan Budget Policies Evaluation.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
Information Technology Study Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) Las Virgenes Unified School District Presented By: Leslie Barnes Steve.
1 Integrating an LMDS End-to-End MultiService Solution Volker Tegtmeyer Siemens Carrier Networks Manager Business Development Broadband Wireless Access.
1 LAN design- Chapter 1 CCNA Exploration Semester 3 Modified by Profs. Ward and Cappellino.
CT Geospatial Information Systems Council Connecticut Geospatial Information Systems Council.
Some Ideas for Network Consolidation GTRA Conference June 24 th, 2012 Bedford Springs.
Delivering Circuit Services to Researchers: The HOPI Testbed Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2 Joint.
S4-Chapter 3 WAN Design Requirements. WAN Technologies Leased Line –PPP networks –Hub and Spoke Topologies –Backup for other links ISDN –Cost-effective.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks Scaling Networks.
Running more bandwidth for less dollars State of Arkansas Network Upgrades.
Illinois Century Network Illinois Broadband Opportunity Partnership – East Central Project.
LAN DESIGN – first step 5 ISB – school year 2006/07.
A RON in Ohio Linda Roos A Gathering of State Networks February 9, 2005.
Cisco S3C3 Virtual LANS. Why VLANs? You can define groupings of workstations even if separated by switches and on different LAN segments –They are one.
Cisco 3 - Switches Perrine - Brierley Page 112/1/2015 Module 5 Switches.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Planning a Network Upgrade Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter.
NSF ANNUAL REVIEW June 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Terrestrial CyberPoPs Implementation Matthew Arrott, Mark James, Brian.
. Large internetworks can consist of the following three distinct components:  Campus networks, which consist of locally connected users in a building.
Reconfigurable Optical Mesh and Network Intelligence Nazar Neayem Alcatel-Lucent Internet 2 - Summer 2007 Joint Techs Workshop Fermilab - Batavia, IL July.
STATE OF THE NETWORK 2000 Bill Mitchell (800) Missouri Research & Education Network.
Data Communications and Networks Chapter 1 - Classification of network topologies Data Communications and Network.
Regional Optical Networks and Evolving US National Research and Education Networking Paul Schopis, OARnet Dale Smith, University of Oregon International.
Ed Tech Audit Case Study Pete Reilly. Process Meetings with the Superintendent Extended meetings with the technology coordinator Meeting with each administrator.
Presented By: Gavin Worden Leased Lines vs. Internet Based VPNs.
Strategic Agenda We want to be connected to the internet……… We may even want to host our own web site……… We must have a secure network! What are the.
Utah Education Network Current Status February 2005.
FIBER OPTIC INTERNET Tierzero has been serving businesses in Southern California since 1997.
Project ICTanzania 2006 Team 5 Saad Riaz | Zach Isamuyo | Nsubis Genesis | Mikael Corp.
Research Focused Networking ● Science DMZ ● Network segment topologically close to campus edge, available as a co-location space for research data ● Optimized.
CERES UNIFIED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES UPDATE
Optical-Based Switching Solutions
Reconfigurable Optical Mesh and Network Intelligence
Welcome To : Group 1 VC Presentation
Chapter 1: WAN Concepts Connecting Networks
Mike Conlon Director of Data Infrastructure October 5, 2005
CORPORATE PROFILE JUNE 2016
PROJECT THOR Impact on the Region
Campus Infrastructure
Mike Conlon Director of Data Infrastructure October 5, 2005
2019 Service Provider Training
Process Overview for Service Providers
Global One Communications
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Education Network “Forum” June 14, 2001

Agenda Overview of Current Network Activities Frequently Asked Questions (& Answers)

Network Development Report Connecticut Education Network

Current Network Activities K-12 Site Surveys –42 Districts complete (Accounts for over 250 buildings) –Next 30 being planned –4 contract stass conductingsurveys K-12 Recommendations / Implementation –Evaluation documents out to 3 districts, 2 more ready –Follow up meetings with districts begin next week

Current Network Activities (2) East Hartford Data Center Development –Firewall acquisition in progress (out to bid) –Content Filtering / Proxy System contract complete! –Network Backbone Equipment on order –Initial Move-In to Data Center possible by June Backbone Deployment –Equipment on order for K12, Initial Higher Eds –Circuit orders in a short holding pattern

Current Network Activities (3) Network Circuit & Deployment Activities –Still hopeful for answers to critical economic and technology questions from service provider(s) –DOIT Enterprise Network Services RFP to identify future service providers being evaluated –Additional New Generation Optical Services procurement process actively contemplated.

Current Network Activities (4) Contract put in place to assist/facilitate backbone design process and pilot district implementations Joint DOIT / Contract Activities: –Protocol Planning –Network Documentation –Field Deployment Assistance –Training, Research, Development, Future planning All day technical meetings begin later this week

Current Network Activities (5) Assessing Dark Fiber Services for Year 2-3 Deployment –Dramatic change in operating costs expected Linear relationship between active bandwidth & monthly cost removed –Equipment costs for CEN and service provider(s) reduced Ex: $30,000 for a router in each district becomes a $3,500 switch Ex: Complexity & overhead of SONET, ATM, Frame relay replaced with simple Ethernet technologies –Positions for exponential bandwidth growth without associated growth in monthly operating costs

Operating Assumptions Connecticut Education Network

Operating Assumptions (5) K-12 Efforts –No grants from CEN funds for equipment or circuits DOIT providing high speed connection service to CEN Agile assistance as needed will enable connection to CEN in each district Other funds (State Dept. of Ed) may provide in-building support Any funds a district saves it should turn back into technology programs –Site surveys continue to focus on infrastructure status analysis and CEN interconnection analysi

Operating Assumptions (6) Backbone Development –The current physical backbone will initially bring Higher Education sites back to DOIT for connection to K-12 sites –As district networks improve to optically based municipal networks, CEN will evaluate tying those networks directly into the backbone. –Physical Topology may not mirror logical topology due to content filtering, firewall and other issues

Operating Assumptions (9) Existing Networks & Aggregators –DOIT has not prioritized integration of legacy networks into CEN. Instead DOIT is focusing on deploying next generation optical network connections to all end-points. –Service and support components of existing Library and RESC consortia should not be effected by CEN.

Operating Assumptions (12) Good Relationships of towns, schools and libraries need to be maintained –Where positive interactions exist, installation of network should not degrade those interactions –Technical implementation needs to support secure connections to non CEN networks in the districts. –Local traffic should stay local where it can.

Connecticut Education Network Discussion Questions, Answers & Other Thoughts