Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD-10-013 M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

First measurement of EWK Z+2j production cross section and hadronic activity in rapidity gap in CMS A.Nikitenko (IC) for 7 TeV Analysis Team March, 2013.

Advertisements

Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.

Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.

Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in p+p collisions at E CM =200 GeV Mike Miller (MIT) For the STAR collaboration.

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS

Dijet Transverse Thrust cross sections at DØ Veronica Sorin University of Buenos Aires.

Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.

W/Z + jets in ATLAS Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford

A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.

November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.

Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.

4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.

Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.

Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

Data results for inclusive all-hadronic (RA  with 318 nb -1 SUSY Hadronic/GMSB Meeting [C. Rogan et al.] Data Plots Towards.

1 PbPb collisions in CMS Bolek Wyslouch École Polytechnique Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology on behalf of CMS.

H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.

Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.

Klaus Rabbertz CERN, LHC MBUE Working Group 1 First UE Results from CMS at 900 GeV Klaus Rabbertz, KIT for the CMS Collaboration LHC MBUE Working.

Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.

A measurement of the Ratio of Tree over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.

W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:

16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.

Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.

Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.

Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.

FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,

1 Hadronic Event Shape Variables in pp collision at 7 TeV Introduction Data-set and Event Selection Comparison of Basic Jet Objects in Data and MC Event.

Elena Bruna for the STAR Collaboration Yale University Quark Matter 09, Knoxville 03/29 -04/

Diffractive Dijet Production Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham SM Soft QCD topical meeting: Diffraction and Forward Detectors 24/05/2011.

Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.

1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.

Update : Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University of Ioannina, Greece Senior Editor.

QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.

Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.

CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.

Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.

Mike Miller First measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in p+p collisions at E CM =200 GeV M.L. Miller (MIT) Motivations: 1.Baseline for inclusive.

April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.

Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.

24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.

Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.

Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector Brian A. Cole Columbia University on behalf of the.

Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.

Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.

Measurement of the 3-jet to 2-jet Cross Sections Ratio in pp Collisions at 7TeV Update : Pythia8 tune 2C P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University.

1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.

Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.

Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.

First Measurement of Jets and Missing Transverse Energy with the ATLAS Calorimeter at and David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 13 May 2010.

Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.

9/11/2003Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.1 Event-by-event charge/neutral fluctuation at RHIC-PHENIX Tomoaki Nakamura / Kensuke Homma Hiroshima University.

Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.

Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.

20 October, 2010Mike Hildreth - CHEP 2010, Taipei, Taiwan Validation and Tuning of the CMS Full Simulation Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac.

Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.

Searching for CHAMPs at CDF

Searches for double partons

Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.

Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS

N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)

Plans for checking hadronic energy

Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF

Presentation transcript:

Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics Symposium, Jaipur th December, 2010 OR CMS Collaboration

Definition of Event Shape Event shape variables display the geometrical flow of the energy in any event. Variables defined in terms of four momenta. Central transverse thrust Central thrust minor Jet momenta are used as a input for the event shape calculation Banfi, Salam, Zanderighi, ’08,’10

Motivation Experimentaly viable - Event-shape distributions are robust against jet energy scale uncertainties and jet energy resolution effects. Theoreticaly stable : collinear and infra red safe, enables to compute in perturbation theory. Event shapes can be used to distinguish between different models of QCD multijet production.

CMS Detector

Example: Central Transverse Thrust Normalized inclusive distribution of the central transverse thrust

Jets in CMS Calo Jet: Jets are clustered from ECAL and HCAL towers Jet-Plus-Track Jets(JPT): Calorimeter jets are corrected with tracks informations Particle Flow Jets(PF): Particles are reconstructed from all sub-detector informations, and then clustered to form jets. Track Jets: Reconstructed from tracks only, completely independent from Calorimetric jet measurements. Anti-Kt algorithm:

Jet Selection  Jet are required to pass quality cuts to remove possible instrumental and non-collision background.  For Calo and JPT jets, EMF > 0.01; no. of calo cells conatianging energy more than 90% must be greater than one; the fraction of energy fraction in HCAL must be < 98%.  PF jets, CHF>0, CEF 1  Track jets are reconstructed, if have at least two tracks. Corrections on jets are used.

Jet Selection(contd.)  Jet with pT>30 GeV and |η| < 2.6 are selected; at least two leading jet pass quality cuts.  Two leading jets are required to be in the central region of the detector |η| < 1.3.  To maximise the trigger eff., the leading jet pT>60(90) GeV cut for low(high) data sample.  If the event is selected, then all jets with pT>30 GeV and |η|<1.3 is used in calculation.

DATA/MC Central Transverse Thrust PYTHIA6 HERWIG++ ALPGEN MadGraph PYTHIA8 Band is the effect of systematic and statistical error, While black arrow is for statistical error only. Pythia6 and Hwerwig++ agree better with data, Alpgen, Madgraph and Pythia8 are away from data.

Central Transverse minor DATA/MC PYTHIA6 PYTHIA8 HERWIG++ MadGraph ALPGEN Band is the effect of systematic and statistical error, While black arrow is for statistical error only. Pythia6 and Hwerwig++ agree better with data, Alpgen, Madgraph and Pythia8 are away from data.

Comparison between different jet types Distributions of all four types of jet show a very good consistency. Final results are based on CaloJets only, a conservative choice

Systematic Uncertainties:JES Main systematic uncertainties come from JES ±10% flat for Calojets |η| dependent ±2% Х η For Calojets, the JES uncertainty leads to deviations within 10%, the dominat effect. Systematic error due to the imperfect modelling of jet energy and position resolution, It adds ~ 5% error on the transverse thrust and thrust minor.

Tr Thrust in multiplicty bins MadGraph and ALPGEN show a good agreement with the data in phase Space of three hard well separated jets, difference mainly come from di-jets Band is effect of systematic and statistical error, while Black arrow is for statistical error only.

Unfolding  Observed events shape variables are not same as predicted(theoretical) using generator level information, because of the detector smearing.  To compare it correctly one needs to unfold the observable distribution based on data to generator level information.  Event shape distributions are invariant under a shift in jet energy scale, but JES does change the number of jets in the event, which effects the event shape distribution.  The maximum bin-by-bin difference between the original distributions and the two shifted distributions, after unfolding, is then assigned as a systematic error due to jet JES.

Conclusion First measurement of hadronic events shape in CMS with collision data at 7 TeV, accumulated by the CMS detector during the first months of 2010 with luminosity 78 /nb. Event shapes are seen to be robust against the choice of jet reconstruction object, and uncertainties in JES and expt. resolution, Comparison of data with the predictions of different event generators is performed. Good agreement with PYTHIA6 and HERWIG++ is observed. Not so good agreement with ALPGEN, MadGraph, PYTHIA8; ALPGEN and MadGraph are consistent.