Progress on NSTX towards steady state at low aspect ratio D. A. Gates, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Supported.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
Advertisements

ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Introduction to Spherical Tokamak
Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, June 16-17,
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
MHD Behaviour of Low-Aspect-Ratio RFP Plasmas in RELAX S.Masamune, T.Onchi, A.Sanpei, R.Ikezoe, K.Oki, T.Yamashita, H.Shimazu, N.Nishino 1), R.Paccagnella.
Proposals for Next Year’s MFE Activities C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Sept. 24, 2000.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory For the NSTX National Team DOE Review of NSTX Five-Year Research Program Proposal June 30 – July 2, 2003.
NSTX The Resistive Wall Mode and Beta Limits in NSTX S. A. Sabbagh 1, J. Bialek 1, R. E. Bell 2, A. H. Glasser 3, B. LeBlanc 2, J.E. Menard 2, F. Paoletti.
9/20/04NSTX RESULTS REVIEW NSTX rtEFIT implementation progress results NSTX 2004 RESULTS REVIEW September 20&21, 2004 REAL-TIME EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION.
10th ITPA TP Meeting - 24 April A. Scarabosio 1 Spontaneous stationary toroidal rotation in the TCV tokamak A. Scarabosio, A. Bortolon, B. P. Duval,
J. Menard, Z. Wang, Y. Liu (CCFE), J-K Park Theory and Simulation of Disruptions Workshop Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey July.
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Initial Exploration of HHFW Current Drive on NSTX J. Hosea, M. Bell, S. Bernabei, S. Kaye, B. LeBlanc, J. Menard, M. Ono C.K. Phillips, A. Rosenberg, J.R.
Mid-Run Assessment - ISD S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak.
Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Study of NSTX Electron Density and Magnetic Field Fluctuation using the FIReTIP System K.C. Lee, C.W. Domier, M. Johnson, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
EJD IAEA H-mode WS,, September 28, Overview Introduction — steady-state performance requirements -Global DIII-D and NSTX progress Plasma control.
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
1 Stability Studies Plans (FY11) E. Fredrickson, For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7, 2006 NCSX.
1 EBW & HHFW Research - G. Taylor PAC-19 2/23/06 EBW & HHFW Research (Including EBW Collaborations with MAST & P EGASUS ) Gary Taylor presented on behalf.
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
1PAC37, non-inductive ramp-up, Francesca Poli, Jan Francesca Poli, Gary Taylor for the Integrated Scenarios science group ECH/EBWH Research Plans.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Scaling experiments of perturbative impurity transport in NSTX D. Stutman, M. Finkenthal Johns Hopkins University J. Menard, E. Synakowski, B. Leblanc,R.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
1 ASIPP Sawtooth Stabilization by Barely Trapped Energetic Electrons Produced by ECRH Zhou Deng, Wang Shaojie, Zhang Cheng Institute of Plasma Physics,
Pedestal Characterization and Stability of Small-ELM Regimes in NSTX* A. Sontag 1, J. Canik 1, R. Maingi 1, J. Manickam 2, P. Snyder 3, R. Bell 2, S. Gerhardt.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
T. Biewer, Sep. 21 st, 2004 NSTX Results Review of 11 Dependence of Edge Flow on Magnetic Configuration in NSTX T.M. Biewer, R.E. Bell, D. Gates,
GO : Progress toward fully non-inductive operation in NSTX Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Team 47 th Annual Meeting of the DPP Monday–Friday,
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP407: Passive Stabilization Physics of the RWM in High  N ST Plasmas – 4/13/04  Goals  Define RWM stability boundary in (V , 
Off-axis Current Drive and Current Profile Control in JT-60U T. Suzuki, S. Ide, T. Fujita, T. Oikawa, M. Ishikawa, G. Matsunaga, M. Takechi, M. Seki, O.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
1 Edge Characterization Experiment in High Performance (highly shaped) Plasmas R. J. Maqueda (Nova Photonics) R. Maingi (ORNL) V. Soukhanovskii (LLNL)
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Reconnection Process in Sawtooth Crash in the Core of Tokamak Plasmas Hyeon K. Park Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea National.
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Progress on NSTX towards steady state at low aspect ratio D. A. Gates, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory on behalf of the NSTX Research Team Supported by * Work supported by US DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-76CH03073 ST Requires high bootstrap fraction, f bs, simultaneous with high  t High f bs and high  t competing requirements (at fixed shape and  N ) Progress for ST and advanced tokamak given by  sus  f bs  t ~ S  N 2 [S = q 95 (I p /(aB t ))] –If  Nmax = C Troyon, then only shape improves  sus –  sus increases linearly with increasing S [S = q 95 (I p /(aB t ))] –Component Test Facility requires  t ~ 20% and f bs ~ 50%,  sus = 10% –ARIES-ST requires  t ~ 40% and f bs ~ 90% Optimized shaping with new PF coils for high triangularity and elongation NSTX has achieved record values of elongation and shape factor –Leads directly to record values of the  sus for the ST For NSTX 100% non-inductive operation with  N ~ 7 only with strong shaping New inboard divertor coils increase accessibility of high-triangularity, high-elongation shapes Highest  now obtained at highest  ≈0.8  S  q 95 I P /aB T = 41 MA/m·T Small (Type V) ELM regime recovered at high  > 2.5 with new coils –Previously observed onset of large ELM-like events when  > 2.2 D. Gates, J. Menard Highest elongation  =3.0 (transient)Sustained elongation  =2.7 (0.1s) Record pulse-lengths achieved at high current by operating with sustained H-mode H-mode with small ELMs  lower flux consumption, slow density rise  T = 20%  N = 5.2%mT/MA  E = 52ms H 89L = 2.0 A = 1.4,  = 2.3,  L = 0.75, l i = 0.49 Long duration discharges reach ~70% non-inductive current TRANSP model agrees with measured neutron rate during high-  phase –Model includes anomalous fast ion diffusion during later phase when low-m MHD activity is present 85% of non-inductive current is  p-driven –Bootstrap + Diamagnetic + Pfirsch-Schlüter 1/1 mode onset causes  drop, fast ion diffusion (Menard, PRL) Expected performance improvements observed as shaping has increased Reduction in control system latency increases elongation (2004) Plasma shaping enhancements Upgrade of PF1A coil enables simultaneous achievement of high  and  Overlay of EFIT boundaries from shots and between 0.3 and 0.9s ~3cm includes MHD perturbations Control points Boundary overlay time window Implementation of rtEFIT improves shape control reproducibility Modified PF1A Coil Old PF1A Coil Shot (record  ) All shots All shots  = 2.75,  = 0.8, S ~ 37  = 1.8,  = 0.6, S ~ 22  = 2.0,  = 0.8, S ~ 23  = 2.3,  = 0.6, S ~ 27  = 3,  = 0.8, S ~ Pulse averaged approximate  sus versus S (S is averaged over the same time window as  sus )  N H89 vs.  pulse /  E Pulse averaged  t versus pulse length Data are sorted by year and by S External kink mode ultimate limit on  t - long pulse discharges above no-wall limit Troyon diagram showing  tmax vs. I p /aB t PEST eigenfunction Shot Time history of  t and n=1 (no-wall) kink mode growth rate, , for Shot , calculated by PEST using LRDFIT equilibrium including MSE  Alfven  % Each point in the above plots represents an EFIT equilibrium reconstruction Data span entire NSTX database and are filtered against rapid plasma motion Effect of modifications provide clear increase in NSTX operating space

LSN DN high-  DN LSN DN high-  DN Increased triangularity actually reduces peak heat flux to divertor target Flux expansion decreases peak heat flux despite reduced major radius Compare single-null & double-null configurations with triangularity  ≈ 0.4 at X-point and high triangularity  = 0.8 double-null plasmas –Measure heat flux with IR thermography of carbon divertor tiles Peak heat flux decreases as 1 : 0.5 : 0.2 ELM character changes: Type I  Mixed  Type V R. Maingi Changes in X-point balance affect ELM characteristics Very small changes in the plasma boundary reproducibly lead to large differences in ELM behavior ELMs have a major impact on plasma performance, controlling them is crucial Precise plasma control provides an important tool for controlling ELMs - highly ITER relevant  r sep (mm) for (black) and (red) Shot Shot Shot Shot  r sep is the radial separation of the flux surfaces which pass through the x-points measured at the outboard midplane Encouraging results from both EBW emission and HHFW current drive experiments Long pulse discharges have elevated q(0) without low frequency MHD modes Experiment (116313) Target The time history of shot showing: 1) the components of non-inductive current as indicated in the plot legend, 2) The plasma current (black) and the surface voltage (red), 3) the reconstructed q(0) (black) and q min (red) and q(0) as determined by a TRANSP magnetic diffusion calculation (blue) 4)  t (black) and the neutral beam power (red). The profiles in preceding figure are calculated over the time interval indicated in green. A spectrogram of magnetic fluctuations as measured by a Mirnov coil for shot The colors represent toroidal mode numbers as indicated in the legend. Notice the period of time after 0.6s where there are only small amplitude high-n MHD modes present. Measured EBW uses efficient Ohkhawa current drive Data on efficiency of EBW emission from identical plasmas for which the EBW antenna pointing angle is varied. The colors represent measured efficiencies of % (red) % (orange), % (green) % (blue) % (purple), % (black ). The ellipses are contours of theoretically predicted emission efficiency Measured EBW emission angle matches theoretical predictions Achieved high T e = 3.6keV in current drive phasing for first time using high B T = 5.5kG –Improvement consistent with reduced PDI and surface waves expected at higher B T –Expect similar improvements from higher k || Useful for HHFW-CD during ramp-up Useful for HHFW heating at high-  HHFW heats efficiently in current drive phasing Steady state scenario predicted with 100% non-inductive current using only NBICD and pressure driven currents Plasma shape and profiles for predicted 100% non-inductive scenario I P = 750kA  N < 5.6,  P < 1.5,  T < 17% l i = 0.6, q min =1.3, B T =4.5kG  = 2.3,  X-L = 0.75, q*=3.9 Present high-f NI long-pulse H-modes: Target scenario: Inductive current drive is replaced by: Higher J NBI from higher T e Higher J BS from higher  P-thermal Need 60% increase in T, 25% decrease in n e –Lithium for higher  E & density control? 20% increase in thermal confinement 30% increase in HH 98 –Core HHFW heating Want q 0  q min  2.4  higher with- wall limit Higher  for higher q,  P, f BS High  for improved kink stability (shape parameters already achieved in other discharges) I P = 700kA  N = 6.7,  P = 2.7,  T =15% l i = 0.5, q min = 2.4, B T =5.2kG  = 2.6,  X-L = 0.85, q*=5.6 Neoclassical Analysis of current profile information Full complement of kinetic profile data enables analysis of current profile composition Full neoclassical calculation of ohmic, and pressure driven currents Shot Black total predicted current Gray total reconstructed current (MSE) Orange - Ohmic current Red - Bootsrap Blue - Beam driven current (TRANSP) Data averaged over s Loop voltage profile calculated from equilibria constrained with MSE data Neoclassical resistivity and bootstrap current from Sauter, et al., Phys. Plasmas 6 (1999) ) 2) 3) 4) 2