Project Overview Ron Strykowsky Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 October 2-3rd, 2013 NSTX-U Supported.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Advertisements

Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Team Meeting April 25, 2014 NSTX-U Construction Progress NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U.
Machine Installations and Construction Management Erik D. Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318.
Machine Installations and Construction Management Erik D. Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318.
Operations Notes Updates Since Last Team Meeting Stefan Gerhardt NSTX Team Meeting B318 January 3 rd, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Project Overview Ron Strykowsky Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 February 4th, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory EVMS Certification Review NSTX Project Overview Ron Strykowsky October 4-6, 2011.
Machine Installation and Construction Management Erik D. Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318.
NSTX-U FWP 2015 Budget Planning Meeting-NSTX Upgrade Status- Ron Strykowsky – 4/10/ NSTX Upgrade Progress Overview Ron Strykowsky Erik Perry, Tim.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX Team Meeting May 28, 2008 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
NSTX-U Diagnostic Installations S.P. Gerhardt, B. Stratton, R. Kaita With help from A. von Halle, E. Perry, F. Jones NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Sustainment and Control Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt 12/5/12 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
EP-TSG session Meeting agenda et al. M. Podestà NSTX-U Research Forum 2015 EP-TSG session PPPL, Room B252 02/24/2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
NSTX Team Meeting July 21,, 2011 NSTX TF Update NSTX Team Meeting July 21, 2011 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
1 NSTX Upgrade Progress Report May 7 th, 2013 Ron Strykowsky, Erik Perry, Tim Stevenson, Larry Dudek, Steve Langish, Tom Egebo, Mike Williams and the NSTXU.
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office May 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the NSTX.
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP for Recomissioning the HHFW System R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli NSTX-U Supported by.
NSTX Centerstack Fabrication Status James H. Chrzanowski and the NSTX Upgrade Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science.
NSTX-U Construction Erik Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Readiness to Operate Review LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
M&P TSG Prioritization for FY2015 and campaign startup M.A. Jaworski, C.H. Skinner, R. Kaita NSTX-U Science and Topical Science Group organizational meeting.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTXU Project Update Jim Chrzanowski, Larry Dudek, Erik Perry, Tim Stevenson, Ron Strykowsky and the Project Team October 4th, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: X Science LLC Ricky Maqueda NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by Vacuum Pumping, Gauging and RGA Systems W. Blanchard Princeton Plasma.
Safety Jerry Levine Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 May 2 - 3, 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
NSTX Team Meeting February 7, 2007 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
NSTX Team Meeting December 21, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting May 7, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Tom Egebo PPPL Review of the NSTX TF Coil Repair Effort September 3 - 4, 2003 Cost & Schedule to Completion Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics.
NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
NSTX NSTX LidsJuly 6, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar.
NSTX Team Meeting June 30, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
NSTX Team Meeting December 4, 2008 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office February 2014 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
NSTX-U Disruption PAM Working Group – Controlled Shutdown XP Discussion S. A. Sabbagh and R. Raman Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting –Masa Ono August 15, 2014 NSTX-U Team Meeting August 15, 2014 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Project Overview Ron Strykowsky Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 December 11-12th, 2012 NSTX-U.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
Research Operations Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Team Meeting B-318 December 4 th, 2014 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX Team Meeting August 9, 2011 NSTX TF Update Team Meeting August 9, 2011 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office December 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
NSTX Team Meeting April 5, 2006 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
NSTX NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design ReviewJune 22-24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Presentation transcript:

Project Overview Ron Strykowsky Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 October 2-3rd, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics Old Dominion ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Agenda

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Contents Progress; –Great Technical progress to date Performance metrics, Cost, Schedule, Budget, Staffing, Risks; –On cost and schedule Charge Questions; –Responsive and complete.

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd NSTXU Test Cell – December 2012 Umbrella legs being cut out and replaced Second beamline in place Vacuum Vessel cutting for Bay J/K neutral beam cap underway 4 Outer TF coils removed

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Excellent safety record. On schedule and cost. On track for January rough pump down. NB Cryogenic services complete 3 HVE’s installed Cable tray and diagnostic rack re-installation underway All Outer TF coils installed along with inter linkages NB DI water piping installation nearing completion Neutral beam vessel port installed on the vacuum vessel (Level II milestone) Platform installation completed Source platform installed NB Power cabling underway NSTXU Test Cell September Significant progress Umbrella structural modifications (incl legs) completed

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Center Stack Fabrication is the critical path! Assembly Proceeding Well  Inner TF bundle Conductor manufactured and delivered COMPLETE  All cooling tubes soldered in the conductors COMPLETE  All 36 TF conductors primed and wrapped with insulation COMPLETE  Four quadrant successfully VPI’d and Tested COMPLETE (major risk retired) (Level 2 milestone)  4 quadrants assembled together and insulated COMPLETE  Full TF bundle successfully VPI’d (major risk retired) COMPLETE  Centerstack casing fabricated, delivered and populated with PFC studs COMPLETE  OH winding assembly fabricated and installed COMPLETE  OH braze qualification successful COMPLETE  Center stack assembly tilt fixture fabricated, load tested and installed into position COMPLETE  Aqua pour process underway  OH winding to begin in November  Final assembly and delivery to the NSTX Test Cell in May 2014

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Cost –CPI = 0.98 Schedule –SPI = 0.97 –Total float = 10 1/2 months to late finish CD-4 Completion –Forecast= November, 2014 –CD-4 DOE Milestone (Late Finish)= September 2015 BAC =$85.0 EAC= $87.6 TPC =94.3M Cost to date = $63.4 M 72% complete (through August) Free balance contingency 30%-28% –$7.2M remaining consistent with remaining risk and uncertainty (27% at CD-2) –Contingency extrapolation consistent with initial CD-2 analysis –Schedule is now major driver to cost containment Performance metrics good

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd CD-4 SEPT Forecast November 2014 CD-3 Dec 2011 Schedule on track for early finish ~3/4 the way through the Centerstack fabrication ! Key to meeting CD-4 and cost containment  Complete and deliver the centerstack to the test cell for installation by May 2014! ~3/4 the way through the Centerstack fabrication ! Key to meeting CD-4 and cost containment  Complete and deliver the centerstack to the test cell for installation by May 2014! Critical path continues to be the centerstack fabrication and installation Keys to meeting schedule Vendor vetting and oversight Timely receipt inspection Overtime Multiple shifts Scheduling workshops Improve efficiency through anticipation Collaborations with NML (report available) 10 1/2 months float remain Critical path continues to be the centerstack fabrication and installation Keys to meeting schedule Vendor vetting and oversight Timely receipt inspection Overtime Multiple shifts Scheduling workshops Improve efficiency through anticipation Collaborations with NML (report available) 10 1/2 months float remain Deliver CS to Test Cell May 2014

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd NSTX Upgrade – Milestones on track Completed since last review

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Procurement Status - Major procurements completed Procurements represent only 9% of remaining scope

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Tech Labor is supporting schedule Technician labor (EM & EE) needs being met by utilizing; Overtime Temporary staff Re-assigning people based on mission need Critical skills (i.e. welders, machinists, crane operators) planned weekly and prioritized daily via the work control center (WCC) Currently at the peak of expected staffing Technician labor (EM & EE) needs being met by utilizing; Overtime Temporary staff Re-assigning people based on mission need Critical skills (i.e. welders, machinists, crane operators) planned weekly and prioritized daily via the work control center (WCC) Currently at the peak of expected staffing

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Budget Status DOE Funding consistent with and supportive of early finish * Our obligational control level during the CR is at the AT level so PPPL has flexibility to “protect” the MIE project from CR perturbations. *

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Risk & Opportunities 13 Retirement Date OH Fab $1,400k  April 2014 (cost of rebuilding twice) Inner TF bundle fab$325k  Oct 2013 Serious injury stand-down$188k CD-4 Late vendor delivery on critical path $250k April 2014 I&C add’l capacity $300k June 2014 Diagnostic re-installation $294k April 2014 Hardware fit up issues $477k Sept 2014 Mgmt direct allocations $216k April 2014 Critical skill lost $188k  Sept 2014 Other$155k June 2014 Total open$3,793 k Opportunities PPPL Overhead rates (baselined at conservative levels ) Risk Events ~$400K net risk retired since last review TF & OH assembly, incl VPI operations, still remain the critical risk events ~$400K net risk retired since last review TF & OH assembly, incl VPI operations, still remain the critical risk events

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Charge question #1 1.Construction Efforts: a)Are construction efforts being executed safely? b)Does the project have adequate resources and the appropriate skills mix to execute the project per the plan? NSTX Upgrade project continues to have an excellent safety record. One recordable non-lost time incident during the period. Trained, experienced and engaged workers and supervisors continue to use well-developed work planning & control processes, combined with support and oversight of ES&H professionals to ensure that NSTX-U construction is being executed safely. This was evidenced by the many successful major lifts and VPI operations. Overall the current staff levels on-board are adequate to execute the project schedule. Critical skills (i.e. welders, crane operators, machinists) work priorities managed via the Work Control Center (daily morning meetings.

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Charge question #2 2. Baseline Cost and Schedule: a)Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the approved baseline cost and schedule? b)Is the contingency remaining adequate for the risks that remain? The project is 10 1/2 months ahead of our CD-4 milestone. Reasonable contingency remains to complete the project. This conclusion is based on forensic schedule analyses, updated EAC’s and contingency extrapolation. Budget plans consistent with DOE BA guidance and CR expectations. Weekly detail schedule progress and monthly EVMS updates conducted. Monthly re-evaluation of EAC’s and recent bottoms-up EAC performed. $400K net reduction in risks identified. Project schedule contingency is 10 1/2 months, cost contingency range is 30%-28% (ref 26.6% baselined at CD-2 ) The project is 72% complete compared to 54% at the last review. (this completion rate consistent with November 2014 forecast.) Scope contingency analysis updated. The project has integrated all relevant program tasks into it’s integrated project schedule. (ref Rollover Schedule)

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Charge question #3 3. Management: a)Evaluate the management structure as to its adequacy to deliver the scope within budget and schedule. b)Are risks being actively managed? c)Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous project reviews? The key management personnel required to deliver the baseline are still in place within the project organization. This includes DOE Federal Project Director and senior laboratory leadership. The Project, with institutional support, successfully managed the FY2013 aggressive procurement plans that ensured the timely receipt of parts and hardware, prioritization of field tasks, and the re-assignment of people to support schedule. The project has reacted effectively to resolve technical issues that have arisen. Communication amongst the project team, senior PPPL management and DOE has provided transparency into all aspects of the project. Independent reviews performed every 6 months by the Princeton University advisory panel. Collaborations with MAST and National Magnet Laboratory. Project risk identified. Mitigation plans being implemented (e.g. coordination meetings, procedures, training, mockups, R&D, trials). The EVMS and supplemental management tools are being effectively utilized to manage the project. Previous review recommendations reconciled - see next slide

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Charge question #3 continued 3-c. Previous review recommendations: 1.Develop a comprehensive facility readiness plan and schedule including both project and non-project items. Present plan at the next review. Presentation by Al vonHalle. 2.Assign adequate personnel to ensure completion of the Digital Coil Protection System on the original baseline schedule. Personnel assigned (hardware, software, and supporting staff). Good progress being made. Noteworthy designs documented and presented at SOFE Attend presentations by Ron Hatcher and Keith Erickson in the afternoon breakout) 3.Reassess the potential impacts of the loss of critical skills and personnel and update the risk registry by February 1, Major funding driven crisis averted. However, the risk registry has been updated to reflect nominal impact of key personnel leaving. 4.Prepare a plan for startup readiness that is acceptable to the Site Office prior to the next review. See #1 above

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Charge question #4 4. Transition to Operations: Is the Project appropriately aligned for completion of construction efforts and transitioning NSTX-U for CD-4 approval? Al vonHalle to provide overview. Project integrated schedule being used to track project and non-project scope leading to CD-4. Weekly project reviews conducted as part of the “Rollover Schedule” meeting. NSTX-U maintains an Activity Certification Committee (ACC) to review newly installed subsystems before commissioning. System reviews are performed at completion of construction activities. Operational Readiness Assessment (ORA) will be conducted. DOE-PSO taking lead. Approvals and training required for NSTX test cell access (per OP-NSTX-12). Work Permits ensure that Test Cell configuration control and proper work practices are maintained. Proper system operation is ensured by an approved set of operations procedures: Administrative procedure (OP-NSTX-02) is used to list the sub-system and integrated system procedures used to start-up and operate NSTX-U The electromagnetic ISTP (ISTP-001) defines protection system settings and necessary test shots for any changes to the NSTX electromagnetic configuration and/or operating envelope. Operator Training Matrixes (OP-NSTX-12)

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Summary The project has maintained a safe working environment. The project continues to make good technical progress. The project is on schedule and cost with adequate contingency to finish. The project is sufficiently staffed to meet schedule. The project is on track for meeting CD-2 baseline within OFES budgetary guidance. The project is preparing for transitioning into operations.

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Contingency Analysis

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Forensic Schedule Analysis

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Project Org Chart

NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade Project – Office of Science Review – October 2-3 rd Project Org Chart