NRC Program Questionnaire Median Time to Degree (TTD) Columbus, OH October 2007 Chad Muntz SR. Research and Policy Analyst University of Maryland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ph.D. Completion Project: Overview and Research Agenda CGS Annual Meeting December 10, 2004 Presenter: Daniel Denecke Director, Best Practices Council.
Advertisements

December 9, 2006 Council of Graduate Schools 1 Ph.D. Completion Project: Tools and Templates 46 th CGS Annual Meeting Technical Workshop.
Office of Institutional Research Song Yan, Kristy Maxwell, Mark A. Byrd Associate Director Senior Research Analyst AVP Wayne State University.
Proposed Revisions to Tuition Fellowship Program February 14, 2012.
Graduate Education at USC 1. The University 2. Being a faculty member 3. Being a student.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Janet Bond-Robinson Arizona State University Chemistry & Biochemistry Dept. Redesign GENERAL CHEMISTRY Non-science Majors Science Majors Sem I and II Engineering.
The Graduate School at The University of Missouri– St. Louis Kathleen M. Haywood, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Dean for Graduate Education in the College.
ECE Graduate Program Guidelines Brian Johnson Professor and Chair Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
AY Annual Program Survey Results NASPAA Annual Conference 2014 Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Bachelor’s Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity * and Gender: *U.S. citizens and permanent residents. SOURCE: NSF/SRS, Science and Engineering Degrees,
Education in the Czech Republic. Czech Republic  The Czech Republic is a country in Central Europe that borders Poland to the North, Germany to the northwest.
Mechanical Engineering 1 Graduate Programs Degree Programs –Master of Engineering or M.E. (thesis option) –Master of Science or M.S. (non-thesis option)
Dr. Laura Dawson Ullrich March 27,  Grade Point Average  Requirement varies, but most require a GPA of greater than 2.75  GRE/GMAT  Focus is.
By Jayelle Hegewald, Michele Houtappels and Melinda Gray 2013.
Careers in Neuroscience Frank Johnson, Ph.D. Director, Program in Neuroscience Florida State University.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
The Case for a Name Change John F. Carney III, Ph.D., PE November 2006.
Research-based Information on Diverse 21 st Century Students & Resources to Help Them Thrive in SBS Guests: Chris Cash, IBP Director of Student Assistance.
Arizona State University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Science Education Mathematics Education Language and Literacy.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Indiana University School of Education Luise P. McCarty, Associate Dean for Graduate Studies; Associate Professor of Philosophy of Education J. Debora.
The Council of Graduate Schools Ph.D. Completion Project Daniel Denecke, Program Director Ken Redd, Director of Research and Policy Analysis Helen Frasier,
The Council of Graduate Schools Ph.D. Completion Project Daniel Denecke, Program Director Ken Redd, Director of Research and Policy Analysis Helen Frasier,
Program Requirements 1.M.A. Courses and language requirement 2.Qualifying Paper and Oral Exam or M.A. Thesis 3.First-year Ph.D. Paper and Oral Exam 4.Ph.D.
Columbia University :: Office of the Provost :: Planning and Institutional Research NRC Assessment of Research-Doctoral Programs October 27,
Orientation 2012 Welcome University of Minnesota Driven to Discover.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
UMass Boston Retention, Persistence, and Graduation Rates UMass Boston Advising Collaborative March 28, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Policy.
University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Graduate Program Degrees.
Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering The Ohio State University CSE Graduate Program Dr. Rephael Wenger Graduate Admissions Committee.
PLANNING 10:UNIVERSITY VOCABULARY November 17, 2011.
WELCOME Rehabilitation Sciences Doctoral Program Faculty and Students.
Copyright © 2014 by Nelson Education Limited. 3-1 Chapter 3 Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion.
Department of Engineering Management, Information & Systems Systems Engineering Program Proposed PhD with a Major in Systems Engineering Jerrell Stracener,
By: Colton Sadler Contact Information: 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO Missouri University of Science and Technology.
The Department of Curriculum and Instruction has many outstanding programs and degree opportunities.
Thinking About Psychology The Science of Mind and Behavior 3e Charles T. Blair-Broeker & Randal M. Ernst PowerPoint Presentation Slides by Kent Korek Germantown.
Appendix 6 College Comparisons. Mean Total Score by College (Possible Score Range 400 to 500) SSD = Total Scores for Colleges of Business, Education,
How do Stipends Affect the Supply of PhD Scientists and Engineers? NBER Science and Engineering Workforce Project Preliminary Report: Tanwin Chang, Hanley.
The Ph.D. Shortage in Communication Sciences and Disorders CAPCSD Palm Springs, CA April 25, 2002 Rosalind R. Scudder and Janet Koehnke.
M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Computational Science Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University.
Understanding Full-Time Status The Graduate School, October 2015.
Ph.D. Programs in Systems Engineering Prepared by Dr. Jerrell Stracener.
Department of Engineering Management, Information & Systems Systems Engineering Program Proposed PhD with a Major in Systems Engineering Jerrell Stracener,
© May 2001,1 Ph.D., in Applied Science with Major in Systems Engineering.
Psychology’s Statistics Appendix. Statistics Are a means to make data more meaningful Provide a method of organizing information so that it can be understood.
Students and Applicants in Higher Education The need for wider information.
Key Findings from Research Understanding for Improvement Key Findings from Research Understanding for Improvement NSF/NIH/CGS Graduate Support Workshop.
An Evaluation of Pipeline Interventions for Minority Scholars An Evaluation of Pipeline Interventions for Minority Scholars Roberta Spalter-Roth, Jean.
Graduate Recruiting CISE Department Spring 1999 Douglas Dankel II
Community College of Baltimore County
OUHSC Graduate College
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
The NRC Study and Neuroscience
Still Seeking Employment
We… Prepare our students to lead in a variety of educational settings including K-12, higher education, adult education and the nonprofit sector Combine.
with your Sanity in tact
FIVE YEAR TRENDS FALL FALL 2016
Supervisory Committee Meeting
DLSPH: Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
The Graduate School at UMBC
Thinking About Psychology The Science of Mind and Behavior 3e
US Graduate Education Model
Graduate Program Update
Oral Reviews: Helping Students Make Connections
Graduate School Conference
Presentation transcript:

NRC Program Questionnaire Median Time to Degree (TTD) Columbus, OH October 2007 Chad Muntz SR. Research and Policy Analyst University of Maryland

Median Time To Degree 2003/04 – 2005/06 Time To Degree All Students (TTDALL) Some programs (6) reported “0” Some programs (31) did not report Non-zero range 2.1 (Colorado; Cognitive Science) to 16.3 (Washington; Music) Time to Degree Full Time Only (TTDFULL) Some programs (73) reported “0” Some programs (152) did not report Non-zero range 2.0 (Arizona; East Asian Studies) to 12.8 (Missouri; Classics) 955/1716 (56%) of fields had the same TTD for All and Full 189/368 (51%) in Arts and Humanities 289/493 (59%) in Life Sciences 328/550 (60%) in Physical Science, Mathematics and Engineering 149/305 (49%) in Social Sciences

Analyses Mean—average of all reported median TTD (non-zero or missing) Median—median of all reported median TTD (non-zero or missing) Min—minimum TTD (non-zero or missing) Max—maximum TTD Range—difference between the max and min 90 th —90 th percentile of TTD scores (non-zero or missing) –Used to determine if 90% of the graduates will be reported in the completions tables The following are used to determine if meaningful reductions in TTD are found: Master’s Policy (C4 on Program Questionnaire) Continuous Enrollment (C6 &C7) Candidacy Requirements (C13 and C14) Teaching Assistantship Requirements (D5 & D6) Size of the degree cohorts used in the TTD calculation Size of the Core/New Faculty

TTD By NRC Area Time To Degree ALL (C2a) Excludes missing and zero NRC AREANMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Arts and Humanities Life Sciences Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering Social and Behavioral Sciences Total Time To Degree FULL (C2b) Excludes missing and zero NRC AREANMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Arts and Humanities Life Sciences Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering Social and Behavioral Sciences Total

TTD By NRC Area (TTD ALL ≠ TTD FULL) Time To Degree ALL (C2a) Excludes missing and zero Excludes TTD ALL = TTD FULL NRC AREANMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Arts and Humanities Life Sciences Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering Social and Behavioral Sciences Total Time To Degree FULL (C2b) Excludes missing and zero Excludes TTD ALL = TTD FULL NRC AREANMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Arts and Humanities Life Sciences Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering Social and Behavioral Sciences Total The purpose of this analyses is to get the true difference between TTD ALL and TTD Full for programs that reported differences. In these tables, it can be seen that there is a larger difference for the students who were full-time. However, when the entire data set is used (including the 56% of the data where TTD ALL = TTD Full), measures of Central Tendency show very little differences as seen in the previous table. Therefore, it is difficult to use all of the data to make meaningful conclusions about full-time enrollment.

Master’s Policy Time To Degree ALL (C2a) By Master's Policy Excludes missing and zero Master's PolicyNMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Master's Required For Admission Earn Master's in doctoral program Neither of the Above Time To Degree FULL (C2b) By Master's Policy Excludes missing and zero Master's PolicyNMeanMedianMINMAXRange90th Master's Required For Admission Earn Master's in doctoral program Neither of the Above

Master’s Policy By NRC Area

Continuous Enrollment

Continuous Enrollment Applies To:

Other Comparisons Faculty Award for Mentoring –About 0.10 year reduction in time to degree (TTDALL) Size of Core/New Faculty –No significant correlation with time to degree (alpha >.05) Size of Degree Cohort –Significant (small) correlation (corr=-.101; alpha <.0001) for TTD All (More grads who graduated in a program, the shorter TTD) Required Teaching Assistantships with Median TTDALL –511 programs with 0 semesters (5.74); 257 programs w/ 1 semester (5.72); 275 programs w/ 2 semster (5.70) –Nonlinear relationship that median TTDALL peaks with 4-7 semesters required for TA Note: That most 1,043 of 1,311 reported 2 or fewer semester requirements Programs with Candidacy Requirements shortened time to degree by.25 for TTDALL (Median All: 5.74 versus 6.00) –Written Exams (Median 5.72) –Oral Exams (Median 5.70) –Master’s Degree (Median 5.98) –Defense of Dissertation Proposal (5.75)

Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED)