Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Wesnesday, January 30, 2013 PS 153 Paul Perskin CFN 204.
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
NCOSP Learning Community Forum March 2007 Science Curriculum Topic Study Examining Student Thinking.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Tools for Teachers Linking Assessment and Learning “Assessment should be an integral part of teaching. It is the mechanism whereby teachers can learn how.
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
CCSS Mathematics Leadership Team Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Application and Concept Development.
Successfully Implementing High-Level Math Tasks
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Preparation, Part II of IV: Unit Planning Dr. Jane J. Baskerville & Steve.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Los Angeles Unified School District – Instructional Support Services Algebra I Unit 1 Training 07/10/07Adapted from the PRISMA project developed by the.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
An Introduction to Science Curriculum Topic Study MSP Summer Institute August 13 th WVC, Wenatchee Presenter: Jeff Bullock; Regional Science Coordinator.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
USING DIGITAL OPEN-SOURCE EDUCATION RESOURCES IN THE SECONDARY MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM Presented by Dr. Paul Gray Chief Curriculum Officer Cosenza & Associates,
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Gradual Release of Responsibility. (c) Frey & Fisher, 2008 In some classrooms … TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Independent “You do it alone”
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
12.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION MAR 2015 SAMPLING, VARIABILITY, AND PROPORTION (OH MY)
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
Moving beyond “Fidelity of Implementation” Some Thoughts about Mathematics Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development Moving beyond “Fidelity of Implementation”:
Teaching & Learning Trajectories: Building Coherence, Connections, and Retention Across Grades Session 3 May 10, 2012 Oakland Schools Gerri Devine
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS North Carolina Teachers of Mathematics Conference 2013 Teruni Lamberg Ph.D. University of Nevada, Reno Whole Class Mathematics Discussions:
CTS Study Group Maureen Griffin Bernie Hermanson Spencer Mesick Alicia Schiller Kyle Weiss.
Responsible Actively Participate Respectful No side bar conversations Reliable Start and end meetings on time.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Victoria Bill, University of.
Field Fridays: Immersing Preservice Teachers in Learning Inquiry Mathematics Instruction Eula E. Monroe & Damon L. Bahr Brigham Young University Joseph.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith and Victoria Bill at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute.
May 8, Let’s Do Some Math 6 cats catch 6 rats in 6 minutes. How many cats will it take to catch 100 rats in 50 minutes?
Promoting Perseverance in Mathematics Borough Instructional Leads for Mathematics Math Team Department of STEM December 3, 2015.
Mark Roddy, Ph.D. Seattle University Effective Teaching Practices in Mathematics from the Marzano 9, to the NCTM 8, to your classroom.
Assessment Considerations A Student Scenario. Assessment Plan Embedded Assessment (Short Cycle) Informs practice Dynamic, moment by moment Participatory.
Review of TTLP Insert comments for another assigned group within their Google doc (be certain to include your name) Read the comments made on your TTLP.
The Year of Core Instruction
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Bag of Marbles Task Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Bag of Marbles Task Examine the student work Were there additional strategies used by the students that were not discussed yesterday Which misconceptions discussed yesterday surfaced in the student work Were there additional misconceptions beyond what was discussed yesterday Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Linking to Literature/ Research: The QUASAR Project The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Planning for High level Tasks High level mathematical tasks are often challenging to implement One way to both control teaching with high-level tasks and promote student success with them is through detailed planning prior to the lesson Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Thinking Through a Lesson: Successfully Implementing High-Level Tasks Focus question: What are some implications for teaching and learning that the article implies? Individually look for evidence in the article and highlight at least 3 implications cited by the authors Discuss these implications at your table and create a poster of your team’s top 5 implications for teaching & learning Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

During the planning phase, teachers make decisions that affect instruction dramatically. They decide what to teach, how they are going to teach, how to organize the classroom, what routines to use, and how to adapt instruction for individuals. Fennema & Franke, 1992, p. 156 Why Lesson Planning? Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Typical Lesson Plan Format Goals and Objectives Materials Motivation Lesson Procedure Closure Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Typical Lesson Plan Format Goals and Objectives Materials Motivation Lesson Procedure Closure Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Typical Lesson Plan Format Goals and Objectives Materials Motivation Lesson Procedure Closure Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

The Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol In what ways is this protocol different from other lesson protocols or formats you have used in the past? Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

How is TTLP Different ? Focuses on students’ learning Addresses ways to facilitate the learning of all students Requires anticipating a range of solutions or solution strategies Prompts the development of questions that will support students engagement and learning Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Background on the Thinking Through the Lesson Protocol (TTLP) Framework for developing lessons Dr. Margaret Smith- University of Pittsburgh “As a teacher, how will you determine what your students learn and the effectiveness of your instruction?” Developed as a result of nearly a decade of work on QUASAR at the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh “The effectiveness of a lesson depends significantly on the care with which the lesson plan is prepared.”- Brahier, 2000

So What’s The Point? The purpose of the Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol is to prompt teachers in thinking deeply about a specific lesson that they will be teaching. The goal is to move beyond the structural components associated with lesson planning to a deeper consideration of how to advance students’ mathematical understanding during the lesson. This is not to say that structural components of a lesson are not important, but rather that a focus on structural components alone is not sufficient to ensure that students learn mathematics. Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Teacher reflection: “I may not have it sitting on my desk, going point to point with it, but I think: What are the misconceptions? How am I going to organize work? What are my questions? Those are the three big things I think about when planning a lesson.” Smith, Bill, Hughes- (MTMS, October 2008, p. 137)

Picking a topic Use the SAS portal including the PA standards, core standards, and curriculum framework sections to determine a topic for focused lesson planning

The Tool 1.Selecting and Setting up a Math Task ESTABLISHING mathematical goals for the lesson (what you want students to know and understand about mathematics as a result of the lesson) DETERMINING prior knowledge and experiences which relate to the mathematical goals SELECTING a high-level math task to engage all students in meaningful learning of the mathematical goals ANTICIPATING solutions, misconceptions, and errors that students might develop as they struggle with the task Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh

Curriculum Topic Study How would Curriculum Topic Study help in the development of part 1 of the TTLP?

Engagement in CTS Find the guide in CTS that best links to your topic Examine the resources from section III of the study guide to better define your learning goals Determine the prior knowledge related to these goals by reviewing the appropriate pages from the Atlas (section V)

Engagement in CTS Complete the left side of the organizer regarding your current knowledge of appropriate teaching strategies and student misconceptions regarding your topic

Engagement in CTS Read the appropriate pages from the resources in sections II and IV to access the research regarding instructional implications and student learning Complete the right side of the organizer while reading the research

Selecting a task Based on the your research, choose a task that will support students’ learning of the mathematical goals SAS portal Materials and resources High level tasks on wikispace

Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Based on your research, begin work on developing part 1 of the TTLP Have all members of your group record answers to all questions in Part 1 of the TTLP or record all answers on Google Docs Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh