Interpreting High Resolution Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Observations with MUSTANG Charles Romero University of Virginia, National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low-frequency radio maps for the REXCESS cluster sample S.R. Heidenreich, University of Southampton In collaboration with J.H. Croston, University of Southampton;
Advertisements

Prospects for the Planck Satellite: limiting the Hubble Parameter by SZE/X-ray Distance Technique R. Holanda & J. A. S. Lima (IAG-USP) I Workshop “Challenges.
X-Ray Measurements of the Mass of M87 D. Fabricant, M. Lecar, and P. Gorenstein Astrophysical Journal, 241: , 15 October 1980 Image:
Cosmological constraints from estimates of M gas -M tot -c in X-ray luminous clusters S. Ettori (INAF/OA Bologna) with F. Gastaldello, M. Meneghetti, I.
Chandra's Clear View of the Structure of Clusters Craig Sarazin University of Virginia Bullet Cluster (Markevitch et al. 2004) Hydra A Cluster (Kirkpatrick.
CLASH SZE Observations and Collaborations Keiichi Umetsu, Academia Sinica IAA (ASIAA), Taiwan (September 20, 2010)
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
SZE in WMAP Data Jose M. Diego & Bruce Partridge 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1179 La Thuile, March 2012.
The Radio/X-ray Interaction in Abell 2029 Tracy Clarke (Univ. of Virginia) Collaborators: Craig Sarazin (UVa), Elizabeth Blanton (UVa)
The GMRT Radio Halo survey Results and implications for LOFAR Simona Giacintucci Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, Cambridge, USA INAF-IRA, Bologna, Italy T. Venturi,
Suzanne Staggs (Princeton) Rencontres de Blois, 1 June 2011 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT): Still More Cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background.
Luigina Feretti Istituto di Radioastronomia CNR Bologna, Italy Radio observations of cluster mergers X-Ray and Radio Connections, Santa Fe, NM February.
Ben Maughan (CfA)Chandra Fellows Symposium 2006 The cluster scaling relations observed by Chandra C. Jones, W. Forman, L. Van Speybroeck.
Hamburg, 18 September 2008 LOFAR Wokshop1/44 Thermal and non-thermal emission from galaxy clusters: X-ray and LOFAR observations Chiara Ferrari Observatoire.
The Green Bank Telescope a powerful instrument for enhancing ALMA science Unblocked Aperture Low sidelobes gives high dynamic range Resistance to Interference.
First X-Ray Results from the Optically Selected Red Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) at Z ~ 1 Amalia K. Hicks, Erica Ellingson, Howard Yee, Tesla Jeltema,
COLD FRONTS IN GROUPS AND CLUSTERS AND THEIR DYNAMICAL STATE IN THE OPTICAL FABIO GASTALDELLO INAF-IASF MILAN & UC IRVINE M. MESSA, L. DI GESU S. GHIZZARDI,
Prospects and Problems of Using Galaxy Clusters for Precision Cosmology Jack Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado,
The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect AMI day, 2011 September 30 Mark Birkinshaw University of Bristol.
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Annalisa Bonafede PhD student at IRA Radio Astronomy Institute Bologna (Italy) With: L. Feretti, G. Giovannini, M. Murgia, F. Govoni, G. B.Taylor, H. Ebeling,
Low frequency radio observations of galaxy groups With acknowledgements to: R. Athreya, P. Mazzotta, T. Clarke, W. Forman, C. Jones, T. Ponman S.Giacintucci.
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
14 July 2009Keith Bechtol1 GeV Gamma-ray Observations of Galaxy Clusters with the Fermi LAT Keith Bechtol representing the Fermi LAT Collaboration July.
Southern African Large Telescope Observations of ACT SZ-Selected Clusters Brian Kirk Catherine Cress, Matt Hilton, Steve Crawford, Jack Hughes, Felipe.
Title Here Probing the Epoch of Reionization with the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment (TIME) Jamie Bock Caltech / JPL CCAT Workshop, Boulder.
Modelling radio galaxies in simulations: CMB contaminants and SKA / Meerkat sources by Fidy A. RAMAMONJISOA MSc Project University of the Western Cape.
MUSTANG-2 follow-up of eROSITA-selected clusters Tony Mroczkowski 1, Jon Sievers 2, Nick Battaglia 3, Brian Mason 4, Charles Romero 4, Mark Devlin 5, Alex.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
X-Ray Observations of RCS Clusters at High Redshift
Studying AGN feedback in nearby X-ray groups and clusters Electra Panagoulia Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK With: Andy Fabian Jeremy Sanders Julie.
OCRA-p science projects Marcin Gawroński Bonn 14.III.2011.
Bolometer Camera Plans at MPIfR, Bonn E. Kreysa, Kaustuv moni Basu, H.-P. Gemünd, G. Siringo, A. Kovacs, F. Schuller, A. Weiß, K. Menten Max-Planck-Institute.
Using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect to Determine H o and the Baryon Fraction by Michael McElwain Astronomy 278: Anisotropy and Large Scale Structure in.
Interpreting High Resolution Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Observations with MUSTANG Charles Romero University of Virginia, National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
MASS AND ENTROPY PROFILES OF X-RAY BRIGHT RELAXED GROUPS FABIO GASTALDELLO UC IRVINE & BOLOGNA D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK W. MATHEWS.
Academia Sinica National Taiwan University AMiBA System Performance Kai-yang Lin 1,2 and AMiBA Team 1,2,3 1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia.
Galaxy Wakes – Theory & Observations Irini Sakelliou University of Birmingham D.M. Acreman, T.J. Ponman, I.R. Stevens University of Birmingham M.R. Merrifield.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
GH2005 Gas Dynamics in Clusters III Craig Sarazin Dept. of Astronomy University of Virginia A85 Chandra (X-ray) Cluster Merger Simulation.
Using the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Array in Detailed Studies of Galaxy Clusters 3 rd Biennial Leopoldina Conference Dark Energy 9 th October 2008 Tony Mroczkowski.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Joint Analysis of Weak Lensing and SZE data from the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager Natasha Hurley-Walker in collaboration with Farhan Feroz, Jonathan Zwart,
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
The effects of the complex mass distribution of clusters on weak lensing cluster surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
X-RAY FOLLOW-UP OF STRONG LENSING OBJECTS: SL2S GROUPS (AND A1703) FABIO GASTALDELLO (IASF-MILAN, UCI) M. LIMOUSIN & THE SL2S COLLABORATION.
E-MERLIN : a pathfinder for the SKA (a summary of the e-MERLIN talk given at the Berkeley SKA meeting) e-MERLIN : a pathfinder for the SKA (a summary of.
Large Area Surveys - I Large area surveys can answer fundamental questions about the distribution of gas in galaxy clusters, how gas cycles in and out.
Baryon content of galaxy groups Ming Sun (University of Virginia) ‏ M. Voit, M. Donahue (MSU) A. Vikhlinin, W. Forman, C. Jones (CfA) N. Sehgal (KIPAC)
Clusters of Galaxies in the Microwaves
Simulating the SZ Sky Predictions for Upcoming Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Galaxy Cluster Surveys Eric J. Hallman CASA, University of Colorado 16 February,
PART II Simulations of Shocks in Clusters of Galaxies ALMA Users Workshop 8 February, 2010 Sándor M. Molnár, Patrick Koch Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
Gas in Galaxy Clusters Tracy Clarke (NRAO) June 5, 2002 Albuquerque, AAS.
Zheng Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University David Weinberg (Advisor, Ohio State) Andreas Berlind (NYU) Josh Frieman (Chicago) Jeremy Tinker (Ohio State)
X-ray Astronomy School 2002 Clusters of Galaxies (and some Cosmology) Scientific and Data Analysis Issues Keith Arnaud NASA/GSFC and UMCP.
Gamma-ray production in Be-XPBs Brian van Soelen University of the Free State supervisor P.J. Meintjes.
Energy Balance in Clusters of Galaxies Patrick M. Motl & Jack O. Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado at Boulder X-ray.
Evolution of clusters M. Arnaud CEA - service d’astrophysique Saclay Assuming favored cosmology  =0.3  =0.7.
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
Probing the Dynamics of Galaxy-Gas Interactions in Groups and Clusters with Chandra and XMM-Newton Marie Machacek Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
G.W. Pratt, Ringberg, 26/10/2005 Structure and scaling of nearby clusters of galaxies – in X-rays Gabriel W. Pratt, MPE Garching, Germany.
Challenging the merger/sloshing cold front paradigm: A2142 revisited by XMM Mariachiara Rossetti (Università degli Studi di Milano & IASF Milano) D. Eckert,
Biased total mass of CC galaxy clusters by SZE measurements Andrea Conte Astronomy PhD, XXIII Cycle “Sapienza” University of Rome. School of Astrophysics.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Missing Thermal Energy of the Universe
Molecular gas in cooling flows Interplay with AGN and starbursts
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Subaru Weak Lensing Study of Seven Merging Clusters of Galaxies
Presentation transcript:

Interpreting High Resolution Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Observations with MUSTANG Charles Romero University of Virginia, National Radio Astronomy Observatory 1 Brian Mason, Craig Sarazin, Mark Whittle, Mike Skrutskie, and Barry Condron

Jack Sayers (Caltech) Nicole Czakon (Sinica) Phil Korngut (JPL/Caltech) Collaborators Brian Mason (NRAO) Simon Dicker (UPenn) Alex Young (MIT-LL) Mark Devlin (UPenn) Erik Reese (Moorpark) Tony Mroczkowski (NRL) Jon Seivers (KwaZulu-Natal) Craig Sarazin (U Virginia) Tracy Clarke (NRL) Sunil Golwala (Caltech) Sara Stanchfield (Upenn) Credit: NASA Key: Graduate Student, Postdoc, Faculty 2 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Outline of Talk Galaxy Clusters – Why study them? SZ Observations – Substructure & Bulk ICM Fitted pressure profiles MUSTANG-2 – Science & Hardware Conclusions & future work Uchicago, adapted from L. Van Sproyboeck 3 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Galaxy Clusters 80-90% Dark Matter 9-18% ICM Gas – n e ~ to [cm -3 ] – k B T e ~ 5 keV (T e ~ 6 x 10 7 K) 1-2% Galaxies 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero – M ○ R 500 ~ 1 Mpc

X-ray cavities Sloshing Radio relics Radio halos Radio phoenixes Shocks Cold fronts 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero5 Fabian+ 2006, Russell+ 2012, van Weeren+ 2012, Giacintucci ICM Physics

Cluster Mass  Cosmology Growth of structure Springel July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

SZ surveys and scaling relations 7 Marriage Czakon Credit: M. Markevitch Y-M scaling relation 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Cosmological Parameter Constraints Sehgal Without scatter in scaling relation With scatter in scaling relation 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

This Study: CLASH clusters 20 X-ray selected 5 lensing selected Multi-wavelength! 0.18 < z < 0.89 Postman July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Outline of Talk Galaxy Clusters – Why study them? SZ Observations – Substructure & Bulk ICM Fitted pressure profiles MUSTANG-2 – Science & Hardware Conclusions & future work Uchicago, adapted from L. Van Sproyboeck July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG’s view of CLASH (+1) July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Studying the ICM: Radio (SZ) Credit: Ned Wright Sunyaev Zel’dovich Effect Δ I ∝ P e 12 MUSTANG 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG + GBT The Green Bank Telescope – Off-axis Gregorian design – 290 MHz to 100 GHz – 240 μm surface RMS – 90 GHz effective area : 2500 m 2 – 90 GHz beam size : 9" FWHM – 2” pointing accuracy MUSTANG – 64 absorber coupled TESs – 42” FOV – 400 μJy/beam in 3’ x 3’ per hour – Cold reimaging optics The science – Star Forming regions – Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect (SZE) 100 m 1 pixel July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Observing via the SZ effect 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero14

Data Processing: MUSTANG Filter out scales > FOV July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG results Korngut Mason July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG results, cont. MACS 0717 Mroczkowski July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG Beam July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Point Source Removal July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Point source removal (cont.) 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero20

Outline of Talk Galaxy Clusters – Why study them? SZ Observations – Substructure & Bulk ICM Fitted pressure profiles MUSTANG-2 – Science & Hardware Conclusions & future work Uchicago, adapted from L. Van Sproyboeck July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Bolocam + MUSTANG 22 Bolocam (on the CSO) 8’ FOV 58” FWHM at 2.1mm (140 GHz) Bolocam Beam MUSTANG Beam 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Pressure Profiles Previous studies have constrained these parameters over their samples of clusters – Nagai 2007, Arnaud 2010, Planck 2012, and Sayers July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Linear Joint Fitting 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero ++ ? 24

MACS 1206 (sequential fit) 25 Young et al (arXiv: ) 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MACS 0647 (simultaneous fit!) 26 Romero et al (arXiv: ) Bolocam only Bolocam + MUSTANG 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Abell Romero et al (arXiv: ) Bolocam only Bolocam + MUSTANG 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero Abell 1835: SZE vs. X-ray

Comparison of profile sets 28 MACS 0647 Abell July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Constraints over all clusters 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 29Charles Romero

Subdivided 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 30 Cool cores clearly have steeper core pressure profiles Charles Romero

Comparing Pressure Profiles 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 31 Our sample shows more dispersion at large radii. Arnaud Charles Romero

Y-M relation 32Charles Romero 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense

SZ + X-ray SZ is directly proportional to P e X-ray emissivity is proportional n e 2 T 1/2 – X-ray constrains n e well 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 33 Constrain T e = P e(SZ) / n e(X) Constrain elongation along LOS (ε = [P e(sz) / P e(X) ] 2 ) Constrain helium sedimentation Charles Romero

15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero34 Separate from cluster geometry (elongation) and He sedimentation modeling. Blue = ACCEPT (Cavagnolo+ 2009) Green = This work Solid line: Vikhlinin model Dotted line: Bulbul model Deriving Electron Temperatures

Cluster Geometry 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero35 b a

Cluster Geometry 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero36 b a

Helium Sedimentation: Models 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 37 Proposed as early as Gilfanov Potential sedimentation calculated by Chuzhoy+ 2004, Peng & Nagai 2009 Some constraints from Markevitch 2007 Bulbul investigated impact on scaling relations Need high resolution SZ to do this! (scales < 0.1 * R 500 ) R 500 ~ 4-6 arcmin Charles Romero

Helium Sedimentation: Fitting I 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 38 Must account for a global offset in pressure between SZ and X-ray Offset could be due to elongation along the LOS. Abell 1835MACS 1311 Charles Romero

Helium Sedimentation: Fitting II 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 39 Rescaled P e(SZ) can now be compared to P e(X) Fit model ratios to data. Charles Romero

Outline of Talk Galaxy Clusters – Why study them? SZ Observations – Substructure & Bulk ICM Fitted pressure profiles MUSTANG-2 – Science & Hardware Conclusions & future work Uchicago, adapted from L. Van Sproyboeck July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG-2 Dicker et al dual polarization feeds 75 – 105 GHz bandpass Antenna +Feedhorn coupled TES bolometers. 9” beam 4.2’ field of view on GBT (9” and 42” for MUSTANG) >200 times faster mapping speeds July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MUSTANG July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero42 Detector module 64 dual polarization feeds 2.5’ field of view on GBT ~40 times faster mapping speeds First light this past spring

Window Determine transmission properties of window materials 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero43

Window Results Total transmission, absorption, and reflection determined. 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero44

Chandra X-ray image Russell et al. (2012) Shocks: Abell 2146

Shock Heating

Observing Abell 2146 Observed in Winter 2011; >7 hours on source

Outline of Talk Galaxy Clusters – Why study them? SZ Observations – Substructure & Bulk ICM Fitted pressure profiles MUSTANG-2 – Science & Hardware Conclusions & future work Uchicago, adapted from L. Van Sproyboeck July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Conclusions Able to constrain pressure profile – MUSTANG adds ability to constrain γ – Pressure profile shape in agreement with previous gNFW results Addition of X-ray data reveals: – Differences between SZ and X-ray profiles – Geometric, temperature, and other checks. 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero49

Appendix 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero50

Future Work abc 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero51

Centroids July 2015 Dissertation Defense Comparing Confidence intervals based on assumed centroid. Charles Romero

Future Work: NIKA-2 IRAM 30m with 6.5’ FOV FWHM: 150 GHz; 240 GHz 1000 pixels for 150 GHz, 2000 pixels for each linear polarization at 240 GHz 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 53 Monfardini Charles Romero

X-ray Properties of Clusters 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 54 Mantz Charles Romero

Ensemble Pressure Profiles 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero55

SZ fits to ACCEPT pressure 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 56Charles Romero

15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero57

Deriving Electron Temperatures 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense 58 Abell 1835MACS 1311 Blue = ACCEPT (Cavagnolo+ 2009) Red = ACCEPT2 (Baldi+ current work ) Green = This work Separate from cluster geometry (elongation) and He sedimentation modeling. Charles Romero

Abell 1835 A10 α and β July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MACS 0647 A10 α and β July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Conclusions MUSTANG sees substructure and compact sources in many clusters – Substructure can reveal dynamics of the cluster Point sources can easily be dealt with. The addition of MUSTANG data to Bolocam does increase ability to constraint γ. – Combination with X-ray allows for constraints on helium sedimentation or temperature profiles. MUSTANG-1.5 will do significantly better July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Beam uncertainties 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero62

Correlation Matrix July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Winter/Spring 2015: MUSTANG detectors populated Several proposals for the spring PIs: Dicker, Gilbank, Romero, Edge, Crichton July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Observing strategies 65 FOV 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

MACS 0647 (sequential fit) 66 Young et al (arXiv: ) 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Galaxy Clusters Credit: NASA Vacca Optical X-ray July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero

Observing with MUSTANG ~20 hours per cluster Good weather Calibration every 30 min. OOF  adjust GBT surface 15 July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero FOV 68

Y-M scaling relation – Liang Yu, Kaylea Nelson, and Daisuke Nagai – Also D talk at AAS July 2015 Dissertation Defense Charles Romero