Analyzing the Problem (SAW, WP, TOPSIS) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D. www.ilkertopcu.net www.ilkertopcu.org www.ilkertopcu.info www.facebook.com/yitopcu twitter.com/yitopcu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modellistica e Gestione dei Sistemi Ambientali A tool for multicriteria analysis: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Chiara Mocenni University of.
Advertisements

6.5 Complex Fractions.
Payam Moradi Young Researchers Club Azad University of Tafresh, Iran Eleventh International Conference on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (FSTA 2012)
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Group Decision Making Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Constructing the Decision Model Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
1. Introduction 2 In this study, fuzzy logic (FL), multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and maintenance management (MM) are integrated into one subject.
Introduction to Management Science
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
END332E Operations Research II Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
Chapter 10 Acids and Bases
MENENTUKAN LOKASI PABRIK YANG IDEAL MENGGUNAKAN AHP PERTEMUAN 12.
Introduction to Management Science
1 Multi-Criteria Decision Making MCDM Approaches.
MADM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
SEN313 MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING Dr. Y. İlker TOPCU
Group Decision Making Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Constructing the Decision Model Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
9-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Multicriteria Decision Making
9-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Methods in Medical Image Analysis Statistics of Pattern Recognition: Classification and Clustering Some content provided by Milos Hauskrecht, University.
BINF6201/8201 Principle components analysis (PCA) -- Visualization of amino acids using their physico-chemical properties
Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP )
1 Topic Adding Polynomials. 2 Lesson California Standards: 2.0 Students understand and use such operations as taking the opposite, finding.
Analyzing the Problem (MAVT) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Conjoint Analysis Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
EXPLOITING THE DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUE TO EXPLORE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FANCIAL FACTORS AND THE STOCK PREFERECE Gyutai Kim, Suhee Jung Department.
Statistics and Linear Algebra (the real thing). Vector A vector is a rectangular arrangement of number in several rows and one column. A vector is denoted.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making by: Mehrdad ghafoori Saber seyyed ali
Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Chapter 9 - Multicriteria Decision Making 1 Chapter 9 Multicriteria Decision Making Introduction to Management Science 8th Edition by Bernard W. Taylor.
MBA567E DECISION MAKING Dr. Y. İlker TOPCU
MHN502E Operations Research I Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 1 Chapter 7 Rational Expressions and Equations.
Fractions and Exponents  Step 1:  Understand the exponent means the number of times to multiply the “base” that it is on  Step 2:  Multiply  Step.
Chapter 3 Vectors in n-space Norm, Dot Product, and Distance in n-space Orthogonality.
Radicals without Calculators
 (Worse) It is a fact that engineers select an appropriate variable and the transformed observations are treated as though they are normally distributed.
Adding and Subtracting Polynomials Adapted for Walch Education.
IYB560E EXECUTIVE AND GROUP DECISION MAKING Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Analyzing the Problem (Outranking Methods) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Evolutionary Algorithms for Finding Optimal Gene Sets in Micro array Prediction. J. M. Deutsch Presented by: Shruti Sharma.
UNCLASSIFIED The Surface-Weighted Options Ranking Technique Peter Williams, Peta Erbacher and Fred DJ Bowden Land Operations Division As presented at.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
Chapter 4 Euclidean n-Space Linear Transformations from to Properties of Linear Transformations to Linear Transformations and Polynomials.
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 1.4 Fractional Expressions Fundamental Concepts of Algebra.
DATA INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES WITH APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH SCIENCES BKSinha Ex-Faculty, ISI, Kolkata April 17, 2012.
IE582 MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Y. İlker TOPCU
CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS
Presented by Rich Goyette
Decision Making A quick and simple system for decision making.
TABLE 14-1 Job Offer Selection Problem
END332E Operations Research II
MBA567E DECISION MAKING Dr. Y. İlker TOPCU
SEN313 MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
Why do we need “managerial decision making”?
IYB560E EXECUTIVE AND GROUP DECISION MAKING
MHN502E Operations Research I
SEN301 Operations Research I
SEN313 MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
END332E Operations Research II
MHY530E DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES
Presentation transcript:

Analyzing the Problem (SAW, WP, TOPSIS) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu

SAW Simple Additive Weighting – Weighted Average – Weighted Sum (Yoon & Hwang, 1995; Vincke, ) A global (total) score in the SAW is obtained by adding contributions from each attribute. A common numerical scaling system such as normalization (instead of single dimensional value functions) is required to permit addition among attribute values. Value (global score) of an alternative can be expressed as: V(a i ) = V i =

Example for SAW Normalized (Linear) Decision Matrix and Global Scores

WP Weighted Product (Yoon & Hwang, 1995) Normalization is not necessary! When WP is used weights become exponents associated with each attribute value; a positive power for benefit attributes a negative power for cost attributes Because of the exponent property, this method requires that all ratings be greater than 1. When an attribute has fractional ratings, all ratings in that attribute are multiplied by 10 m to meet this requirement V i =

Example for WP Quantitative Decision Matrix and Global Scores

TOPSIS Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Yoon & Hwang, 1995; Hwang & Lin, 1987) Concept: Chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution Steps: Calculate normalized ratings Calculate weighted normalized ratings Identify positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions Calculate separation measures Calculate similarities to positive-ideal solution Rank preference order

Steps Calculate normalized ratings Vector normalization (Euclidean) is used Do not take the inverse rating for cost attributes! Calculate weighted normalized ratings v ij = w j * r ij Identify positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions where J 1 is a set of benefit attributes and J 2 is a set of cost attributes = = = =

Steps Calculate separation measures Euclidean distance (separation) of each alternative from the ideal solutions are measured: Calculate similarities to positive-ideal solution Rank preference order Rank the alternatives according to similarities in descending order. Recommend the alternative with the maximum similarity

Example for TOPSIS Normalized (Vector) Decision Matrix

Weighted Normalized Ratings & Positive–Negative Ideal

Separation Measures & Similarities to Positive Ideal Solution