RHODES Gardner Systems RHODES: Fundamental Principles Larry Head, Gardner Systems Pitu Mirchandani, University of Arizona TRB Annual Meeting 2000 Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a network? A network consists of two or more computers that are linked in order to share resources (such as printers and CD-ROMs) , exchange.
Advertisements

Engineering Internet QoS
Fixed Time Signal Coordination
Lecture 1 Traffic Signal Coordination. Lecture 1 Why? When the traffic signals are placed close enough, it is often seen that the cars waiting in a queue.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
ACS-Lite Offset Tuning Algorithm. Collect data from advance detectors on coordinated approaches Develop a Statistical Flow Profile correlated to the phase.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration ACS-Lite FHWA Adaptive Signal Control Systems Raj S. Ghaman, P.E. Team Leader, Office.
Multi-Layer Switching Layers 1, 2, and 3. Cisco Hierarchical Model Access Layer –Workgroup –Access layer aggregation and L3/L4 services Distribution Layer.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
CE 2710: Transportation Engineering Traffic Signals April 3, 2009 Nicholas Lownes, Ph.D.
1 Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE County Traffic Engineer Seminole County Florida 10/18/11.
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
1Chapter 9-4e Chapter 9. Volume Studies & Characteristics Understand that measured volumes may not be true demands if not careful in data collection and.
Lecture #12 Arterial Design and LOS Analysis. Objectives  Understand the factors in arterial design Understand how arterial LOS is determined.
Final Exam Tuesday, December 9 2:30 – 4:20 pm 121 Raitt Hall Open book
REVISION. Sample Question The sample questions for this year. Describe briefly the classic transport model, explaining the four stages of the model. [10]
Progressive Signal Systems. Coordinated Systems Two or more intersections Signals have a fixed time relationship to one another Progression can be achieved.
Adaptive Sampling for Sensor Networks Ankur Jain ٭ and Edward Y. Chang University of California, Santa Barbara DMSN 2004.
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
Lecture #6 Chapter 16: Principles of Intersection Signalization.
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
Introduction to Transport
Signals. Laneage Coding Examples.
Highway Capacity Software Based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Special Report 209 Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker Paramics User Group Meeting February.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Chapter 17: Basic principles of intersection signalization (objectives) Chapter objectives: By the end of this chapter the student will be able to: Explain.
Lecture #11 Signal Coordination: Chapter 22. Objectives Factors affecting coordination Basic theory of signal coordination Application to arterial progression.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Lecture 2 Basics of Traffic Control Signals Any power-operated traffic control device other than a barricade warning light or steady burning electric lamp,
Signalized Intersections
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
Network Topologies.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Atlas Pitu Mirchandani Professor and Director, ATLAS Research Center Systems and Industrial Engineering Department The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
SCATS Adaptive Traffic System
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY MODEL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS 1 December 20, 2012.
Coordinated Operations, notes from the field Edward Fok Resource Center Operations Technical Service Team 2005 TRB Annual Meeting.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
LAN Switching and Wireless – Chapter 1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
Session 2 Equipment Requirements for Adaptive Traffic Control SCOOT Axel Reissnecker, EAGLE Traffic Control Systems, Austin, TX TRB Workshop on Adaptive.
Introduction to Transport
CEE 764 – Fall 2010 Topic 5 Platoon and Dispersion.
Telecommunications Essentials Chapter 7 Wide Area Networking.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
EMERGENCY SERVICE: A GENERALIZED FLEXIBLE SIMULATION MODEL Paola FACCHIN Department of Paediatrics, University of Padova, Italy Giorgio ROMANIN JACUR Department.
1 RANKING OF FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS/ TOPIC AREAS FOR NEEDED RESEARCH BY THE TRB TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE JULY 21, 2002 MID-YEAR MEETING IN SALT.
Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 1 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT TRB Presentation on SCOOT January 2000.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Smart Information for a Sustainable World True Adaptive Signal Control A Comparison of Alternatives Technical Paper # Presentation to the 18 th World.
Telecommunications and Networks Chapter 6 Principles and Learning Objectives Effective communication is essential to organizational success. –Define.
1 IEX8175 RF Electronics Avo Ots telekommunikatsiooni õppetool, TTÜ raadio- ja sidetehnika inst.
Thinking Inside the Box
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
Signalized Intersections
* Topic 7 Field Operations
CprE 458/558: Real-Time Systems
Presentation transcript:

RHODES Gardner Systems RHODES: Fundamental Principles Larry Head, Gardner Systems Pitu Mirchandani, University of Arizona TRB Annual Meeting 2000 Workshop on Adaptive Signal Control Systems

RHODES Gardner Systems Overview Basic Philosophy of RHODES Control Variables Data Sampling, Filtering and Smoothing Phasing Flexibility Measures of Effectiveness Oversaturated Conditions Preemption/Priority

RHODES Gardner Systems Basic Philosophy of RHODES to proactively respond to and utilize the natural stochastic variations in traffic flow with the appropriate time scale to operate within the framework of North American traffic signal controllers

RHODES Gardner Systems System Architecture - Hierarchical Destinations/Origins Network Load Control Network Flow Control Intersection Control Traffic Signal Activation Detectors and Surveillance Actual Travel Behavior and Traffic Network Loads Target Timings Actual Timings Control Signal Vehicle Flow Prediction Scenario Origins/Destinations Current Capacities, Travel Times, Network Disruptions (seconds) (minutes) (minutes/hours/days) Platoon Flow Prediction Network Load Estimator/Predictor Network Flow Estimator/Predictor Intersection Flow Estimator/Predictor Measurements y(t) ATIS Historical/Infrastructure Data

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Structural (static) –Geometric Description of Network –Location/Type of Detectors Traffic Dynamics Parameters (adaptive) –Saturation Flow, Turning Proportions… Signal Control (scheduled) –Phasing, Minimum, Maximum, Pedestrian,…. Optimization Parameters (interpreted to mean: Model and User Supplied Parameters)

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Structural –Geometric Description Link-node representation Lanes, turning pockets, etc. Lane Channelization Lane Utilization

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Structural –Detectors Location (e.g. 224’ upstream - Passage) Type –Passage (counting) –Presence (stop bar) –Detector Movement Assignment –Prediction Feed Assignment

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Traffic Dynamics Parameters –Turning Percentage Dynamic using OD Estimation (currently static) –Queue Discharge Rates - by movement/phase Saturation Flow Rate Dynamic using Queue Estimate and Presence Detectors Start-up Lost Time –Link Free Flow Speed Free Flow Corrected for Volume/Occupancy

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Signal Control Parameters –Phase (optimization stage) Allowable movements Skipping Minimum Green Maximum Green (optional) Amber & Red Clearance Times

RHODES Gardner Systems Control Variables Optimization Parameters –Target Phase Evaluation Order ABCDACDE... –Horizon User-definable, now using 45 seconds –Resolution 1 second, 2 second, etc…….

RHODES Gardner Systems Data Sampling, Filtering and Smoothing (data characteristics) Data Sampling –data resolution = 1/second –detector signals passage (count of falling edges) presence (state of detector just before end of second) –Signal state (phase, interval) Filtering = NONE Smoothing = NONE

RHODES Gardner Systems Phasing Flexibility Number of Phases –Any number of stages Flexibility in Phase Order –for any optimization - select desired phase order ABC DEB ABD B EC

RHODES Gardner Systems Phasing Flexibility Currently assumes a fixed phase order –rolling horizon =ABCDEA, BCDEAB,….. Phase Skipping allowed –user selectable –decisions = {0, min, min+1, ….., max*} for each phase *optional

RHODES Gardner Systems Measures of Effectiveness Internal to RHODES –Queue Size (number of vehicles) Estimate –Predicted Link Flow Profiles –Predicted Delay based on current queue and predicted arrivals External –Queue Size –Predicted Arrival Profile

RHODES Gardner Systems Special Features for Oversaturated Conditions Consideration for Queue Spillback –adjust departure rate for movements with upstream queue spillback –delay “discounting” for movements where excessive downstream delay will occur

RHODES Gardner Systems Transit Priority Used coordination method –Progression band Priority Band for Detected Buses –Near upstream detection –Far side stations –Conditional on headway lateness

RHODES Gardner Systems Fire Priority Not in current RHODES model Potential route priority –Using coordination method (bandwidth) Preemption provided by underlying controller logic –Ignore the adaptive control commands when a preemption event is timing

RHODES Gardner Systems Arterial/Network Designed for both Most experience/experimentation on arterials Optimization horizon (approx. 45 secs.) –need to populate predictions –travel time between intersections defines the horizon over which optimization has data

RHODES Gardner Systems END SESSION 1

RHODES Gardner Systems RHODES: Equipment Requirements Larry Head, Gardner Systems Gary Duncan, Econolite Control Products

RHODES Gardner Systems Overview  System Architecture  Data requirements  Communication requirements  Local Controllers  Central Hardware requirements  Installation cost ranges  Operations & Maintenance cost ranges

RHODES Gardner Systems Architecture RHODES –H ierarchical Network Loading Network Flow Control Management System –D istributed Local Intersection Control

RHODES Gardner Systems System Architecture ATMS Servers Workstation Field Communications LAN

RHODES Gardner Systems Architecture Traffic Adaptive Signal Control is an added capability of an ATMS RHODES has been designed to operate as an extension of existing ATMS systems Requirements are for –Additional Communications –Additional Detection –Additional Processing

RHODES Gardner Systems Architecture ATMS Servers Workstation Field Communications LAN Additional Detection Additional Communications Additional Processor * * *

RHODES Gardner Systems Data Requirements (Number, Type and Location of Sensors) Observability –need to be able to observe vehicle flows and flow dynamics Predictability –need to be able to predict vehicle flows over a prediction horizon of interest Flexibility –need to accommodate wide range of detector locations

RHODES Gardner Systems Data Requirements (Number, Type and Location of Sensors)

RHODES Gardner Systems Data Requirements (Number, Type and Location of Sensors) Prediction Generators Prediction Receiver

RHODES Gardner Systems Data Requirements (Number, Type and Location of Sensors) Detectors –Passage (upstream) Count of number of passed vehicles (trailing edge) Used for flow prediction and queue estimation –Presence (stop bar) State of detector at end of second Used for queue estimation –IF(presence = 0) queue =0

RHODES Gardner Systems Communications Requirements (Architecture, Polling Time, Bandwidth) Architecture –Peer-to-Peer Communications –Central-Intersection Communications Polling Time (options) –Discrete Event –1 message/second Bandwidth –depends on architecture

RHODES Gardner Systems Communications Requirements (Architecture, Polling Time, Bandwidth) Architecture - Alternatives –Token Ring –Ethernet –Point-to-Point, Tree Technology –Field Hardened –$$$

RHODES Gardner Systems Peer-to-Peer Communications: Tucson and Seattle Central Management System Communications Hub Intersection Controllers (2070 with MEN CPU) Optelecom 9712 Modem Pairs: Baud RS K Serial/PTZ 1 - Full Motion Video Baud Voice Figerlign Mux: 1 - T1 Data (6 - RS-232) 9 - Full Motion Video All Communications are over single mode fiber. The link between the communications hub and the central management system in Seattle is TBD. Figure 1: Peer-to-Peer Communications Architecture for Tucson and Seattle.

RHODES Gardner Systems Communications Requirements (Architecture, Polling Time, Bandwidth) Bandwidth (approx.) –central= 150 bytes/sec hub-central (8 intersections)= 1200 *10 (bits/byte) total= 12,000 bps –peer-to-peer packet: overhead (header, trailer, etc) 10 bytes data (predictions, signal)+ 30 bytes packet (estimated total)= 40 bytes 4 packets/sec= 160 bytes/sec central+ 150 bytes/sec total= 310 *10 = 3100 –Recommend 19.2Kbps for Central, –9600 bps for peer-to-peer

RHODES Gardner Systems Hardware Requirements (Central, Intermediate Field, Local Processor) Central –PC-based traffic server (e.g. icons TM ) –Serial Communications (e.g. Rocket Port) Intermediate Field –Field Hardened PC *+ Serial Comm Local Processor (options) –2070 with VME Co-processor –standard controller+Co-processor

RHODES Gardner Systems Installation Cost Ranges Difficult to estimate –Project dependent –Architecture dependent Several projects estimated in the range of $45,000 - $50,000 per intersection including hardware + engineering License: The University of Arizona (approx. $500/intersection)

RHODES Gardner Systems O&M Cost Ranges Incremental cost based on additional hardware (including detection) and software Cost savings based on improved signal timing