Survey on Electronic Data Collection and Newborn Screening System Information Needs Assessment May 13, 2010 Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracking and Data Management Technical Assistance Workshop for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Margaret Lubke, Ph.D. National Center.
Advertisements

TM Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
CDC EHDI RESOURCES for States. CDC EHDI Website CDC EHDI Website Purpose: To provide up-to-date.
Virginia’s Newborn Hearing Screening Program
DSHS Texas Newborn Screening Program Processes Susan Tanksley, PhD David Martinez April 10, 2008.
KANSAS STATE GENETICS PLAN - AN OVERVIEW Presented by Linda Williams MT(ASCP) Newborn Screening Follow-up Coordinator Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
How Can Vital Statistics Remain Vital for Measuring Health Status in the U.S.? Charles J. Rothwell Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National.
Module One: Introduction to the Screening Information System (SIS)
1 South Carolina Department of Mental Health Tri-County Community Mental Health Center Marlboro, Chesterfield, and Dillon Counties Dr. Teresa Rhodes
Michigan Community Dental Clinics Quality Improvement with a Patient Centered Perspective August 5, 2014.
NBSTRN Update NCC/RC PI/PD Meeting November 19, 2010 Michael Watson.
Newborn Screening Overview Marie Mann, M.D., M.P.H. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal.
Sara Copeland, MD Department of Health and Human Services
In Collaboration with NewSTEPs: Data collection efforts at the national level for newborn screening quality improvement Marci K Sontag, PhD NewSTEPs (Newborn.
GUIDELINES & TOOLS for HOSPITAL DOTS LINKAGE (HDL)
Project Update : Claims/Clinical Linkage Project MHDO Board of Directors June 6, 2013.
CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield is the shared business name of CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. and Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. which are.
Michigan Birth Defects Registry Overview and Status.
Michigan Medical Home.
NCC Long-Term Follow-Up Project and the NBSTRN CC November 17, 2009 Amy Hoffman, MPH Amy Brower, PhD Project Manager, NBSTRNProject Manager, NCC LTFU.
Hospital Practices Influence Breastfeeding Rates: The Data Tell the Story Birth & Beyond California: Breastfeeding Training & QI Project With funding from.
Gayle Greer Clutter, R.T., CTR Program Consultant
Us Case 5 Delivery Coordination with Vital Records Update, Hearing Screening & Quality Monitoring to Aid Early Pediatric Care Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn.
Assessing and Improving Local Health Departments’ e- Health Capability and Capacity Bethany Bradshaw, MPH Applied Public Health Informatics Fellow, Wisconsin.
“It is my vision to help seniors obtain quality medical and personal care. As a certified elder law attorney, I have seen the enormous benefit that a.
Information for OHIT conference Priscilla Moschella, BS, CSW.
Challenges of Lender List Creation Objective, analytical lender selections Documenting & defending your lender selections Collecting & administering lender.
Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.
Public Consulting Group EdPlan - System for Managing Individualized Documentation of SEN Students at Your School September 2011.
Improving Data Quality and Quality Assurance in Newborn Screening by Including the Bloodspot Screening Collection Device Serial Number on Birth Certificates.
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders of Newborns and Children September 22, 2011 Newborn Screening Translational Research Network (NBSTRN)
Tracking from Birth: Massachusetts Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program MCHB/CDC Annual Meeting on Successful Statewide EHDI Programs Presenter:
IMPROVING QUALTY OF CARE FOR CHILDREN TROUGH HEALTH IT Tennessee Project for Children with Special Health Care Needs AHRQ Annual Meeting September 26,2007.
What is Chapter Affairs? Global View and Support –Leadership Forum –Chapter Executive Workshop –Chapter Awards Program Liaison between Chapters and ACC.
CHILD HEALTH PROFILE FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS AAP Annual Meeting Council on Clinical Information Technology-October 28,2007 Carmen B.
Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns Using Pulse Oximetry – New Jersey’s Experience Lori Freed Garg, MD, MPH New Jersey Department.
Update on Newborn Screening Use Case Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns and Children - Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns.
Small County Data Center Project: Phase 1
WHY is EHDI a part of the HIT conversation A first encounter between providers and public health As an encounter, communication becomes essential Communication.
Big Strides for Small Patients: Developmental Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Department of Pediatrics Jerold Stirling, MD Rebecca Turk, MD Melanie.
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
February 13, 2002CDC/MCHB1 NATIONAL EHDI MEETING February 13, 2002 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH TRACKING FROM BIRTH.
Bob Bowman, MS Director of Genomics & Newborn Screening Indiana State Department of Health.
Newborn Screening Translational Research Network Virtual Repository of Dried Blood Spots Investigator Demonstration February 16, 2012 Call in Number: (470)
Assessing CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey Results What Can CAHPS Database Do For You Janice Ricketts, CAHPS Database Manager, Westat 2011 AHRQ Annual Conference.
MCHB Activities to Integrate Newborn Screening & Other Child Health Information Systems Deborah Linzer Senior Public Health Analyst U.S. Department of.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
Hallgrímur Snorrason Management seminar on global assessment Session 8: Planning, programming and priority setting under budgetary restraints; human resource.
Regional Genetics Collaboratives: A Hidden EHDI Resource Penny Hatcher, MSN, DrPH Nancy Vanderburg, BSN, PHN Minnesota Department of Health St. Paul, Minnesota.
TEXAS OPT-IN METHODOLOGY FOR SAMPLE STORAGE & RESEARCH Susan Tanksley, PhD Laboratory Operations Unit Manager.
Update on SACHDNC Administrative Processes Sara Copeland, MD Chief, Genetics Services Branch Designated Federal Officer Secretary’s Advisory Committee.
Newborn Screening Translational Research Network Virtual Repository of Dried Blood Spots Investigator Demonstration March 15, 2012 Call in Number: (415)
1 Hospital Practices Influence Breastfeeding Rates: The Data Tell the Story Birth & Beyond California: Breastfeeding Training& QI Project.
Public Health Reporting Initiative January 4, 2012.
EHDI Tracking and Surveillance The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program Cheryl A. McDermott, MS, CCC-A.
LBHA Functions Draft for NTBHA Board Presentation February 10, 2016.
TRACKING FOR HIGH RISK CONDITIONS New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Leslie Beres-Sochka, MS Program Manager Kathy Aveni, RNC, MPH Research.
Regional Genetics Service Collaboratives; setting the context for analyzing the impact Sara Copeland, MD Chief, Genetics Services Branch September 11,
Outcome 1: Clients access Medical Case Management Services  Objective 1: XX clients attend XXX face- to-face MCM office sessions.  Objective 2: XX clients.
The Region 4 Genetics Collaborative is a project of MPHI and is funded by HRSA/MCHB Grant # H46MC24092 Public Health Newborn Screening Long-term Follow-up.
Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD): The Wisconsin Experience Region IV Genetics Meeting September 11, 2012 Sharon Fleischfresser.
Pediatric Regional Integrated Services Model. Purpose The purpose of the Pediatric Regional Integrated Service Model (PRISM) is to provide streamlined.
New Directions from the National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives (NCC) Alisha S. Keehn, MPA Project.
3/4/20161 Barbara Palmer APD Director Rick Scott Governor Client Data Management System (CDMS)
The Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program Overview
CSEC Data Collection and Screening Tool Selection
SCHS and Health Statistics
An Improved Medical Home for Every SoonerCare Choice Member
Technical and Advisory Meeting
Utilizing Immunization Registries in Local Public Health Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Survey on Electronic Data Collection and Newborn Screening System Information Needs Assessment May 13, 2010 Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives

Survey  Goal  Plan for the future expansion of the National Newborn Screening Information System (NNSIS)  Design  Drafted and reviewed by team from HRSA, NICHD, NNSGRC, Genetic Alliance, CDC, APHL, ACMG-NCC & NBSTRN-CC, and selected state newborn screening programs (NBS)  Participants  Current users of NNIS  Two from each state and territory Laboratory Short-Term Follow-Up (STFU)  Timing  Administered April 2010 to May National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives

 Survey ed to 102 individuals  2 from each state  Responses from 64 individuals (62.7%)  50% provided contact information  Majority of respondents work in either screening laboratory or short- term follow-up Respondents National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 3

 Response Rate – 98% Communication of Screening Results Answer OptionsResponse Percent PCP 79.4% Birth Facility 66.7% Ordering Physician 66.7% NNSIS 57.1% Other Database (Stork, etc) 52.4% STFU 33.3.% Parent (Urgent Results) 20.6% Parents (Urgent Results for Selected Conditions) 17.5% Parents (All Results including Normal) 7.9% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 4

 Response Rate – 92% Tools Used to Communicate Screening Results Answer OptionsResponse Percent FAX to submitter or primary care provider 83.1% Phone to submitter or primary care provider 72.9% Regular mail to submitter 61.0% Phone to specialty care consultant 57.6% Regular mail to primary care provider if different from submitter 52.5% Phone to follow-up coordinator 28.8% Phone to parent 27.1% Regular mail to parent 25.4% FAX to follow-up external contractor 22.0% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 5

 Response Rate – 59% Communication of Confirmatory Diagnosis Answer OptionsResponse Percent NNSIS 80.5% Pediatrician/Primary Doctor 48.8% Specialist/Subspecialist 41.5% Other database 36.6% Local case registry 22.0% State birth defects registry 19.5% Parents 14.6% Other 14.0% Birth hospital 9.8% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 6

 Response Rate – 59% Tools Used to Communicate Confirmatory Diagnosis Answer OptionsResponse Percent Phone 57.9% FAX 52.6% 50.0% Electronic download (internet bulletin board and/or transfer) 34.2% Regular mail 31.6% Other 23.60% Certified mail 2.6% Courier 2.6% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 7

 Response Rate – 76% NNSIS Data Entry & Frequency Answer OptionsResponse Percent As time permits 38.1% Daily 33.3% Yearly 27.0% Monthly 17.5% When reminded 12.7% Quarterly 6.3% Never 6.3% Answers ProvidedResponse Percent Short Staff 54% STFU Enter Data 36% Contract for Others to Enter Data 1% Answer Options Response Percent Monthly < 10 hours 30.8% Annually < 10 hours 20.5% Monthly < 1 hour 17.9% Do Not Enter Data 17.9% Annually > 10 hours 10.3% Monthly < 20 hours 2.6% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 8

 Response Rate – 53% NNSIS Website Use Answer Options Response Percent Monthly 50.0% When requested 25.0% Quarterly 21.9% Yearly 12.5% Daily 9.4% Never 6.3% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 9

 Response Rate – 81% NNSIS Information Type Utilized Answer OptionsResponse Percent Number of diagnosed cases 84.6% Amount of NBS fee 71.2% Laboratory method in use 55.8% Number of births 53.8% Number of tests reported on initial screens 50.0% Number of unsatisfactory specimens 50.0% Time from birth to treatment/diagnosis (depending on condition) 48.1% Number of not normal results on initial screens 48.1% Number of tests reported on subsequent screens 34.6% Number of not normal results on subsequent screens 30.8% Race/ethnicity of diagnosed cases 26.9% Other (please specify) 21.2% Sex of diagnosed cases 19.2% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 10

 Response Rate – 100% NNSIS Information Uses for Programs Answer Options Response Percent Program evaluation and/or development 53.7% Daily, weekly, monthly or yearly reports. 42.6% Other (please specify) 29.6% Quality assurance. 27.8% National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 11

 Response Rate – 100% NNSIS Information National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 12

 Response Rate – 98% Program Database Types and Usage National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 13

 Response Rate – 42% NNSIS Expansion Answers Provided Include Maternal Data Ability to Edit Individual Case Expanded Analytics Expanded Diagnostic Categories Improved Classification of Disorders Incorporate National Standards National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 14

 Response Rate – 50% NBS Program Future Information Needs Answers Provided LTFU Link NBS & Vital Real Time Linkage Automatic Downloads HL7 Data Exchange Electronic Communication with Providers 15

 Response Rate – 100% NNSIS Case Definition National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 16

 Response Rate – 100% Demographic Information Confirmation National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 17

 Response Rate – 100% Long-Term Follow-Up National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 18

 Response Rate – 100% Screening Confirmation National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 19

 Response Rate – 60% Second Screen Linkage National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 20

 Response Rate – 78% NBS and NBH Data Exchange National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 21

 Response Rate – 78% Barriers to Information Technology Expansion & Type of Support Needed Answers Provided Compliance Funding Staffing Lack of Buy In Confidentiality Concerns Lack of Expertise Not a Priority Lack Legal Authority Political Issues National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 22

 Response Rate – 100% Concerns About Information Sharing National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 23

 Response Rate – 100% Expanded Information Concerns National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives 24

Discussion  Discussion  Survey Feedback  Results Feedback  Use of Survey Results 25 National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives

Acknowledgements   HRSA   NICHD   CDC   Regional Collaboratives   Genetic Alliance   APHL   NNSGRC   State NBS Programs   ACMG/NCC   ACMG/NBSTRN-CC 26 National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives