GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 1 I Can’t Buy What? An Overview of GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Stephen HartSusan St. George Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Advertisements

Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
DOCUMENTING MATCH GEAR UP KENTUCKY 3.0 A SHORT PRIMER FOR PARTNERS.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Seminar on Financial Management Office of Justice Programs Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF COST ALLOCATION Presenters: Steven J. Zuraf, Branch Chief for Colleges/Universities, Non-Profits & Hospitals.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
Management Matters A PMFO Series. Cost Allocation National Center on Program Management and Fiscal Operations (PMFO)
THE BIGGEST WINNER FISCAL EDITION. Test Your Fiscal Fitness Fiscal Basics Property & Facilities Cost Allocation Nonfederal Share Records & Reports
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
WELCOME TO WASHINGTON, DC. Seminar on Financial Management OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 2.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
Audio is available via internet. Please be sure your… speakers are attached and turned on and your volume is up.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
How to Prevent Findings Part 2 Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Ms. Jackie Reese, Audit Unit Manager Mr. Richard.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
WELCOME TO THE Annual NAU GEAR UP Site Coordinator Meeting “Paying For The Journey” Year 2 Financial Reporting & Cost Share Thursday, August 15 | 4:15.
$ PARK- Fiscal Update. “$PARK - FISCAL UPDATE” Year 3 Financial Reporting & Cost Share Tuesday, August 19 | 2:15 pm – 2:45 pm (New) Thursday, August 21.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Financial and Administrative Management
GEAR UP Year 5 Coordinator/Assistant Meeting
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Bureau of Indian Education School Board Training
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Managing Federal grants
Presentation transcript:

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 1 I Can’t Buy What? An Overview of GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Stephen HartSusan St. George Arizona GEAR UPWashington State GEAR UP (602) (360)

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 2  SESSION OBJECTIVES ► Carefully walk you through the world of federal cost principles. ► Help you better understand GEAR UP’s 1:1 match obligation and how you can help your GEAR UP project satisfy it. ► Answer your specific questions about GEAR UP fiscal operations. ► Provide you with some tools and resources that may address some of your specific GEAR UP grant administration concerns.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 3  Background ► The “Misuse of Public Monies” Top /04/06/the-general-services-administration.html  M. Johnson, B. Peck, S. Leeds, former GSA officials (Washington, DC) “…GSA’s planning and expenditures for the 2010 Western Region Conference were incompatible with its obligation to be a responsible steward of the public’s money...” -- Brian Miller, U.S. Inspector General  J. Thor, former school principal (Tempe, AZ)  G. Conway, former district superintendent (Page, AZ)  R. Canchola, former county superintendent (Nogales, AZ)  C. Ballard, former university business manager (Tucson, AZ)  J. Wimmer, former university accountant (Salt Lake City, UT)

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 4  Burning Issues ► What GEAR UP finance-related topics or issues would you like to see addressed in today’s workshop? ► Standard Disclaimer ► Standard Plea For Mercy

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 5  OUTLINE ►Introduction  Background  Burning Issues ► Federal Cost Principles  The Allowability Test  Hierarchy of Governing Docs  Match ► Special Topics  Fiscal Agent; Audit Readiness; Pro-Rating Costs; Time & Effort  Teacher Time; Volunteer Time; Public Relations; Food  Facilities; Discounts; Indirect Costs; Scholarships ► Q&A

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 6  The Allowability Test Is the expense: ► Allowable and necessary to implement the program; ► Reasonable; ► Allocable to program objectives; and ►Compliant with the program’s federal administrative regulations ►Consistently treated (i.e. a cost your organization can normally pay for)?

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 7  Hierarchy of Governing Docs ► Statute: Public Law , GEAR UP program legislation (very broad) ► Program Regulations: EDGAR and 34 CFR Part 694 (much more detailed) ► Federal Cost Principles: OMB Circulars (even more detailed)

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 8  Hierarchy of Governing Docs The documents that govern GEAR UP: ► are diverse and sometimes confusing ► may have inconsistencies that come from government and agency policies trying to accommodate many unique grant programs When you encounter conflicts or inconsistencies: ► begin with the GEAR UP statute ► move through the hierarchy (program regulations, OMB Circulars) ► seek clarification from USDOE Program Officer

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 9  Statute ► The statute is a federal law that authorizes or governs a program. In the case of GEAR UP, the term statute refers to the program legislation found in Title IV of the 1998 Amendments to the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965 [P.L ]. ► The statute sits at the top of the hierarchy but affords the Secretary of Education the authority to set program-specific policies, which are commonly known as program regulations. The statute only broadly defines how the program should operate.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 10  Program Regulations ► Program regulations provide additional guidance when the statute is silent or vague on an issue. They provide details that govern the application competition, dictate how programs will be implemented, and other implementation details. ► There are two types of regulations that you should become familiar with – EDGAR and GEAR UP program regulations.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 11  EDGAR ► The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) are agency- wide and set broad administrative policies that impact nearly all grant programs funded at the USDOE. The regulations are published in Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The pertinent sections of EDGAR to your grant administration are 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 12  GEAR UP Program Regulations ► Whereas EDGAR sets broad agency-wide policies, the GEAR UP program regulations addresses the very unique administrative matters associated with GEAR UP. ► GEAR UP program regulations are published in 34 CFR parts idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title34/34cfr694_main_02.tpl

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 13  OMB Circulars ► Cost principles A-21, Educational Institutions. A-87, State, Local Governments and Indian Tribe Governments (Includes School Districts). A-122, Non-Profit Organizations. ► Administrative Requirements A-102, State and Local Governments. A-110, Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non- Profit Organizations. ► Audit Requirements A-133, States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. OMB Circulars:

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 14  Match? In-Kind? In-Kind Match? ► “Match” is a general term that refers to anything donated to the project, regardless of who paid for it. In the case of GEAR UP grants, it means the non-federal share of program costs. ► "In-Kind" refers to non-cash contributions of goods or services made by third party individuals or organizations to GEAR UP Projects. ► Match must follow the same rules as the money you spend – allowable, reasonable, and allocable.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 15  GEAR UP Matching Requirements ► Dollar-for-dollar or 1:1 match - for every dollar of federal grant money spent on the project, the grantee must find an equal dollar amount of match in the form of state, local, or donated funds. ► It is the grantee’s job to generate and document this match with the same care and attention to accuracy, accountability, and timeliness as documenting the use of federal grant funds. ► If a grantee does not meet the match requirement, they could have their federal funds reduced, or their award could be terminated.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 16  Why Match???? ► When Congress created the GEAR UP program, they wanted to create partnerships that would sustain themselves. ► The result is the dollar-for-dollar match requirement. The total project cost is shared between federal and non-federal sources. ► Match helps ensure that local partnerships are created and that GEAR UP grant resources are being directed to communities.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 17  And, the Details … ► Match can be counted only ONCE. ► Matching contributions cannot be shifted from one project to another. ► Matching contributions must be obligated during the grant period. ► Match cannot be claimed from other sources/ programs that are federally funded.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 18  Ask yourself: ► When considering match, could I pay for this (item or service) using my federal GEAR UP funds? ► Is it legal and ethical? ► Does it pass the “headline test”? If in doubt, contact your grant’s fiscal agent or, if you are the fiscal agent, your Program Officer.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 19  Match Documentation Must: ► Capture the match identified with a particular project; ► Contain adequate source documentation for claimed match; and ► Provide clear valuation of in-kind match documentation.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 20  Special Topic: Fiscal Agent ► The Fiscal Agent is the entity that wrote the GEAR UP grant and is named specifically as the grantee in the annual Grant Award Notification (GAN). ► The Fiscal Agent bears primary responsibility for fiscal reporting, compliance with federal cost principles, and satisfying the match obligation. ► The Fiscal Agent chooses partners and creates the terms/conditions that formalize and govern those partnerships.  If in doubt about who your fiscal agent is, ask your GEAR UP Director.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 21  Special Topic: Audit Readiness ► Fiscal Agents must maintain accurate, current and complete records that disclose financial results and connect financial data to program data. ► What keeps Fiscal Agents up at night? Anytime a GEAR UP cost is incurred, or a cost share claim is made, you have to think:  What will a stranger from Washington DC, think of this cost, based on the available documentation, assuming (s)he is armed only with: an accounting degree; a cursory understanding of college access / GEAR UP; a calculator; and a mandate to find something to report to his/her chain of command?

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 22  Special Topic: Pro-Rating Costs ► The “allocable” test: GEAR UP costs / cost share must be applied in proportion to relative benefits, as approximated through reasonable methods. ► In other words, if the benefits of a good or service extend beyond the GEAR UP cohort, pro- rate the associated costs / cost share. ► The “room on the bus” caveat: it is not necessary to pro-rate if the primary reason a good or service is procured is to satisfy a GEAR UP objective, and the benefits spill over to others.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 23  Special Topic: Time and Effort ► Federal regulations require that every GEAR UP staff whose salary is supported in full or in part need to document the time, effort, and activities during any given pay period. ► Develop a process for collecting time and effort sheets regularly and accurately. ► When you use in-kind personnel contributions as match, they have to fulfill the same reporting obligations as if they were paid with federal funds.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 24  Special Topic: Teacher Time ► Generally, on-contract teacher time (salaries + benefits) cannot count as match because of the perception that compensating teachers during the contracted school day cannot be directly related to the GEAR UP grant. ► If, however, teachers are being paid by the school district (from a non-federal source) or are volunteering their time to conduct activities outside their normal duties that are specifically related to the GEAR UP grant, the hours of those activities (valued at that teacher’s salary+benefit rate) may count as match.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 25  Special Topic: Volunteer Svcs ► If volunteers provide services in their profession, that time is valued at their rate of pay and benefits. EX: A university admissions officer gives a presentation to GEAR UP families on college admissions requirements. ► If volunteers provide services other than their profession, they should be valued at the rate of what someone would ordinarily be paid to do the work rather than their actual paid wage.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 26  Volunteer Services (continued) ► If the organization has no one doing similar work, then the value needs to be consistent with what is paid for that type of work in the local area or you can use the value of volunteer time for your state. ► Keep supporting documentation on how the rate was determined.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 27  Special Topic: Public Relations ► Use caution when incurring public relations costs or counting them as match. ► OK: briefing current and potential stake- holders and communicating with parents and students by highlighting GEAR UP activities in websites, newsletters, and other similar media. ► OK: promoting a college-going culture with strategic and/or inspirational messages using selected forms of media and/or guest speakers. ► Not OK: lobbying; fundraising; advertising; entertaining; socializing; sales/marketing.  anything designed “solely to promote the governmental unit.”

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 28  Special Topic: Food ► Food is not specifically prohibited by OMB Circulars, but entertainment expenses are. ► Some GEAR UP programs will adhere to policies that prohibit the purchase of any kind of food under any circumstances, or require specific permission from your fiscal agent, who in turn must secure it from your federal program officer. ► If food purchases are permitted, make sure the use of public funds to buy food is well-justified (i.e. the success of the event depends on it).

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 29  Special Topic: Facilities ► Use caution when counting facilities as match. ► The space must be justified, allowable or reasonable – generally this should be approved as part of your grant agreement. ► Avoid counting classroom space used during the school day. ► It is likely that your organization uses depreciation or cost allowance to value facilities match.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 30  Special Topic: Discounts ► Use caution when counting discounts and/or waived fees as match. ► Ask vendors, in their quotes and/or invoices, to specify the exact amount of the discount they are providing, and indicate that it is specifically for GEAR UP. ► Best Practice: instead of getting 25% off four items, pay for three and have the vendor specify that the fourth is free.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 31  Special Topic: Indirect Costs ► These are “overhead” costs which are difficult to readily and specifically identify with a particular grant project or institutional activity (e.g. centralized services; lighting; electricity). ► Are allowable, as GEAR UP costs and/or match, but are limited to 8% of the approved federal direct costs under the award, or your indirect cost rate agreement (whichever is less). ► Can only be captured/reported if you have a formally stated negotiated indirect cost rate, resulting from a formally submitted proposal, from a cognizant federal agency.

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 32  Special Topic: Scholarships ► Scholarships are a common component of GEAR UP programs, esp. State grants. ► Know which basic statutory requirements your grant adheres to:  either the existing Higher Education Act (HEA)…  or the recently reauthorized HEA… ► Scholarships are specifically authorized as matching by Section 404(c) of the HEA, but use caution when valuing them  Carefully document the amount of waivers or financial assistance paid to students from NON-FEDERAL sources (State, local, institutional, or private funds)

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 33  Some Good Online Resources GEAR UP Statutes, Regulations, and Circulars: Washington GEAR UP resource list: Arizona GEAR UP policies, procedures, forms, etc: USDOE’s “Fiscal Accountability for Administering ED Grants”: USDOE’s “GEAR UP Matching Requirements”: 12_NCCEP_GEAR_UP_Annual_Conference/Session_Presentation s_and_Files/Session_Files_and_Presentations.htm

GEAR UP Fiscal Operations Overview ● October 23, 2012 ● 34 Stephen HartSusan St. George Arizona GEAR UPWashington State GEAR UP (602) (360)  Questions?