Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.

Advertisements

An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship Desirability Within Hook-up Culture: Nice-Guys vs. Bad-Boys An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship.

AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

The relationship between level of religious devotion and marital satisfaction Amanda Caddell Kevin Utt.

RELIGIOSITY AND SPIRITUALITY’S INFLUENCE ON CLOSENESS IN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Ally Cooke, Kate Eipl, & Rachel Jacobs Hanover College “Almost every single.

Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College

Predictors and Consequences of Involvement in Age-Discrepant Romantic Relationships Amy Bender Hanover College 2007.

Kelsey Grossman Laura Jimenez

Background Internalized homophobia (IH) is often conceptualized as “a set of negative attitudes and affects toward homosexuality in others and toward homosexual.

Classroom Crushes: An Exploration of Student-Instructor Attraction Emily L. Travis and Traci A. Giuliano Southwestern University Student-teacher romances.

The Nature of Adolescents’ Non-romantic Sexual Relationships and Their Link With Well-being Catherine M. Grello Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.

The Psychological Impact of Living in a Virtual World Exploring MySpace Users Ages Jyenny Babcock California State University, Dominguez Hills.

Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.

VOCATION AS CALLING: THE ROLE OF GENDER IN VOCATIONAL DISCERNMENT AND ACTION AMONG FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE STUDENTS Cindy Miller-Perrin Don Thompson Research.

Abstract Rankin and Reason (2005; Reason & Rankin 2006) have suggested than women and students of color experience more harassment on college campuses.

Genderization of Social Media By: Rakhi, Lisa, Mary, and Tricia.

Patterns of Age Mixing and Sexually Transmitted Infections Julie Kraut-Becher University of Pennsylvania Sevgi O. Aral Division of STD Prevention, CDC.

Dating Violence among Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Adolescents: Results from a Community Survey Naomi Freedner, MPH Lorraine H. Freed, MD MPH S. Bryn Austin,

POSTER TEMPLATE BY: om Sex Differences in Associations between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Substance Use Lesley A.

A TTRACTION AND A TTRACTIVENESS IN M ALE -F EMALE D YADS : D O D ATING C OUPLES D IFFER FROM C ROSS -S EX F RIENDS ? Whitney Joseph, Heather Williquette,

An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Sex Differences in Exercise Behaviors and Motivations Peter K. Jonason Summary and presentation by: Redd Davis,

Testosterone, Attachment and the green-eyed monster Nicola J. Fussell & Angela C. Rowe School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, UK. Are.

EVENT LEVEL: Sex obtained through aggression will frequently be unprotected GLOBAL LEVEL: Men who have perpetrated sexual aggression will be more likely.

Gender differences in mate selection What are men and women attracted to? (Campos, Otta & Siqueira, 2002) explored how men and women responded to personal.

Prof. Riyadh Al_Azzawi F.R.C.Psych S EXUAL O RIENTATION :

CYBERSEX: SOCIAL OPPORTUNITY OR SOCIAL ISOLATION? Marsia Vletsa - John Papadimitriou UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS.

The Opinions of Parents vs. Friends in the Dating Decisions of LGBT Individuals Karen L. Blair, PhD University of Utah Caroline F. Pukall, PhD Queen’s.

The Introductory paper: The skeletal structure of the CAPPUN paper.

By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco

Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.

Relationship Power & Sexual Risk in a Sample of Drug-Involved Women Aimee Campbell, MSSW Columbia University School of Social Work Social Intervention.

Examination of Public Perceptions of Four Types of Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs Brandon Kopp Raymond Miltenberger.

American Views of Homosexuality and Same Sex Marriage Survey of 1,191 American Adults.

Quantitative Research Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital Aaron Levenstein.

College Students’ Expectations for Hook-Ups. Amanda Smitley Hanover College.

Masculinity Levels and the ‘Extreme Male Brain’ in Asperger’s Syndrome Jennifer Barr & Kathryn Lucas.

Ta ble 3: R E S U L T S (C O N T.) ORGASM FUNCTIONING AND SEXUAL SATISFACTION: THE SELECTIVE PROTECTIVE VALUE OF GOOD RELATIONSHIPS Kyle R. Stephenson,

EDTECH Module 7 Technology Survey by J.D. Winterhalter.

Telling Lies: Type, Prevalence, and Gender Differences in a Turkish Population Emrah Akçay Anadolu University Introduction Lying and deception is a topic.

Differences between Genders And Age groups. Hypothesis: Male students believe they perform better in traditional classes over online classes while female.

Hypothesis Objective Epistemological Frameworks Results  Nikole Bryson & Molly McHugh  Department of Communication & Journalism  University of Wisconsin-Eau.

Observed Autonomy And Connection With Parents And Peers As Predictors Of Early Adolescent Sexual Adaptation Joseph P. Allen Felicia Hall University of.

Sex Differences in Aggression Between Heterosexual Partners: A Meta-Analytic Review John Archer Nicole Boyd Radford University.

Predicting Sexual Risk Taking and Dysfunction in Women: Relevance of Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Cynthia A. Graham, Ph.D., 1,2,6 Stephanie.

College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.

Janis L. Whitlock Cornell University.   Previous research show that human beings develop in multiple social ecologies but school connectedness and the.

Age and Social Networking Use Angelica Craig EDTC 5103 March 2011.

Venkatesan C, et al. 24th National IASSTD & AIDS & 11th SEAWP IUSTI Conference, India, 2000 CONSISTENCY OF CONDOM USE AMONG MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN (MSM)

 qiOt9cg  The probability of dominant behaviors increases as the levels of drive rise.  Has been empirically proven.

Grand Canyon University-PSY-550 December 11, 2013 Raymond Williams.

The Effect of Social Media Use on Narcissistic Behavior By Mariel Meskunas.

Are you currently in a sexual relationship? Women.

Baumeister & Tice Chapter 6 Erotic Plasticity. Nature & Nurture  Sexual revolution l Dramatic change in sexual climate l Bigger change for females -

Perceived Risk and Emergency Preparedness: The Role of Self-Efficacy Jennifer E. Marceron, Cynthia A. Rohrbeck Department of Psychology, The George Washington.

Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.

Housing discrimination, housing status, and HIV risk behavior among U.S. mid-Atlantic sexual and gender minority individuals Ariella R. Tabaac 1, Laurie.

Background There is a long literature documenting greater willingness to take risks by men than by women. This gender difference in risk taking has been.

Method Participants  145 undergraduates: 38 men (26.2%) and 107 women (73.8%) earning research participation credit for Psychology courses  Recruited.

SATISFACTION WITH BODY IMAGE AND HOW IT AFFECTS SELF-ESTEEM WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE IN RELATIONSHIP Between 6 months to 2 years.

Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships

Testosterone Levels in Women and Men Who are Single, in Long-Distance Relationships, or Same-City Relationships Sari M. van Anders and Neil V. Watson Department.

Sex Differences in Gender, Orientation, and Identity

Attachment-anxiety and identification with groups:

Friendship Quality as a Moderator

Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time

2University of Virginia

Lauren A. Barlotta & David E. Szwedo James Madison University

Presentation transcript:

Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April

Survey Design Taken from Pew Internet surveys – Princeton University Maximal 55 questions* Question Style – Yes or no – Likert scale – Dimensional analysis

Survey Participants Not Compensated Anonymous honesty

Race By # out of 91 Total Participants

Gender Orientation Demographics

Extremes via Survey Adult Friend Finder OkCupidEHarmony

Older = more likely to meet & more particular Mcintosh, Locker, Briley, Ryan, and Scott (2011) Online = trust & intimacy higher Offline = lower Ross M. (2005) Casual = more sexual acts Romantic = less sexual acts Bauermeister, Santana, Johns, & Pingel (2010) Hypothesis Participants differ behaviorally by demographics and dating site preference

Linking Research & our Participants YOUNGOLDER Actively seeking Highly selectiveDivorcedWill TravelNo RushCasual “Holds more weight with age”

Other Interesting Outlier Sexual Orientation & Exploration – Male – Prefers Men – Is married – Identifies as heterosexual – Somewhat agreed that some people who use online dating lie about whether they are married

Correlation between Responses? 50% 13/26 total participants “Online dating is a good way to meet people” “Most people can be trusted” Ross M. (2005) found that even TRUST and INTIMACY are heightened when communicating online versus face to face.

Characteristics of the Sex Extreme Never Married Looking for a partner Active Online User Never been in a long term relationship with Online partner (2 of 3) Adult Friend Finder.com

Consistent with Other Researchers Casual Seeker Trends gathered by other researchers Characteristics of those who use AdultFriendFinder VS. Romantic seeker as examined in Bauermeister, Leslie-Santana, Johns, & Pingel’s (2010)

Limitations 3 of 91 is a small sample size Lacks other “strictly sex” oriented websites Implications for Further Research 1 Participant was a Bisexual Female Bisexuality as correlated with tendency to use “strictly sex” websites in women

Strengths of Survey Reliability via Multiple Questions Length Based on Other Surveys Range of Demographics Opinions from Nonusers Dimensional Analysis

Limitations of Survey 1. Large Sample Size 2. Internal Validity for Constructs 3. Longitudinal comparison 4. Further information from outliers LACKS:

Conclusion Our survey addressed not only extremes of online interpersonal relationships But also, contained outliers that have been backed by psychological literature As with every experiment, this study can be replicated and improved to produce stronger results and to gain new insight