VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Local Accountability Meeting June 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

RESEARCH COMPLIANCE Agenda 1. No Destruction of local research documents after scanning 2. Training for shipping biological samples/specimens 3. Regulatory.
Ethical regulations for health research involving human subjects in Cambodia By Chap Seak Chhay, MD, MPH, MHPEd Public Health and Health Professions Educator.
Multi-Institutional Facilitated IRB Review Philip A. Cola, MA Vice President, Research and Technology University Hospitals Case Medical Center Third Annual.
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
IRB Review Mechanics: Looking under the hood IRB Administrators 2012 PRIDE Lucindia Shouse, MS, CIP May 31, 2012.
Office of Research Oversight. Working Group Report Slide 2.
Office of Research Oversight. Challenges & Opportunities Related to “Collaborative” Research with Affiliates Challenges –Federal Records Retention Requirements.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
OHRP Electronic Access Web Site:
VHA Handbook K. Lynn Cates, M.D. Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE HRPP 201 March 24, 2011.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Research Studies UCSF HRPP Submission Process Overview Tuesday, December.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
HRPP Policies & Forms Created/Revised for AAHRPP.
VA Research: IRB and R&D Approval Process From Initial Submission, Through the Informed Consent Process and Continuing Review, To Inactivation Kimberly.
2012 VA IRB Administrators Meeting Stephania H. Griffin, JD, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer Director, Information Access and Privacy Privacy Officer.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
 About SP ERC  Role of SP ERC  SP ERC Members  ERC Operations  Definition of Research  Definition of Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, Collaborator.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
IRB Board Education Session 6 How Consent Regulations are Implemented in INSPIR Mary Banks Director, Office of the IRB June -July 2005.
Developing Solutions - Specific ISO & Privacy Officer Responsibilities for Review of Human Research Projects K. Lynn Cates, M.D. Assistant Chief Research.
Privacy Officer Core Responsibilities for Human Research Protection Stephania H. Griffin, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Questions: AAHRPP Evaluation Instrument for Use with Final Revised Accreditation Standards Presented by: C. Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst,
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator HRPP 101, September 2010.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
VA Central IRB Annette Anderson, MS, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Updated: September 21, 2015.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.
Office of Research & Development (ORD) Local Accountability of Research 2009 Baltimore, Maryland January 13-14, 2009 “Meeting the Current Challenges of.
Human Research Protection Program & IRB Responsibilities Marisue Cody, PhD Director Center on Advice & Compliance Help.
VHA Handbook What’s new. General Requirements for Informed Consent A Legally Authorized Representative may not always qualify as a ‘personal representative’
1 Role of the Privacy Officer on the IRB Stephania H. Griffin, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
1 Role of the Privacy Office in VA Research Stephania H. Putt VHA Privacy Officer.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
VA HRPP Accreditation October 18, 2011 Accreditation Conference Call PRIDE/Soundia Duche, MA, MS.
The VA Central irb opportunities and challenges
1 Research & Development Committee Brenda Cuccherini, Ph.D., MPH Office of Research & Development January 2007.
Office of Research Oversight What’s New in VHA Handbook Dated November 15, 2011 December 1, 2011.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs September.
VA Central IRB MOU Webinar K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
IRB BASICS BETTY WILSON, MS, CIP. CONCEPTS SUBMISSION APPROVAL RECRUITING WORKING WITH PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) /SPONSOR POLICIES DEVIATIONS RECORD.
Guidance for Researchers on Using the Wisconsin IRB Consortium (WIC) February 2014.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Conditional IRB Approval
Introduction to the Human Research Protections Office (HRPO)
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
IRB reporting updates.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
Multisite Human Subjects Research
IRB Harmonization 2016 Review
Presentation transcript:

VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Local Accountability Meeting June 2011

2 VA Central IRB Purpose Improve human research protection in VA multi-site studies by ensuring Consistent expert ethical & scientific review Local issues are addressed Enhance efficiency and consistency of multi-site IRB reviews 2

3 Projects Reviewed by VA Central IRB VA Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded studies only with some exceptions (SPRINT NHLBI-funded study) VA facilities that do not use the VA Central IRB will not be able to participate in projects reviewed by the VA Central IRB - there can be no IRB shopping 3

4 4 Local VA Facility Requirements Local VA facilities that plan to use the VA Central IRB must: Amend their Federalwide Assurance (FWA) to include the VA Central IRB as one of their IRBs of record Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with VHA Central Office Develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) for using the VA Central IRB as an IRB of record Modify affiliate MOU if appropriate

5 Memorandum of Understanding Spells out the respective authorities, roles and responsibilities of the VHA Central Office Human Research Protection Program (HRPP), the VA Central IRB, and the local VA facility Requires the Medical Center Director (IO) to appoint the local site representatives to: Provide comments to VA Central IRB on initial project review determinations Provide final local site participation decision Serve as local site liaison with VA Central IRB

6 6 Local Accountability Every VA facility that performs human research has ultimate responsibility for its HRPP, even if it uses an external IRB (e.g., affiliate’s, another VA’s or the VA Central IRB) Include the VA Central IRB as part of local VA facility annual review of its HRPP

7 VA Central IRB Operations IO is Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Health Staffed by Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE) No charge to the field for using the VA Central IRB Monthly meetings or more frequently as needed Ad hoc expert advisors VA Central IRB website 7

8 VA Central IRB is a Full Service IRB Convened Board and Expedited Continuing Reviews and Amendments Exempt Reviews Waivers of HIPAA-compliant authorization and Informed Consent SAE/UAP; Protocol Deviations; and Reports of Noncompliance The VA Central IRB does not review the emergency use of test articles 8

9 VA Central IRB Composition 17 voting members from across the country, including two Co-Chairs 5 nonvoting members Ethics Legal Affairs Regulatory Affairs Privacy & HIPAA Information Security Officer 9

10 Progress to Date 94 VA facilities have amended their FWA listing the VA Central IRB as an IRB of Record 46 studies reviewed involving over 400 sites since inception in August 2008 AARHPP site visit took place in February 2011 and results will be reviewed at June AAHRPP Council First routine ORO site visit scheduled for end of August

11 Application Process -2 Processes Principal Investigator (PI) or Study Chair (SC) New Project Application Co-PI and Coordinating Center Supplements Protocol and other documentation (i.e., investigator drug brochure, surveys, scripts, case report forms) Waiver requests and Vulnerable Population Supplements Model Documents (i.e., recruitment materials, informed consent forms Local Site Investigator (LSI) Application

12 Key Elements of the PI/SC Application Protocol must clearly differentiate clinical care from research activities Protocol must be consistent with The PI/SC Application Informed consent form HIPAA authorization form Protocol must contain sufficient information for the IRB to evaluate all regulatory criteria for approval of research

13 Key Elements of the PI/SC Application List of potential participating facilities PI or SC enlists local VA facilities Check VA Central IRB website to see if all potential participating sites have listed the VA Central IRB as an IRB of record If not listed, verify with the VA facility that it can perform human research (i.e., that it has a FWA) Notify VA Central IRB staff of all potential participating VA facilities that are not listed ASAP Signed by PI/SC, PI/SC’s supervisor, and ACOS/R&D at the PI/SC’s VA facility

14 Administrative and Designated Reviews Administrative Review by assigned VA Central IRB Coordinator and Regulatory Advisor Primary Reviewer System with extensive use of reviewer checklists Privacy Officer and Information Security Officer Reviews Any reviewer can contact investigators for response to questions or they can go through VA Central IRB staff Ad hoc reviewers as needed

15 Potential VA Central IRB Actions Approve the study Approve the study contingent upon required minor modifications (Convened Board) Approve contingent upon local site comment Require modifications (Expedited Review) Defer the study pending major modifications (Convened Board) Disapprove

16 Local Site Initial Review After the PI/SC application is approved contingent upon local site comment, or approved contingent upon required minor modifications A copy of the approved PI/SC Application packet is sent to each local site for review, along with a copy of the VA Central IRB approval letter Local Site Investigators (LSIs) can begin preparing LSI applications

17 Local Site Initial Review Each local site has 30 days to provide comments to the VA Central IRB A form has been developed for this purpose Comments must be provided to the VA Central IRB by the individual designated by the Medical Center Director; usually one of the following: R&D Chair Local IRB Chair ACOS or AO for R&D

18 LSI Application Process Each LSI prepares a LSI Application based on the approved PI/SC Application The PI/SC reviews all LSI Applications for consistency The VA Central IRB will require a justification for any differences among the LSI Applications including the informed consent forms

19 Review of Local Site Comments VA Central IRB reviews all local site comments and decides if changes are needed as follows: No changes needed; comments or questions of an administration nature only were received, or a no further comments response provided Changes required in PI/SC Application (may or may not affect LSI Applications;) Changes required in specific LSI Application only (affects only local site making comment)

20 Review of Local Site Investigator Applications Usually reviewed in conjunction with local site comments but can be reviewed after depending upon timing of receipt Reviewed by convened IRB or expedited review procedures and: Approved Approved contingent on required minor modifications Deferred for major modifications Disapproved

21 Local Facility Participation Decision Once a LSI Application is approved, local VA facilities have 10 work days to decide whether or not to participate If a facility decides to participate, a copy of the applicable VA Central IRB minutes is posted to its SharePoint site A facility can still suggest changes but if the VA Central IRB, PI, or LSI do not accept the changes, the facility can decide not to participate in the study

22 Local Facility Approval Local VA facility must approve the research in accordance with VHA Handbook (R&D Committee) and local procedures before research can be initiated at that facility Copy of Local VA facility approval must be forwarded to VA Central IRB and to LSI Sites added after a study is approved are not given 30- day comment period; however, a site can always provide comments

23 Continuing Review VA Central IRB staff notifies PI and LSIs of continuing review deadlines Each local participating site submits a continuing review report to PI/SC PI/SC prepares summary report and submits to VA Central IRB, along with copies of LSI reports Continuing review date is set for the overall study, not for each site; all sites for a given study are on the same IRB review cycle

24 Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations, and Complaints Reported to VA Central IRB, not the local IRB Table of Reporting Requirements is posted on the VA Central IRB website and is referenced in each final approval letter Specific Reporting forms for Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, and Protocol Deviations are posted on VA Central IRB website Other reports of noncompliance or complaints must be reported as they occur

25 Future Plans Improve communications with sites by improving website content Instituting periodic webinars for new site liaisons and for when changes occur New Handout for Liaisons Revise Memorandum of Understanding to incorporate changes and improve communications Transition to a fully electronic system

26 Contact Information Annette Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator ; Website Toll free number