Transport.tamu.edu Fall 2016 Proposed Route Changes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
MUNI Operations Overview and Recent Innovations Julie Kirschbaum San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Operations Planning and Scheduling Manager.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
California Transportation Commission Glendale, California July 25-26, 2007 Business Plan 2008 Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA)
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
New Shuttle Routes. Current Health Sciences Shuttles – Four (4) different primary routes with excessive stops – A few single purpose routes – “Concierge”
Parking and Transportation Services Presentation December 2, 2008.
Evaluating – Performance Standards 3/13/2012Part II Evaluating - Fleet Performance1.
1 Example of How Bus Stop Inventory is Used and Issues are Addressed.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Changes to the Bus Schedule Spring Goals of the Service Enable students to get to class on time Enable students to obtain and maintain off-campus.
THE MILESTONES OF MASS TRANSIT CS 410 Blue Group communicate 2Me.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
Transportation Services Budget February 4, 2010 Josh Davis, Director 1.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Transport.tamu.edu Texas A&M University Aggie Spirit 2010 Doug Williams Interim Director Texas A&M Transportation Services.
Transit Service Detours during Confederation Line Construction Transit Commission December 9, 2013.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
SALEM PUBLIC SCHOOLS STUDENT TRANSPORTATION - UPDATE July 27,
Arriva in Southend Kevin Hawkins Commercial Director.
Report on the Effects of the Spring 2007 Changes and Reasoning for the Fall 2007 Changes July 2007 The Purchase Loop Report.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
LYNX FY2013 Budget Presentation Orange County Board of County Commissioners John M. Lewis, Jr. LYNX Chief Executive Officer July 17, 2012.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
UC San Diego Transit and Shuttle Funding Issues Fall Quarter 2009.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
Transport.tamu.edu Proposed Changes for Spring and Fall 2015.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Project Background  Several recent initiatives have helped transform the system in positive ways – New brand and logo – New website and real-time bus.
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
Welcome. How Did We Get Here… The process started in early 2012 In October 2014 Peterborough Transit introduced 3 service level increases for the Fleming.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Collier Area Transit February 8, 2012 Report Findings and Recommendation s.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Colfax Corridor Connections (Denver) & 15/15L Transit Priority Study (RTD) RTD Board - Planning & Development Committee August 6, 2013.
2   Provides On And Off-Campus Shuttles   Increases Parking Availability   Reduces Traffic Congestion   Reduces Car Trips to Campus and Supports.
Proposed Route Modifications
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
US 36 BRT/ Flatiron Flyer Proposed Service Plan
Campus Services.
Insert image or graphic
Transportation and Parking Services
Capital Programming Committee South Coast Rail Phase 1 Service
Bus Rapid Transit Study
GROTON-DUNSTABLE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Justin Tippy, Transit Manager Texas A&M Transportation Services
Justin Tippy, Transit Manager Texas A&M Transportation Services
M14A/D Select Bus Service
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Reimagine RTS Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

transport.tamu.edu Fall 2016 Proposed Route Changes

transport.tamu.edu Overarching Principles Recognize our limitations – 86 full size buses to run day routes, night routes, charters, training and general / long-term maintenance Serve densest student populations Adapt to student growth and apartment location change Minimize cost per passenger – use student service fees wisely Increase riders per bus-mile – get the best bang for the buck Shorten route times – more seats per hour Efficient, timely, dependable service – deliver what we promise Avoid congested intersections – don’t be dumb

transport.tamu.edu Operational Focus for 2016 Serve more students and utilize student service fees wisely by: – Providing cost-effective service on- and off-campus – Adapting and reallocating buses to serve areas most heavily populated by students New construction leads to shifting service areas: – Vet School opening – Holleman South corridor residential growth

transport.tamu.edu Student Population Students are moving from older to newer developments Annual maps show students shifting housing areas Ridership data also shows shift Used this data to combine Routes 33 and 34 two years ago

transport.tamu.edu Where We Are in Fall 2015 To help understand where we are, here are key stats regarding our growth: Enrollment up 15% from 2012 to 2015 Ridership is up 29% from 2012 to 2015

transport.tamu.edu Where We Are in Fall 2015 (cont.) Overall cost per passenger – FY12 = $1.08 – FY15 = $0.95 Number of days in the fall semester when we reached “1 million rides” – FY 13 – 26 days – FY 14 – 24 days – FY 15 – 22 days Average number of off-campus stops per route – Current – 14 stops – Proposed for FY 16 – 11 stops

transport.tamu.edu Where We Are in Fall 2015 (cont.)

transport.tamu.edu Route Ridership Review (1 st 6 weeks of fall semester) Routes With No Modification Needed Routes Needing Improvement

transport.tamu.edu On-Campus Modifications Route 03 – Modify route for better utilization of bus resources – Move NCTM stop to Route 09 New on-campus route: Route 09 – Serve Vet School, NCTM and Wehner

transport.tamu.edu Route 03 Modify Route 03 and exclude NCTM stop – moved to new Route 09 Continue with 3 buses to serve White Creek Dorms, Modulars, SPH, Wehner and MSC

transport.tamu.edu New Vet School Building

transport.tamu.edu Route 09 2 buses 10 minute headways Move bus from Route 06 due to relocation of Vet School Adds bus with service between Wehner and MSC

transport.tamu.edu Off-Campus Modifications Combine stops to improve on-time performance and adapt to new residential patterns Reconfigure routes to serve areas with most students Serve area of rapid student housing growth – Holleman Drive south of FM 2818 (Harvey Mitchell Parkway )

transport.tamu.edu Route 12 Difficult to maintain schedule – long route and many stops 10 of 20 stops are in bottom 50 boardings Combine stops – improve time reliability, other stops nearby Adjust bus path in real time, serve all stops Current: Buses – 4 Headway – 15 min Stops – 20 7% late arrival (5 th highest) Plan: Combine stops – 17 total Adjust bus path to avoid congestion

transport.tamu.edu Route 22 Ridership dropped over 10% from ‘14 to ’15 Top on-time performance Every stop declined in ridership from ‘13 to ’15 Only 1 stop in bottom 50 boardings Current: Buses – 5 Headway – 6 min Stops – 10 Plan: Buses – 4 Headway – 7 min Stops – 10 Move bus to new route

transport.tamu.edu Route 26 Long route with many stops Combine stops; improve time reliability, provide more ridership capacity Shares stops with Route 27 on Anderson Shelter at Scandia – 300 feet from Taos Current: Buses – 6 Stops – 20 Headway – 6 min Propose: Buses – 6 Stops – 15 Headway – 5 min Combine stops to increase capacity during peak ridership

transport.tamu.edu Route 27 For better route efficiency – drop Taos, move to Scandia (match Route 26 service) 3 stops in bottom 50 boardings Current: Buses – 4 Headway – 7 min Stops – 15 Propose: Buses – 4 Headway – 7 min Stops – 14

transport.tamu.edu Route 34 Current: Buses – 3 Headway – 16 min Stops – 13 Roundtrip – 48 minutes Lowest ridership off-campus route 8 of 13 stops in bottom 50 boardings 9 to 12 are in the bottom 75 boardings Most expensive off-campus route per mile – $2.14

transport.tamu.edu Route 34 Proposed: Buses – Reduce to 2 Stops – 7 Headway – 15 min Park and Ride remains at First Baptist Church on Welsh Drop Walmart Stop – Access to Target / HEB via Routes 26 and 27 Eliminate 8 of bottom 60 boardings Reducing headway from 18 min to 15 min Reallocate bus to new route

transport.tamu.edu Holleman Drive South

transport.tamu.edu Current Routes 35 and 36 Current 35: Buses – 4 Headway – 7 min Stops – 10 3 rd highest cost per passenger Current 36: Buses – 6 Headway – 5 min Stops – 11 Change area 36 services

transport.tamu.edu Proposed - Routes 35, 36 & 40 North of 2818 – move stops between Routes 35 and 36 – continue to serve areas and make more efficient Add a bus to Route 35 for a total of 5 Route 35 can handle the demand because we have capacity Route 40 will handle service to the area South of 2818

transport.tamu.edu Route 36 Current: Buses – 6 Headway – 5 min Stops – 11 Proposed: Buses – 4 Headway – 5 min Stops – 6 Stay away from congested intersections Improve reliability

transport.tamu.edu New Route 40 Service areas include MSC, Kleberg, The Cottages and The Barracks Jones-Butler and Holleman Drive provide predictable travel time for most trips Dynamic path options – May not use Holleman for every trip depending on traffic congestion Proposed: Buses – 4 Headway – 9 min Stops – 6

transport.tamu.edu Questions ?