UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 Focus on Navigation – deliberate mission analysis  Integration with MTSRU (Marine Transportation Systems Recovery Unit)  Navigation playbook Synchronization of Emergency Support Function (ESF), Navigation, Civil Works (CW) missions Introduction to the transition toward long-term economic recovery Integration with North Atlantic Division (NAD) – two Division fight C2 changes with weight to the main effort – western TN & KY and incorporation of Hurricane Sandy lesson’s learned Synchronized with FEMA’s (Regions IV and V) year strategic planning intent LRD NMSZ Exercise – October 2015 LRD 2015 Mission Planning Focus

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 2 The Great Lakes and Ohio River Division executes operations following a NMSZ catastrophic earthquake under FEMA, DoD and USACE authorities in order to preserve life, protect property and provide for the long-term recovery of the affected area. On order, LRD integrates assets from NAD and USACE; assesses and repairs flood protection, civil works and navigation infrastructure within civil works boundaries; re-establishes commercial navigation on the Ohio, Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers; executes ESF#3 missions in support of DHS/FEMA within TN, KY, IN and OH; provides temporary emergency power support to DHS/FEMA throughout the entire NMSZ area; initiates actions in support of long-term economic recovery for TN, KY, IN and OH and is prepared to support other organizations repairing critical infrastructure LRD Draft Mission Statement

LRD CG LRD HQ NAD Support NAD HQ NAP Support NAPLRB LNO HQ LRHLRLLRELRPLRC NAD SupportNAP SupportLRB LNO LRD – Phase 2A-2B (0 – 72 hours) 249 th CDR (TFTEP) LRP CDR (Power LNO)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 4 Mission – Main Effort  Inspection and assessment of Civil works projects  Inspection and assessment of Navigation missions  Executes ESF #3 operations to preserve life, protect property, and provide for the long-term economic recovery of the affected area.. Specified, Implied and Essential tasks  S – Assessment of LRD Civil Works projects  S – Assessment of navigation capabilities  S – ESF #3 Mission in TN, KY, IN, OH  S – Temp emergency Power mission in NMSZ  S – Initiate RSOI procedures  I – Integrate into TN, KY Decision making processes and response actions  I – Integration of NAD/USACE assets  I – Initiate planning to set conditions for long-term recovery  I – Determinate operational capability of LRN Movements  Phase 2A (0-24 hrs): - LRD FWD (CG) moves to TN - LRN executes COOP if necessary - Districts deploy LNOs to SEOC  Phase 2B (24-72 hrs): - NAD support initiates movement towards LRD AO - NAD CDR and support cell to TN SEOC - Integration of NAD into regional planning and response activities - Establish LNOs with USCG MTSRUs - Establish Power LNO (LRP CDR) with HQUSACE - Establish LNOs with HQUSAC FWD (LRB CDR) and MVD Command, Control, Communication  EQ triggers Silent Movements (No-signal initiation of movement)  LRD Forward (CG) to TN  NAD initiates movement toward LRD AOR  NAD CG and support cell moves to TN SEOC  Reorganization of LRD HQ: TF Temp Power, TF Navigation, ESF #3, Civil Works, TF Recovery, TF Special Projects LRD – Phase 2A-2B (0-72 hrs)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 5 Constraints 1.Overall mobility of initial reconnaissance assets and follow-on support functions 2.Navigation – Lack of planning in reference to Navigation assessments 3.Lack of habitual association with DoD planning and support 4.Lack of heavy support (fleet activities) contracting capability 5.Land Management in TN and lack of State resources to support unanticipated requirements 6.Communications challenges – requires innovative, new communications 7.Life/Safety issues associated with aftershocks while entering impacted zone 8.DTOS support plan – update to reflect recent planning changes Gaps/Concerns/Recommendations 1.HQ - Integration of MTOE FEST-As (HMWV mobility) and DoD assets 2.HQ - Establishment of national navigation priorities and focus on navigational impacts 3.HQ - Increased collaboration with 416 th TEC and local reserve units (pre-scripted missions) 4.LRD - Mission & gap analysis on contracting capability versus anticipated requirements 5.All - No ad-hoc execution on emergency response operations in TN 6.HQ - Create a robust USACE High Frequency (HF) radio network 7.HQ/LRD - Create rules of engagement for aftershocks 8.LRD – Coordination with HQ to reflect changes and requirments LRD – Phase 2A-2B (0-72 hrs)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 6 LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

- State EOC - USACE Office/RFO - Installation Support Base (ISB) LRD HQ - Cincinnati, OH O6 (LRD) LRD FWD - Nashville, TN O7 (LRD CDR), O5 (LRE CDR) RFO TN; Jackson, TN Phase 2C: O6 (LRH CDR) RFO KY; Greenville, KY Phase 2B: O6 (LRL CDR) Phase 2C: O6 (NAD) RFO IN; Indianapolis, IN Phase 2B: O6 (LRC CDR) Phase 2C: O5-O6 (NAD) RFO OH; WPAFB, OH Phase 2B: O5 (LRH) Phase 2C: O5-O6 (NAD) ISB KY; Greenville, KY O6 (NAD), O4-O5 (LRL) ISB TN; Arnold AFB O5 (NAD), O4-O5 (LRP) ISB IN; Grissom AFB Phase 2B: O6 (NAD) Phase 2C: O4-O5 (NAD) ECCV8 MCV HQ USACE FWD - D.C. O6 (LRB CDR) LRD – Phase 2C ( Days) ECCV RFI RFI ECCV ECCV MCV RFI ECCV MCV RFI

NAB PRT LRD HQ LRH O6LRP PRTLRB PRTLRN O6NAD SP RFO TN RFO TN – Phase 2C ( Days) LRD CG

LRD HQ LRH O6 LRLLRE LRP PRT LRL O6 + PRTLRD CG LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 NAB PRTNAN PRT RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRTLRH PRT LRC LRB PRT RFO KY RFO KY - Phase 2C ( Days)

NAD PRT (2)NAD O6NAD SP LRD HQ LRH O6 LRP PRT LRL O6 + PRT LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRT LRH PRT LRB PRT RFO KY NAN PRT NAB PRT LRE LRC O6 LRC NWW PRTLRH PRT RFO IN RFO IN – Phase 2C ( Days) LRD CG

NAD PRT (2)NAD SPNAD O5-O6 LRD HQ LRH O6 LRLLRE LRP PRT LRL O6 +PRT LRD CG LRB PRTNAD SP LRN O6 NAB PRTNAN PRT RFO TN NAD O6 + SPSAS PRT LRH PRT LRC LRB PRT RFO KY LRH O5 + PRT NAD PRT (2) NAD O6 NAD SP NWW PRT RFO IN LRC O6 LRH PRT RFO OH - Phase 2C ( Days) NWW PRT RFO OH

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 12 Mission – Main effort  Civil Works assessment and restoration  Re-establish commercial navigation on Ohio, Tennessee and Cumberland rivers  ESF #3 missions in TN, KY, OH, IN - RFO/EFO are established - PRT deployment  Temp emergency power missions throughout NMSZ  Fully integrated into TN/KY response capabilities and recovery planning  Regional collaboration with State, Federal and industry stakeholders Specified, Implied and Essential Tasks  E – Initiate emergency Contracting activities  S – Integration with USCG MTRSUs  S – Active RSOI procedures  I – Perform route clearance missions with debris PRT  I – Creation of emergency civil works supplemental funding requests  I – Conduct 24/7 operations Movements  RFO/EFO establishments  LRH – TN RFO  NAD – KY RFO  NAD – OH RFO  NAD – IN RFO  PRT Deployments – TN/KY RFO  Full integration of NAD support (LRD/Districts/RFOs)  LNO Deployments  Support to MTSRU  Sustainment operations Command, Control, Communication  Full integration of NAD’s leadership and support  Reorganizational change with TN SEOC, TN RFO, KY SEOC, KY RFO as separate reporting entities to report directly to LRD HQ  MTSRU fully established and supported  ISBs established and under LRD control  State-level integration (District, SEOC, RFO coordination)  Long-term Sustainability planning LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 13 Constraints 1. WWPC capability gap creating limited ability to acquire generators 2. PRT sustainment/coverage past initial deployment 3.Transition plan for recovery operations from region to national 4.Lack of national navigation priorities 5.Require economy of force/risk management planning– can’t do everything 6.Capability to sustain long-term efforts Gaps/Concerns/Recommendations 1.HQ/LRD - Task force power continues planning with FEMA 2.HQ – Create a ready-reserve plan through ESF 3 Cadres/SMEs  SME/Cadres produce and expand PRTs just in time  Regional efforts toward on-the-job training  IN/OH do not have temp power PRT (low risk) 3.HQ - Addresses national recovery plan in future OPORD 4.HQ/LRD – continued planning and ultimate creation of playbook (navigation center of expertise) 5.HQ/LRD – CDRs need to identify and manage risk 6.HQ/LRD – Required deliberate sustainment planning and new personnel tools and initiatives  Schedule - employees  Rehired annuitant’s  Contractor assistance  Just-in-time training LRD – Phase 2C ( Days)

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 14 North Atlantic Division support to LRD during NMSZ response 1.Essential for level of response required and sustainability of effort 2.Requires senior leader C2 effort, RFO operations, technical and staff support (LRD and Districts) to navigation and civil works, administrative 3.Fully integrated into response/recovery plans – two Division fight 4.Specified Missions: a)TN SEOC Liaison Cell (NAD CG and support staff) b)KY SEOC C2 c)KY RFO d)OH RFO e)IN RFO f)OH RFO g)TF Recovery (SES) Lead h)TF Civil Works (SES) Lead i)TF Special Projects Lead j)TF ESF #3 Lead k)TF ESF #3, Debris OIC l)LRD G3 and G33(x2) m)ISB (x4) C2

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 15 North Atlantic Division (NAD) support LRD during NMSZ response Rank# Required Location 0-71 TN EOC SES2 LRD G LRD G-3/RFOs 0-51 LRD G-3/RFOs 0-46 ISBs Civilians86 LRD G-3 Engineers84 LRD Districts Rank# Required Location Ft. Leonard Wood Support from school house to support LRD during NMSZ response

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 16 PURPOSE: Conduct a Rehearsal of Concept exercise focusing on navigation on LRD lakes and rivers. FOCUS: Primary focus will be on transportation of commodities (coal, petroleum, grains) across ~400 miles of navigable waterways (Ohio, Tennessee to include the Great Lakes) post 7.6+ magnitude destructive earthquake and related aftershocks while concentrating on port and waterway restoration, bridge and utility obstruction removal and hazardous waste recovery and disposal as well as debris recovery and disposal to include emergency dredging operations to maintain the required navigation channel. SCOPE: Host a half day NMSZ discussion for USACE only with focus NMSZ planning for FY16 through FY 18 in support of FEMAs National – Regional Planning Strategic Intent Host a one (1) day ROC drill for LRD Area of Operations of all major players and organization. Focus on earthquake, preparedness, response, preparedness and recovery activities with focus on Navigation DATE: TBD – Fall 2015 in Cincinnati, Ohio area LRD Fall 2015 NMSZ Navigation Focus Exercise

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 17  Channels river miles - Loss of width and depth  Bridges - 10 bridges  Aerial Power - 15 crossings  Power Generation - Cumberland City Steam Plant  Commercial Docks - One downstream of Barkley - Six upstream of Barkley  Tennessee River - Canal at CRM 33 - Loss of pool for 184 miles from Kentucky Dam to Pickwick Landing Dam LRD – Navigation Mission Analysis DistrictFlood Risk Mgmt NavigationOther † Total Buffalo11*02* Chicago01*1 Detroit91010 Huntington Louisville2015*944* Nashville7**4**010** Pittsburgh CELRD Total8854*30171* *Include Locks without Dams **Barkley is both FRM and Navigation † Levees & Retention Ponds

UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 18 LRD Request for Information (RFIs) to HQ USACE  Request LRD be relieved of specified task to provide HQ USACE Power LNO  Recommend HQ USACE pre-designate additional DTOS assets to support efforts in TN, KY, IN, and OH  US&R and Infrastructure Assessment PRTs integration process  Using Debris PRT for Route Clearance  Expiration of World Wide Power Contract (WWPC) impact  Task and purpose for USACE FWD element  Provide guidance for Long-Term Recovery Concept of Operation (post phase 2C ~30 days)  Procedure for Battle Captain request – (21 O3’s from Fort Leonard Wood Captain’s Career Course) - Process to request Title 10 (Active Duty/USAR) / FEST teams to support LRD Operations - Use of DOD/NORTHCOM Assets/Habitual Associations - Integration of 416 th TEC, USAR  Adjudication of Permanent Cadre/Team Leaders/Assistant Team Leaders/ Local Government Liaisons  USACE acreage at projects for joint use as staging area for ARNG/USAR missions  Integration of dual status commanders in USACE HQ OPLAN  Rules of Engagement (ROE) for earthquake aftershocks  Navigation Assessments priority  Timeline for updated HQ OPLAN dtd 21 DEC 2010 “USACE Response to a Catastrophic Earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone”