Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING, MONITORING, AND RECLAIMING OPERATIONS MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING,
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
HEADQUARTERS Strategic Environmental Assessment ”SEA is a systematic process for evaluating the environmental consequences of proposed policy, plan or.
Module 3 Counterpart Regulations Standards of Review for Determining Project Effects.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Six Transportation System Development.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 6 1 Module 6: CSS and Livability in Construction, and Maintenance.
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Safeguards Workshop October 30, 2008 Moldova, Chusinau Day 2 – Quiz Mitigation Dmytro Glazkov.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Visual Resource Management May 2015 Lander, Wyoming.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
Compensation in Bulgarian Law Where are we ? KONSTANTIN ILCHEV.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Mitigation and Impact management
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Managing 6(f) Conversions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Greenville, SC September 8-11, 2015.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Understanding the Section 504 Process
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Mitigation.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Environmental Commitments
Environmental Reports
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Commitments/Tracking

Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of the NEPA and other essential considerations of nation policy, to restore and enhance the quality of the human environment and avoid or minimize any possible adverse effects of their actions on the quality of the human environment CFR (f) Mitigation of impacts must be considered whether the impacts are significant or not. Agencies are required to identify and include in the action all relevant and reasonable mitigation measures that could improve the action.

Environmental Commitments  The NEPA process is intended to help public officials make decisions that are based on understanding of environmental consequences, and take actions that protect, restore, and enhance the environment CFR § (b): Purpose  For the vast majority of capital projects: ODOT will “take action”, or in other words, make environmental commitments to protect, restore, or enhance the environment  What are they, what do they mean, why are the important?

Environmental Commitments  For all ODOT Projects we strive to: MAXIMIZE POSITIVE IMPACT MINIMIZE NEGATIVE IMPACT

Environmental Commitments Environmental commitments are developed based upon the need to: 1.Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. 2.Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. 3.Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. 4.Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. 5.Compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. Any action that does one of the conditions above rises to an environmental commitment. ODOT may incorporate these by design or integral components of contracting methodology. These types of commitments need to have appropriate methods of documenting them as commitments and have methods in place for ensuring compliance and success.

Environmental Commitments 1.ECs come from 1.Federal, state, and local laws 2.Public outreach 3.Context specific needs 2.ECs are often multidisciplinary, on multiple timelines, and can require action before, during, and after construction.

Environmental Commitments Common Types of Environmental Commitments Timing Considerations –In water work restrictions, tree clearing restrictions, noise and timing, seasonal restrictions (school bus impacts, etc) Location/spatial Considerations –Avoiding certain areas (wetlands, trees, habitats, buildings, parks, etc) Retaining Access/Use –Trails, businesses, residences, EMS, school buses, etc Notification requirements –Prior to construction, during construction, after construction, etc Survey Requirements –Assess presence or absence surveys for species, pre-construction, as built, etc Restoration actions –Natural resource replacement, cultural resource improvements/protections/relocations, social or economics restoration (connectivity, livability, etc)

Environmental Commitment Project Implications 1.Must be in the plans as a standard specification, note, or special provisions 2.Can affect project staging, schedule, and design 3.All parties working on the project are responsible to know and ensure compliance of environmental commitments 4.Failure to implement ECs has consequences

Environmental Commitment Implementation 1.Not our strongest area 2.ECs can be easily non-performed, or inadvertently forgotten

Environmental Commitment Documentation Our near future is the comprehensive documentation of how ECs are implemented successfully

Take Away 1.Environmental Commitments (ECs) can be created throughout the PDP 2.Once made, ECs are required to be met 3.Non performance of ECs devalues, undermines, and makes worthless the Planning and NEPA process 1.Result in immediate work stoppages, delay claims, fines, jail time, removal of federal funding from this and future projects, and will substantially slow down the delivery of your next project 4.Performance of ECs results in minimizing negative impacts, and maximizing positive impacts

Environmental Commitments Matt Perlik, M.S. Assistant Environmental Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Environmental Services 1980 West Broad Street, Mail Stop 4170 Columbus, OH Matt Perlik, M.S. Assistant Environmental Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Environmental Services 1980 West Broad Street, Mail Stop 4170 Columbus, OH

Project Development Process