Problem Statement The amount of adhesive consumed in the assembly operation is higher than specified by engineering, resulting in significantly higher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative Capability Assessment
Advertisements

1 Why Are These Nozzles Found in More Locations Than Any Other…
California State University, Northridge PROFESSOR: HAMADE, JAY
Statistics and Data Analysis Professor William Greene Stern School of Business IOMS Department Department of Economics.
Pris mot antal rum. Regression Analysis: Price versus Rooms The regression equation is Price = Rooms Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant.
REGRESSION AND CORRELATION
Chapter 6: Quality Management
Catheter Tube Assembly Process
/k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico.
1. 2 SIX SIGMA "Delivering Tomorrow's Performance Today" AIR CDRE ABDUL WAHAB.
DMAIC DefineMeasureAnalyzeImproveControl D Define M Measure A Analyze I Improve C Control Implementing Six Sigma Quality at Better Body Manufacturing.
C L A S #4 Driver Operator Refresher Training.
Six Sigma is Two Things A Highly Capable Process – Long Term Statistical Defect Rate Prediction of 3.4 Defects Per Million or Less A Structured Process.
Model selection Stepwise regression. Statement of problem A common problem is that there is a large set of candidate predictor variables. (Note: The examples.
Reduce Scrap at the Extrusion
Six Sigma What is Six Sigma?
Cytec Engineered Materials Business Confidential and Proprietary Applications of Six Sigma In The Composite Materials Industry 12 th IAQG General Assembly.
ENGM 620: Quality Management 26 November 2012 Six Sigma.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
Process Capability Process capability For Variables
August 02, 2012 Abdolreza Bayesteh Kaustubh Ladia.
© 2003 Six Sigma Academy0 Impact and Depth Projects General Case Studies Champion Workshop.
Keith Ridgeway SIS Ltd Copyright 2006 Audit Services.
How to make “Touch Free” washing clean better. RYKO Manufacturing Company.
Management of Quality Chapter 9 PP June 27, 2012.
Variable selection and model building Part II. Statement of situation A common situation is that there is a large set of candidate predictor variables.
Chapter 5 – Part 3 The TQM Philosophy. Mini Case: Quality Improvement LSL USL X = Amount of Toner Toner Operation: Adding Toner to Cartridge Current Process.
NSQP MEETING Valery AKHNAZAROV January 20th 2011 ISP PP0 Board Bonding Procedure Type 1 Type 3 Type 4peek Type 4 Assembly Name: ISP ASM Parts.
Figure 8.1. Engineering drawing of the “steer support”, a critical component of the Xootr scooter. The “height” of the steer support is specified by the.
ASQ Raleigh ASQ Raleigh Section 1113 Six Sigma SIG DMAIC Series.
Business Statistics: A First Course, 5e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 12-1 Correlation and Regression.
Introduction to Linear Regression
New Single Family Houses Sold South QMB 5303 EMBA11 Team 7 Time Series Regression Mark Caulfield Robert Daum Tom Donegan Michael Rowley Rick Shafer.
Understanding Variation in Patient Satisfaction. All Rights Reserved, Juran Institute, Inc. Understanding Variation in Patient Satisfaction 2.PPT Variation.
Lean Six Sigma An Introduction to Process Improvement.
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 2) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
Copyright ©2011 Nelson Education Limited Linear Regression and Correlation CHAPTER 12.
Solutions to Tutorial 5 Problems Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F-test Regression Residual Total ANOVA Table Variable.
1 SIX SIGMA "Delivering Tomorrow's Performance Today" AIR CDRE ABDUL WAHAB.
Project Storyboard (Page 1 of 2)
Lecture 10 Chapter 23. Inference for regression. Objectives (PSLS Chapter 23) Inference for regression (NHST Regression Inference Award)[B level award]
Inference with computer printouts. Coefficie nts Standard Errort StatP-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Intercept
Statistical Quality Control
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Automotive Technology, Fifth Edition James Halderman MEASURING SYSTEMS AND TOOLS 12.
 What type of Inspection procedures are in use  Where in the process should inspection take place  How are variations in the process detected before.
A first order model with one binary and one quantitative predictor variable.
An Introduction to Design and Development
Statistics and Numerical Method Part I: Statistics Week VI: Empirical Model 1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์ 1.
Metrocket Senior assistance tool. Dimensions (Seat)  seat height is 550 mm -normal seat height of about 100 mm higher  The seat angle of the first prototype.
FICCICECE Six Sigma - A Breakthrough Strategy Competitive Edge Management Consultants.
Regression through the origin
732G21/732G28/732A35 Lecture 4. Variance-covariance matrix for the regression coefficients 2.
Inference for  0 and 1 Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests.
Inference with Computer Printouts. Leaning Tower of Pisa Find a 90% confidence interval. Year Lean
NSQP MEETING Valery AKHNAZAROV January 20th 2011 Corrugated Panel Bonding Procedure Assembly Name: ISP Corrugated Panel ASM Parts.
732G21/732G28/732A35 Lecture 6. Example second-order model with one predictor 2 Electricity consumption (Y)Home size (X)
Model selection and model building. Model selection Selection of predictor variables.
Free Air Cooling for Data Centres
Overview Definition Measurements of process capability control
MEASURING SYSTEMS AND TOOLS
TQM Defined Total quality management is defined as managing the entire organization so that it excels on all dimensions of products and services that are.
Introduction Edited by Enas Naffar using the following textbooks: - A concise introduction to Software Engineering - Software Engineering for students-
California State University, Northridge PROFESSOR: HAMADE, JAY
OPS/571 Operations Management
WASHERS.
ENGM 621: Statistical Process Control
Implementing Six Sigma Quality
DMAIC Roadmap DMAIC methodology is central to Six Sigma process improvement projects. Each phase provides a problem solving process where-by specific tools.
13.0 PROCESS CAPABILITY SPECIAL TOPICS
Six Sigma (What is it?) “Six sigma was simply a TQM process that uses process capabilities analysis as a way of measuring progress” --H.J. Harrington,
Presentation transcript:

Adhesive Project Example

Problem Statement The amount of adhesive consumed in the assembly operation is higher than specified by engineering, resulting in significantly higher production expenses, which impact profitability of the product. Target: Identify the causes of excessive adhesive consumption and reduce the usage of adhesive in the assembly line operation by 400%. Critical To Quality - CTQ Applying the specified amount of adhesive is essential to bond strength. Applying excessive adhesive causes costs to exceed targets. Benefits Achieved $500,000 savings in material costs for adhesive.

Projected Usage For the Year Metrics Adhesive usage and cost Adhesive Volume/Cost Total Plant 1st Qtr Usage Projected Usage For the Year Brought in house 14,983 Gal. $174,738 56,479 Gal. $658,689 Usage Per Projected Specification 3,542 Gal. $41,305 13,353 Gal. $155,731

Cause-Effect Diagram Methods Machines Manpower Measures Limit switch set up (too high causes excessive adhesive remaining in drums) Purging process - - Drum’s change over process Over use of adhesive during assembly processes Pressure set up - - Nozzles timing Nozzles Height - vs. Panel nest - Needed training on spec’s. - In- Process Measurement system -Leaking during application Machines Manpower Measures

Current dimensions data: Base line D-M-A-I-C

Current Process not capable- Negative Sigma Level

DOE - Optimize Pressure & Time Settings for the dispensing nozzles

Results Main Effects Plot Regression Model Results used to optimize settings for nozzles Regression Analysis: Diameter versus Pressure, Time The regression equation is Diameter = - 39.0 + 0.740 Pressure + 1.61 Time Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant -38.985 8.038 -4.85 0.000 Pressure 0.73956 0.09967 7.42 0.000 Time 1.6121 0.2100 7.68 0.000 S = 1.596 R-Sq = 94.0% R-Sq(adj) = 93.5%

ADHESIVE'S SPOTS SIZE Visual Aid WRONG TOO BIG WATCH FOR THIS DEFECT TOO SMALL ADHESIVE'S SPOTS SIZE 23 mm LOWER SPEC. 25 mm TARGET WRONG TOO BIG 27 mm UPPER SPEC.. WATCH FOR THIS DEFECT

BEFORE CHANGING ADHESIVE Visual Aids To avoid Adhesive spillage… When plate is here There is 25% of adhesive remaining in this drum BEFORE CHANGING ADHESIVE DRUMS CHECK FOR: Piston is at bottom Piston is here The drum to be removed from the line is empty. The piston is all the way down to the bottom of the drum. Air pressure closed for drum to be changed T-valve closed for the drum to be changed. T-valve open for the remaining drum. T-valve AFTER CHANGING ADHESIVE DRUMS CHECK FOR: LOSS $11.7/gallon T-valve is open for both drums. Air lines open for both drums; if not, one drum will pump Adhesive to the other.

Measurement tool for Adhesive spots Measurement System Measurement tool for Adhesive spots Prototype II Gage type: Go / no go 23mm 27mm 1000mm 60mm Lower specification limit Higher specification limit Material: Plexiglass

Process Capability for Diameter Improved Ppk= 3.1 Actions: Material handling Changes Optimized Application Settings Project Results 1st Qtr Cost Improved Process Cost Difference Yearly Savings $ 0.58/panel $0.24 /panel $0.34/panel $503,000 Process Capability for Diameter Improved Ppk= 3.1