X-ray sky survey of bright, serendipitous sources with 2XMMi at the AIP Speaker: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: Humboldt-Uni Berlin, Germany Institute:AIP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAHA, 5 Feb 2005XMM-Newton Surveys Xavier Barcons.
Advertisements

Astrometry and EPIC flux cross-calibration in 2XMMp/2XMM Silvia Mateos R. Saxton, S. Sembay and the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre.
Epic-Cal 4 Feb 2003 Flux check Richard Saxton XMM-SOC/SSC Flux Comparisons.
Tracing cosmic accretion through the XMM-Newton Medium Survey (XMS) Xavier Barcons On behalf of the AXIS/XMS/SSC team.
15 years of science with Chandra– Boston 20141/16 Faint z>4 AGNs in GOODS-S looking for contributors to reionization Giallongo, Grazian, Fiore et al. (Candels.
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
Statistical analysis of the X-ray emission properties of type-1 AGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey Silvia Mateos Leicester University (UK) Leicester.
EGRET unidentified sources and gamma-ray pulsars I. CGRO mission and the instrument EGRET and it’s scientific goals II. Simple introduction of EGRET sources.
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
GALEX UV Light-curves of M-Dwarf Flare Stars: “ THE FLARING UV SKY” Barry Welsh, Jonathan Wheatley & Stanley Browne (UC Berkeley) Richard Robinson (Catholic.
Star-Formation in Close Pairs Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Overview The effect of galaxy interactions on star formation has been investigated.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
Ringberg Meeting, Apr 05 2dF Spectroscopic Identification of a Southern XMM-Newton Serendipitous Sample Jonathan Tedds (Leicester), Mat Page (MSSL) & XMM-Newton.
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey Richard Saxton, M. Pilar Esquej Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri Andrew Read.
Summary Candidate supernova remnants G and G23.5–0.0 were observed by XMM-Newton in the course of a snap-shot survey of plerionic and composite.
Obscured and unobscured growth of Super-massive Black Holes Francisco J. Carrera, X. Barcons, J. Bussons, J. Ebrero, M. Ceballos, A. Corral (IFCA, CSIC-UC,
GIANT TO DWARF RATIO OF RED-SEQUENCE GALAXY CLUSTERS Abhishesh N Adhikari Mentor-Jim Annis Fermilab IPM / SDSS August 8, 2007.
The XMM-Newton hard band wide angle Survey Nicoletta Carangelo and Silvano Molendi (IASF-MI(CNR)) Epic Consortium Meeting Palazzo Steri, Palermo,
Automated Classification of X-ray Sources R. J. Hanisch, A. A. Suchkov, R. L. White Space Telescope Science Institute T. A. McGlynn, E. L. Winter, M. F.
Review of 2XMMp data products Anja Schröder, Univ of Leicester, UK John Pye, Univ of Leicester, UK.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
X-ray Surveys with Space Observatory Khyung Hee University Kim MinBae Park Jisook.
RAS National Astronomy Meeting April 2006, University of Leicester, UK The XMM-Newton Slew Survey The excellent sensitivity of the XMM-Newton.
SPIE, San Diego, CA - 1 August 2005 Bruno Altieri, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 The XMM-Newton Slew Survey: processing challenges.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
Wiss. Beirat AIP, ClusterFinder & VO-Methods H. Enke German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory ClusterFinder VO Methods for Astronomical Applications.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain The XMM-Newton Slew Survey XMM-Newton Slew 1 (XMMSL1) Fig 1. Slew observation.
X-ray astronomy 7-11 September 2009, Bologna, Italy XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources R.D. Saxton a, A.M.
Swift/BAT Census of Black Holes Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey ImgCutout: The universe at your fingertips Maria A. Nieto-Santisteban Johns Hopkins University
Spectral Energy Distributions of 2XMM-selected AGN & VO-tools Rodrigo Gil-Merino Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) Santander, Spain MAVO workshop,
The XMM SSC Bright Source sample * November 2006 Report to the SSC XID R. Della Ceca A. Caccianiga T. Maccacaro P. Severgnini F. Cocchia * on behalf of.
On behalf of the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Roberto Della Ceca INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan The Cosmological properties of AGN.
X-ray emission properties of BLAGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey S. Mateos, M.G. Watson, J. A. Tedds and the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Department.
The 6dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Status Report and Data Release 2 Heath Jones ANU/AAO Will Saunders AAO Mike Read Edinburgh Matthew Colless AAO 100,000.
Compton-thick AGN in the CDFN I. Georgantopoulos NOA A. Akylas NOA A. Georgakakis NOA M. Rovilos MPE M. Rowan-Robinson Imperial College.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
X-Ray Binary Light-Curve Analysis in optical and x-ray or “the ‘crazy’ LMXB (low mass x-ray binary) EXO “ Trainee: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: HU.
Obscured and unobscured growth of Super-massive Black Holes from the XMM-Newton Medium Survey Francisco J. Carrera, X. Barcons, J. Bussons, J. Ebrero,
Andrii Elyiv and XMM-LSS collaboration The correlation function analysis of AGN in the XMM-LSS survey.
XMM slew survey Richard Saxton 1, Andy Read 2, Pili Esquej 3, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1 1. ESAC 2. University of Leicester 3. MPE XMM slew survey.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker X-Ray Studies of the Central Compact Objects in Puppis-A & RX J Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
Observations of Near Infrared Extragalactic Background (NIREBL) ISAS/JAXAT. Matsumoto Dec.2-5, 2003 Japan/Italy seminar at Niigata Univ.
Extragalactic Survey with MAXI and First MAXI/GSC Catalog Extragalactic Survey with MAXI and First MAXI/GSC Catalog Yoshihiro Ueda Kazuo Hiroi, Naoki Isobe,
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey Richard Saxton, Andy Read, M. Pilar Esquej, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Diego Bermejo, Veronica Lazaro.
Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) is a NASA infrared- wavelength astronomical space telescope launched on December 14, 2009 It’s an Earth-orbiting.
Color Magnitude Diagram VG. So we want a color magnitude diagram for AGN so that by looking at the color of an AGN we can get its luminosity –But AGN.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain Extended Sources in the XMM-Newton slew survey V. Lazaro a, R. Saxton a, A.M.Read.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker Probing the Proper Motion of the Central Compact Object in Puppis-A Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain Extended Sources in the XMM-Newton slew survey V. Lazaro a, R. Saxton a, A.M.Read.
X-Ray Binary Light-Curve Analysis in optical and x-ray or “the ‘crazy’ LMXB (low mass x-ray binary) EXO “ Trainee: Alexander Kolodzig Origin:
EVALUATION OF THE XMM NEWTON CROSS CALIBRATION ARCHIVE
Periodicity Search in X-ray data of RX J
Simulations for WXT aboard Einstein Probe mission with Geant4
Gerard Fitzpatrick Tutor: Andy Pollock Trainee Project 2009
sourceIdentify and identification strategies for LAT sources
XMM-Newton slew sources A quick analysis
Nam08, belfast apr 1-4, 2008 martin still, christopher brindle, mat page, vladimir yershov, alice breeveld, houri ziaeepour (ucl-mssl) simon rosen (leicester)
Field content and target identification
XMM-NEWTON EPIC CONTAMINATION MONITORING.
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
TRAINEE PRESENTATION The North and South Ecliptic Pole fields population Project supervisors: R. Saxton N. Loiseau Trainee student: Jaime Abella Payá.
X-ray high resolution spectra in the VO: the case of XMM-Newton RGS
Presentation transcript:

X-ray sky survey of bright, serendipitous sources with 2XMMi at the AIP Speaker: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: Humboldt-Uni Berlin, Germany Institute:AIP (Astronomical Institute Potsdam), Potsdam, Germany Tutor: Axel Schwope ESAC Summer Alumni Trainee Meeting 2009

The 2XMMi-Catalog 2XMMi = The incremental second XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalogue –largest X-ray source catalogue (2009) 4117XMM-Newton observations (2000 – 2008) – each field is visually screened ~1.0%sky area covered independently rows of X-ray detections unique X-ray sources 300columns of information per detection XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig2

selection conditions (among others): –inspired by Della Ceca et al. (2004) –bright sources: SOFT-Band [ keV] –Rate> 0.01 counts/secLikelihood> 18 HARD-Band [ keV] –Rate> counts/secLikelihood> 12 –serendipitous sources just point sources off axis angle ≥ 3 arcmin  no center of the observation field just certain Observation Field Classifications XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig3 source selection

matching with the catalogs: 1. SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) Data Release 6 2. BSS (XMM-Newton Bright Source Sample, Della Ceca et al. (2004)) –similar survey but of the BSS with 400 sources identified 3. NED (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database) 4. SIMBAD –identify possible optical counterparts add information of: –optical magnitude –red shift –source type XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig4 source matching

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig5 SOFT-Band selection

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig6 SOFT-Band selection

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig7 HARD-Band selection

2XMMi-Catalog (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig8 X-ray sky map

SOFT-Band (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig9 sky map of identified sources

HARD-Band (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig10 sky map of identified sources

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig11 distribution of known source types

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig12 distribution of known source types

SOFT-Band (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig13 sky map of known source types

HARD-Band (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig14 sky map of known source types

ratio: X-ray flux / optical flux SOFT-Band HARD-Band XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig15 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

optical flux [mag] vs. galactic latitude [deg] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig16 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

optical flux [mag] vs. galactic latitude [deg] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig17 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

optical flux [mag] vs. red shift [log(z)] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig18 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

optical flux [mag] vs. red shift [log(z)] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig19 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

–compare optical type and X-ray source identify of additional or wrong optical counterparts –development of automatic type-identifying method for X-ray bright sources –new list of unknown, maybe interesting X-ray sources  characterisation of the X-ray sky XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig20 further applications

Thank You For Your Attention! Contributions or Questions?

Backup - Slides

The 2XMMi-Catalog 2XMMi-Catalog: –constructed by SSC (XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre) –serendipitous: found by coincidence XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig23

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig24 XMM-Newton Observatory

factsheet : –ESA Satellite, launched 1999 –most sensitive X-ray telescope (so far) –3 independent X-ray cameras (PN, MOS1, MOS2) energy range: keV field of view:0.5 degree –2 X-ray reflection grating spectrometers (RGS) –1 independent optical/UV monitor (OM) simultaneous longtime observations in x-ray and optical XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig25 XMM-Newton Observatory

XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig26 XMM-Newton Observatory

my tasks: 1. selecting the “bright, serendipitous sources” 2. matching with other catalogs 3. statistics XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig27 Task - Overview

selection-conditions (among others): –serendipitous sources: just point sources Offaxis Angel ≥ 3 arcmin –no detection from the center of the observation field Observation Field Classification: –f = all detections are potential target –n = the target was not detected or in the field XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig28 1. Selecting

Selection-Conditions: –OBS_CLASS < 4 Quality classification of the whole observation, <10% has been flagged –EP_EXTENT < 6 arsec extent radius of a source detected, < 6" = point-source –M1,M2,PN_SubMode= “FullWindow/ExtentedWindow” –TSERIES = True(has Light-Curve) –SPECTRA = True(has Spectra) –SUM_FLAG = 0 summary flag of the source is derived from the EPIC flag, 0 = “none of the flags was set” –M2_OFFAX ≥ 3 arcmin, ≤ 13 arcmin  just serendipitous sources –RATE and Likelihood for each BAND of the M2-Camera SOFT: >0.01 counts/sec,Likelihood >18 HARD: >0.002 counts/sec,Likelihood >12 –FIELD_CLASS: n,f  just serendipitous sources f - 'field', that is, all detections are potential target n - the target was not detected or in the field, whole field is serendipitous XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig29

1. Selecting Data mainly from EPIC MOS2-Camera: –explained by the paper: –detector pattern simplifies the analysis of the field e.g. object source target is fully contained in the central chip –it has the best PSF –gaps between the EPIC MOS chips are narrower –sensitivity with the bright sources isn’t important XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig30

Matching: –matching with coordinates (RA & DEC) –error-radius: 3 arcsec possible identification of wrong optical counterparts –Matching-Tool: “STILTS” (script-version of TOPCAT) –purpose: identify possible optical counterparts add Information of: –optical magnitude –red shift –source type XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig31 2. Matching

matched with the following catalogs: 1. SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) Data Release 6 – sources (with known & unknown source types) –pre-matched catalog with 2XMMi 2. BSS (XMM-Newton Bright Source Sample, from SSC) – 400 sources –similar but smaller survey of 2XMMi 3. NED (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database) – 163 million sources (with known & unknown source types) –Data-Extraction difficult 4. SIMBAD – 4.6 million sources XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig32 2. Matching

Plot: normalized with the circle area XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig33 3. Statistics offaxis angel distribution

3. Statistics Results: Number of Sources SOFTHARD*Description 933 (0,4%) 217 (0,1%) serendipitous bright sources 468 (50%) 121 (56%) identify sources and known type 128 (14%) 23 (11%) identify sources but unknown type 337 (36%) 73 (34%) unknown sources (so far) *Hard-Band without “detections” which appear as well in the Soft-Band XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig34

3. Statistics Results: Number of Det./Src. SOFTHARDStage Det.: without Field-Class /234*Det.: total Selection /217*Src.: total Selection 0.42%0.21%/0.10*%from now just source-numbers ??*identify with SDSS ?(?)?*(?*)identify with BSS (additional) ?(?)?*(?*)identify with NED (additional) ? (?%) ?* (?%) identify sources (known & unknown type) ? (?%) ?* (?%) unknown sources (so far) *Hard-Band without “detections” which appear as well in the Soft-Band XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig35

2XMMi-Catalog (in ecliptic coordinates) XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig36 X-ray sky map

X-ray flux [log(erg/(cm²  s))] vs. red shift [log(z)] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig37 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

red shift [log(z)] vs. galactic latitude [deg] XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig38 comparison of stars, galaxies & QSO’s

Overview 1.? 2.? 3.? XMMi-Survey of bright sources at AIP - Alexander Kolodzig39