An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Lorain County Children Services Providing safety, permanency, and well-being to Lorain County’s abused and neglected children.
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
February 10, 2011 San Diego.  Federal law enacted in 2008  Intent to improve well-being and permanency outcomes for court dependent children  Two California.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
1 What Is Child Welfare? Child Welfare in the United States Background for understanding the public child welfare system The Service Array Process National.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
THE RANGE OF PLACEMENTS An Overview of the California Foster Care System.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
1 NSCAW I and II Updates and New Field Work for a Child Welfare Landmark Study John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Rady Children’s.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
Office of Children’s Services Ombudsman May 17, 2006 Marilyn Jackson Legislative Policy Analyst.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
ADVOCACY 2015 MISSOURI COALITION OF CHILDREN'S AGENCIES Together for children.
Ashley Howell.  Children's Administration works with children and families to identify their needs and develop a plan for services which support families.
L EGISLATION, P OLICIES & P ROCEDURES. L EGISLATION Children Act, 1989 Education Act, 1996 The Protection of Children Act, 1999 Children Act, 2004 United.
Juvenile Justice.
411: Overview of Child Welfare and Fiscal. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Agenda Introductions Overview of the Child Welfare System and.
The Child Welfare System An Introduction Child Welfare in Numbers Nationally, an estimated 896,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
The Alliance For Children's Rights Overview of Services.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Quantitative Performance Measures for Juvenile Dependency Court Administrative Office of the Courts March 14, 2008.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
DCFS Internet Site: Los Angeles County Dept. of Children & Family Services Director Patricia S. Ploehn, LCSW Presented by: Angel.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN INC. Non- Profit Agency for Children At Risk 4534 Lovers Lane Suite #378 Plano, TX (972)
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
Using the CANS – F to Support In-Home Child Welfare Services Tim Kelly, MS, Department of Social and Health Services Children’s Administration 11th Annual.
Child Welfare FCSFC 485 Lecture 7 & 8 1. Overview Child Welfare Services Child maltreatment ▫Statistics ▫Risk and Resilience Child Abuse Prevention and.
Helping Youth in Indiana. Indiana Department of Child Services Child Protection Services “protects Indiana's children from further abuse or neglect and.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Family Preservation in Georgia
Santa Clara County Probation Department
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Presentation to the Senate Jurisprudence Committee August 26, 2010
Children, Youth and Families Department
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
RFA Jeopardy!.
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Human Trafficking and Child Welfare Services
Short term safety planning for asylum seeking children an example by, Elinoar Lindroth
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System

Child Welfare Services (CWS)  This system is the safety net for protecting neglected and abused children  Is a complex array of programs and services  A primary CWS service and program is foster care The 24-hr out-of-home care provided to children in need of substituting parenting because their own families are unable or unwilling to care for them  The primary entryway into foster care

Navigating the System  Many players have a role in providing for the safety, permanence, and well-being of children  The federal level United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children, Youth, and Families  The state level The California Department of Social Services (CDSS) The Foster Care Ombudsman Office  The county level The county social services department The county probation department The juvenile court

Federal Level  The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children, Youth, and Families  Oversees state CWS/foster care  Issues regulations and policy  Conducts compliance reviews  Allocates CWS and foster care funds to the state

State Level  The California Department of Social Services (CDSS)  Supervises county administration of CWS/foster care and allocates federal and state funds  The Foster Care Ombudsman Office  An autonomous entity within the California Department of Social Services  Investigates complaints and resolves concerns related to foster care  Staff includes former foster youth

County Level  Each county has flexibility in how it operate the CWS program  Counties can differ in demographics, administrative structure, or childcare philosophy  Key county players  County agencies  Public and private service agencies  Caregivers / families

County Level  The county social services department  Provides management for dependent children (children who have been removed from the custody of their parents by the juvenile court)  County social workers provide emergency response, assessment, and case management service  The county probation department  Provides case management for wards (youth in the juvenile justice system who are on probation)  Probation officers provide the same services to wards in the foster care system as social workers provide to dependents  The juvenile court  Determines if a child needs protection and makes decisions about the child’s future

References  Foster, Lisa K. Foster Care Fundamentals: An Overview of California's Foster Care System. California State Library, California Research Bureau, 2001.