House of Cards: Strategies for success in supports for student learning Kate Connor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
Advertisements

Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.
Active Student Participation Inspires Real Engagement
Tri-County Technical College Quality Enhancement Plan.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Assurance of Learning The School of Business and Economics SUNY Plattsburgh.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Monroe Community College 1 Assessment of General Education Social Sciences Knowledge and Skills Area Presenters Frances Dearing, Assessment Coordinator.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Principles of Assessment
The College Board: Expanding College Opportunity The College Board is a national nonprofit membership association dedicated to preparing, inspiring, and.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning Training Conducted at Campus-Based SLO Summit Spring 2014 How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 2009 PROJECT DIRECTOR’S CONFERENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DONNA M. SOBEL, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Engaging Mathematics at Roosevelt University College Algebra: Modeling the City Barbara Gonzalez and Cathy Evins Engaging Mathematics 1 Timeline: Fall.
Basic Skills as a Foundation for Student Success in California Community Colleges
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Joanna Fulbright Jeremy Nicholson Chris Lorch Ozarka College, Melbourne, Arkansas Based on a process created by the Des Moines Area Community College System.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Connecting Course Goals, Assignments, and Assessment Faculty Development for Student Success at Prince George’s Community College William Peirce
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Language Arts Senate Report: Student Learning Outcomes SLO Process => Inquiry Inquiry => What We Do Well vs. What Needs to Improve Inquiry = Faculty Dialogue.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Creating a Comprehensive Early Warning System to Further Student Success and Retention Shane Hammond CCLA June, 2007.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
Academic Program Review
CTE Academy: Engaging Faculty in a Culture of Continuous Improvement
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Supporting Part-Time Faculty
Guided Pathways Work Plan
Presentation transcript:

House of Cards: Strategies for success in supports for student learning Kate Connor

A little about Truman College… Part of the seven City Colleges of Chicago Dramatic changes throughout the District through Reinvention effort Individually accredited by HLC 23,000 students Large ESL and GED population Multiple Special Program Accreditations: – NATEF, NAEYC, ACEN

Strategy and the Academy Utilizing the political capital of HLC and the Academy to get student learning at the forefront of conversations for: – Increased funding and support for general education and program assessment – Faculty engagement about student learning Changing the view of assessment – Cheerleading in a time of intense change Faculty were uncomfortable taking chances with assessment (What if the data is bad?) – Increased administrative support for understanding student learning

Work to be done… Basing projects on our HLC Reaffirmation Report, we are focused on the following areas: Continue General Education Assessment Further develop program/discipline efforts Create sustainable structures – Committee structure – Professional Development – Becoming part of the college culture Per our report, we needed to “successfully complete” our projects

We had big plans… Joined Assessment Academy HLC Site Visit and Site-Visit Report Went to our Kickoff- MADE BIG PLANS HLC recommended we continue in the Academy and show “successful” completion Bob Mundhenk raised concern that projects did not address HLC concerns Streamline of Academy projects to address concerns and focus our efforts TRIED TO EAT A WHALE

Streamlining Our project: General Education Developed an assessment process with a calendar through 2019: Student Learning Outcomes- Develop or review Student Learning Outcome(SLO) for Goal(s) Assessment Research and Design- Find or Create Appropriate Tools and Processes for Specific General Education SLO’s assessment Administration of Assessment Tool-Recruit sample for assessment through faculty and conduct assessment Data Analysis- Data input, reliability and validity checks, produce analyzed and usable data Dissemination of Data- Share data with all stakeholders and produce report for posting to the public Data-Driven Decisions- Partner with stakeholders to discuss and implement data driven improvement

Streamlining Our Project: General Education We have assessed all general education areas and have a baseline for moving forward

Streamlining Our Project: Department/Discipline Faculty Development day focused on department and discipline work: Three Questions: – What do you know about student learning? – How do you know it? – What do you do with this information? Each question has “guiding questions below” and feedback is given from a common rubric to help guide work

Streamlining Our Project: Department/Discipline Met with faculty based on Three Questions Report – Example: Humanities Discussed outcomes in our Humanities 201 course and alignment to General Education Outcomes – Focused here because of number of sections and enrollment – Numerous full and part-time faculty Faculty selected one outcome from the course and agreed to develop a common assessment: – 3d. describe the historical and stylistic connection of the works presented

Streamlining Our Project: Department/Discipline Faculty in the Discipline developed a broad essay: “X (a specific work of the humanities, covered in class) represents y (a specific style or movement of the humanities, also covered in class). Describe the historical circumstances out of which this style was born, using the work as an example.” Faculty developed a rubric aligned to agreed-upon components of the outcome selected

Streamlining Our Project: Department/Discipline 72% of students received a “satisfactory” rating or higher on the assessment During the discussion faculty decided they wanted to partner with the Writing Center to better prepare students for reading and writing within the discipline

Streamlining Our Project: Department/Discipline Two topics: – Humanities Vocabulary – Reading and Writing in the Humanities Developed using Humanities 201 textbook We are currently revising the “Reading and Writing in the Humanities” to tailor them to the HUM201 final assessment

Streamlining Our Project: Sustainable Structures Restructuring of our committee – Bylaws and Release time – Representatives from all departments – Ex-officio members from administration – Standing presentations at all Department Chairs and Faculty Council meetings – Roles and duties realigned to focus on promotion and support of the assessment process as a tool to understand student learning

Streamlining Our Project: Sustainable Structures Faculty Development – Common Language: FDS and Second Semester Seminar and working with Assessment Committee Assessment Basics Presentation – Assessment Strand at Faculty Development Week – Data discussion day: Focus groups led by Social Science Faculty – Spring Faculty Development 2013: Department/Discipline 2014: Symposium on Teaching and Learning: Partnered with Office of Instruction: Developmental Education – Work with anyone and everyone willing to work with us!

Focus Supported Success Develop PD Strands for fall FD Continue Gen Ed efforts Partner with Departments (develop basic reports) Math Center/Writing Centers and Powershots start Faculty and Administration attend HLC Roundtable Plan for Faculty Assessment Day in Spring- To share data, best practices, and plans for moving forward Bob Mundhenk, our HLC Academy Mentor, PRAISES Truman and the progress to date!

Addressing HLC Concerns that are specific to Assessment General Education Assessment Year assessed:Reflect, React, Document changes based on data(if any) HLC Concern Addressed 1. Communication2010, 2011Fall 2012 Challenge 1 & 3 2. Inquiry and Analysis2011Fall 2012Challenge 1 & 3 3. Critical Thinking2011Fall 2012Challenge 1 & 3 4. Civic Engagement/DiversityHuman Diversity: Fall 2012 Civic Engagement: Fall 2013 Challenge 1 & 3 Program Outcomes and Assessment Year assessed:Reflect, React, Document changes based on data(if any) HLC Concern Addressed Continuous work: Assessment chair will now work with Department Chairs directly and during Department Chair Meetings On-goingOngoingChallenge 2

Strategy Matters Understanding what works at our College – Culture: What works and why? – Champions: Knowing and creating – Getting everyone into the right positions

Please feel free to contact: Kate Connor