Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Y. R. Roblin, G2P review, 1/17/ HALLA G2P readiness review Yves Roblin, CASA.
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
XAL at J-PARC Hiroyuki Sako, G. Shen, JAEA C. K. Allen, ORNL Contents Why did we introduce XAL? Installing XAL Developing XAL Achievements with XAL Summary.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
JCE A Java-based Commissioning Environment tool Hiroyuki Sako, JAEA Hiroshi Ikeda, Visible Information Center Inc. SAD Workshop.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS MEBT : Beam Dynamics, Diagnostics, Performance. Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
SciDAC Accelerator Simulation project: FNAL Booster modeling, status and plans Robert D. Ryne, P. Spentzouris.
Tuning an Accelerator for 1 MW C. Peters WAO 12 August 8 th, 2012.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy SNS Beam Diagnostics: Ten Years After Commissioning A. Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Overview of Beam Instrumentations for High-Power Operation of the Spallation Neutron Source Saeed Assadi.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Experience from the Spallation Neutron Source Commissioning Dong-o Jeon Accelerator Physics Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 9, 2007.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy High Intensity Effects in the SNS Accumulator Ring Jeff Holmes HB 2008 August 27, 2008.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS BLM System Overview Detectors, Measurements, Simulations Alexander Zhukov Saeed Assadi SNS/ORNL.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Beam Commissioning Tools and Experience Andrei Shishlo on Behalf of SNS Team HB2008, Nashville,
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Injection and Extraction Systems Issues and Solutions by M. Plum for the SNS team and our BNL collaborators.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
SASE optimization with OCELOT Sergey Tomin other co-workers: I. Agapov, G. Geloni, I. Zagorodnov.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
1 BEAM COMMISSIONING SOFTWARE AND DATABASE FOR J-PARC LINAC Hiroyuki Sako G. Shen, H. Sakaki, H. Takahashi, H. Yoshikawa, JAEA H. Ikeda, VIC C. K. Allen,
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
SNS Beam Diagnostics A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Beam losses and collimation at the Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source by Mike Plum Beam losses and collimators in transfer lines workshop Lund May 13-14,
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
R. Miyamoto, MEBT Lattice Optimization, ESS AD Beam Physics Internal Review 1 MEBT Lattice Optimization Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) For Beam Physics Group,
SNS linac beam commissioning By Michael Plum Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge National Laboratory ESS Workshop on beam commissioning April 8-9, 2014.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan.
ESS Front End diagnostic
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Andrei Shishlo ORNL SNS Project Florence, Italy November 2015
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
1- Short pulse neutron source
EPICS Meeting March 12 – 14, 2008, Shanghai, China
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
SNS Commissioning Mike Plum
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Presentation transcript:

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov HB2008, Nashville, TN August 26, 2008

2Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Outline  SNS Accelerator Complex  XAL Structure and Online Model  Model Based Orbit Correction  Longitudinal Phase Space Tuning  Conclusions

3Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Liquid Hg Target SNS Accelerator Complex 945 ns 1 ms macropulse Current mini-pulse Current 1ms 1 GeV LINAC Accumulator Ring: Compress 1 msec long pulse to 700 nsec Chopper system makes gaps 2.5 MeV1000 MeV87 MeV CCL SCL,  = 0.61 SCL,  = MeV387 MeV DTL MEBT Accumulator Ring RTBT Target HEBT InjectionExtraction RF Collimators Ion Source + RFQ

4Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name XAL Overview SNS application software environment for High level physics application software for modeling, operation and accelerator physics studies XAL and its apps XAL includes:  Online Model  Tool Box (math, optimization, plotting etc. packages)  Application Framework  Services  Abstract CA Clients layer

5Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Models and Applications Codes and their usage at the SNS Central Control Room (CCR) TypeSingle-ParticleEnvelope w/wo SCMulti-Particles CodeXAL Online Model Trace3D XAL Online Model Trace3D PARMILA IMPACT UsageXAL OLM:  Orbit Correction  Beam Based Orbit Correction  Model based Orbit Correction  Phase Scans and Longitudinal Tuning  Phase Tuning Control  Energy meter  Off-line analysis Trace3D:  Virtual Accelerator XAL OLM:  Transverse matching  Virtual Accelerator Trace3D:  Off-line modeling  Virtual Accelerator PARMILA:  Design  Transverse Matching  Off-line modeling IMPACT:  Off-line modeling Used in SNS CCR Combination Off-line and CCL usage

6Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name CCL Orbit Correction Problem  CCL has 48 quads and 10 BPMs  Traditional orbit correction does work  Losses and activation were high even after this orbit correction  Conclusion: it is possible to have near zero BPMs signals and big bumps in the trajectory between them Black points are BPMs

7Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Beam Base Alignment  Quad Shaker XAL Application performs a beam based alignment  Losses and activation dropped!  It takes about 40 minutes (too long!)  It needs the expert attention

8Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Model Based Orbit Correction We can use the Online Model for orbit correction:  we can find the initial conditions (positions and angles of the beam) at the entrance of CCL by using BPMs readings and known live fields in quads and correctors  Then we can find the orbit everywhere and find the correction to flatten it CCL Dipole Correctors CCL BPMs, Magnets Solver for Initial conditions at the CCL entrance XAL Online Model Solver for Orbit Correction (fields for Dipole Corr.) XAL Online Model Problem is very simple! But it did not work!

9Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name The First Stage – Initial Conditions The large set of measured CCL orbits was analyzed. They were divided by cases in which initial conditions were the same. The spread of “guessed” initial conditions was too big.

10Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Orbit Difference – Model and Measurements Agree

11Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Model Based Orbit Correction (Cont.) Result of studies:  The model needs correction. Each quad and BPM has a non-zero transverse offset.  The parameters were found after the analysis of about 3000 measured trajectories  Modified model can predicts the BPM’s signals with accuracy about 0.1 mm  It takes about 30 seconds to flatten the CCL orbit, can be done parasitically, no expert is needed. One knob application. Found offsets are too big to be true. They should be considered integrated phenomenological corrections parameters

12Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name XAL Model Based Orbit Correction Application

13Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Longitudinal Tuning in Warm Linac XAL Online Model - each RF gap is considered as a thin lens: In the beginning we used the “Delta-T” method  Have to find an approximate values for amplitude and phase first  Uses tables calculated offline  Fast PASTA – XAL Application phase signature matching Later we switched to PASTA XAL Application: Phase/Amplitude Scan and Tuning Application

14Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Warm Linac – Longitudinal Tuning Correction  Due to different reasons, from time to time we need to correct cavity phases and amplitude or to check that the tuning is right  The “Delta-T” or “phase signature matching” methods are too slow and can not be used “parasitically” during a production run  The “longitudinal shaking” method with a small “phase shaking” amplitude was suggested Δφ A 0, f 0, φ 0 A 1, f 1, φ 1 … A n, f n, φ n W,φ Δφ 0 Δφ 1 Δφ n Δφ i = (f i /f 0 )Δφ 0 BPM Change in phases of all cavities is an equivalent to the change of the phase of the center of the bunch

15Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Longitudinal Shaking Advantages:  Technique can be used during production run. It does not effect losses, trajectory etc. downstream  Interpretation very simple Comparison between measurements and design case calculated with the online model Blue – BPM Red – model for design case Δφ BPM (s), s – BPM position Drawbacks: It is difficult to correct several cavities at once. It has to be applied sequentially Used to correct amplitudes of cavities not phases

16Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Conclusions  The single-particle models have their own niche –Simple and fast single particle online model can be a very valuable tool for linac tuning –Validated model can reduce the number of diagnostics stations –Some of diagnostics tasks can be done “parasitically” during the production runs  We are looking ahead for more possibilities to use simple, fast, and available in a control room models

17Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name Backup Slides

18Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Presentation_name XAL Online Model  Calculate beam parameters.  A lattice view of the machine is constructed from the “device”structure (via a set of rules. –Drifts are added, elements are split. –Device view -> intermediate lattice -> online model lattice  Lattice element values can be updated from the machine, design, or logged values.  Can do ‘what-if’ with any one of the above data sources.  Mostly use an envelope model for single-pass linac tracking or closed orbit for ring.