CTEP Plans: Consensus Reviews & Templates Andrea Denicoff, MS, RN, ANP Clinical Investigations Branch CTEP, DCTD OEWG Kick-Off Meeting March 23, 2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.

Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.

How Your Research Administration Team Supports You From Start to Finish Michelle Melin-Rogovin, Manager of Research Administration Research Administration.

ICTR Data Managers Interest Group October 28, 2014.

GCRC Advisory Committee Evaluating Projects for GCRC Use Dr. Jules L. Dienstag, Chair Evaluating Projects for GCRC Use Dr. Jules L. Dienstag, Chair.

UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.

Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.

Standard operating procedures the blueprint of research Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2014 June 17th Oana M. Pop MA Cluj School of Public Health College of Political,

UMBRELLA CRADAS: AN EASIER PATH AN EASIER PATH Suzanne M. Frisbie, Ph.D. Unit Supervisor Technology Transfer Center National Cancer Institute National.

CPT Review of Drug Administration Services AMA Presentation.

Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.

1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.

 The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is:  The largest of the Institutes that constitute the National Institutes of Health  The largest sponsor of research.

AUDITS Process and Corrective Actions OIG RolesGAO ROLES – OIG –OIG Lead Auditor –OCFO – owner of MATS and Agency Audit Process –OEI AA – Designated OEI.

NIH Proposed Use of a Central IRB (C-IRB) for NIH-funded multi-site studies Committee on Clinical Research January 26,

1 Safety and Health Manager’s Meeting March 4, 2002 The Occupational Health Handbook What is it and Why Should you Care? Catherine M. Angotti, R.D., L.D.

WELCOME TO THE PROCUREMENT SEMINAR Procurement and Contracts An Overview of Contract Administration.

Tracking Protocol Development Timelines Steve Friedman, MHSA Chief, Clinical Trials Operations and Informatics Branch.

Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Project Kick-Off Meeting for with Project Manager Name,

Biostatistics Analysis Center Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Minimum Documentation Requirements.

NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) January 19, 2005 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Nextel Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.

FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.

1 ICSSC International Clinical Sciences Support Center Family Health International.

CTEP Protocol and Information Office (PIO) Overview.

CHAPTER#08 MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS AND SPECIFICATIONS Lecture No. 08 Course: Engineering Management 19 april 2013 MED DEPARTMENT, U.E.T TAXILA.

Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.

D1.HGE.CL7.01 D1.HGA.CL6.08 Slide 1. Introduction Design, prepare and present reports  Classroom schedule  Trainer contact details  Assessments  Resources:

The Revised §1915(c) Waiver Application CMS Teleconferences Changes to the HCBS 1915 (c) Waiver August 8 th & 15 th, 2005 Presenter: Nancy Thaler, CMS.

VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator HRPP 101, September 2010.

OEWG Kick-Off Meeting Meg Mooney, MD Chief, Clinical Investigations Branch CTEP, DCTD, NCI – March 24, 2010 CTEP & Cooperative Group Plans for OEWG Implementation:

ABSTRACT Title: Developing National Formularies Based on the WHO Model Formulary Authors: Tisocki K 3, Laing RL 1, Hogerzeil H 1, Mehta DK 2, Ryan RSM.

SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

NYS Professional Development Standards Based on National Staff Development Council Standards and goal: Every educator engages in effective professional.

Changing Implementation of NSF Data Policy Dr. Jennifer M. Schopf, NSF OD/OIA/EPSCoR On behalf of the NSF Data Working Group March 17, 2011 CASC Spring.

Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Principles, criteria and methods Part 2 Quality management Produced in Collaboration between.

Doc.: _SEC_Motions_Mar08 Submission March 2008 Michael Lynch, Nortel Networksh Motion to SEC Motion by: LynchSeconded by: Heile.

Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting October 11, 2011.

1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.

Commercial Mapping Products Guideline CMPG Ad Hoc Team Report ASPRS Hot Topic San Diego Conference.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.

Developing a Project Management Standard for Your Organization Francine DiMicele, PMP June 08, 2015 NC Piedmont Triad Chapter.

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

CTEP Visiting Physician Externship Coordinator: Igor Espinoza-Delgado, M.D. NCI CTEP Investigational Drug Branch

Doc.: IEEE /0828r0 Submission May 2007 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Procedural Clarification Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.

Your Input Feedback from NGOs Presentation by Anne Marie Darmanin.

Chapter 5 – Slide 1 Effective Communication for Colleges, 10 th ed., by Brantley & Miller, 2005© Good News and Neutral News Messages.

THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.

EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT IN CPR DEVICE TRIALS: PROTECTION OF PATIENTS’ RIGHTS Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting September 21, 2004 Elisa.

Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.

Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.

NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) Update

Aquatic Life Metals Criteria Under Development in OW

The final steps to the HDA project

Top Ten eIRB Application Mistakes

Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module

Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals

Specification on float equipment

The Optional Protocol Module 8.

Preparation for New Curriculum Proposal System (CPS)

Human Gene Therapy Institutional Review Procedures

Clinical Trial Development: RA’s Role, OEWG, and IRB Submissions Martha Heckel Protocol Associate, ACRIN Dept. of Protocol Development & Regulatory.

Patty Orndoff RN, MEd IRB Education Coordinator

Presentation transcript:

CTEP Plans: Consensus Reviews & Templates Andrea Denicoff, MS, RN, ANP Clinical Investigations Branch CTEP, DCTD OEWG Kick-Off Meeting March 23, 2010

Objectives Describe CTEP’s internal changes to improve consensus reviews based on OEWG input Discuss plans for CTEP to gather feedback Provide information on protocol templates and improvement plans Gather your feedback

Major Goals to Improve Consensus Reviews Assist with streamlining CTEP’s protocol review comments Facilitate PI/Group response to CTEP through identifying major concerns and administrative comments easy to incorporate into protocol. Act as an intermediary step towards the use of an ePA system

Methodology Examined CTEP reviews and PI/ Group responses to consensus reviews Invited all branches of CTEP to provide input and feedback on various new review formats and ideas to improve process Multiple reviewers, including CIB and IDB lead reviewers, suggested and tested various formats and provided feedback Through field testing of various forms and input, final draft created

CTEP Feedback Major comments should be prioritized and include key scientific issues or a major “show stopper” such as a CRADA problem, agent availability, etc Where possible, reviewers should use clear and concise language that promotes rapid/simple response from the study site (e.g. change ‘X’ to ‘Y’) Created column to list protocol section for sorting comments and to facilitate PI/Group response

Reviewer Comment Sections 1.Major Issues (Response required) Major areas of concern in the protocol or informed consent 2.Administrative (Response required) Required additions, requested clarifications of the protocol and informed consent, and editorial changes. 3.Recommendations (Response is not required) Recommendations and comments to the PI/Group that CTEP PRC considers may improve the protocol, but is only for PI/Group consideration.

Revised Consensus Reviews sent back to PI/Groups Plans are underway to solicit feedback from PIs/Groups about their use of revised formatting Once the majority of PIs/Groups have provided input, adjustments will be made to finalize formatting Future plans: CTEP’s PIO will directly add administrative changes to an unofficial copy of the protocol document that has been specified by the lead reviewer to change using Track Changes™. Plan to pilot test within CTEP to assure quality control, and then pilot test with PIs/Groups that are interested.

CTEP Protocol Templates Protocol development information and templates on CTEP web site includes: –Forms –Generic protocol templates –Protocol authoring handbook –Policy and guidelines for protocol development –Lists of codes and values –RECIST criteria –CDE Dictionary –Data policies –Generic informed consent template –Correlative science guidelines

Protocol Development Protocol development information that is included with each LOI/Concept approval: –Agent specific protocol template (if available) –Appropriate CAEPR(s) –Appropriate pharmaceutical data sheet(s) –Appropriate Investigators Brochures

Plans for CTEP Templates CTEP will provide up to date agent- specific protocol templates available for agents involved in mass solicitations A secure web site to place confidential agent templates needed for protocols is under investigation

QUESTIONS & YOUR INPUT