New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Differentiated Supervision
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Welcome ! Collab Meeting May 6, Things to remember  Aug 12 – First day for teachers  Aug – FAI In-service  Aug 25 – First day for students.
Welcome ! New Work Training April 15, Things to remember  April 22 – STEPP  April 29 – School Based RTI  May 6 - Grade Level Meeting RTI  We.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation Danielson Framework Yukon Koyukuk School District New Teacher Training.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Welcome ! SLO Training Please pull up the SLO template. All teachers will pilot ONE SLO this year. We will be using MAP and PMAP scores “Interval.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District

Housekeeping Stuff Process Rules for Today  Be an active learner/participant  Be seen – please be big in your little rectangle  Type into the Google Docs during the activities Announcement s  Grade Level Collaboration Meetings  Attendance and Grades  AMP (AMP It Up, Tech, Testlets)  Aug 2015 In-service

Simultaneous Tools! VTC Google Drive on your laptop

Google Drive We will be able to see each other and the presentation via VTC AND be able to see and work on a document all at the same time. All of us typing into the same document at the same time Let’s try it out! Go to the Google Doc that I shared with you today.

What is our “New Work”? Alaska Standards (ELA & Math) (2012) Replaced the GLE’s Assessments AMP = Alaska Measure of Progress (April 2015) Replacing the SBA Accountability ASPI Score – Replacing AYP ( Fall 2014) Teacher Evaluation System (2014) SLO’s = Student Learning Objectives ( ??) Student Growth – it’s the data RTI Plans (2014) Creating, Implementing, Monitoring and Adjusting

Evaluation Quick Facts Evaluation will be on 12 specific Danielson components See the Smart Card Rubrics for each component will make expectations clear Data points (SLO’s) may be included next year. The new system is more about coaching than evaluation “The quality of the coaching conversations is the linchpin of the system”

YKSD Danielson Smart Card

Danielson Domain Quiz Identify the domain that each prompt addresses 1. Ms. A couldn’t verify whether a certain student was absent a few weeks ago. 2. Ms. C had her class watch a video of the “I Have a Dream” speech, then guided them through questions that were factual, interpretive, and analytical in nature. 3. Students in Mr. H’s class are puzzled after he explains “slope” in Algebra. Instead of assigning problems like he had planned, Mr. H tried a different approach in clarifying the content. 4. Mr. B designed a rubric for student projects. It identified key elements of a good project and three levels of performance for each element. 5. Ms. W sends home newsletters with her elementary students that explain what the students will learn this week. 6. The students in Ms. L’s class begin work on a warm-up that is written on the board as soon as they walk in and sit down.

Observation vs. Evaluation They are two different things OBSERVATION – When the principal goes in to watch the teacher teach during a lesson. In YKSD, all teachers have a formal observation twice a year. About minutes long Recorded on Observe4success They are for coaching and gathering information EVALUATION – (Summary Evaluation) The final document that summarizes the assessment of the teacher from all year and multiple other sources. (Also on Observe4success) Summary Evaluations have policy and statute regulations attached to them

Summary Evaluation

Observation vs. Evaluation

Evaluation Ratings Review  How do we determine the component ratings?  Principals will refer to the rubrics and use their professional judgment  How do we determine the domain ratings?  The three component scores determines the domain score  How do we determine the overall rating?  The four domain scores determine the overall rating (SLO’s will be a 5 th domain when they are required) ***There are visuals in the next few slides to make this easier to follow

Evaluation Ratings How do we determine component ratings? Principals will refer back to the rubrics.

Evaluation Ratings How do we determine domain ratings?

Evaluation Ratings How do we determine overall ratings?

YKSD Educator Evaluation System Requirements *Two to four valid, reliable measures of student growth including statewide assessments  Observations (district may select a nationally recognized framework approved by the department)  Information from parents, students, etc.  Other information (as determined by the district) Information Sources YKSD Evaluation Components Results & Actions Professional Learning Focus for district & teacher. _______________ Annual Evaluation Alternative for the following school year (as determined by the district) District Support OR Plan of Professional Growth (optional) Plan of Improvement Proficient or higher on 4 standards and basic or higher on 1 standard. ______________ Exceeds the districts performance standards (as determined by the district) Basic on 2 or more standards Unsatisfactory on 1 or more standard Student Learning Objectives Domain 4 – Professional Responsibilities Domain 3 – Instruction Domain 1- Planning And Preparation Domain 2 – Classroom Environment Cultural Standards Performance Rating on each of the four ( 4) components  Unsatisfactory  Basic  Proficient  Exemplary

YKSD Educator Evaluation System Requirements What’s important to know? What questions need to be answered? Go back to Google docs!

Performance Levels What is the difference between Exemplary, Proficient, Basic, Unsatisfactory?

Performance Levels Exemplary, Proficient, Basic, Unsatisfactory Level will be earned for each of the 12 components Your three components in each domain will result in the overall domain score Your four domain scores will generally result in the overall performance level of Exemplary, Proficient, Basic or Unsatisfactory

Performance Levels Let’s look at the every component… Read through the component that is assigned to your school in two slides. In each box, type in the key words or phrases that are used in the rubric that describe each level in your assigned component.

Performance Levels

Performance Levels Assigned Components This should take 4-5 minutes 1c - Setting Instructional Outcomes - Nulato 1e – Designing Coherent Instruction - Ruby 2a – Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport - Koyukuk 2c – Managing Classroom Procedures - Hughes 2d – Managing Student Behavior - Minto 3c – Engaging Students in Learning - Manley 3e – Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness - Allakaket 4b – Maintaining Accurate Records - Kaltag 4c – Communicating with Families – Huslia Secondary 4f – Showing Professionalism – Huslia Elementary

Performance Levels

Student Learning Objectives (SLO) SLO’s will be the 5 th Domain that will be part of your evaluation. What do you already know about SLOs? Back to Google docs!

Student Learning Objectives (SLO) SLO’s refer to student data Student growth An SLO is an document that lays out the students included, the time frame, the content area, the test being used, growth targets and corresponding ratings. Each teacher and administrator will need TWO AMP must be used if the teacher teaches ELA or Math We could also use MAP/PMAP May have to come up with other tests May be postponed, but we won’t know until June

Sample SLO

Sample SLO pg 1

Sample SLO pg 2

January 28 Closure Google Docs one more time!