Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 1 Division I Enforcement: Conducting a Campus Investigation 2012 Regional Rules Seminars.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Advertisements

Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Overview of NAU Compliance IAC April 10, 2009 Jared Bruggeman, Associate Athletic Director Lynn Newson, Compliance Assistant.
NCAA Division I Enforcement Hot Topics. Session Overview Trending violations. Enforcement policies and procedures update and enforcement activities after.
Documenting Disciplinary Issues
HEAD COACH CONTROL AND PROVIDING GUIDANCE TO ALL COACHES October 2013 Compliance Meeting.
December  Bylaw now states that a head coach is presumed to be responsible for the actions of all assistant coaches and administrations.
 Overview and Virginia Tech Procedures for Reporting October 19, 2010 Virginia Tech Athletics Compliance ***** RULES-EDUCATION *****
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
NCAA Bylaw 11 (Conduct and Employment of Athletics Personnel) Concepts.
What’s new in Compliance Education for coaches, SA, PSA’s, Boosters, faculty/staff ◦Website improvements ◦Forms online and accessible ◦Research information.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
CS 152 & CS 154 Bill Crum, Lecturer Bill White, Instructional Coordinator Earth Chandrraungphen, Lab TA.
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational Accountability 06/26/2013.
Department of Human Resources. Progressive Process A progressive discipline system gives employees ample warning of misconduct or work-related problems;
Network security policy: best practices
NCAA Enforcement: How to Conduct a Campus Investigation 2014 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
NCAA Bylaw 13 (Recruiting) Concepts. Concept No. 1: Establish an earlier date by which prospective student-athletes who have demonstrated a commitment.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
Planning and Conducting An Investigation Deon Woods Bell U.S. Federal Trade Commission Livingstone, Zambia September The Fifth Annual African.
Regional Rules Seminars  Provide background of academic misconduct legislative proposal.  Identify proposed changes to academic misconduct legislation.
FHSAA Eligibility and Compliance Allegations And Investigations Florida High School Athletic Association.
Select and Train the Fact- Finding Team. Selecting the Team.
DIVISION II LEGISLATIVE AND INTERPRETIVE PROCESSES Amanda Conklin Jennifer Fraser.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Orientation Session for Advanced Compliance Administrators.
Secondary/Level III Violations and Online Self-Reporting Process Renee Gomila Kelly Groddy 2014 Regional Rules Seminar.
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS Compliance Policies/Procedures Review & New Academic Year Changes Devrance M. Fisher, Compliance Officer.
1 Seminar on 2008 SNA Implementation June 2010, Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda GULAB SINGH UN Statistics Division Diagnostic Framework: National.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Security Policies and Procedures. cs490ns-cotter2 Objectives Define the security policy cycle Explain risk identification Design a security policy –Define.
Practice Management Quality Control
NCAA Division I Student- Athlete Reinstatement (Part I) Kelly Groddy Jennifer Henderson.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Preseason Coaches Meeting. When faced with a question or concern regarding NCAA rules and regulations, the following process should be followed: Step.
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Beginning of the Year Coaches Meeting August 26, 2008.
FAMIS CONFERENCE Mari M. Presley, Assistant General Counsel Florida Department of Education June 12, 2012.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
NCAA Working Group on the Collegiate Model – Rules Overview March 2012.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
o Anticipated timeline. o Summary of the feedback thus far. o Examples of a few concepts. o Key points. o Successful Outcomes. page 3.
Lynn Holzman Director of Academic and Membership Affairs, NCAA.
Division I Enforcement Level III/Secondary Violations and Level IV Incidental Infractions Renee Gomila Kelly Groddy.
IDEA FORMAL COMPLAINTS Administrative Accountability Branch Kentucky Department of Education Understanding the Self-Investigation Process.
PRESENTED BY: WACAC ADMISSION PRACTICES COMMITTEE Ethical Practices.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Self-Reporting Secondary Violations. This session will review: 1. The definition of a secondary violation; 2. Level I and Level II secondary violations.
Processing Level I and II Violations 2013 Regional Rules Seminars Laura McNab and Mike Zonder NCAA Enforcement Staff.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Understanding Privacy An Overview of our Responsibilities.
Understanding Privacy An Overview of our Responsibilities.
Secondary/Level III Violations and Online Self-Reporting Process Janet Calandro A. Faith English Kelly Groddy 2016 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.
NCAA Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Dialogue
HOW TO CONDUCT A CAMPUS INVESTIGATION 2017 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Brynna Barnhart – Director of Enforcement (San Diego) Tom Hosty – Director of.
Non-Compliance Behaviors General Overview of Physical Restraint Requirements for Public Education Programs Prepared by the Massachusetts Department of.
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Janet Calandro A. Faith English Kelly Groddy
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Personnel Investigations
Division I Legislative Relief Waivers Brandy Hataway abbie markey
Interpretations process Kelly Brummett Kris richardson
Academic integrity Forum: Current Landscape
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
Janet Calandro Kelly Groddy Cindi Merrill
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin Compliance Conference
Presentation transcript:

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 1 Division I Enforcement: Conducting a Campus Investigation 2012 Regional Rules Seminars

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 2 Session Overview Purpose: Discuss methods and strategies for investigating NCAA rules violations on campus, including suggestions for gathering documents, conducting interviews and working with the enforcement staff. Outline: I. Introduction A. Major versus Secondary B. Cooperative Principle II. Methods III. Strategies IV. Conclusion

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 3 Defining a Secondary Violation Secondary (NCAA Bylaw ) –Isolated or inadvertent in nature, –Provides or is intended to provide only a minimal recruiting, competitive or other advantage, and –Does not include any significant recruiting inducement or extra benefit.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 4 Defining Major Violations Major (Bylaw ) All violations, other than secondary violations, specifically those that provide an extensive recruiting or competitive advantage.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 5 Cooperative Principle (Bylaw ) Imposes an affirmative obligation to assist enforcement staff in developing full information to determine whether violation(s) occurred. Requires all individuals to protect the integrity of an investigation and failure to do so may be a violation of the principles of ethical conduct. In some instances, to protect the integrity of an investigation, the enforcement staff may not be able to share information with the institution.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 6 Cooperative Principle Other Pertinent Principles and Bylaws: Responsibility for control [2.1.1 and 2.1.2] Principle of rules compliance [2.8.1] General obligation of membership [ ] Refusal to furnish information [10.1-(a)] Responsibility to cooperate [ ] Responsibility to cooperate [ ]

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 7 A Further Look at Cooperation Institutions are obligated to cooperate. The NCAA Committee on Infractions (COI) will consider the degree of the institution's cooperation. Parties are not to disseminate information among themselves that might impede development. Failure to cooperate could result in an allegation of a violation of the principles of ethical conduct and/or the cooperative principle. The COI considers whether an institution's inquiry was complete and thorough.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 8 Methods

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 9 Rationale for Establishing a Written Investigative Policy Promotes uniformity/ transparency. Provides for a timely and organized response to potential violations. Lack of policy may lead to questions of institutional control. COI may review institutional policy and protocol.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 10 Content of Investigative Policies Guidelines setting forth circumstances in which an inquiry is conducted. Roles/responsibilities of administrators. Statement of confidentiality. Consequences for failing to report violations. Procedures for addressing, correcting and preventing violations. Procedures for reporting violations, investigations and sanctions.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 11 Gathering Information: Interviews Recommendations for the Institutional Investigator: Identify individuals to be interviewed. Determine who should be present for each interview. Find a location for interviews that is comfortable, disturbance free and has low visibility. Explain the purpose of the interview - determine knowledge of or involvement in violations. Do not specify the substance of the interview.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 12 Gathering Information: Interviews Recommendations for the institutional investigator: Record each interview. State on the record, the name of the person interviewed, date, time, location and individuals present. Review the obligation to tell the truth and be forthcoming [Bylaws & 10.1] and ramifications for not being truthful [Bylaws 10.4]. Opportunity for legal counsel.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 13 Gathering Information: Documents Use of releases. Possible documents/information to be reviewed: Financial Records: Bank Statements Credit/Debit Cards Western Union Transfers Travel Records:Air Travel Hotel/Lodging Phone Records:Cell Text

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 14 Gathering Information: Documents Possible documents/information to be reviewed: Vehicle Information Computer Records: Hard drives Social Media:Twitter/Facebook Academic Documents:Transcripts SAT/ACT information

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 15 Evaluating Information The administrator responsible for evaluating information should be set forth in the institutional policy. Identify eligibility issues.  If any exist, contact Student-Athlete Reinstatement.  Institutional Responsibility [Bylaw ].

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 16 Notifying Enforcement Contact enforcement staff when guidance is needed. Staff may join the investigation or allow the institution to continue inquiry on its own. Early contact may avoid duplicative efforts. Staff may have additional information regarding potential violations.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 17 Content of the Investigative Report Purpose Case chronology General overview of findings Overview of the institutions investigation Specific findings Other possible violations Corrective actions Conclusions Appendix

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 18 Strategies

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 19 Determining Who to Interview Sources outside the institution.  Boosters  Business People  Parents  Prospects  High School Coaches  Former Student-Athletes Who can be trusted? Corroborating sources.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 20 Determining Who to Interview Institutional Staff Members Who is an institutional staff member?  Coaches  Administrators  Academic Counselors  Tutors  Secretaries/Support Staff  Another Student-Athlete  Professors Be thorough (this can be difficult with campus personnel).

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 21 Determining Who to Interview Institutional Staff Members Identify who is potentially "at risk" for involvement in the violations. Strategy discussions should not include potentially "at risk" individuals.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 22 Order of Interviews Interview outside sources first. Conduct interviews in a timely fashion. Consider the sequence of interviews. Instruct individuals to not discuss information. Anticipate interviews will take longer than expected.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 23 Conducting the Interviews Prior to interview, collect supporting documents. Conduct the tough interview. Discuss previous collection of significant information and the importance of being truthful.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 24 Interviewing Details Telephone or in-person?  At risk individuals: interview in-person.  If information is significant: interview in-person. Cold call or prearranged?  Suspect non-cooperation: cold call.  To avoid talking with other witnesses: cold call. Where to conduct interviews?  Controlled and private setting.  Accommodating off-campus individuals.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 25 Interview Techniques Questioning and listening techniques. Purpose of the interview is to gather information. Two types of information:  Investigative: Who, what, where, why, when, how and who can corroborate.  Behavioral: Emotions, attitudes and non-verbal responses.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 26 Effective Interviewing Ask open-ended questions.  The best information is a narrative response.  Interviewee should do the majority of the talking.  Begin questions with a verb or command word. Pause to elicit more information.  Avoid interruptions. - Increases opportunity for obtaining more information. - Silence is okay. Ask specific questions. Paraphrase responses to determine accuracy of the information.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 27 Suggestions for Interviewers Refrain from interruptions. Visual aids can be useful. Avoid offering advice, being judgmental or filling in gaps. Good listeners are good interviewers. Calendars may prove to be useful to pinpoint timeframes.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 28 Compliance Systems Make honest, candid assessments. Identify potential breakdowns. Determine the scope of violations. Implement meaningful corrective actions. Will help avoid future violations of the same kind, promote earlier detection and avoid potential failure to monitor and/or lack of institutional control charges.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 29 Conclusion Suggestions should help member institutions in handling the "nuts and bolts" of conducting effective investigations of potential major NCAA rules violations on campuses. If a hearing before the COI is required, the committee will take into consideration the thoroughness of the institution's internal investigation. Don't take a chance by leaving investigation methods and strategies (or lack of) open to criticism.

Powerpoint Templates NCAA Enforcement Page 30 Conclusion If you need help or advice:  Contact the enforcement staff.  Contact the conference office.  Website ( - links to enforcement information and databases. Questions?