Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BA (Hons) Primary Education
Advertisements

Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Introduction to: Assessing Pupil Progress (APP)
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Why revisit the SA? Now you are in post, your view of your personal skills, needs and knowledge levels may have changed. Your mentor will probably not.
BEA NOBLE-ROGERS 0FSTED: LESSONS LEARNED APTE 2013 TEACHER EDUCATION SOLUTIONS.
Consistency of Assessment
Performance management guidance
External Mentor and Link Tutor Conference Tuesday 27th January 2015
BA Year 2 SBT Briefing for Class Mentors Wednesday, 29 th April 2015 Ben Wye Year 2 Cohort Leader - Crewe Tel Archana Hinduja.
Observing Learning Helen Bacon and Jan Ridgway Inclusion Support Services.
Lessons from Ofsted ITE Inspection overview 2009/10 WMCETT Forum Professional Dialogue seminar 1 st November 2010 Jill Hardman.
Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) in English Workshop: Introducing APP February
Welcome to Mentor Training for People and their roles Heather Davies – Programme Director Caroline Lundy – GEB Programme Tutor Jo Traunter.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
From Partnership to Leadership: collaborative improvement of student teacher placements Tricia Young & David Owen.
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
OFSTED READINESS: RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 2014 BEA NOBLE-ROGERS TEACHER EDUCATION SOLUTIONS.
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during the block experience Understand.
Ian Hodgkinson HMI 19 June 2015
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
MMU Faculty of Education Subject Mentor Training
Year 1 School Based Training Briefing 2. Have you: developed an understanding of how children learn? developed an understanding of the range and diversity.
PG SE JS/CH1.  Introductions  Reflective Portfolio – expectations  Weekly Review meetings  Expectations on School Experience 3  Action planning.
Year 1 First Placement University of Hull BA Primary Teaching Year 1 Mentors’ Meeting June 2014.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Understanding Teachers Standards. Objectives of the session To develop an understanding of the teachers standards To start thinking about the relevant.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
ACCURACY IN ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCING AND TRACKING PROGRESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION BEA NOBLE-ROGERS.
School Direct Mentor Training Using post-its, consider: 1)What do you want from today’s session ? 2)What issues have arisen with mentoring SD trainees?
Julie Rotchell -Programme Manager PESS Update Partnership Leaders Conference November 18 th 2010.
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 VISIT DAY Wednesday 7th October WEEK BLOCK SCHOOL EXPERIENCE 1 (SE1) Monday.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
PGCE Early Years & Primary Pre-Placement Meeting November / December 2015.
Assessing, Recording and Reporting Citizenship A Collaborative Approach.
PGP1 Autumn 2015 School Based Mentor training Laura Manison Shore Primary Partnership Manager Linda Bennett SBM at Parson St and School Based Training.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
Partnership Conference  Welcome  The university-based training, including that for special educational needs and sport, which enables trainees.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership Friday 25 th January pm – 4.00pm Barbara Hosier & Alison Silby.
Helmingham Community Primary School Assessment Information Evening 10 February 2016.
THE TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT: A GUIDE TO ACCURACY UEL MENTOR TRAINING 3 JULY 2015.
Some Definitions Monitoring – the skill of effectively over- viewing and analysing a learning situation Assessment – is the closer examination of pupil’s.
Link Tutor Update 17 th March Inspection of Leeds Beckett ITE We anticipate being inspected this year as an ITE provider The Ofsted window opens.
Assessor Training 11 TH FEBRUARY Key Messages from Ofsted  Strengths  The partnership has a clear vision for improving the quality of practice.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
School Direct Mentor Training Key areas of focus 1)What does the SD training involve? 2)How do you support trainees in writing an effective individual.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS IN THE CULM VALLEY FEDERATION.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Making Secure Judgements
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that the review will relate directly to three different.
Making Judgements The following slides indicates some of the ‘tools of the trade’ for making judgments about trainee progress. It is intended that a trainee.
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that students should have provided their TP files and.
Accuracy in assessment: tracking trainee progress through impact on pupil progress over time We encourage colleagues to tailor this presentation to the.
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Primary pgce mentor training
Super.. Great A look at OFSTED criteria for trainee achievement.
Working in Partnership with UEA
Professional Tutor Conference 2017
Practice of Teaching Part 1
School of Education Mentor Training.
Practice of Teaching Part 1
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
SCITT Mentor Training Spring 2018
Assessment (SOLAR).
Presentation transcript:

Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime

Accuracy in assessment tool Kit: The principles a vision for the development of outstanding teachers which places the pupil at the heart of teacher education a framework for assessing the quality of trainees’ teaching - starting with impact on pupils’ progress which informs ongoing achievement and final attainment the identification of essential resources to support trainees and their tutors/mentors in recording and evidencing progress and the setting of appropriate long and short term targets assessments reflect the quality of trainees’ teaching overall; the interrelatedness of the Teachers’ Standards and the promotion of pupil progress an unambiguous shared language for discussing the progress of, and expectations for, trainees

ThE Heart of the system Identify evidence of pupils’ progress over time What difference has teaching made? Why? Identify strengths and areas for development for the trainee Map to TS grade descriptors to identify quality of teaching Review and identify precise short and longer term targets

The 7 absolutes of assessment Assessed as a trainee teacher, in accord with TSs’ Judged by impact on pupil progress and learning overtime Judged through sequences of lessons -using all available evidence Judged against Teachers’ Standards - in full and sub headings Assessors’ informed professional judgments applied All grades, comments, targets aligned and moderated All trainees exceed the minimum expectation for the Teachers’ Standards - appropriate to the age range and ability of pupils

the toolkit The Toolkit is being adapted and used across the country to ensure Accuracy in assessment That all trainees and partners understand and can explain how accuracy in assessment is achieved and their role in that!!

Impact across a partnership At-a-glance processes and procedures from observation to assessment understood and used by all Mentors, trainees and link tutors understanding and using the language of progress Collaboration over training: trainees taking increased responsibility for their progress and that of their pupils Trainees able to pinpoint their own needs, working with their mentors – individualised training Secure evidence of progress towards exceeding the Teachers’ Standards – showing how pupil progress results from impact of teaching overall through performance in individual standards

Toolkit: additional resources and guidance Tracking and evidencing trainees’ progress Accuracy in target setting Joint HEI SCITT development group hosted by NASBTT

Tracking and Evidencing Trainee progress Currently, this process can be cumbersome - masses of evidence collected against each TS and sub-heading confused as to purpose, expectations and intended impact on trainees’ teaching and progress focused on ‘getting’ individual TS

Tracking and evidencing trainee progress Shift focus, to ensure that identifying and analysing of evidence demonstrates: impact on progress of groups of learners overtime which aspects of teaching, linked to TS, are securing this impact which aspects of teaching, linked to TS, need strengthening to enhance impact Always emphasising it is the impact of the strengths across the interrelated TS which secure pupil progress

Interrelationship of TS and Pupil Progress Teaching Impact on Pupil progress High expectations Promote progress Subject knowledge Plan and teach well Respond to needs Use of assessment Manage behaviour Wider professional responsibilities Personal and professional conduct

Tracking and evidencing Trainee progress Accurate tracking data of quality of all trainees’ teaching and their pupils’ progress and learning overtime progress and areas of development against the TSs targets linked directly to pupil progress Explicitly used to inform on going self-evaluation and improvement planning for trainees overall and groups of trainees Clearly rationalised for trainees and mentors, fit for purpose as it demonstrates:

Pupil progress and learning overtime Quality of trainee’s teaching within each standard Quality of trainee’s teaching overall

evidence ‘bundles’ process Trainee, with mentor, identifies strong sequence (or sequences) of lessons re pupil progress overtime Pull together a ‘bundle’ of evidence relating to this: assessments, marking, learning plans, observations, evaluations, photographs, weekly review forms etc. ‘Bundle’ analysed and annotated to: identify evidence of impact on the progress and learning of different groups highlight what has enabled the impact linked to TSs indicate evidence of progress against each of the TSs Trainee writes analytic evidence-based commentary of their progress since their previous review; including impact of training NB Building evidence bundles needs to be modeled through centre and school based training

evidence bundles Evidence bundles can be used to demonstrate: progress made by pupils overall and by groups of pupils quality of trainee’s teaching overall how trainees’ skills against each Standard has enabled them to impact on pupil progress how strong their teaching is in each of the Standards areas for targets specifically linked to pupil progress quality of trainees’ teaching within subjects, eg PE

Tracking and evidencing Trainee progress 1 Observations: full range of evidence of pupil progress and learning overtime, trainee strengths and areas for development impacting on pupil progress 2 Weekly meetings: trainees present evidence of pupil progress and learning overtime, progress v targets, map new and revised targets and key strengths against Teachers Standards 3 Interim reviews: evidence of impact on groups of learners; evidence bundle/s review targets and progress against TSs’ 4 Summative reviews: evidence bundle/s; progress for groups of learners; progress against the TSs’; strengths and targets for next stage

In Practice Pupil progress is a focus for discussion in taught sessions: developing language for discussing progress and evidence of progress for trainees and pupils; modelling of evidence bundle building and analysis The weekly mentor meeting draws on evidence from across the week: trainee provides evidence for appraisal – mentors need training to do this Increased focus on groups of pupils’ progress The Teachers’ Standards, grade descriptors and targets are reviewed in the light of the progress made by pupils Progress against the standards is tracked back from the impact of teaching on pupil progress and learning overtime

University OF St Mark and St John The Indicative evidence a collation of a range of synoptic evidence that illustrates that the trainee is secure in all standards and moving beyond minimum expectation but not divided standard by standard. The Indicative evidence should refer to two key stages and include: Unit of work for either KS 3, 4, or 5 which includes 6 lesson plans, evaluations and all resources used to deliver the unit, assessment material, and risk assessment. A second unit of work from a different KS. A further 6 Lesson plans showing development and progression with their lesson evaluations Additional resources Examples of pupils’ work, feedback, photos of displays, How does the indicative evidence support the judgments made of Trainee Progress? How does the indicative evidence demonstrate pupil progress?

What more is needed? Challenges?

How it works: starter Activity for mentors and trainees Think about your/your trainees’ last taught sequence of lessons Did pupils make expected progress? Was that because of you or the trainee? What made the difference? Positive/negative? How can you evidence this? What would you do to extend the impact of the teaching on pupil progress?

Contact details Gillian Golder – Director of Teacher Education University of St Mark and St John 01752 636700 ggolder@marjon.ac.uk Liz George - Programme Director LDBS SCITT Liz.George@london.anglican.org 02079321126 Bea Noble-Rogers - Teacher Education Solutions 07776177588 bea@teacher-education.co.uk