“Step” “Step” n2 M-STAR! Strategic Tools for Educator Preparation  This training was designed to support the training effort of all Mississippi educators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
PRINCIPAL AND TEACHER EVALUATION OVERVIEW What’s Next for Counselors? Lois Kappler Project Manager.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Differentiated Supervision
Principles of Assessment
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Session Materials  Wiki
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Mississippi Student Services Coordinators Appraisal Rubric (M-SSAR)
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
 What does 21 st century assessment look like?  How does 21 st century assessment encourage learning?  How do effective teachers use assessment?
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Supporting and Coaching Classroom Facilitators Oudete Taylor August 13, 2015.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Developing High Quality Student Learning Objectives
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Identifying Assessments
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11  What role will student feedback play in your district next year?
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

“Step” “Step” n2 M-STAR! Strategic Tools for Educator Preparation  This training was designed to support the training effort of all Mississippi educators to learn the M-STAR process.  M-STAR is a tool for you to use as a road map to success in your classroom.  Today, learn the basics of this process and prepare to use it for your professional growth.  More training is coming your way, and we are excited to bring it to you.

Objectives of This Training  To introduce the Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR) to Mississippi teachers  To help teachers acquire knowledge and understanding of M-STAR  To increase teacher effectiveness  To promote higher levels of achievement for all students

The research and data are clear! “ Teacher quality is the single most important variable impacting student achievement.” (Rivkin, Hanushek & Kain, 2005; Rockoff, 2004)

What do teachers want to know?

Why an appraisal system now?  Under previous systems of evaluating teachers’ work, the scores teachers have received have become separated from the key output – student learning.  Teachers have received considerably higher ratings than test results suggest should be the case.  Meaningful evaluations start with a well-designed system. But ultimately the system’s success depends on strong implementation with good communication at its core.

What have your previous evaluations been like? Were they  Consistent throughout your school and district?  Completed each semester?  Informative to you?  Helpful in your professional growth?  Grounded in best practices and research?

Most Important Reason for Effective Appraisals  Student Achievement U.S. ranks 17th in industrialized nations in education In Mississippi, almost 50% of children in 3rd-8th grade are below grade level in language arts and math. Low graduation rates! Students not equipped with 21st-century skills!  Whose job is it to improve these outcomes? All Mississippi educators!

Federal and State Theory of Action Improved Evaluation System Improved Educator Quality Improved Student Outcomes

How is M-STAR different?

MS Teacher Evaluation M-STAR

M-Star Timeline M-Star Timeline Pilot implemented with 20 schools in Mississippi January – July 2012Focus group review and feedback July 2012 – July 2013Statewide training on use of the system Field test the M-STAR process Full implementation

More Questions from Teachers Is my pay going to decrease? Do I have to do this? What is in it for me?

Observation Cycle Pre-Obs. Conf. Within 1-2 days prior to obs Obs. Post-Obs. Conference Within 1 week after ob. Follow-up Walkthrough Within 2 weeks after post-obs. conference Effective, concrete feedback + next steps are key! Observe feedback in action Key Questions: What are students learning? What is the evidence for this learning? Review lesson plan, understand context, + ask clarifying questions

Five Components of the Teacher Observation Cycle 1.Teacher self-assessment 2.Professional Growth Goals (PGG) and Student Learning Objectives (SLO) - MDE will have additional training in the future on these items. 3.Walk-through visits 4.Formal observations and conferences 5. Student surveys (optional)

M-STAR Ratings A teacher’s performance on each standard will be appraised in accordance with a four-level rating scale:  Level 4 Distinguished: Indicates that the teacher’s performance consistently exceeds expectations – exemplary; cream of the crop!  Level 3 Effective: Indicates that the teacher’s performance meets expectations. Learning is evident!  Level 2 Emerging: Indicates that the teacher’s performance inconsistently meets expectations. PD is needed as teacher continues to learn more about the science of teaching and learning.  Level 1 Unsatisfactory: Indicates that the teacher’s performance does not meet expectations. An immediate plan of improvement should be designed by the administrator and teacher.

Example: Summative Observation Rating DomainDomain Score WeightWeighted Rating I: Planning2.75x II: Assessment4x III: Instruction2.5x IV: Learning Environment3.5x V: Professional Responsibilities2.5x Summative Classroom Observation Rating ( ) = SPRING SCORING

What does the rubric mean? The M-STAR rubric can be difficult to understand. What can I do to simplify it? It is important to fully understand the rubric!

M-STAR Rubric Overview  Five domains (weighted equally) 1. Planning (4 standards) 2. Assessment (2 standards) 3. Instruction (5 standards) 4. Learning Environment (5 standards) 5. Professional Responsibilities (4 standards)  20 standards (placed among the 5 domains)

A Closer Look A Closer Look Look at your copy of the M-STAR appraisal rubric.  Find Domains  Locate Standards  Identify the Indicators  Examine Domains III and IV

What do best practices look like?  Don’t get lost in what the standards are saying...  Instead, focus on what behaviors will be seen when an effective teacher and his/her students are observed.

Actively engages students in the learning process Teachers will be: Using a variety of teaching strategies and resources Teaching appropriate for skill levels and different learning styles Linking content with student interests Probing and incorporating students’ questions As a facilitator, he/she is able to grasp and hold students’ attention. Using a wide range of learning skills and technology to enhance learning Within close proximity to students Exhibiting excitement and interest in lesson and students Leading a student-centered classroom  Can you think of other evidence of engaging students in learning? Standard 8

Actively engages students in the learning process Students will be: Asking and answering questions Their questions reflect applicable understanding of content Responding to formative assessments Using technology to access, interpret, and apply information Demonstrating interest in lesson/activity Learning on their level; engaged  What else will they be doing if they are truly engaged? Standard 8

What are artifacts?  Real working documents that provide evidence of the standards  Administrators will talk with you further about what artifacts are important  Artifacts are not “portfolios” or decorated boxes that are time consuming to organize!!

Are we reaching our students? What is a 21st- century educator?

M-STAR Key Points  Student-centered vs. teacher-centered  Rubric is not a checklist but used to evaluate where a “preponderance of evidence” points on the rating scale.  Conversations and FACE-TO-FACE feedback are key pieces in improving teacher practice.  Stay focused on clear communication, which is transparent and professional.

Will it be some work? Yes... but you work hard everyday.

Develop Your M-STAR Cruise Plan

Any Questions?

Exit Slips

For More Information Contact: MDE Quality Professionals and Special Schools

For More Information Check out the RCU website: Under the MDE tab, go to the M-STAR tab and find great reference items put there for you.

Contact Information Lois Kappler, M-STAR Coach (w) (c) Call or text – leave a message with your information and your call will be returned.