Status of VIRGO Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration ANNECY - December 15 th, 2004  Status of the Commissioning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

24. June 2004 Andreas Freise Status of VIRGO A. Freise For the Virgo Collaboration European Gravitational Observatory SPIE Glasgow 2004.
Status of the Virgo Commissioning G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze/Urbino for the Virgo Collaboration.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
Locking improvements after the end of VSR1 Gabriele Vajente for the Locking Group 14 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Cascina – March 6 th 2008.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress and plans ILIAS, Jan 23 rd 2007 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Use ofSiesta in VIRGO commissioning Lisa Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa For the Virgo collaboration Caltech, December 19th 2003.
SIESTA for Virgo locking experience L. Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa on behalf of the Virgo Locking Group Cascina, March 16th 2004 Simulation.
COMMISSIONING PROGRESS G.LOSURDO – INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
Interferometric detector for GW: status and perspectives Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze-Urbino
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
The status of Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze-Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration Workshop on GW detection– Gingin, Oct. 4-7, 2005.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
07. July 2004 Andreas Freise Status of VIRGO A. Freise For the Virgo Collaboration European Gravitational Observatory.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
Status of VIRGO Francesco Fidecaro (after Lisa Barsotti) - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration Aspen - January 19 th, 2005.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during.
1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Noise analysis in Virgo Cascina, 7-8 July 2004 Analysis of noise in VIRGO.
Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration CASCINA - January 24 th, 2005 ILIAS  Locking of Full Virgo Status of VIRGO.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
Analysis of the Virgo runs sensitivities Raffaele Flaminio, Romain Gouaty, Edwige Tournefier Summary : - Introduction : goal of the study / Overview on.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
Status of Virgo a short update Michele Punturo. A bit of History July 29 – August –C6 run Duty cycle: Locking 89%, Science Mode 86% September.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
The VIRGO detection system
L’Interferometro Virgo Michele Punturo INFN Perugia a nome della Collaborazione Virgo.
MG 11 - Berlin Virgo status Marie-Anne Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
1 The status of VIRGO E. Tournefier LAPP(Annecy)-IN2P3-CNRS Journées SF2A, Strasbourg 27 juin – 1er juillet 2005 The VIRGO experiment The commissioning.
Automation of the Lock Acquisition of the 3 km Arm Virgo Interferometer F. Carbognani for The Virgo Collaboration ICALEPCS - Geneva 14 October, 2005.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Present Status of the Virgo Experiment
The VIRGO DATA ANALYSIS Fulvio Ricci
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Virgo Update B. Mours LIGO-G Z August 15, 2006 LSC meeting.
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Virgo Update – LSC meeting
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Status at the Prague meeting
Presentation transcript:

Status of VIRGO Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration ANNECY - December 15 th, 2004  Status of the Commissioning Activity  Status of Data Analysis - Agenda

VIRGO Optical Scheme BS NI WI PR 3-km Fabry Perot cavities in the arms

Commissioning Plan Steps of increasing complexity: Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 A SINGLE FABRY-PEROT CAVITY PR misaligned

Commissioning Plan Steps of increasing complexity: Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 A SINGLE FABRY-PEROT CAVITY PR misaligned

Commissioning Plan Steps of increasing complexity: Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 A SINGLE FABRY-PEROT CAVITY Feb 2004 – Dec 2004 Feb 2004 – Dec 2004 ITF in RECOMBINED MODE PR misaligned

Commissioning Plan Steps of increasing complexity: Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 Oct 2003 – Feb 2004 A SINGLE FABRY-PEROT CAVITY Feb 2004 – Dec 2004 Feb 2004 – Dec 2004 ITF in RECOMBINED MODE Sept 2004 Sept 2004 ITF in RECYCLED MODE  Final configuration PR aligned

Sensitivity Progress  From a single arm to the recombined mode C3: Automatic alignment and frequency servo tested in a single arm configuration C4: Automatic alignment and frequency servo tested in recombined configuration C1 – November 2003 C4 – June 2004

Commissioning Run C4 - June 2004 ITF controlled with the reflected and the asymmetric beams Automatic alignment of the cavities Laser frequency stabilized to cavities common mode Cavities common mode locked to reference cavity Output Mode Cleaner locked on the dark fringe Tidal control on both arms  Recombined Data Taking Mode

Commissioning Run C4 - June 2004  5 days of run  Lock losses understood  Longest lock ~ 28 h  h reconstruction on line SPECIAL TESTS:  Acoustic noise injection in the laser and detection laboratory Session 7: Environmental noise studies in VIRGO - I. Fiori  Injection of inspiral events Session 9: Inspiral analysis of the VIRGO commissioning run 4 – L. Bosi

Commissioning Run C4 : Noise Characterization Coupling of IB resonances into the michelson controller signal due to a mismatch between modulation frequency and input mode-cleaner length (~ 70 Hz) C4 After frequency modulation tuning Michelson controller signal Problem understood -> not final solution yet

After C4  July – August Upgrade of the terminal benches -> Re-tuning and improvement of the linear automatic alignment Suspension full hierarchical control started Commissioning of the Recycled ITF started Effect of the backscattered light in the IMC -> attenuator installed between the IMC and the ITF  Mid September: Re-Start  October – November: -> Recombined ITF locked with the full hierarchical control of the suspensions -> ITF locked in recycled mode

Suspension Hierarchical Control  10 3  Locking acquired and maintained acting at the level of the mirror z z x y marionette reference mass mirror  Reduce the strength of the mirror actuators by a few 10 3 to reach Virgo design sensitivity

Suspension Hierarchical Control DC-0.01 Hz Hz 8-50 Hz Corrections sent to the marionette Corrections sent to the mirror Force on the mirror reduced of a factor 20  Switch to low noise coil drivers TIDAL CONTROL RE-ALLOCATION OF THE FORCE

Suspension Hierarchical Control  Single arm locked with the hierarchical control for the first time in July -> controllability of the superattenuator demonstrated  Last main result: hierarchical control of the recombined ITF in the C4 configuration, with automatic alignment and frequency servo engaged  Stable lock -> tested in the last commissioning run (C5, 2-6 December 2004)  SUMMARY

The Variable Finesse Locking Strategy “A recycled ITF with a low recycling factor is similar to a recombined ITF “ NINE WE WI BS PR Low Recycling Factor Half Fringe  Lock immediately the 4 degrees of freedom of the ITF on the half fringe:  end photodiodes to acquire the lock of the long cavities  simple michelson locked on the half fringe with the asymmetric DC signal  3f demodulated reflected signal to control the recycling cavity length

POWER IN THE RECYCLING CAVITY  With the ITF in a stable state, bring it adiabatically on the dark fringe evolving the control scheme Recombined interferometer (~ 60 mW) Recycled interferometer (~ 17 W) T PR=8% -> Recycling factor ~ 25  frequency servo (SSFS) engaged to control the common mode of the arms  from DC to demodulated signal to control the simple michelson length The Variable Finesse Locking Strategy

 First lock of the recycled ITF on the end of last October  Stable lock of the recycled interferometer ~ minutes  no linear automatic alignment yet  next step  Locking procedure tested several times  lock acquired in few minutes  New original lock acquisition procedure established, combining end photodiodes, frequency servo, 3f-demod signal, slightly misalignement of PR mirror, and lock on the half fringe  M. Evans (LIGO) and K. Arai (TAMA) present on Virgo site  1 day and half of test in the last commissioning run C5  SUMMARY

Commissioning Run C5 - December 2004 Best VIRGO Sensitivity  Injection of bursts and inspiral events during the run -> Analysis in progress 10 times more power than C5

Data Analysis Activity  h reconstruction (F. Marion - LAPP )  Physics group activity: Burst (P. Hello - LAL ) Coalescent Binary (A. Vicerè – INFN Urbino) Pulsar Source Software (S. Frasca – Roma University ) Stochastic Background (G. Cella – INFN Pisa) Noise Analysis (J. Y. Vinet – NICE)  Network analysis

Agenda - I  A new time-frequency tool: the S-Trasform Session 15: A burst search method based on the S-transform (A-C. Clapson – LAL )  Network analysis of bursts Session 15: A couple of techniques to improve sensibility preserving robustness in gravitational wave's burst detection (G. Cella – INFN Pisa)  Injection of bursts and inspiral events in C4 Off–line analysis -> (see L.Bosi’s talk) Session 15: Chirplet chains: a quasi-physical model for near- optimal detection of gravitational wave chirps  New algorithm for generic chirp (Eric Chassande-Mottin – NICE ) Burst and Inspiral Search POSTER: New definition of discrete time-frequency unitary Wigner-Ville distribution (A. Pai – Roma University)

Agenda - II POSTER: Simulation of gravitational wave stochastic background (G. Cella – INFN Pisa)  Session 12: Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources (C. Palomba – INFN Roma) Periodic Sources  POSTER: Simulation of a population of gravitational wave-driven neutron stars (C. Palomba – INFN Roma)  POSTER: Evaluation of sensitivity and of computing power for the Virgo hierarchical search for periodic sources (S. Frasca – Roma University) Stochastic Background  Session 15: Pade and symmetrized Pade approximants in data processing (J. Fournier – CNRS)

Agenda – III  So far mainly carried out in the commissioning activity -> Peculiar tests performed to study the environmental noise and its coupling with the interferometer (see I. Fiori ‘s talk)  Line detection POSTER: NAP: a tool for noise data analysis (E. Cuoco – EGO) POSTER: A simple line detection algorithm applied to Virgo data (Eric Chassande-Mottin – I. Fiori)  Extended noise analysis to be added -> Software tool development: Noise Analysis Package Noise Analysis

Network Analysis  LSC – Virgo Collaboration - Joint working group for inspiral and burst search on simulated data Session 9: First comparison between the LIGO/Virgo inspiral search pipelines (F. Beauville – LAPP ) Session 13: Comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst search using simulated LIGO and VIRGO data (M. Zanolin – MIT)

Conclusions  Well advanced status of the commissioning activity -> Suspension hierarchical control in recombined mode -> Lock of the recycled ITF  Next steps: -> Linear automatic alignment of the recycled ITF -> Frequency servo optimization  Last Commissioning Run Data -> analysis in progress  Data analysis main activities will be presented