Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp.31-34 Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Construction
Advertisements

Environmental life cycle assessment. Why Sustainable Construction?  Social progress, which recognises the needs of everyone  Effective protection of.
Environmental Engineering
Green Industry & Green Job Statistics in Republic of Korea
GREEN BUILDING.
Introduction Acknowledgements : Future work Results and discussion Methods: Objective : Abstract Chirjiv
Getting Green Building Automation. Why is Building Automation a Green Technology? There are programs starting all over the nation that focus on alternative.
Copyright The Solution Foundry. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 101.
IGES | 1 UNEP-ILO-Eurostat-EEA International Technical Workshop on “Measuring Progress on Greening the Economy: Policies and Practices”
CAPABILITY OF INCREASING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN EU HOUSING Nataliya Anisimova Czech Technical University in Prague
Clara María Mollá Muñoz. PFG_T31 17-July, Introduction. Sustainable architecture The strategies are focused on energy efficiency. Reduce environmental.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Kara Steeland Adena Kass William Finnicum Global Change 1-Section 5.
Hector Huijon ( ), Jacqueline Covarrubias ( )
Life Cycle Analysis. Topics  Definition  Use  Process  Limitations.
Global Warming Effect Assessment in the Electricity Sector Using Hybrid Life-cycle Inventory Assessment Arpad Horvath, Assistant Professor Department of.
Going Green Interior Design. Today city-planners, engineers, builders, designers and consumers are looking for ways to reduce fuel and water consumption.
Carbon, Water and Energy Implications of Rainwater Harvesting in Educational Buildings Hannah West, Dr. Defne Apul Department of Civil Engineering, University.
Chapter 10 - Biofuels. Introduction Existing standards for carbon accounting Forestry schemes as carbon offsets Biomass energy in place of fossil fuels.
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Request Form Instructions for completing the form NICSA.
CESI Barcelona May 2003 R.BERTI IT Session 1 – Block 2 1 Product Environmental Profile and Benefits for Electrical Utilities R. Berti CESI.
Energy Curriculum Advanced Transportation Technology and Energy Initiative.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
Global Warming By: Ryan Collins and Nguyet Luong.
Bangalore, India,17-18 December 2012 METHODOLOGIES TO ASSESS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ICT KEVIN J HOUSTON, CEO CARBON MASTERS Member of Independent.
TAOYUAN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARK BUSINESS INVITATION SEMINAR PRESENTATION OF PREFERENTIAL MEASURE & COUNSELING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
September 17, Thursday NIER(National Institute of Environmental Research) Proposal of Water Pollution Sources Management based.
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
Marty Matlock, PhD, PE, BCEE Executive Director, Office for Sustainability Professor,UA Division of Agriculture Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Are There Any Ecological Problems In Saint-Petersburg?
CARBON FOOTPRINT ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS Elmiira Ebrahimimahin, Muneeb Abbassi, M. Umar Riaz, Farid Ullah, Ahsan Abid Kalim, Kim Ngan Dau, Guillermo Munoz.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp The Study.
IGES | 1 UNEP Workshop May 2014 Dr. Zhou, Xin; Dr. Ambiyah Abdullah Green Economy Area Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp A Study on.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp A Preliminary.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.47 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2014), pp Electromagnetic.
T172 Tutorial 2. Maths Day school for Technology Students Saturday 27 March Regional Centre, Manchester (Details to be sent in post) The day school clashes.
Sustainability Elements of the ARRA, and Getting the Most out of Stimulus Funding Jeannie Renne-Malone, LEED AP National Director – Climate Change & GHG.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA). As corporations seek to improve their environmental performance they require new methods and tools. LCA is one such tool.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.100 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2015), pp A Study.
Robot Velocity Based Path Planning Along Bezier Curve Path Gil Jin Yang, Byoung Wook Choi * Dept. of Electrical and Information Engineering Seoul National.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.74 (ASEA 2014), pp Development of Optimization Algorithm for.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.28 (EEC 2013), pp Fuzzy Technique for Color Quality Transformation.
Socially Acceptable Costs for Municipal Solid Waste Management Services Vojtěch Doležal, SEWACO s.r.o 24 June 2015 ISWA Study Tour WASTE-TO-ENERGY.
Course Title: Introduction to Civil Engineering (CVE 102) Course Lecturer: Engr. F. M. Alayaki Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University.
Comparison of potential environmental impacts of microwave and RF phytosanitary treatment of wooden pallets to conventional heat treatment and methyl bromide.
Reducing Carbon Footprint- A Health Perspective Our carbon footprint is the measure of the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases we.
Sustainable Architecture in Korea The Present Situation and Policy ACGSA REPORT 31 October, 2012 Korea Institute of Registered Architects (KIRA)
Life Cycle GHG Emission and Energy Consumption for Production of Biodiesel Using Catalyst from Crude Palm Oil and Curde Jatropha Curcas Oil in Indonesia.
Do you know? By 2015, an estimated 40-48% of new non-residential construction by value will be green, equating to a $ billion.
The Design of Smart RFID Tag System for Food Poisoning Index Monitoring Chang Won Lee 1.1, Nghia Truong Van 1, Kyung Kwon Jung 2, Joo Woong Kim 1, Woo.
Introduction. Apple and Environment Climate Change. Materials Efficiency. Energy Efficiency. Packaging Main factors that affect the environment Recycling.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp Experimental.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.47 (Healthcare and Nursing 2014), pp Design of Roof Type.
Life Cycle Assessment Assessing local impacts María del Mar Pintor
A Scientific Way to Look at Going Green!
IMPACT OF BUILDING'S LIFESPAN ON THE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Green Design Model Green Businesses Green Businesses Evaluation and
What role can Life Cycle Assessment play in the selection of green construction materials? N. L. AMPOFO-ANTI © CSIR
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.96 (IRTT 2015), pp.9-13
Circular Economy Development in China
Green Building and Sustainable Architecture
The role of bioenergy to meet the renewable energy target for New Zealand Dr. Per S. Nielsen.
MIT Research: Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Pavements
Carbon Footprint.
Carbon Footprint.
Reducing construction phase greenhouse gas emissions of detached houses through material supply chain management Jani Laine.
Life Cycle Analysis of Drainage Pipes
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp Development of a Carbon Emission Evaluation Index for Apartment Buildings Doo-Sung Choi 1, Hung-Chan Chun 2, Kyun-Hyong Cho 2, Yong-Shik Kim 3, Yong-Ho Jung 1 1 Department of Building Equipment & Fire Protection System, Chungwoon Univ., Incheon, Korea 2 Department of Architectural Engineering, Suwon Univ., Hwaseong, Korea 3 Division of Architecture and Urban Planning, Incheon National Univ., Incheon, Korea Abstract. In this study, numerous apartments in South Korea were analyzed in order to develop an evaluation index to evaluate carbon emission quantities from apartments. Our results show the following carbon emission quantity indexes per evaluation area (average emission rates): 992kg- CO 2 / ㎡ ∙ yr for energy consumption, 507kg-CO 2 / ㎡ ∙ yr for material consumption, 41kg-CO 2 / ㎡ ∙ yr for waste generation, and 70kg-CO 2 / ㎡ ∙ yr for water resource consumption. Keywords: Apartment Building, LCCO 2, CO 2 Emission, Evaluation Index, Life Cycle Assessment 1 Introduction The present study aims to suggest a method to quantitatively evaluate and manage the carbon emission quantity in all stages throughout the life cycle of a structure, from production and construction to maintenance and destruction. Therefore, this study determines the major evaluation categories related to carbon emission quantity throughout the life cycle of a structure, and establishes evaluation indexes to determine evaluation criteria (emission rates) for carbon emission quantity per category. 2 Analysis Outline 2.1 Range of Analysis This study computes Life Cycle CO 2 (LCCO 2 ) through a case analysis of a representative housing structure in Korea, which is an apartment, using life cycle assessment (LCA) methods [1] defined in the ISO series. The life cycle of a structure is classified into four stages: production, construction, use phase, and dismantling and destruction. Life cycle inputs for carbon emission quantity analysis are energy and water resources, while the output is the carbon emitted by the input [2]. Use phase and sources of all data applied in the analysis was limited to South Korea. Thirty years was taken to be the duration of the use phase stage as this is the legal apartment reconstruction term in South Korea. Data from 274 apartments in 26 ISSN: ASTL Copyright © 2013 SERSC

Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013) apartment buildings constructed between 2008 and 2009 were used for the case analysis. 2.2 Analysis method After determining the carbon emission quantity evaluation categories (item) from the international standards suggested by the Common Carbon Metric (2011) of UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) [3] for the evaluation of carbon emission quantity per stage of the life cycle of an item, the evaluation index per item of each category (potential carbon emission quantity rates) was computed. Table 1 shows the selected carbon emission quantity evaluation categories (item) with the sources of the reference data (method). Table 1. Carbon emission quantity evaluation categories (Item) Evaluation Evaluation item Life cycle phase Analysis method and source category Heating energy carbon Use phase emission quantity The Construction Standard on Low- Hot water supply carbon Use phase emission q u a n t i t y Energy Green House and Performance (MOLIT)[4] Energy Construction machinery and Construction The Guideline calculation ofCO 2 site carbon emission quantity phase emissions fromfacilities (MOLIT)[5] Carbon offset by Use phase new/renewable energy The Construction Standard on Low-Energy Green House and Performance (MOLIT) Carbon emission quantity of Material input material production phase Material consumption Carbon emission quantity of input material when substituting/repairing Use phase Input-Output Tables (BOK)[6] Material Annual CO 2 Uptake by Trees Carbon offset by tree planting Production phase (KFS) [7] Water resource consumption Water consumption carbon Guideline calculation of CO 2 Use phase emission quantity emissions from facilities (MOLIT) 3 Analysis Results 3. 1 Carbon emission quantity during the life cycle Dismantling stage waste Dismantling and carbon emission quantity destruction National Air Pollutant Emission Calculation Method Manual II (NIER)[8] 2011 Generation and Treatment of Waste in Korea (ME)[9] Waste production Construction stage waste Construction carbon emission quantity phase emission q u consumption Electric energy carbon Use phase antity 32 Copyright © 2013 SERSC

Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013) Figure 1 shows the results of analyzing carbon emission rates according to the direct/indirect energy input per stage of the life cycle of the apartment buildings (274 apartments) targeted in this study for the development of the carbon emission rates evaluation index. Fig. 1. LCCO 2 analysis result (/ ㎡ ·30yr) As shown in Figure 1, the total life cycle carbon emission rate per unit area (/ ㎡  30yr) was 1,610kg - CO 2, with the use phase contributing the highest at 1,109 kg - CO 2 (68.9%), followed by material construction at 449kg - CO 2 (27.9%), dismantling and destruction at 40kg - CO 2 (2.5%), and the construction stage at 10kg - CO 2 (0.7%) 3. 2 Carbon emission index per evaluation category Table 2 lists the analysis results of the carbon emission evaluation index (emission rate) per evaluation category and item suggested by the aforementioned Table 1 and the results of the life cycle carbon emission rates analyzed in Figure 2. Table 2. Analysis results of the carbon emission evaluation index Evaluation category (Contribution%) Evaluation item CO 2 Emission quantity (kg-CO 2 / ㎡ ·30yr) MaxMeanMin Energy consumption (61.6%) Heating energy carbon emission quantity Hot water supply energy carbon emission quantity Electric energy carbon emission quantity Construction machinery and site carbon emission quantity Carbon offset by new and renewable energy*(-) Material consumption (31.5%) Carbon emission quantity when inputting material for new construction Carbon emission quantity when replacing or repairing Carbon offset by tree planting*(-50)(-40)(-26) Wasteproductio n (2.5%) Construction phase waste carbon emission quantity221 Dismantling phase waste carbon emission quantity Water resourceWater consumption carbon emission quantity Copyright © 2013 SERSC 33

Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013) consumption (4.3%) Total 2,130 1,610 1,276 * The carbon offset by new renewable energy and tree planting were excluded from the total As shown in Table 2, the average carbon emission quantity per unit area (/ ㎡ ·yr) is ranked in the following order: energy consumption at 992kg-CO 2 (61.6%), material consumption at 507kg-CO 2 (31.5%), water resource consumption at 70kg-CO 2 (4.3%), and waste production at 41kg-CO 2 (2.5%). The maximum and minimum emission rates were 2,130kg-CO 2 and 1,276kg-CO 2, respectively. 4 Conclusion In this study, a life cycle carbon emission quantity evaluation index for apartment buildings was developed to quantitatively evaluate and manage carbon emission quantities from structures. Our results show that the life cycle carbon emission quantity per unit area of apartment buildings is (/ ㎡ ·yr) approximately 1,610kg - CO 2, with the use phase contributing the most at 1,109kg - CO 2 (68.9%), followed by the dismantling and destruction phase with 40kg - CO 2 (2.5%), and the construction phase with 10kg - CO 2 (0.7%). In addition, the evaluation index used to suggest the objective criteria (emission rates) for the carbon emission quantity analysis results was classified into 4 categories in order to suggest an average carbon emission quantity level per category (item) per unit area. Analysis of the carbon emission rates per category gave the following results: 992kg - CO 2 for energy consumption, 507kg - CO 2 for material consumption, 41kg - CO 2 for waste production, and 70kg - CO 2 for water resource consumption. Acknowledgements. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation ofKorea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOE) (Grant Number : ) References 1.ISO : ISO14040 Environmental management - Life Cycle Assessment – principles and frame (2006) 2.IPCC : Global Warming Potential (2006) 3.UNEP : Common Carbon Metric – for Measuring Energy Use & Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations (2011) 4.Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport : The Construction Standard on Low-Energy Green House and Performance (2012) 5.Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, Guideline calculation of CO 2 emissions from facilities (2011) 6.The Bank of Korea : 2008 Input-Output Tables (2009) 7.Korea Forest Service : Annual CO 2 Uptake by Trees (2013) 8.National Institute of Environmental Research : National Air Pollutant Emission Calculation Method Manual II (2010) 9.Ministry of Environment, 2011 Generation and Treatment of Waste in Korea (2012) 34 Copyright © 2013 SERSC