M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Gilchriese US ATLAS Pixel Meeting July 18-19, 2002 UC Santa Cruz.
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
ATLAS Frame PRR 1 W.O. Miller Feb US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports PRR W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, R. Baer HYTEC G. Gilchriese, E.
M. Gilchriese Evaporative Cooling Tests of Pixel Disk Sectors June 2000 E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, F. McCormack, J. Taylor, T. Weber, J. Wirth.
M. Gilchriese Mechanics Labor and Disk Sectors US Pixel Meeting November 2001.
Global Supports Update W.O. Miller October 2001 US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports Status W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, G. Hayman, R. Baer HYTEC.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
Engineering Division 1 Mechanical and Integration CD0 Walkthru, 19-Dec, 2007 Eric Anderssen, LBNL.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
M. Gilchriese Status Report Sectors, Rings, Frame December 2002.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
The ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector Gianfranco Segato Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Padova and INFN for the ALICE Collaboration A barrel of two layers.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
November 16, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2001 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report October 11, 2001 N. Hartman, E. Anderssen,
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – May 7, 2012 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on HFT/PXL plans for post May 2012 TPC – Time Projection Chamber.
Evaporative Heater Design, qualification and planning M.Olcese PRR SCT off-detector cooling PRR SCT off-detector cooling March March 2005.
M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
1 US Pixel Mechanics Role Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
M. Gilchriese Module Assembly and Attachment at LBNL M. Gilchriese for F. Goozen April 2000.
M. Gilchriese Overview of Production Plan for Pixel Global Support and Disk Support Rings M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
M. Gilchriese - April 2001 Disk Sector Status. M. Gilchriese - April Technical Status Three prototypes to current dimensions(8-sector disks) except.
M. Gilchriese Sectors, Rings, Frame Assembly and Installation July 18.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2002 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort February, 2002 N. Hartman,
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2003 Services E. Anderssen LBNL Service Connectivity from Module to PP1b Eric Anderssen LBNL Pixel Services Meeting, CERN.
November 12, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – May 7, 2012 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on HFT/PXL plans for post May 2012 TPC – Time Projection Chamber.
M. Gilchriese Disk Sector Production Pixel Local Supports Production Readiness Review.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
1 Outer Barrel, Phase 2 Mech Review 26 Aug 2013, indico: Antti Onnela, CERN Tracker Phase 2 Mechanics Review, 26 August 2013 Status of the Outer.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS /March 2001 WBS Pixel Overview and WBS Pixel Mechanics M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
M. Gilchriese - November 14, Module Decision - To Do List By pixel meetings associated with February 22-26, 1999 ATLAS week Beyond making and testing.
M. Gilchriese Items from Talks U.S. Pixel Meeting Santa Cruz July 2003.
1 Monophase Measurements on Prototype Pixel Structures D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese, J. Taylor and J. Wirth and contributions from D. Cragg, E. Perrin and.
M. Gilchriese Stave Prototype Status Summary July 5, 2006.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 SC Pixel Meeting N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube WBS Santa Cruz Cost Workshop July 9, 2003.
M. Gilchriese - December 2000 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Wirth and D. Uken Lawrence.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
December 1999 Frame and Assembly Planning Status E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen LBNL W. Miller Hytec, Inc.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
M. Gilchriese - September 2000 Pixel Insertable Layouts September 2000.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
ATLAS Pixel Detector December 2001 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort December, 2001 N. Hartman,
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
DPF2000 ATLAS Pixel Detector M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory August 2000.
1 Disk Sectors Integrated support and cooling for disk modules. Each sector has 6 modules Number of sectors is 2x9+4x8=50. Fabrication of all sectors in.
SVD Status Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) SVD-PXD Göttingen, 25 September 2012.
M. Gilchriese - February 2001 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Taylor, T. Weber, J.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Mechanics(Only) Status September 16, 2006.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
Micro Vertex Detector of PANDA Status of Strip BARREL and DISC
End-cap Mechanics FDR Overview of the Project
Mechanics: (Tim).
WP9 ITS Mechanics and Cooling
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
Work packages status in Torino and perspectives
P. Calafiura, C. Day, C. Leggett, J. Milford, D. Quarrie, C. Tull
Presentation transcript:

M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000

M. Gilchriese 2 Pixel System 160 cm 37 cm Barrel region Disk region Three space points for all tracks Three barrel layers –Innermost is “B-layer” and is removable from outside the Inner Detector Five disks on each end

M. Gilchriese 3 Pixel Layout Summary

M. Gilchriese 4 Pixel Module Power/DCS flex cable Bias flex cable Optical fibers Front-end chips Clock and Control Chip Optical package Interconnect flex hybrid Wire bonds Resistors/capacitors Temperature sensor Silicon sensor Module is basic building block of system Major effort to develop components and assemble prototypes. All modules identical. Pigtail

M. Gilchriese 5 Pixel Mechanics Support Frame Barrel shells support staves Disk rings support sectors Cables and piping not shown

M. Gilchriese 6 Overview of Proposed Responsibilities Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56) x5 x3 U.S. Europe Final assembly at CERN

M. Gilchriese 7 Pixel Power and Cooling Power –Power is generated by integrated circuits, connections to them(cables and connections) and in the silicon detectors. –Design(for mechanics) maximum power is about 50W per disk sector. Baseline cooling system is an evaporative system based on C 3 F 8 –Liquid C 3 F 8 under pressure expands(via orifice or capillary) to form mixed phase that cools the mechanical structure. –The maximum normal operating pressure within the mechanical structure depends on detail on the cooling system design, which is not complete, but is currently 4 bar absolute. –In the very unlikely case of sudden blockage of the exhaust tube, the maximum pressure within the mechanical structure might reach 10 bar absolute for a brief period(duration not known) before relief. –Systems tests are underway now to fix the essential requirements for the mechanical system: effective hydraulic diameter(s), maximum normal operating pressure and fault pressure conditions. The requirements presented now may be modified as a result of these tests.

M. Gilchriese 8 Definition of Terms and Proposed US Responsibilities Local supports –These precisely locate and cool the pixel electronics modules –Staves in the barrel region –Sectors in the disk region(US) Intermediate supports –These hold the local supports and connect to the support frame –Half-shells in the barrel region –Rings in the disk region(US) Support frame and related(US) –Central section with “cones” supporting barrel shells –Two identical end sections for disks –Inner thermal barrier/B-layer support –End thermal barrier, stiffener and cable support Services –Cables for power and slow signals. Multiple types. “Low mass” within Inner Detector volume(US) Outside volume –Cooling Plant and piping to pixel detector Disk region piping/connections(US) Barrel region piping/connections

M. Gilchriese 9 The US Team Hytec, Inc under contract to LBNL. Bill Miller et al –Support frame design –Disk ring design –Disk ring support/pixel-to-SCT support(in collaboration with LBNL) –Alternative disk sector design(SBIR supported) LBNL –Lead engineer/configuration management - E. Anderssen –Sector detailed design/assembly/testing - J. Wirth, F. Goozen, J. Taylor –Disk assembly/testing - J. Wirth, J. Taylor, T. Weber, F. Goozen –Disk ring supports/SCT attach - E. Anderssen –Thermal barriers and related - E. Anderssen –Services and related interfaces design - E. Anderssen, M. Alford, J. Taylor –Cable design and fab - E. Anderssen, T. Weber, R. Bartolo –Cooling connections design and fab - E. Anderssen –Module attachment interface - F. Goozen –Final assembly/survey - F. Goozen, E. Anderssen –QA coordination - J. Taylor –Expect additional engineer(part time) to be added by May. Also can call on additional design help and will add assembly personnel as we move into production. And additional shop personnel, of course. Ohio State –Fabrication of tooling for disk rings –Other tooling fabrication planned

M. Gilchriese 10 Pixel Project Status in US The pixel work in the US is approved only for development through about this fiscal year - until about October Production is not yet approved and there will be a production baseline review later this year(early November). The detailed cost estimate for production is under preparation and will not be presented here. The associated schedule is also under development but is not ready yet and we will not show US production schedules at this review. There is a complete overall ATLAS schedule and key milestones from this will be presented. The key review milestones are –ATLAS Final Design Review(FDR) -> more like US Preliminary Design Review –ATLAS Production Readiness Review(PRR) - more like US Final Design Review However, the US scheduling process is typically more conservative and so the ATLAS milestones should be regarded as aggressive - best case.

M. Gilchriese 11 Where Are We in US Mechanics Design? Much more detail later…but to summarize the situation Disk Sectors –Many prototypes made and tested but baseline design recently changed –In preliminary design –Fabrication of multiple baseline sectors in progress to obtain “statistics” on outstanding points. –Meeting ATLAS schedule for design reviews is tight but meeting production schedule is OK. Disk Rings and Disk Assembly –One prototype made. Full disk assembled and tested. –Second prototype under construction –In preliminary design, except for ring to frame support which is in conceptual design –Schedule is OK Support frame –Full prototype end section fabricated successfully –In preliminary design, except for thermal barriers, which are in conceptual design phase –Major issue is to define all interfaces, particularly services –Schedule is OK assuming interfaces can be defined. Services –Cable prototypes under fabrication. –Coolant prototypes under fabrication –In conceptual -> preliminary design –Schedule OK but major interface issue that affects many other items, including overall Inner Detector Final assembly/installation –In early conceptual design phase

M. Gilchriese 12 ATLAS Mechanics Milestones The critical path item in the overall ATLAS pixel schedule is the integrated circuit electronics, and there is currently considerable uncertainty in the schedule for this. The mechanics is not(yet) on the critical path. ATLAS milestones shown below. US goal is to try to meet these milestones, but with float in schedule - so US milestones will be more conservative.