Dyslexia: To Screen or Not to Screen Wendy Stovall, Ed.S., Keri Horn, Ed.S., Amber Broadway, Ed.S., & Mary Bryant, Ed.S. Crowley’s Ridge Education Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Psychological Evaluations
Advertisements

Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Dyslexia Parent Meeting
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Wise et al. 2010—Fluency and Comprehension Fluency and Comprehension Wise et al. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency.
PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS PHONICS FLUENCY VOCABULARY COMPREHENSION National Reading Panel Components of an Effective Reading Program.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia
INTRODUCTION TO THE FAST SYSTEM The FAST Team University of Minnesota Theodore J. Christ, PhD
Reading Assessment: Getting Started Weber School District September 3 & 4, 2009.
1 MISD Tier 3 Screeners McKinney ISD Special Populations Department Dr. Laura W. Simmons, Special Populations Coordinator.
Assessment for Intervention Model Preventing Reading Problems Dr. Virginia Berninger University of Washington.
Dyslexia Assessment: Looking at all the Angles Region 2 Education Service Center November 1, 2005 Brenda Taylor State Dyslexia Consultant.
Assessing Growth in Critical Reading Skills Middle Schools Leadership Conference Orlando, April 30, 2004 Pat Howard Florida Center for Reading Research.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
W OODCOCK -J OHNSON III T ESTS OF A CHIEVEMENT. I NTRODUCTION TO WJ-III A CH The 2001 Woodcock-Johnson III consists of 2 instruments: Tests of Cognitive.
Angela is a 6 th grader in a k-8 schools. She hit her reading benchmarks in K, 1 st and 2 nd Grade. She was proficient on state testing in 3 rd grade,
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Assessment of Achievement.
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement Kara McGoey, Ph.D. & Erich Merkle, M.Ed., M.A. Psychoeducational Assessment, Spring 2003.
Educational Assessment of Children
Assessment of Academic Achievement Chapter Eight.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
ASSESSMENT BY RUKHSHANA F. SHOLAPURWALA
The Language, Phonology and Reading Connection: Implications for Teaching Practice Dr Valerie Muter Great Ormond St Hospital for Children May 2009.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
RDG 567 & RDG 568 (East Lyme Cohort) Session 3.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
Dyslexia: What is it exactly?. Definition of Dyslexia Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in origin. It is characterized by.
Phonological Awareness (Blevins, Rosner and Words their Way) Alphabetic Principle (Core Phonics, Words their Way, LETRS Morphological Awareness) Vocabulary.
Process Assessment with Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 Treatment Validity Virginia Berninger University of Washington Director, Multidisciplinary Learning.
Phonological Awareness (Blevins, Rosner and Words their Way)
SLD Academy 2.0 Houston Independent School District.
Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high,
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II Overview.
Response to Instruction: Using Data to Make Decisions PRESENTER: Lexie Domaradzki.
2006 OSEP Project Directors Meeting 1 Screening and Progress Monitoring for Identification of Reading Disabilities within an RTI Model Screening and Progress.
Multisensory Structured Language Education
Case Study #3 – Peter Pan Peter Pan – age 11.8, Grade 5 Referred by teacher in December New to district this year; Lack of ability; lack of progress; placed.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
Decoding Dyslexia Parent Support Group October,
DRA2 and DIBELS Next October 15 th, What is the DRA2? Universal assessment used last year- administered 3 times a year in grades K-3 The DRA2 provides.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
INTERVENING WITH DYSLEXIA IN SCHOOLS Joseph Simoni, Director of Special Education & Student Services Beth DeArce, Intensive Reading Specialist Wappingers.
Victor J Ramirez Patricial Lomeli Kimberly Kimura Dyslexia.
Functional Assessment of Academic Performance Problems.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Reading Skills Assessment Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers
Assessment. Issues related to Phonemic awareness assessment  Is it a conceptual understanding about language or is it a skill?
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PARENT.
Going Deeper with Dyslexia Identification
Understanding Learning Disability Documentation
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director
DIBELS.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Progress monitoring Is the Help Helping?.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Chapter 7: Academic Assessment
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-Second Edition CTOPP-2
Variability in the skills measured by tests of “reading comprehension across tests and across grade levels Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University.
Dysgraphia, Dyslexia, & O&W LLD Revised from: Berninger, Virginia; October 27, 2010 :Symposium on Working Memory. International Dyslexia Association.
DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC
Presentation transcript:

Dyslexia: To Screen or Not to Screen Wendy Stovall, Ed.S., Keri Horn, Ed.S., Amber Broadway, Ed.S., & Mary Bryant, Ed.S. Crowley’s Ridge Education Service Cooperative October 2015

Who needs to be screened O All K-2 – DIBELS and Rapid Naming O All 3-12 who are referred by their teachers/parents for concerns O Can begin the process at any level and move forward

Universal Screening O Screening of all students to find those in the category of “some risk” or “at-risk” O DIBELS is required by the Dyslexia law O Rapid Naming O AR Rapid Naming Screener O Local Norms – Excel or SPSS

Examples of Universal or Level 1 Screeners

Sources for additional screeners O Sources for additional screeners: O charts/screening-tools-charthttp:// charts/screening-tools-chart O O um/cali/elementary_assessments_ pdf um/cali/elementary_assessments_ pdf O um/cali/secondary_assessments_ pdf um/cali/secondary_assessments_ pdf

After Universal Screening O After students are identified through universal screening to be some risk/at-risk O Monitor progress (level 1) and intervene with skill deficits O May move on to therapy/intervention if RTI committee determines it is warranted O May also move directly to level 2 screening if warranted. O Local control/RTI team control

Deciding when to go for Level 1 screening O If, through progress monitoring and appropriate intervention, the student is not showing improvement the RTI team should gather data for a Level 1 screening

Level 1 screening

Adequate Intelligence or the Ability to Learn? O Check to see if they’ve had a speech/language screening – Pass or Fail O If you have a speech evaluation can look at listening comprehension skills – average LC equates to average cognitive abilities O Average math calculation skills, poor reading may affect math problem solving (word problems)

Assembling Your Level 1 Screener O Personalize your Level 1 Screening using what you have available to you in your district

Level 1 Screening

Do I Mark Yes or N0? O Is my student consistently receiving scores in the some risk/at-risk range of scores on the DIBELS? Then mark Yes O Is my student now, after receiving intervention, achieving scores in the expected range for their grade? Then mark No

Level 1 Screening O If the consensus of the Level 1 screening data table indicates the possible presence of dyslexia then a Level 2 screening should be conducted – Do you have more yes’s than no’s? Do you have yes’s that are concerning and warrant more investigation? O Phonological awareness difficulties – blending, segmenting, rhyming, phoneme isolation, word find issues, alphabet knowledge, etc. O Word reading/decoding issues O Spelling difficulty

Level 2 screening O The Level 2 Dyslexia Screening is a more detailed process for identifying a pattern of strengths and weaknesses documenting the characteristics of dyslexia. - See Level 2 Table O Meant to be norm-referenced meaning that you will be obtaining standard scores, scaled scores, and/or percentiles – See Bell Curve handout

Level 2 Screening O The specific skills to be tested include O phonological awareness, O rapid naming, O word reading, O decoding, O fluency, O spelling and O reading comprehension.

Assembling Your School’s Level 2 Battery O Get in Small groups or individually O Use Assembling Your Schools Level 2 Battery handout O Complete your Level 2 battery form to determine if you have all needed materials to screen for level 2 O Discussion… help topics

Appendix G of the DRG UNDERLYING CAUSE PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS O CTOPP - 2 (Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing) - Phonological Awareness Composite - Elision, Blending Words and Phoneme Isolation or Sound Matching subtests make up this composite O PAT - 2 (Phonological Awareness Test - 2) - first six subtests O KTEA-3 (Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement - 3rd edition) O WRMT - Ill (Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Ill) - Phonological Awareness O WJ-IV(Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Oral Language - 4th edition) - Segmentation and Sound Blending

Appendix G UNDERLYING CAUSE RAPID NAMING O CTOPP Rapid Naming Composite O KTEA-3 - Rapid Automatized Naming, Letter Naming Facility and/or Object Naming Facility O WRMT - III - Rapid Automatic Naming O WJ-IV Tests of Oral Language** - Rapid Picture Naming O RAN/RAS (Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus) Letter Knowledge O PAT Graphemes O WRMT - III - Letter Identification O WJ-IV (Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement - 4th edition)- Spelling of Sounds (Phoneme knowledge)

Appendix G CHARACTERISTICS DECODING O PAT Decoding O KTEA-3 - Nonsense Word Decoding O WIAT - III (Wechsler Individual Achievement Test - 3rd edition) - Pseudoword Decoding O WJ-IV Ach- Word Attack O WRMT – III - Word Attack

Appendix G CHARACTERISTICS WORD RECOGNITION O KTEA-3 Letter & Word Recognition O WIAT - Ill - Word Reading O WJ-IV Ach - Letter-Word Identification O WRAT - 4 (Wide Range Achievement Test - 4th edition) - Reading O WRMT - III - Word Identification

Appendix G CHARACTERISTICS FLUENCY Oral Reading Accuracy O GORT - 5 (Gray Oral Reading Test - 5th edition) - Accuracy score O Oral Reading Rate GORT Rate score

Appendix G CHARACTERISTICS Oral Reading Fluency (Rate and Accuracy as a Composite only) O KTEA-3 Word Recognition Fluency, Associational Fluency, Silent Reading Fluency O TOWRE - 2 (Test of Word Reading Efficiency- 2nd edition) - Sight Word Efficiency, Phonemic Decoding Efficiency, and Total Word Reading Efficiency O WIAT- III - Oral Reading Fluency O WJ-IV Ach - Oral Reading Fluency, Sentence Reading Fluency O WRMT – III - Oral Reading Fluency

Appendix G CHARACTERISTICS SPELLING O KTEA-3 - Spelling Orthographic Processing Cluster - Spelling, Letter Naming Facility, and Word Recognition Fluency O TWS - 5 (Test of Written Spelling - 5th edition) - Spelling O WIAT - Ill - Spelling O WJ-IV Ach - Spelling O WRAT Spelling

Appendix G OUTCOMES READING COMPREHENSION O GATES (Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests) - Silent reading comprehension O GORT-5 - Oral reading comprehension O GSRT (Gray Silent Reading Tests) - Reading comprehension O KTEA-3- Reading Comprehension O WIAT – III Reading comprehension O WJ-IV Ach- Passage Comprehension O WRAT Sentence Comprehension O WRMT - III - Passage Comprehension

Appendix G OUTCOMES Written Expression O KTEA-3 Written Expression O TOWL - 3 (Test of Written Language - 3rd edition) - Overall writing quotient O WIAT - Ill - Written Expression O WJ-IV Ach - Writing Samples

You’ve Tested and Gathered Data for a Level 2… now what? O See Level 2 Dyslexia Table handout O Plug your data in to the table to visually see the profile.

Level 2 Step 1

Level 2 Profile Step 1

Level 2 Step 2

Level 2 Profile Step 2

Level 2 Step 3

Level 2 Profile Step 3

Dyslexia: Yes or No? O Case Study Data O Questions