Five Key Questions Why are we here? What are we doing? How well are we doing it? What does it mean? Where are we going?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Organizational Governance
. . . a step-by-step guide to world-class internal auditing
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Principles of Standards and Measures
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Understanding Boards Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Program Review: Beyond Compliance to Program Improvement Kathleen Gorski, Ed.D.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Academic Excellence Presented by Mary Laura Farnham Sponsored Projects & Research.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
GOOD GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND GUIDANCE for Not-for-Profit Organisations Promoting good governance and supporting directors and boards of not-for-profit.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Compliance Issues for Medical Research at Healthcare Systems Jerry Castellano, Pharm.D., CIP Corporate Director Institutional Review Board Christiana Care.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Principles and Practices For Nonprofit Excellence.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Promoting Effective Boards of Directors
1 Implementation of AQIP and the Possible Implications for TSR Presented by Rosemary Jones, Executive Director Institutional Planning and Evaluation April.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
GEF Evaluation Office. Two overarching objectives:  Promote accountability for the achievement of GEF objectives through the assessment of results, effectiveness,
IRB Process Overview Ling Wang IRB Representative Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences.
Yadvindera (Bobby) Bains MD Director of Radiation Oncology, Laredo Medical Center Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
DAY 1: OVERVIEW The nature of internal auditing
Freshman Faculty Welcome August 22, Mission The University of Missouri-Rolla, UMR, has a major responsibility for meeting Missouri’s needs for engineering.
. 1.  EH&S Strategic Plan ◦ Review Mission, Vision, Values ◦ Strategic Objectives  Projects and Action Plans to support Objectives  Aligning Working.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Christine Yalda, J.D., Ph.D. Chair, Human Research Review Committee Grand Valley State University.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Principles of Good Governance
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Division of powers between IA, SAI and FI
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Campus Improvement Plans
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Process and Procedure Documentation
Presentation transcript:

Five Key Questions Why are we here? What are we doing? How well are we doing it? What does it mean? Where are we going?

1. Why Are We Here? College Department/Program Community College Act (110 ILCS 805/1-2) HCC Mission, Values and Institutional Goals Statewide Goals IBHE Public Agenda ICCB Promise for Illinois Revisited Department Mission and Purposes Relationship to HCC Mission AQIP Category(ies) supported Relationship to statewide goals, if any

2. What Are We Trying To Accomplish? College Department/Program Ongoing Operational Goals/Activities AQIP Categories How will we measure progress/success? Performance Measures Target Level if appropriate Departmental Goals and Objectives Performance measures Data sources Responsible party/parties

3. How Well Are We Doing It? College Department/Program Monitor performance measures Regular internal reports CQI Report Required external reports AQIP Systems Portfolio Measure achievement of goals Establish metrics Identify available comparative data Identify benchmarks or target levels of performance

4. What Does It Mean? College Department/Program Compare performance to Internal historical data Peers Target levels External benchmarks Consider external factors Environmental Scan Consider internal factors Analyze and interpret comparative data Identify external factors impacting department/ program Identify internal factors impacting department/ program

5. Where Are We Going? College Department/Program Strategic Plan What new initiatives are needed? What major improvements are needed? Areas of special emphasis Align with AQIP Action Projects Establish budgetary and other resource requirements Areas in need of improvement New initiatives Specify goals, time line, responsibilities, resource requirements

HCC 2008 – 2012 Strategic Goals Continue to enhance financial position Continue to improve by participating in AQIP Continue to provide high quality education Foster a climate of cultural understanding and global awareness

Relationships Among Goals HCC Goals Division Goals (IS, CE, BS, IA) Program/Department Goals Position/Individual Goals

Five Key Questions Annual Review Cycle Why are we here? Mission What are we doing? Op Goals How well are we doing it? Data What does it mean? Analysis Where are we going? SP Goals

Recognition Process ICCB Recognition Manual HCC conducts a self-study HCC applies to ICCB for Recognition ICCB reviews application materials ICCB conducts a site visit Draft Report/HCC Response ICCB awards “Continued Recognition” Process recurs in five years

Ethical standards and HCC institutional values Culture of evidence and accountability Compliance with federal regulations Why do we need it?  HSRRB is the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at HCC.  Responsible for ensuring that any human subject research conducted at HCC meets legal and ethical standards

One from each academic division One from Student Services One from Institutional Research One each from Business Services and Continuing Education One external member not associated with the College HSRRB Membership

Individuals can be directly or indirectly identified Results will be published or presented in a public venue Subjects are members of protected or vulnerable populations Children, mentally impaired, prisoners, non-native speakers, etc. Subjects are at risk Potential harm to health, well-being or reputation External purpose Grant funded, thesis, dissertation, etc. Research Must be Reviewed if…

Compliance reporting Internal research Classroom assessment, program review, etc. Student research for class requirements Assume faculty inform students of ethical principles Except: If subjects are at risk If presented in a public venue BUT, IRB must maintain a catalog & documentation of all research Exempt from HSRRB Oversight

Links Strategic Plan Recognition Self-Study Report Z:\DepartmentalInformation\InstitutionalResearchan dStrategicPlanning\ICCBRecognitionSelf- Study2010.pdf Z:\DepartmentalInformation\InstitutionalResearchan dStrategicPlanning\ICCBRecognitionSelf- Study2010.pdf Institutional Review Board Z:\DepartmentalInformation\InstitutionalResearchan dStrategicPlanning\HCCIRBGuide docx Z:\DepartmentalInformation\InstitutionalResearchan dStrategicPlanning\HCCIRBGuide docx And IR Intranet page